olivLaw · US equity research
WhiteFiber, Inc. WYFI
Finance Services · SIC 6199 · Vertical: Finance Services (SIC 6199)
WhiteFiber, Inc. presents itself as an artificial intelligence infrastructure provider that owns Tier-3 HPC data centers and offers GPU-based cloud services to AI and machine learning developers. The company was spun out from Bit Digital in August 2025 and matters now as demand for dedicated AI compute infrastructure grows. Revenue for fiscal 2025 was 79.2 mn USD, up from the prior year, but the company also reported an operating loss in the same year.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, WhiteFiber, Inc. (WYFI) stock was 9.15 USD (−12.77% on the day), with market capitalisation 355.5 m USD, beta 4.47, 52-week range 9.15–44.77 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 28.8 m USD (+54.5% YoY), net income of -15.0 m USD, diluted EPS -0.39 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 32.7
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 7.87 – 15.78
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.16 · band width 66.8%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 15.86 / 20.99
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -1.98 / -2.04
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −47.6% | −1.1% | −46.5 pp | — |
| 3 months | −64.9% | −0.5% | −64.4 pp | — |
| 6 months | −57.3% | +4.4% | −61.7 pp | — |
| Year to date | −42.1% | +12.3% | −54.4 pp | — |
| 1 year | −70.0% | +13.5% | −83.5 pp | −48.5% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +76.4% | unavailable | −74.4% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 12.3 m | 14.6 m | 16.8 m | 18.7 m | 20.2 m | 23.6 m | 21.9 m | 28.8 m |
| Gross profit | 6.7 m | 7.4 m | 9.8 m | 11.1 m | 12.7 m | 13.9 m | 12.8 m | 16.8 m |
| Operating income | -847.4 k | -1.9 m | 2.0 m | -9.2 m | -14.5 m | -5.2 m | -11.0 m | -9.3 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 4.3 m | 5.0 m | 3.8 m | 5.1 m | 6.4 m | 8.1 m | 6.4 m | 6.6 m |
| Interest expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | -2.0 m | 4.6 m |
| Pre-tax income | 19.1 k | -1.3 m | 2.0 m | -8.4 m | -15.7 m | -3.7 m | -11.0 m | -15.7 m |
| Income tax | 383.6 k | -252.0 k | 594.6 k | 446.0 k | 66.7 k | -2.2 m | 1.1 m | -749.0 k |
| Net income | -364.6 k | -1.0 m | 1.4 m | -8.8 m | -15.8 m | -1.5 m | -12.0 m | -15.0 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.01 | -0.04 ≈ | 0.05 | -0.33 | -0.47 | -0.04 ≈ | -0.31 | -0.39 |
| Operating cash flow | 19.6 m ≈ | -1.2 m | -2.9 m | -3.9 m ≈ | -16.9 m ≈ | 69.4 m | 3.2 m | 85.9 m ≈ |
| Capex | 2.8 m ≈ | 72.8 m | 50.2 m | 80.8 m ≈ | 15.5 m ≈ | 121.9 m | 169.2 m | 175.5 m ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 47.6 m | 79.2 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +66.2% |
| Net income | 1.4 m | -24.7 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | −1,901.9% |
| Diluted EPS | 0.05 | -0.78 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | −1,660.0% |
| net % | 2.9% | -31.2% |
| Free cash flow | -60.3 m | -222.7 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 114.4 m USD
- Financial debt
- 20.0 m USD
- Net debt
- -94.4 m USD
- Equity
- 482.5 m USD
- Total assets
- 651.4 m USD
- Debt / equity
- 0.04x
- Current ratio
- 2.03x
- ROE
- -7.6%
- ROA
- -5.6%
- FCF margin
- -281.4%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 47.6 m | 79.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 26.9 m | 47.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | 628.4 k | -26.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 16.5 m | 23.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | 17.1 m ≈ | -3.4 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026derived |
| Pre-tax income | 2.2 m | -25.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 874.2 k | -1.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | 1.4 m | -24.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 0.05 | -0.78 | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 27.0 m | 31.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 11.7 m | 114.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Aug 2026verified |
| Receivables | 5.3 m | 23.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Aug 2026verified |
| Current assets | 46.5 m | 167.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Aug 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 89.2 m | 336.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Aug 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 19.4 m | 20.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Aug 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 13.0 m | 12.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Aug 2026verified |
| Total assets | 229.1 m | 651.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Aug 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 2.3 m | 8.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Aug 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | — | 20.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 45.8 m | 82.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Aug 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 59.4 m | 168.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Aug 2026verified |
| Equity | 169.7 m † | 482.5 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Aug 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 18.7 m | 45.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 79.0 m | 268.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -60.3 m ≈ | -222.7 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -80.0 m | -267.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 76.4 m | 323.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 4 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 29.2% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 355.5 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
29% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 29.2% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | -10.8% | 89 (vs peers) | 36% |
| Net margin · Quality | -46.9% | 61 (vs peers) | 21% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.8x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 14% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -95.8% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 29% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality78/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
WHITEFIBER, INC. (WYFI). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 79.2 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 66.2%; net margin -46.9%; ROE -13.7%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 29.2% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- ROIC: -10.8%
What contradicts it
- Current ratio: 0.8x
- FCF yield: -95.8%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Finance Services (SIC 6199) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AXPAmerican Express Co | 223.0 bn | 18.7 | 35.9% | 27.9% | +6.4% | −9% / +95% |
| COINCoinbase Global, Inc. | 40.1 bn | — | -4.7% | -12.5% | +9.4% | −44% / +21% |
| SOFISoFi Technologies, Inc. | 22.4 bn | 36.3 | 7.1% | 104.3% | +23.1% | −42% / +138% |
| IRENIREN Limited | 7.8 bn | — | -23.4% | -99.4% | +41.1% | −55% / +340% |
| HUTHut 8 Corp. | 5.9 bn | — | -34.5% | -169.8% | +44.8% | +9% / +415% |
| BLSHBullish | 3.5 bn | — | -27.3% | -0.3% | −2.2% | −47% / unavailable |
| PURRHyperliquid Strategies Inc | 1.9 bn | 3.0 | 32.6% | 3,229.8% | unavailable | unavailable / unavailable |
| CLSKCleanSpark, Inc. | 1.7 bn | — | -68.6% | -130.2% | +102.2% | −55% / +9% |
| WLTHWealthfront Corporation | 1.7 bn | — | -20.5% | -19.4% | +18.2% | unavailable / unavailable |
| BTDRBitdeer Technologies Group | 1.5 bn | — | -196.7% | -171.3% | −5.1% | −51% / +45% |
| AMBRAmber International Holding Limited | 865.0 m | — | -116.1% | -88.7% | −9.0% | −27% / −51% |
| CDChaince Digital Holdings Inc. | 741.4 m | — | -12.3% | -182.5% | +277.9% | −30% / +622% |
| TRONTron Inc. | 664.1 m | 96.8 | 3.8% | 135.6% | +10.0% | −24% / −48% |
| JFU9F Inc. | 536.7 m | 23.2 | 4.7% | 125.2% | +12.2% | −52% / −43% |
| ABTCAmerican Bitcoin Corp. | 516.7 m | 7.5 | -10.5% | -26.7% | +158.8% | −90% / −99% |
| WYFIWhitefiber, Inc. | 355.5 m | — | -13.7% | -46.9% | +66.2% | −70% / unavailable |
| ORBSEightco Holdings Inc. | 340.9 m | — | -157.0% | -1,260.9% | −16.8% | −70% / −74% |
| CHADDefi Development Corp. | 310.0 m | — | -589.3% | -1,319.5% | +442.3% | unavailable / unavailable |
| CPSSConsumer Portfolio Services, Inc. | 221.6 m | 9.9 | 7.5% | 5.0% | +10.4% | +23% / +7% |
| DGXXDigi Power X Inc. | 217.0 m | — | -24.7% | -114.8% | −7.6% | −48% / +50% |
| TONXTon Strategy Company | 159.7 m | — | -75.5% | -532.8% | +1,327.8% | −15% / −93% |
| DEFTDefi Technologies Inc. | 152.4 m | 2.3 | 74.0% | 62.9% | +215.5% | −74% / unavailable |
| HSDTSolana Company | 127.0 m | — | -183.2% | -1,302.8% | +1,057.1% | −49% / −100% |
| AGPUAxe Compute Inc | 86.2 m | — | -1,565.2% | -7,769.8% | +47.7% | +24% / −85% |
| MGLDThe Marygold Companies, Inc. | 84.1 m | — | -20.7% | -17.3% | +8.0% | +93% / +91% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for WYFI from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
WhiteFiber, Inc. presents itself as an artificial intelligence infrastructure provider that owns Tier-3 HPC data centers and offers GPU-based cloud services to AI and machine learning developers. The company was spun out from Bit Digital in August 2025 and matters now as demand for dedicated AI compute infrastructure grows. Revenue for fiscal 2025 was 79.2 mn USD, up from the prior year, but the company also reported an operating loss in the same year.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company has an integrated model combining power, data centers and cloud services, which can reduce dependence on external providers.
- The retrofit strategy allows faster deployment of sites than greenfield projects, according to management.
- Long-term contracts, including the Nscale agreement at NC-1 and the Cerebras agreement at MTL-3, provide revenue visibility.
Weaknesses
- The operating loss in 2025 shows that the cost structure is not yet balanced against the revenue level.
- Reliance on a small number of large customers concentrates revenue and exposes it to renegotiation risk.
- The company describes itself as being at a development stage, with a small management team.
Opportunities
- If NC-1 reaches its contracted capacity, colocation revenue could grow significantly.
- The large project pipeline under review leaves room for expansion, if customers and financing emerge.
- Expanding cloud services into new regions through third-party partnerships could diversify the customer base.
Threats
- An important customer has paused services, and discussions on prepayments, deposits and termination fees are not finalized.
- Lower GPU prices or new hardware generations could reduce the value of rented equipment.
- If financing becomes more expensive, project development could be postponed or scaled back.
Risks
- Customer concentrationhigh
Cloud revenue depends on a few large customers, and the interruption of one contract can quickly affect results.
