olivLaw · US equity research
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM
Metal Mining · SIC 1000 · Vertical: Metal Mining (SIC 1000)
Hudbay Minerals Inc. is a Canadian company that files annual reports with the SEC on Form 40-F under the US-Canada multijurisdictional disclosure system. The source document is the report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed March 27, 2026, which includes audited financial statements and management's discussion and analysis.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) stock was 22.22 USD (+3.64% on the day), with market capitalisation 8.8 bn USD, P/E 15.4 on diluted EPS of 1.44 USD over the last 12 months, dividend yield 0.06%, beta 1.86, 52-week range 14.58–31.87 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 39.0
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 20.64 – 26.36
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.28 · band width 24.3%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 25.73 / 24.82
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -1.10 / -1.02
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −18.5% | −1.1% | −17.4 pp | — |
| 3 months | −14.2% | −0.5% | −13.8 pp | — |
| 6 months | −7.4% | +4.4% | −11.8 pp | — |
| Year to date | +11.9% | +12.3% | −0.4 pp | — |
| 1 year | +49.6% | +13.5% | +36.1 pp | −10.3% |
| 3 years | +375.8% | +76.4% | +299.4 pp | +67.8% |
| 5 years | +226.8% | +63.7% | +163.1 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 25 percentile of its own 4-quarter history (min 13.8, median 21.9, max 40.5; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.5 bn | 1.2 bn | 1.1 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.7 bn | 2.0 bn | 2.2 bn |
| Revenue YoY | +5.0% | −16.0% | −11.7% | +37.5% | −2.7% | +15.6% | +19.6% | +9.4% |
| Net income | 85.4 m | -343.8 m | -144.6 m | -244.4 m | 70.4 m | 66.4 m | 76.7 m | 568.5 m |
| Net income YoY | −38.9% | −502.5% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | −5.7% | +15.5% | +641.2% |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | unavailable | -0.55 | -0.93 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 1.44 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | −18.5% | −9.1% | +620.0% |
| net % | 5.8% | -27.8% | -13.2% | -16.3% | 4.8% | 3.9% | 3.8% | 25.7% |
| Free cash flow | 288.7 m | 51.7 m | -121.7 m | 32.9 m | 178.8 m | 195.8 m | 319.1 m | 240.6 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 568.9 m USD
- Financial debt
- 1.0 bn USD
- Net debt
- 439.7 m USD
- Equity
- 3.2 bn USD
- Total assets
- 6.2 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- 0.31x
- Current ratio
- 0.95x
- ROE
- 19.3%
- ROA
- 9.7%
- FCF margin
- 10.9%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.1 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.7 bn | 2.0 bn | 2.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 1.1 bn | 1.4 bn | 1.2 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.5 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 39.0 m | 131.0 m | 276.9 m | 392.5 m | 553.8 m | 743.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | -37.2 m | 18.3 m | 214.3 m | 297.1 m | 400.3 m | 916.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 363.6 m | 359.8 m | 339.1 m | 393.1 m | 428.0 m | 441.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | 326.4 m ≈ | 378.0 m ≈ | 553.4 m ≈ | 690.2 m ≈ | 828.3 m ≈ | 1.4 bn ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026derived |
| Pre-tax income | -179.1 m | -202.8 m | 95.8 m | 151.8 m | 251.6 m | 912.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | -34.5 m | 41.6 m | 25.4 m | 82.3 m | 183.8 m | 347.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -144.6 m | -244.4 m | 70.4 m | 66.4 m | 76.7 m | 568.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -0.55 | -0.93 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 1.44 | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 261.3 m | 261.5 m | 262.2 m | 311.0 m | 377.3 m | 396.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | 0.01 | — | — | — | 0.01 | 0.01 | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026derived |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 439.1 m | 271.0 m | 225.7 m | 249.8 m | 541.8 m | 568.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | 141.2 m | 204.1 m | 113.2 m | 203.4 m | 235.5 m | 377.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | 143.1 m | 158.5 m | 155.0 m | 207.3 m | 197.4 m | 199.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 755.7 m | 656.7 m | 524.2 m | 673.2 m | 1.0 bn | 1.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 3.7 bn | 3.7 bn | 3.6 bn | 4.3 bn | 4.2 bn | 4.7 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | — | — | 0 | 75.3 m | 69.2 m | 72.