olivlawolivlaw

olivLaw · European equity research

PureTech Health plc PRTC.L

United Kingdom · London Stock Exchange · ISIN GB00BY2Z0H74 · Vertical: Listed companies from United Kingdom

1.22GBP−1.93% · 1 dayClose 05 Nov 2026

PureTech Health plc is a biotherapeutics company that builds its portfolio through a hub-and-spoke model, inventing and developing therapies for diseases with unmet medical need. The profile matters now because Cobenfy, invented at PureTech, has received FDA approval, and the company reports a history of 80% of clinical trials succeeding.

At the close of 05 Nov 2026, PureTech Health plc (PRTC.L) stock was 1.22 GBP (−1.93% on the day), with beta 0.47, 52-week range 1.08–1.40 GBP.

Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: ESEF annual reports and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.

Market cap
unavailable
shares as of 31 Dec 2025
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
Diluted EPS TTM -0.46 · TTM to 31 Dec 2025
E/P (TTM)
unavailable
TTM to 31 Dec 2025
Dividend yield
unavailable
Beta (2y)
0.47
Volatility (1y) 34%
52-week range
1.081.40

Price history

Loading chart…

Technical reading

RSI (14)
59.9
strong (55–70)
Bollinger (20, 2)
1.08 – 1.24
in the upper half of the band · %B 0.87 · band width 13.4%
SMA 50 / 200
1.17 / 1.23
mixed trend
MACD (12, 26, 9)
0.02 / 0.01
MACD above signal

Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).

Performance

CompanyEURO STOXX 50vs EURO STOXX 50Vertical median
1 month+11.7%−0.6%+12.4 pp—
3 months+4.5%−4.2%+8.6 pp—
6 months−4.8%+4.3%−9.2 pp—
Year to date−2.6%+7.5%−10.1 pp—
1 year−4.1%+9.9%−14.0 pp+5.8%
3 years−24.6%+49.8%−74.5 pp+26.3%
5 years−65.7%+42.8%−108.6 pp—
Max drawdown (1y)
−23.3%
26 May 2026 → 05 Oct 2026
Max drawdown (5y)
−71.0%
08 Nov 2021 → 09 Apr 2025
Compound annual growth (5y)
−19.3%
EURO STOXX 50 +7.4%

Price returns, dividends excluded.

Quarterly results

ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).

E/P over time

the price (USD) and the reports are in different currencies

E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.

Fiscal years

Fiscal year2022202320242025
Revenue15.6 m3.3 m4.8 m4.7 m
Revenue YoYunavailable−78.7%+45.0%−3.5%
Net income-50.4 m-65.7 m53.5 m-109.7 m
Net income YoYunavailableunavailableunavailable−305.1%
Diluted EPS-0.18-0.240.21-0.46
Diluted EPS YoYunavailableunavailableunavailable−319.0%
net %-322.4%-1,972.9%1,108.3%-2,355.4%
Free cash flow-181.0 m-106.0 m-134.4 m-85.1 m

Balance sheet & financial health

Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025

Cash
252.5 m USD
Financial debt
unavailable USD
Net debt
unavailable USD
Equity
305.7 m USD
Total assets
534.7 m USD
Debt / equity
unavailable
Current ratio
6.59x
ROE
-30.8%
ROA
-19.3%
FCF margin
-1,827.4%

Financial statements (source on every figure)

Revenue and net income (USD)

Margins

Income statement · USD

Revenue
2023
3.3 m
2024
4.8 m
2025
4.7 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Research & development
2023
96.2 m
2024
69.5 m
2025
56.6 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Operating income
2023
-146.2 m
2024
-136.1 m
2025
-98.5 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Interest expense
2023
3.4 m
2024
1.7 m
2025
1.9 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Pre-tax income
2023
-36.1 m
2024
23.8 m
2025
-110.9 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Income tax
2023
30.5 m
2024
-4.0 m
2025
-842.0 k

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Net income
2023
-65.7 m
2024
53.5 m
2025
-109.7 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Diluted EPS
2023
-0.24
2024
0.21
2025
-0.46

