olivlawolivlaw

olivLaw · US equity research

One and one Green Technologies. INC YDDL

Wholesale-Misc Durable Goods · SIC 5090 · Vertical: Wholesale — durable goods (SIC 509x)

1.03USD−0.96% · 1 dayClose 04 Nov 2026

One and one Green Technologies is a recycler of waste and scrap metals in the Philippines that operates through contractually controlled variable interest entities. It reported fiscal 2025 revenue of 65.8 million USD, up 23.12%, and the company is in its first period as a listed stock after its October 2025 IPO.

The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).

At the close of 04 Nov 2026, One and one Green Technologies. INC (YDDL) stock was 1.03 USD (−0.96% on the day), with P/E 4.6 on diluted EPS of 0.23 USD over the last 12 months, beta -0.62, 52-week range 0.96–15.34 USD.

Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.

Market cap
unavailable
P/E (TTM)
4.6
Diluted EPS TTM 0.23 · TTM to 31 Dec 2025
E/P (TTM)
21.88%
TTM to 31 Dec 2025
Dividend yield
unavailable
Beta (2y)
-0.62
Volatility (1y) 142%
52-week range
0.9615.34

Price history

Loading chart…

Technical reading

RSI (14)
31.3
weak (30–45)
Bollinger (20, 2)
0.97 – 1.37
in the lower half of the band · %B 0.15 · band width 33.6%
SMA 50 / 200
1.41 / 4.18
downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
MACD (12, 26, 9)
-0.11 / -0.11
MACD below signal

Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).

Performance

CompanyS&P 500vs S&P 500Vertical median
1 month−27.0%−1.1%−25.9 pp—
3 months−42.5%−0.5%−42.0 pp—
6 months−77.9%+4.4%−82.3 pp—
Year to date−80.2%+12.3%−92.5 pp—
1 year−74.6%+13.5%−88.1 pp−34.5%
3 yearsunavailable+76.4%unavailable+1.0%
5 yearsunavailable+63.7%unavailable—
Max drawdown (1y)
−93.8%
06 Apr 2026 → 30 Oct 2026
Max drawdown (5y)
−93.8%
06 Apr 2026 → 30 Oct 2026
Compound annual growth (5y)
unavailable
S&P 500 +10.4%

Price returns, dividends excluded.

Quarterly results

ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).

E/P over time

E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.

Today's P/E sits at the 0 percentile of its own 1-quarter history (min 23.0, median 23.0, max 23.0; quarters with earnings only).

Fiscal years

Fiscal year202320242025
Revenue41.3 m53.5 m65.8 m
Revenue YoYunavailable+29.5%+23.1%
Net income5.6 m6.5 m11.8 m
Net income YoYunavailable+16.3%+82.4%
Diluted EPS0.110.120.23
Diluted EPS YoYunavailable+16.3%+80.9%
net %13.5%12.1%17.9%
Free cash flow225.0 k2.0 m-9.8 m

Reported results vs expectations

Loading…

Balance sheet & financial health

Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025

Cash
957.3 k USD
Financial debt
unavailable USD
Net debt
unavailable USD
Equity
41.8 m USD
Total assets
56.0 m USD
Debt / equity
unavailable
Current ratio
3.57x
ROE
37.8%
ROA
25.5%
FCF margin
-14.8%

Financial statements (source on every figure)

Revenue and net income (USD)

Margins

Income statement · USD

Revenue
2023
41.3 m
2024
53.5 m
2025
65.8 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Cost of revenue
2023
32.4 m
2024
42.9 m
2025
50.1 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Gross profit
2023
8.9 m
2024
10.6 m
2025
15.8 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Operating income
2023
7.3 m
2024
8.1 m
2025
11.9 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Interest expense
2023
—
2024
501
2025
6.5 k

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Pre-tax income
2023
7.3 m
2024
8.4 m
2025
12.1 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Income tax
2023
1.8 m
2024
1.9 m
2025
334.4 k

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Net income
2023
5.6 m
2024
6.5 m
2025
11.8 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Diluted EPS
2023
0.11
2024
0.12
2025
0.23

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Weighted average diluted shares
2023
52.0 m
2024
52.0 m
2025
52.4 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Balance sheet · USD

Cash
2023
136.5 k
2024
1.8 m
2025
957.3 k

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Receivables
2023
—
2024
17.4 m
2025
26.6 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Inventories
2023
—
2024
5.2 m
2025
7.2 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Current assets
2023
—
2024
24.8 m
2025
39.0 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Property, plant & equipment, net
2023
—
2024
11.3 m
2025
10.3 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Total assets
2023
—
2024
36.5 m
2025
56.0 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Accounts payable
2023
—
2024
5.8 m
2025
1.7 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Current liabilities
2023
—
2024
15.7 m
2025
10.9 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Total liabilities
2023
—
2024
15.8 m
2025
14.2 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Equity
2023
15.1 m †
2024
20.7 m †
2025
41.8 m †