- High capital needshigh
Operations are capital-intensive, and the company relies on capital markets to finance its growth.
- Construction and power delaysmedium
Permits and power access can delay site commissioning, which could postpone expected revenue.
- Dilution from financingmedium
Convertible notes and any share issuance could reduce the value of existing shareholders' stakes.
- Dependence on local partnerslow
If a local partner cannot meet its obligations, the company could face difficulty delivering services in that jurisdiction.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If demand for AI infrastructure stays strong, the large project pipeline could turn the company into an important provider of capacity.
- Long-term contracts such as the NC-1 agreement could offer more predictable revenue than parts of the market.
- The integrated model and retrofit strategy could allow faster deployment than competitors building from scratch.
What would break the thesis
- The 2025 operating loss and reliance on a few customers could keep results volatile.
- The suspension of services for an important customer shows the risk that cloud contracts can be changed or ended.
- Financing needs and possible dilution could limit returns for shareholders if projects are delayed.
What to watch
- Commissioning of the first NC-1 phase and start of billing to NscaleQ2 2026
- Outcome of discussions with the customer that paused services2026
- Achievement of the 70 MW capacity target by year-endQ4 2026
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
WhiteFiber operates two linked businesses: colocation and data center services on one side, and GPU-based cloud services on the other. The integrated model means one company provides both the power and space and the compute services, which, according to the company, can lower costs and delivery times. The HPC business was transferred from Bit Digital in August 2025 and currently relies on several sites in Quebec and North Carolina and on external partnerships.
Its development strategy is based on retrofits: buying existing industrial buildings with power connections already in place, near metropolitan areas. The company says this shortens build time considerably compared with greenfield projects. Development nevertheless depends on financing, permits and power availability, and projects such as MTL-2 have been put on hold to preserve capital.
Segments
GPU cloud services
The cloud segment provides access to GPU clusters for AI training and inference, under usage-based or committed-capacity contracts. Revenue was 68.8 mn USD in 2025 and makes up the majority of the business. Concentration risk is high, since one important customer has entered discussions about terminating services.
Market context
WhiteFiber operates in the artificial intelligence infrastructure market, where demand for GPU capacity and data center power has grown quickly. The company sets its capacity targets and project pipeline around this demand, which is however volatile and depends on the plans of large industry customers.
Competition turns on power availability, speed of deployment and access to the latest hardware. The market is capital-intensive, and smaller companies can be affected by the cost of financing and by GPU pricing.
Trends
- Demand for AI computetailwind
Training and inference of generative models create continuing demand for GPUs and for data centers with high power density. If this demand stays high, the company could make use of its large project pipeline.
- Cost of capitalheadwind
The infrastructure requires heavy investment, financed partly through loans and convertible notes. If interest rates stay high or capital markets tighten, development could slow.
- GPU price volatilitymixed
The value and availability of GPUs change quickly with new hardware generations. Companies that rent out equipment may benefit from better prices, but could also lose value if equipment becomes obsolete fast.
- Power access and permitsheadwind
Electricity availability and permit approval determine the timing of each site. Faster power supply could accelerate revenue, while delays could postpone it.
Competitive position
WhiteFiber faces AI cloud providers and data center operators with more capital and easier access to hardware. The company's advantage lies in its integrated model and its ability to develop retrofit sites quickly, but these advantages depend on execution.
In colocation, competition comes from data center operators in the same metropolitan areas, which can offer capacity already built. The company tries to differentiate through high density and connectivity suited to AI workloads.
- Bit DigitalBTBT
The parent company from which the HPC business was transferred, which keeps some shared management roles during the transition period.
- Nscale
Major customer at NC-1 and also a player in AI infrastructure, relevant both as a contract counterparty and as a possible competitor.
- Cerebras
Colocation customer at MTL-3, representing a contracted revenue stream over five years.
- AI cloud and colocation operators in Europe and North America
Providers offering comparable GPU compute or data center space, with greater scale and access to capital.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- B. Riley keeps WhiteFiber at Buy, $38 target as North Carolina financing nearsYahoo Finance — News · 10 Sept 2026 · EN
- WhiteFiber’s Cloud and Colocation Revenue Grew With 6 Million Shares Sold Short. Is This AI Data-Center Bet a Squeeze or a Trap?Yahoo Finance — News · 05 Sept 2026 · EN
The latest news item in our archive is from 10 Sept 2026; the newest SEC filing is from 03 Nov 2026. The press archive comes from the RSS feeds we follow and does not necessarily cover the latest event — the filings alongside do.
SEC filings
- Current report03 Nov 2026Material agreement · Acquisition or disposition of assets · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement21 Oct 2026
- Current report14 Sept 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report (amendment)26 Aug 2026Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report21 Aug 2026Material agreement · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Item 3.02 · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report17 Aug 2026Material agreement · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report12 Aug 2026
- Current report03 Aug 2026Departure or appointment of officers · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report10 Jun 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report27 May 2026Material agreement · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / WhiteFiber, Inc. · 26 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / WhiteFiber, Inc. · 12 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.