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Balance sheet · USD

Cash
2023
191.1 m
2024
280.6 m
2025
252.5 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Receivables
2023
2.4 m
2024
1.5 m
2025
1.8 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Current assets
2023
347.2 m
2024
386.3 m
2025
305.0 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Property, plant & equipment, net
2023
9.5 m
2024
7.1 m
2025
5.2 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Intangibles (excl. goodwill)
2023
906.0 k
2024
601.0 k
2025
601.0 k

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Total assets
2023
694.0 m
2024
602.6 m
2025
534.7 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Accounts payable
2023
44.1 m
2024
27.0 m
2025
23.2 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Current liabilities
2023
51.4 m
2024
41.4 m
2025
46.3 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Total liabilities
2023
235.7 m
2024
194.7 m
2025
229.0 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Equity
2023
458.2 m
2024
407.9 m
2025
305.7 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Shares outstanding at year end
2023
273.7 m
2024
254.8 m
2025
238.6 m

esef· 12 May 2026derived

Cash flow · USD

Operating cash flow
2023
-105.9 m
2024
-134.4 m
2025
-85.1 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Capex
2023
70.0 k
2024
11.0 k
2025
6.0 k

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Free cash flow
2023
-106.0 m ≈
2024
-134.4 m ≈
2025
-85.1 m ≈

esef· 12 May 2026derived

Investing cash flow
2023
69.0 m
2024
240.9 m
2025
63.3 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Financing cash flow
2023
78.1 m
2024
-17.0 m
2025
-6.3 m

esef· 12 May 2026verified

Computed indicators

Growth

Revenue growth (YoY)
-3.5%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Revenue CAGR 3Y
-33.2%
computed by olivLawFY 2022 → FY 2025
Revenue CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income growth (YoY)
-305.1%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Net income CAGR 3Y
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EPS growth (YoY)
-319.0%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
EPS CAGR 3Y
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
EPS CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
FCF growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive

Profitability

Gross margin
unavailable
input data missing
EBITDA margin
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT margin
-2,114.8%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Net margin
-2,355.4%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
FCF margin
-1,827.4%
computed by olivLawFY 2025

Returns

ROE
-30.2%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
ROA
-19.3%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
ROIC
unavailable
input data missing
ROCE
-20.2%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Payout ratio (EPS)
unavailable
input data missing
Payout ratio (FCF)
unavailable
input data missing

Balance sheet

Net debt
unavailable
input data missing
Net debt / EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
Debt / equity
unavailable
input data missing
Interest coverage
-52.5x
computed by olivLawFY 2025

Liquidity

Current ratio
6.6x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Quick ratio
unavailable
input data missing
Cash ratio
5.5x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025

Cash

Operating cash flow
-85.1 m USD
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Capital expenditure
6.0 k USD
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Free cash flow
-85.1 m USD
computed by olivLawFY 2025
FCF conversion
unavailable
insufficient data
Cash conversion
unavailable
input data missing

Efficiency

Days sales outstanding
128 days
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Days inventory outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Days payables outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Cash conversion cycle
unavailable
input data missing

Market and valuation

Market capitalisation
unavailable
input data missing
Enterprise value
unavailable
input data missing
Market cap / net income TTM
unavailable
input data missing
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
input data missing
Earnings yield
unavailable
input data missing
P/B
unavailable
input data missing
P/S
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBIT
unavailable
input data missing
EV/Sales
unavailable
input data missing
P/FCF
unavailable
input data missing
FCF yield
unavailable
input data missing
Dividend yield
unavailable
input data missing
Shareholder yield (distributions)
unavailable
input data missing

1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.

Valuation

olivLaw classification

Insufficient data
What is missing
  • indicators available: 4 of at least 6
  • score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%
  • valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.

Closing price

1.22 GBP

05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series

Market cap: unavailable

Price and reporting are in different currencies; market indicators are unavailable.