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Cash flow · USD

Operating cash flow
2023
4.1 m
2024
2.0 m
2025
-9.7 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Capex
2023
3.8 m
2024
11.5 k
2025
29.6 k

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Free cash flow
2023
225.0 k ≈
2024
2.0 m ≈
2025
-9.8 m ≈

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026derived

Investing cash flow
2023
-3.8 m
2024
-11.5 k
2025
-2.0 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Financing cash flow
2023
-17.7 k
2024
-257.5 k
2025
10.1 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Apr 2026verified

Computed indicators

Growth

Revenue growth (YoY)
23.1%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Revenue CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
Revenue CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT growth (YoY)
46.6%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Net income growth (YoY)
82.4%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Net income CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
Net income CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EPS growth (YoY)
80.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
EPS CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
EPS CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
FCF growth (YoY)
-588.5%
computed by olivLawFY 2025

Profitability

Gross margin
23.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
EBITDA margin
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT margin
18.0%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Net margin
17.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
FCF margin
-14.8%
computed by olivLawFY 2025

Returns

ROE
37.8%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
ROA
25.5%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
ROIC
unavailable
input data missing
ROCE
26.3%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Payout ratio (EPS)
unavailable
input data missing
Payout ratio (FCF)
unavailable
input data missing

Balance sheet

Net debt
unavailable
input data missing
Net debt / EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
Debt / equity
unavailable
input data missing
Interest coverage
1,837.4x
computed by olivLawFY 2025

Liquidity

Current ratio
3.6x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Quick ratio
2.9x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Cash ratio
0.1x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025

Cash

Operating cash flow
-9.7 m USD
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Capital expenditure
29.6 k USD
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Free cash flow
-9.8 m USD
computed by olivLawFY 2025
FCF conversion
-82.6%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Cash conversion
unavailable
input data missing

Efficiency

Days sales outstanding
122 days
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Days inventory outstanding
45 days
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Days payables outstanding
27 days
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Cash conversion cycle
140 days
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025

Market and valuation

Market capitalisation
unavailable
input data missing
Enterprise value
unavailable
input data missing
Market cap / net income TTM
unavailable
input data missing
P/E (TTM)
4.6x
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Earnings yield
21.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
P/B
unavailable
input data missing
P/S
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBIT
unavailable
input data missing
EV/Sales
unavailable
input data missing
P/FCF
unavailable
input data missing
FCF yield
unavailable
input data missing
Dividend yield
unavailable
no dividend in the structured statements; a missing line is not a confirmed zero
Shareholder yield (distributions)
unavailable
input data missing

1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.

Valuation

olivLaw classification

Insufficient data
What is missing
  • indicators available: 5 of at least 6
  • score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%

A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.

Closing price

1.03 USD

04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series

Market cap: unavailable

Key indicators

Market capitalisation
unavailable
input data missing
P/E (TTM)
4.6x
computed by olivLawFY 2025
P/B
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
ROE
37.8%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Net margin
17.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Revenue growth (YoY)
23.1%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Dividend yield
unavailable
no dividend in the structured statements; a missing line is not a confirmed zero

Coverage and freshness

25/37 reporting lines present
Latest full fiscal year: 2025
Latest reported period: 31 Dec 2025
Latest balance sheet date: 31 Dec 2025
Source: SEC (XBRL)published 27 Apr 2026
verified 70

Score by group

33% · Insufficient data

Estimated value range

Low
3.09
USD per share
Mid
3.81
USD per share
High
4.54
USD per share
Price: 1.03 USD
The price is below the range
Potential to the central value: 269.5% (value / price − 1)
Margin of safety: 72.9% (1 − price / value)
Agreement between methods: single method · 1 methods used · 1 independent bases

The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 3.09 – 4.54 USD.

Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.

Method ranges (USD per share)

— — Mid · ▏ Price

Valuation methods

  • DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
  • Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
  • Peers: P/E3.09 – 4.54 (Mid 3.81)
    5 companies used · median multiple 16.9x · quartiles 13.7x – 20.1x
    AENT, CNM, GOLD, POOL, SORA
  • Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
Multiple comparisons use the SIC vertical: Wholesale — durable goods (SIC 509x)

Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.

Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)

Risk-free rate
4.3%
Equity risk premium
5.0%
Beta (default)
1.00
Cost of equity
9.3%
Terminal growth
2.5%

Factor scorecard

Insufficient data

Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%

FactorValueScoreWeight used
ROIC · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
Net margin · Quality17.9%71 (vs peers)19%
FCF conversion · Quality-82.6%0 (on a fixed band)19%
Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growthunavailableunavailable—
EPS CAGR 3Y · Growthunavailableunavailable—
Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheetunavailableunavailable—
Interest coverage · Balance sheet1,837.4x100 (on a fixed band)19%
Current ratio · Balance sheet3.6x100 (on a fixed band)13%
P/E (TTM) · Valuation4.6x100 (vs peers)31%
EV/EBITDA · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
FCF yield · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—
Payout ratio (FCF) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—

Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.

