olivLaw · European equity research
AUGA group, AB AUG1L.VS
Lithuania · Nasdaq Vilnius · ISIN LT0000127466 · Vertical: Listed companies from Lithuania
AUGA group, AB is a Lithuanian organic agriculture group active in crop and livestock production, processing and distribution. Its annual report for the year ended 31 December 2025 shows it is reorganising operations and reshaping its sustainability strategy, which makes its financial position a subject of interest.
At the close of 05 Nov 2026, AUGA group, AB (AUG1L.VS) stock was 0.08 EUR (−0.24% on the day), with beta 0.18, 52-week range 0.06–0.11 EUR.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: ESEF annual reports and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 57.8
- strong (55–70)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 0.06 – 0.08
- above the upper band · %B 1.06 · band width 27.6%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 0.09 / 0.08
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.00 / -0.01
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | EURO STOXX 50 | vs EURO STOXX 50 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −0.2% | +0.4% | −0.6 pp | — |
| 3 months | +3.4% | −3.3% | +6.7 pp | — |
| 6 months | +22.9% | +4.0% | +18.9 pp | — |
| Year to date | +22.9% | +8.1% | +14.8 pp | — |
| 1 year | +11.6% | +10.7% | +0.9 pp | +10.8% |
| 3 years | −73.9% | +50.1% | −124.0 pp | +55.7% |
| 5 years | −84.6% | +43.6% | −128.2 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 77.4 m | 55.3 m | 51.5 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | −28.6% | −6.9% |
| Net income | -18.4 m | -32.4 m | -10.6 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | 0.08 | -0.14 | -0.05 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | −275.0% | unavailable |
| net % | -23.8% | -58.5% | -20.7% |
| Free cash flow | -13.8 m | 2.0 m | 2.6 m |
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 668.0 k EUR
- Financial debt
- 80.7 m EUR
- Net debt
- 80.1 m EUR
- Equity
- 19.5 m EUR
- Total assets
- 184.8 m EUR
- Debt / equity
- 4.13x
- Current ratio
- 0.44x
- ROE
- -42.8%
- ROA
- -5.5%
- FCF margin
- 5.1%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (EUR)
Margins
Income statement · EUR
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 77.4 m | 55.3 m | 51.5 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 70.9 m | 49.5 m | 40.2 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Gross profit | -2.4 m | -4.9 m | 5.4 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Operating income | -15.9 m | -21.1 m | -2.6 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Interest expense | 10.2 m | 11.4 m | 7.1 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -18.2 m | -32.4 m | -10.5 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Income tax | 208.0 k | 55.0 k | 265.0 k | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Net income | -18.4 m | -32.4 m | -10.6 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 0.08 | -0.14 | -0.05 | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
Balance sheet · EUR
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 3.5 m | 1.7 m | 668.0 k | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Receivables | 10.1 m | 7.6 m | 5.9 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Inventories | 28.7 m | 17.0 m | 12.4 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Current assets | 68.7 m | 50.0 m | 36.0 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 90.8 m | 89.0 m | 59.3 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Total assets | 228.7 m | 203.1 m | 184.8 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | 64.0 m | 83.6 m | 57.3 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | 14.6 m | 0 | 23.5 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 105.2 m | 126.8 m | 82.0 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 166.9 m | 172.8 m | 165.3 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Equity | 61.8 m | 30.3 m | 19.5 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
Cash flow · EUR
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -7.4 m | 5.6 m | 3.2 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Capex | 6.4 m | 3.6 m | 594.0 k | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -13.8 m ≈ | 2.0 m ≈ | 2.6 m ≈ | esef· 12 May 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | 4.4 m | -3.7 m | -624.0 k | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 3.1 m | -3.6 m | -3.7 m | esef· 12 May 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 4 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: unavailable
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
27% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · input data missing
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 3.0%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.5%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 8.5%