Key indicators

Market capitalisation
unavailable
input data missing
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
input data missing
P/B
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
ROE
-30.2%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Net margin
-2,355.4%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Revenue growth (YoY)
-3.5%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Dividend yield
unavailable
input data missing

Coverage and freshness

24/37 reporting lines present
Latest full fiscal year: 2025
Latest reported period: 31 Dec 2025
Latest balance sheet date: 31 Dec 2025
Share count (cover of the latest filing), as of: 31 Dec 2025
Source: esefpublished 12 May 2026
verified 92derived 4

Score by group

25% · Insufficient data

Estimated value range

unavailable — no valuation method could be computed

Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.

Valuation methods

  • DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
  • Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
  • Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
  • Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption

no valuation method could be computed

Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)

Risk-free rate
4.3%
Equity risk premium
5.0%
Beta (default)
1.00
Cost of equity
9.3%
Terminal growth
2.5%

Factor scorecard

Insufficient data

Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

FactorValueScoreWeight used
ROIC · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
Net margin · Quality-2,355.4%3 (vs peers)25%
FCF conversion · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth-33.2%0 (on a fixed band)33%
EPS CAGR 3Y · Growthunavailableunavailable—
Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheetunavailableunavailable—
Interest coverage · Balance sheet-52.5x0 (on a fixed band)25%
Current ratio · Balance sheet6.6x100 (on a fixed band)17%
P/E (TTM) · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
EV/EBITDA · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
FCF yield · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—
Payout ratio (FCF) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—

Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.

Score groups

  • Balance sheet40/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
  • Growth· partial0/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
  • Quality· partial3/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
  • Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
  • Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value

A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.

Memo

PURETECH HEALTH PLC (PRTC.L). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.

Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 4.7 m USD in 2025; YoY growth -3.5%; net margin -2,355.4%; ROE -30.2%.

Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.

Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).

Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.

What supports the thesis

  • Current ratio: 6.6x

What contradicts it

  • Net margin: -2,355.4%
  • Revenue CAGR 3Y: -33.2%
  • Interest coverage: -52.5x

Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).

Versus the vertical median

Listed companies from United Kingdom · same country · compared with 39 companies

Multiples and returns vs the median

P/E
—
vertical median 15.3x
EV/EBITDA
—
vertical median —
P/S
—
vertical median 1.5x
P/B
—
vertical median 2.2x
ROE
-30.2%
vertical median 14.4%
below median (−310.2%)
Net margin
-2,355.4%
vertical median 10.8%
below median (−21,968.9%)
EBIT margin
-2,114.8%
vertical median 22.9%
below median (−9,315.6%)
Revenue YoY
-3.5%
vertical median 7.9%
below median (−144.4%)
Net debt/EBITDA
—
vertical median —
Dividend yield
—
vertical median 2.9%

Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)

Companies in the vertical

Market capP/EROENet marginRevenue YoY1A / 3A
BATS.LBritish American Tobacco P.L.C.104.3 bn13.516.5%30.3%−1.0%+7% / +88%
ABF.LAssociated British Foods PLC14.7 bn14.39.2%5.3%−3.1%−5% / −15%
0EV1.LCarnival PLC5.5 bn4.146.7%13.4%+6.4%unavailable / unavailable
BAB.LBabcock International Group PLC5.1 bn24.734.7%4.1%+7.2%−10% / +158%
AUTO.LAutotrader Group PLC4.8 bn16.460.2%47.1%+3.9%−13% / −23%
BBY.LBalfour Beatty PLC4.2 bn16.323.2%2.8%+15.2%+20% / +160%
ABDN.LAberdeen Group PLC4.1 bn10.88.0%28.9%−2.1%+11% / +41%
BKG.LThe Berkeley Group Holdings PLC3.6 bn11.38.8%13.4%−4.2%−0% / −22%
BME.LB&M European Value Retail PLC2.9 bn17.421.2%2.8%+3.7%+68% / −51%
AJB.LAj Bell PLC2.4 bn22.849.9%33.1%+18.0%+8% / +128%
ASHM.LAshmore Group PLC1.4 bn13.913.1%71.6%−0.1%+28% / +18%
BCG.LBaltic Classifieds Group PLC1.2 bn23.215.8%57.6%+6.9%−99% / −99%
APN.LApplied Nutrition PLC763.6 m36.241.2%19.7%+24.2%+71% / unavailable
BAG.LA.G. Barr P.L.C.671.9 m14.414.4%10.8%+4.0%−7% / +26%
ASC.LAsos PLC494.5 m—-81.3%-12.0%−14.7%+71% / +8%
ALFA.LAlfa Financial Software Holdings PLC486.8 m16.361.5%23.8%+15.3%−28% / +10%
AML.LAston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings PLC344.3 m—-93.4%-39.2%−20.6%−45% / −85%
APTD.LAptitude Software Group PLC111.3 m28.57.2%6.2%−7.3%−30% / −23%
AMGO.LAmigo Holdings PLC9.9 m———−81.9%+325% / +844%
ASBE.LAssociated British Engineering PLC605.3 k—-19.1%—unavailableunavailable / unavailable
AMIF.LAmicorp Fs (uk) PLC221.6 k0.127.5%9.1%+8.1%unavailable / unavailable
AAF.LAirtel Africa PLC——24.1%10.6%+29.5%−7% / +164%
AAL.LAnglo American PLC——-19.3%-20.2%+4.5%+30% / +76%
ACG.LAcg Metals Limited——-80.3%-32.0%+134.8%+60% / +63%
AEP.LAnglo-Eastern Plantations PLC——16.1%19.5%+25.0%+5% / +113%