Score groups

  • Balance sheet100/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
  • Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
  • Quality36/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
  • Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
  • Valuation· partial100/100 · 1/3 factors with a value

A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.

Memo

One and one Green Technologies. INC (YDDL). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.

Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 65.8 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 23.1%; net margin 17.9%; ROE 37.8%.

The estimated value range is 3.09–4.54 USD per share (median of 1 methods, agreement: single method); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 3.81 USD, the price of 1.03 USD leaves a potential of 269.5% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of 72.9% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.

Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%).

Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.

What supports the thesis

  • Net margin: 17.9%
  • Interest coverage: 1,837.4x
  • Current ratio: 3.6x
  • P/E (TTM): 4.6x
  • The price is below the estimated value range

What contradicts it

  • FCF conversion: -82.6%

Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).

Versus the vertical median

Wholesale — durable goods (SIC 509x) · same industry group (3-digit SIC) · compared with 7 companies

Multiples and returns vs the median

P/E
4.6x
vertical median 16.9x
below median (−72.9%)
EV/EBITDA
—
vertical median —
P/S
—
vertical median 3.5x
P/B
—
vertical median 1.6x
ROE
37.8%
vertical median 11.9%
above median (+217.8%)
Net margin
17.9%
vertical median 6.0%
above median (+201.0%)
EBIT margin
18.0%
vertical median -2.4%
above median
Revenue YoY
23.1%
vertical median -0.4%
above median
Net debt/EBITDA
—
vertical median —
Dividend yield
—
vertical median —

Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)

Companies in the vertical

Market capP/EROENet marginRevenue YoY1A / 3A
POOLPool Corporation7.8 bn20.230.4%7.3%−0.4%−10% / −37%
GOLDGold.com, Inc.1.2 bn13.710.8%0.3%+132.4%+44% / +45%
AENTAlliance Entertainment Holding Corporation223.6 m16.911.9%483.6%0.0%−34% / +362%
SORAAsiaStrategy60.4 m4.8106.1%111.9%−37.7%−37% / unavailable
BGMSBio Green Med Solution, Inc.5.9 m—-40.8%-204.0%−100.0%−41% / −100%
GNLNGreenlane Holdings, Inc.871.7 k—-534.0%-4,630.6%−67.2%−95% / −100%
CNMCore & Main, Inc.—20.123.4%6.0%+2.8%+1% / +39%
YDDLOne and one Green Technologies. INC—4.637.8%17.9%+23.1%−75% / unavailable

1- and 3-year price returns: for YDDL from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.

olivLaw engine forecast

The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.

The engine has no published run for this company yet.

Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)

Illustrative scenarios

Scenarios are not available. input data missing

AI analysis

AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 27 Apr 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (29 Sept 2026), 6-K (11 Sept 2026), 6-K (03 Sept 2026), 6-K (24 Jun 2026).

In brief

One and one Green Technologies is a recycler of waste and scrap metals in the Philippines that operates through contractually controlled variable interest entities. It reported fiscal 2025 revenue of 65.8 million USD, up 23.12%, and the company is in its first period as a listed stock after its October 2025 IPO.

SWOT

Strengths

  • Government authorization to process hazardous waste and declared compliance with environmental requirements, which act as a barrier to entry for competitors 1.
  • Proprietary exhaust gas recirculation technology, which the company considers an advantage over competitors that cannot prevent pollution 1.
  • Revenue and net income growth in fiscal 2025, with gross profit rising faster than revenue 1.

Weaknesses

  • High dependence on two main products, copper alloy ingots and aluminum scrapes, which account for most revenue 1.
  • Control through contractual arrangements without direct ownership may be less effective than direct ownership and costly to enforce 1.
  • Small company size and workforce may limit execution capacity for international expansion 1.

Opportunities

  • Expansion into Southeast Asia and other international markets, with raw material sources from Japan and South Korea 1.
  • Sustained demand for recycled alloys in the metallurgical industry, which the company sees as part of the global transition to renewable sources 1.
  • Strategic acquisitions and investments in recycling technologies, which could accelerate growth if executed effectively 1.

Threats

  • Legal uncertainty over enforcing contractual arrangements in the Philippines, which have not been tested in a court of law 1.
  • Political instability and corruption issues in the Philippine government, which can affect the business environment 1.
  • Inflationary pressures and currency fluctuations that could raise costs and weigh on margins 1.