- Terminal growth
- 2.0%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | -2.1% | 10 (vs peers) | 38% |
| Net margin · Quality | -20.7% | 0 (vs peers) | 23% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -0.4x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 23% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.4x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 15% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet0/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality6/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
AUGA group, AB (AUG1L.VS). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 51.5 m EUR in 2025; YoY growth -6.9%; net margin -20.7%; ROE -43.3%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
What contradicts it
- ROIC: -2.1%
- Net margin: -20.7%
- Interest coverage: -0.4x
- Current ratio: 0.4x
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Listed companies from Lithuania · same country · compared with 15 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGD1L.VSLitgrid Ab | 571.2 m | 16.7 | 13.0% | 8.0% | +14.2% | +38% / +67% |
| IVL1L.VSAkcinė bendrovė "Invalda INVL" | 318.0 m | 7.0 | 19.7% | 230.8% | +44.6% | +21% / +165% |
| AKO1L.VSAB Akola group | 267.2 m | 7.2 | 10.5% | 2.5% | −4.4% | +4% / +58% |
| APG1L.VSAkcinė prekybos bendrovė "APRANGA" | 213.6 m | 13.2 | 23.9% | 5.3% | +4.9% | +22% / +44% |
| AMG1L.VSAB "Amber Grid" | 199.3 m | 120.0 | 0.8% | 2.0% | −6.4% | 0% / +4% |
| VLP1L.VSAb "vilkyškių Pieninė" | 184.2 m | 16.8 | 12.6% | 3.8% | +16.9% | +46% / +228% |
| KNE1L.VSAB "KN Energies" | 180.3 m | 9.9 | 10.8% | 17.3% | +12.3% | +41% / +139% |
| GRG1L.VSAB "Grigeo" | 131.7 m | 7.9 | 12.5% | 6.7% | +15.7% | +0% / +2% |
| RSU1L.VSAkcinė bendrovė "ROKIŠKIO SŪRIS" | 130.5 m | 7.6 | 11.1% | 4.3% | +8.7% | −7% / +46% |
| ZMP1L.VSAkcinė bendrovė "ŽEMAITIJOS PIENAS" | 117.1 m | 5.4 | 14.1% | 6.4% | +10.6% | +9% / +68% |
| KNR1L.VSAkcinė bendrovė "Kauno energija" | 88.7 m | 11.4 | 7.6% | 9.1% | −0.3% | +16% / +124% |
| VBL1L.VSAkcinė bendrovė "VILNIAUS BALDAI" | 37.4 m | 8.4 | 11.5% | 4.3% | +7.1% | −5% / +54% |
| INL1L.VSAkcinė bendrovė "INVL Baltic Farmland" | 23.7 m | 29.0 | 4.1% | 91.6% | +6.7% | +12% / +1% |
| INR1L.VSSpecialioji uždarojo tipo nekilnojamojo turto investicinė bendrovė "INVL Baltic Real Estate" | 21.5 m | 5.9 | 13.7% | 89.4% | +2.8% | −15% / +34% |
| NTU1L.VSAkcinė bendrovė "Novaturas" | 5.8 m | — | -64.2% | -3.8% | −3.6% | unavailable / unavailable |
| AUG1L.VSAUGA group, AB | — | — | -43.3% | -20.7% | −6.9% | +15% / −73% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for AUG1L.VS from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
AUGA group, AB is a Lithuanian organic agriculture group active in crop and livestock production, processing and distribution. Its annual report for the year ended 31 December 2025 shows it is reorganising operations and reshaping its sustainability strategy, which makes its financial position a subject of interest.
SWOT
Strengths
- The group has an integrated business model covering primary production, processing and distribution, which gives it control over the value chain.
- The focus on organic farming and animal welfare gives it a distinct positioning compared with conventional production.
- The report describes a governance and compliance policy framework approved by the Board, which supports transparency of operations.
Weaknesses
- The group has not yet set quantitative climate targets for the 2030 and 2050 horizons, which makes it harder to measure progress over time.
- The restructuring of group companies is not fully completed, which could create operational uncertainty.
- Dependence on suppliers and partners for raw materials and seeds exposes the group to supply risks.
Opportunities
- Developing biomethane production could support the circular economy and emission reduction if projects expand.
- Growing demand for organic and healthier food could support higher sales of finished products.
- New sustainable agricultural technologies developed through research and development could improve production efficiency.
Threats
- Rising raw material prices and changing demand could compress profit margins.
- Changes to European subsidies could reduce financial support for agricultural activity.
- A sharp rise in land lease prices could affect long-term production costs.
Risks
- Liquidity riskhigh
The report lists liquidity risk among the group's priority risks. If cash flows are insufficient, the group could face difficulties financing current activity.
- Restructuring implementationhigh
The report flags the risk that restructuring in group companies is only partly implemented or fails, which could affect efficiency and financial performance.
- Raw material pricesmedium
Rising raw material prices and changing demand are identified as a priority risk, which could reduce margins if costs cannot be passed on to customers.