1- and 3-year price returns: for PRTC.L from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.

olivLaw engine forecast

The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.

The engine has no published run for this company yet.

Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)

Illustrative scenarios

Scenarios are not available. input data missing

AI analysis

AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

In brief

PureTech Health plc is a biotherapeutics company that builds its portfolio through a hub-and-spoke model, inventing and developing therapies for diseases with unmet medical need. The profile matters now because Cobenfy, invented at PureTech, has received FDA approval, and the company reports a history of 80% of clinical trials succeeding 1.

SWOT

Strengths

  • The company cites a high clinical trial success rate and a track record of approved therapies, supporting the credibility of its innovation model 1.
  • The hub-and-spoke model spreads risk across several Founded Entities, so the failure of one program should not affect the entire portfolio 1.
  • Board and management members with domain expertise guide Founded Entities, providing solid governance for program development 1.

Weaknesses

  • The company currently has no approved therapeutics of its own and depends on clinical trial success to generate value 1.
  • Reliance on Founded Entities and partners such as Bristol Myers Squibb for Cobenfy limits direct control over commercialization 1.
  • The company has not yet set emissions reduction targets, which could matter in future ESG assessments 1.

Opportunities

  • Programs such as deupirfenidone for IPF could become a new standard of treatment if data from ongoing studies are confirmed 1.
  • Growing interest in rare diseases and in therapies with better tolerability could open new therapeutic areas for the portfolio 1.
  • Partnerships with patient organizations and scientific institutions may accelerate research and funding for new programs 1.

Threats

  • The failure of a major program could reduce the company's value and make additional fundraising more difficult 1.
  • Climate and ESG reporting requirements could become mandatory and raise compliance costs 1.
  • If the tolerability or efficacy of competing therapies improves, the competitive advantage of PureTech programs could diminish 1.

Risks

  • Scientific and technological failurehigh

    Science or technology developed by some businesses could fail, and the failure of a major program could reduce the company's value and its reputation as a developer of high-value technologies 1.

  • Clinical trial failurehigh

    Clinical trials are expensive, complex and have uncertain outcomes, and a critical failure could lead to program termination and a significant decrease in value 1.

  • Delays in obtaining approvalsmedium

    If clinical trials are delayed, obtaining regulatory approvals could also be postponed, and the capital needed to become sustainable on a cash flow basis could increase 1.

  • Climate and ESG compliance riskslow

    The company considers that it has no material climate risks at present, but it could be affected by new reporting regulations and compliance costs 1.

  • Dependence on partners for commercializationmedium

    The commercial success of some products depends on external partners, and their decisions on commercialization could influence the company's results 1.