Risks

  • VIE structure and contract enforcementhigh

    Control over Philippine operations depends on contractual arrangements that have not been tested in court, and if they cannot be enforced the company could be unable to operate its business 1.

  • Foreign ownership restrictionshigh

    If Philippine authorities find that the structure does not comply with restrictions on foreign investment, the company could face severe penalties, including being prohibited from operating 1.

  • Inflation and raw material costsmedium

    Higher raw material prices and labor costs could weigh on margins if they cannot be passed on to customers 1.

  • Political and policy instabilitymedium

    Political instability and changes in government policy could affect demand and operating results 1.

  • Concentration in a few productsmedium

    Revenue concentrated in two product categories means a drop in demand or prices for these materials could have a disproportionate effect on results 1.

Investment thesis

What would need to be true (bull case)

  • Rising revenue and net income in fiscal 2025, together with an improving gross margin, suggest the business model can generate profit if demand holds 1.
  • Government authorization to process hazardous waste and proprietary recirculation technology could offer a competitive position that is hard to replicate 1.
  • The expansion plan in Southeast Asia and other markets could open new revenue sources if executed successfully 1.

What would break the thesis

  • The contractual control structure could be challenged or prove ineffective before Philippine authorities or courts, with severe consequences for operations 1.
  • Concentration of revenue in two products leaves the company exposed to changes in demand or prices for these materials 1.
  • Inflationary pressures and currency fluctuations could reduce margins if costs cannot be passed on to customers 1.

What to watch

  • Revenue trend in the copper and aluminum segments relative to demand in the Asia-Pacific regionQ1 2027
  • Use of proceeds from the April 2026 offering and execution of the international expansion strategy2027

Products, market & competition

AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 27 Apr 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (29 Sept 2026), 6-K (11 Sept 2026), 6-K (03 Sept 2026), 6-K (24 Jun 2026).

The business

The company recycles, produces and trades waste and recovered metals in the Philippines through Yoda Metal and DL Metal, entities controlled by contractual arrangements rather than direct equity ownership by the Cayman parent. Its activities include processing electronic waste and industrial scrap, with an estimated annual capacity of around 300000 tons, supported by a government authorization to import hazardous waste as raw material 1. Its core products are copper alloy ingots and aluminum scrapes, which accounted for 68.5% and 30.0% of revenue in 2025 respectively 1.

The company says its exhaust gas recirculation system captures ash and slag for further metal recovery, a technology it considers an advantage over table concentrators that cannot prevent pollution in final processing stages 1. Customers are industrial enterprises in the casting and vehicle sectors, and raw materials come from local sources and from Korea, Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe and the USA 1.

The legal structure is specific: the Cayman parent does not hold the Philippine operations directly but controls them through contractual agreements with the VIEs, because of Philippine restrictions on foreign ownership 1. This matters for investors because the strength of control depends on enforcing these contracts under Philippine law, which has not yet been tested in a court of law 1.

Market context

The expansion strategy targets Southeast Asia and other international markets and aims to secure raw material sources from Japan and South Korea, with demand from end customers tied to the Asia-Pacific region where sales grew in 2025 1.

Trends

  • Rising demand for recycled alloystailwind

    The company observed higher sales volumes for copper and aluminum ingots in 2025, driven by stronger demand in the Asia-Pacific region, which could support growth if that demand holds 1.

  • Stricter environmental rulesmixed

    The company argues its environmentally friendly processes position it well for regulations worldwide, but Philippine environmental legislation is tightening and compliance costs could rise if rules advance 1.

  • Inflationary cost pressuresheadwind

    Inflation, higher raw material prices and fluctuations of the Philippine peso against the dollar can raise operating and borrowing costs, particularly if they cannot be passed on to customers 1.

  • International expansiontailwind

    The growth strategy in Southeast Asia and other markets, together with a planned international business development team, could open new customers but carries execution risk 1.

Competitive position

The company says it differentiates itself through its environmentally friendly gas recirculation technology and its authorization to process hazardous waste, while competing technologies such as table concentrators cannot prevent pollution in final processing stages 1. The supplied sources do not name US-listed competitors, so competitive recognition is limited to the company's own description 1.

The company says it could maintain its position by developing technology and products, but if it fails to innovate it could lose customers to other recyclers in the region, making competitive pressure an important factor for its growth outlook 1.

  • Table concentrator technologies

    The company describes these technologies as less effective at preventing pollution in the final stages of processing 1.

  • Other metal recyclers in the Philippines

    The source mentions industry competition without naming specific companies 1.

  • Recyclers in the Asia-Pacific region

    The regional markets where the company focuses its growth are also where competition is present 1.

  • Recycling operators in Southeast Asia

    Planned expansion in this area could bring the company into direct competition with these operators 1.

News & filings

Sources

  1. [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / One and one Green Technologies. INC · 27 Apr 2026

Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.