From books

Choosing your ruler is not freedom if the structure of domination itself remains untouched.

Étienne de La Boétie · Discurs despre servitutea voluntară · 1576 · paragraful 21 minute readpublic domain
I do not see what freedom the people could have left, if the only power remaining to them is that of choosing their master.Étienne de La Boétie · Discurs despre servitutea voluntară · 1576 · paragraful 2

Choosing your master isn't freedom: you change domination's face, not the balance of power.

La Boétie attacks the illusion that popular sovereignty is exhausted in voting. If the only power left is to name whoever will command you, you have changed the face of rule, not the balance of power. The mechanism is the confusion between participation and real power: the legitimacy granted by election can even strengthen servitude. A citizen who votes every four years but has no say in the daily decisions that concern them lives precisely this condition.

Why it mattersIt raises useful questions for anyone who mistakes periodic voting for real control over their own life.

Vote every fouryearsLegitimizes ruleNo daily sayServitude reinforced
What follows from the only power to choose a master

Back to the feed