Investment thesis

What would need to be true (bull case)

  • The favourable case rests on several therapies invented at PureTech having reached FDA approval, which could demonstrate the quality of its innovation model 1.
  • If deupirfenidone confirms the data from ongoing studies, the IPF program could become an important option for patients with few well-tolerated alternatives 1.
  • The hub-and-spoke model could limit the impact of one program's failure on the whole company, which could support long-term stability 1.

What would break the thesis

  • The unfavourable case starts from the fact that there are as yet no approved therapeutics of its own, so value depends on uncertain future clinical trial results 1.
  • If several programs fail or are delayed, the capital required could increase, and financing could become more expensive or harder to obtain 1.
  • Dependence on partners such as Bristol Myers Squibb for Cobenfy could limit the direct financial benefits the company receives from commercial success 1.

What to watch

  • Final results from the ELEVATE extension study for deupirfenidone2027
  • Energy and emissions data for the Boston headquarters, December 2025May 2026
  • Announcements of new GHG emissions reduction targetsnext 10-K
  • Cobenfy progress under Bristol Myers Squibb and its impact on the partner2027

Products, market & competition

AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

The business

According to the annual report for the year ended December 31, 2025, PureTech presents itself as a clinical-stage biotherapeutics company with no approved therapeutics of its own, which discovers and develops medicines through a hub-and-spoke model 1. The company says it has taken three therapeutics from inception to FDA approval, including Cobenfy™, and its portfolio targets patients with rare diseases or unmet needs 1. Activity depends heavily on clinical trial success and on the ability of Founded Entities to turn technology into commercially viable therapies 1.

Segments

Wholly owned therapeutic portfolio

Programs owned 100% by PureTech include deupirfenidone (LYT-100), developed by Founded Entity Celea Therapeutics for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, where the company reported data from the open-label extension of the Phase 2b ELEVATE trial 1.

Founded Entities and partnerships

The model relies on Founded Entities in which PureTech supports strategy through board and management members, and Cobenfy now sits under Bristol Myers Squibb following its acquisition of Karuna Therapeutics 1.

Market context

The report describes a market shaped by unmet medical needs in neuropsychiatry, pulmonary fibrosis and other rare conditions, where poor tolerability of current treatments has limited adoption 1. The source notes that three FDA-approved agents exist for IPF, but that tolerability challenges have often outweighed suboptimal efficacy 1.

Trends

  • Development of therapies for rare diseasestailwind

    The report points to growing awareness of the more than 6,000 rare diseases affecting over 300 million people globally, which could support interest in programs such as those in IPF 1.

  • Climate and ESG reporting requirementsheadwind

    The company shows partial alignment with TCFD recommendations and monitors frameworks such as CSRD and ISSB, without yet facing direct compliance obligations 1. Compliance costs could rise if these requirements become mandatory.

  • Energy efficiency of headquarterstailwind

    Reported data for the Boston headquarters show reductions in energy use and emissions against the 2030 Challenge baseline, suggesting operational progress, although December 2025 data has been delayed 1.

  • Scientific failure remains a structural riskmixed

    The biotechnology sector depends on clinical trial results, and if several programs fail at once, the company's value and its ability to attract capital could be affected 1.

Competitive position

The analysed sources do not explicitly name competitors. The report does, however, imply a comparison with other biotechnology companies developing treatments for the same conditions, such as IPF or schizophrenia, where approved therapies already exist 1.

  • Bristol Myers SquibbBMY

    The company that commercializes Cobenfy after acquiring Karuna Therapeutics, and therefore also a strategic partner for PureTech.

  • Producers of approved IPF therapies

    The report mentions three FDA-approved agents for IPF, so the firms developing them are direct competition for deupirfenidone.

  • Neuropsychiatry biotechnology companies

    The sources refer to treatments for schizophrenia, where Cobenfy competes with other medicines or candidates in development.

  • Clinical-stage biotechnology peers

    The source does not name competitors but suggests that firms developing therapies for unmet needs compete for funding and talent.

News & filings

Figures computed by olivLaw from ESEF annual reports and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.

PureTech Health plc (PRTC.L): stock, results, valuation and forecast · olivLaw