- Loss of suppliers or partnersmedium
Dependence on suppliers for seeds, fertilisers and other materials could expose the group to supply interruptions if relationships deteriorate.
- Changes to EU subsidieslow
The risk of changes to European support for agriculture is cited as a factor that could affect the group's income, particularly over the medium term.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the group completes its restructuring and maintains its position in organic agriculture, it could benefit from growing demand for sustainable products.
- The integrated model, covering production, processing and distribution, could provide control over costs and quality across the value chain.
- Development of biomethane and the circular economy could open additional revenue sources and reduce environmental impact.
What would break the thesis
- If raw material and land prices continue to rise, the group's margins could be compressed significantly.
- Incomplete restructuring could generate additional costs and could reduce the confidence of suppliers and partners.
- The absence of quantitative climate targets for 2030 and 2050 could make it difficult to demonstrate progress to investors and customers.
What to watch
- Progress in implementing the restructuring plan in group companies2026
- New environmental and climate strategy with quantitative targets for 2030 and 20502026
- Trends in raw material prices and land lease ratesnext 10-K
- Liquidity and financing position of the groupnext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
The group operates across the agricultural value chain, from sourcing seeds and fertilisers to distributing finished products to consumers. According to the annual report, primary production includes growing crops such as corn, potatoes, rapeseed, soybeans and cereals, as well as livestock farming and production of mushrooms and other vegetables. The emphasis is on sustainable and organic farming practices.
In processing and manufacturing, raw materials are cleaned, sorted, prepared and transformed into packaged finished products for market. The group manages subsidiaries and its own facilities, and its management, operations and research and development activities aim at innovation in sustainable practices and production efficiency, according to the annual report.
The report notes that the group applies a strategy approved by its Board in April 2020, while its environmental and climate strategy for the 2030 and 2050 horizons is still being developed. Until it is finalised, the group has not set quantitative climate targets for these horizons, which limits comparability of progress.
Segments
Primary production
Covers cultivation of field crops such as corn, potatoes, rapeseed, soybeans and cereals, as well as livestock farming and production of mushrooms and vegetables, all under organic practices according to the annual report.
Processing and manufacturing
Raw materials are prepared, transformed and packaged into finished products, with a focus on maintaining quality and ecological standards throughout the process.
Distribution and consumption
Logistics covers transport, warehousing and the supply chain to consumers, as well as promotion of organic food consumption, as described in the report.
Market context
The annual report provided does not offer a detailed analysis of the organic food market or the group's market share. However, the description of the value chain shows the group operates in the agricultural and food sector, where raw material and land costs directly influence margins.
Risks identified by the group include rising raw material prices and changing demand, as well as a sharp increase in land lease prices, factors that could affect performance in a volatile market environment.
Trends
- Restructuring in group companiesheadwind
The report flags the risk that restructuring in group companies is only partly implemented or fails, which could affect costs and operational stability if the process is not completed.
- Organic farming and sustainabilitymixed
The focus on organic farming, animal welfare and circular economy is presented as a differentiating advantage, but it requires ongoing investment and has no quantitative targets set for 2030 and 2050.
- EU subsidiesheadwind
The risk of changes to EU subsidies is cited in the report as a risk factor. If public support changes, the group's agricultural income could be affected.
- Biomethane productiontailwind
Biomethane use is presented as a positive contribution to climate change mitigation and integration into the circular economy, which could create additional opportunities if projects develop.
Competitive position
The source provided does not explicitly name the group's competitors. However, the report describes risks such as loss of suppliers or partners and pressure on prices, which suggests competition for raw materials, land and customers in the organic agriculture sector.
Comparison with other producers cannot be made from the document provided, since it contains no data on market shares or competitor performance. A competitive analysis would require additional sources.
- Organic agricultural producers in Lithuania and the region
The source does not name direct competitors; such players could compete for land, suppliers and customers.
- Conventional food producers
The report mentions intensive agriculture as an environmental pressure, which suggests competition with conventional models.
- Seed and fertiliser suppliers
Dependence on suppliers for essential materials appears as a risk in the report, without specific companies being identified.
- Distributors of organic products
Distribution channels to consumers are described in the report, but competitors at this stage are not named in the source.
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
Annual reports (ESEF)
- Annual report 202512 May 2026
- Annual report 202421 Aug 2025
Sources
- [1] Annual report, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 (ESEF) · SEC / AUGA group, AB · 31 Dec 2025
Figures computed by olivLaw from ESEF annual reports and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.