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 5.4 m | 5.9 m | 4.8 m | 4.0 m | 5.5 m | 7.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 4.7 bn | 4.6 bn | 4.3 bn | 5.3 bn | 5.5 bn | 6.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 233.1 m | 207.8 m | 211.5 m | 239.3 m | 270.2 m | 342.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | — | — | — | — | 0 | 472.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | 1.1 bn | 1.2 bn | 1.2 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.1 bn | 536.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 448.8 m | 509.2 m | 447.6 m | 537.4 m | 537.2 m | 1.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 3.0 bn | 3.1 bn | 2.8 bn | 3.1 bn | 2.8 bn | 3.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 1.7 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.6 bn | 2.2 bn | 2.6 bn | 3.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | 261.3 m | — | — | — | 394.9 m | 395.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 239.5 m | 385.1 m | 487.8 m | 476.9 m | 666.2 m | 707.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 361.2 m | 352.2 m | 309.0 m | 281.1 m | 347.1 m | 466.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -121.7 m ≈ | 32.9 m ≈ | 178.8 m ≈ | 195.8 m ≈ | 319.1 m ≈ | 240.6 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -359.0 m | -376.3 m | -337.7 m | -271.8 m | -382.9 m | -468.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 162.1 m | -175.9 m | -196.3 m | -182.4 m | 10.2 m | -214.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 3.8 m | 4.1 m | 4.0 m | 4.5 m | 5.5 m | 5.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
Score: 66 / 100
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 8.8 bn USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
- Balance sheet75
- Valuation56
- Quality61
- Growth100
- Returns41
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 17.44 – 51.37 USD.
Methods computed but outside the aggregate range: Dividend discount (DDM) (a small share of earnings is paid as dividends (capital returns through buybacks): the dividend model does not describe the value and stays outside the aggregate).
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the reported interest expense is far older than the latest period (the filer changed its XBRL tag): a stale figure is not used
- Peers: EV/EBITDA42.49 – 51.37 (Mid 45.87)4 companies used · median multiple 13.7x · quartiles 12.7x – 15.3xCLF, ERO, FCX, SCCO
- Peers: P/E17.44 – 35.38 (Mid 23.05)8 companies used · median multiple 16.0x · quartiles 12.1x – 24.6xBHP, BVN, ERO, FCX, NEXA, RIO, SCCO, TMC
- Dividend discount (DDM)outside the aggregate0.19 – 0.25 (Mid 0.21)a small share of earnings is paid as dividends (capital returns through buybacks): the dividend model does not describe the value and stays outside the aggregate
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Neutral profile · Score 66/100
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | 16.5% | 73 (vs peers) | 11% |
| Net margin · Quality | 25.7% | 84 (vs peers) | 7% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | 42.3% | 18 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 14.8% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | 74.7% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | 0.3x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.9x | 12 (on a fixed band) | 4% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 15.4x | 56 (vs peers) | 11% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | 6.8x | 75 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| FCF yield · Valuation | 2.7% | 34 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 0.1% | 1 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | 2.3% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 4% |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet75/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth100/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Quality61/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Returns41/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Valuation56/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
Memo
Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 2.2 bn USD in 2025; YoY growth 9.4%; net margin 25.7%; ROE 19.7%; net debt/EBITDA 0.3x.
The estimated value range is 29.97–43.37 USD per share (median of 2 methods, agreement: low); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 34.46 USD, the price of 22.22 USD leaves a potential of 55.1% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of 35.5% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
olivLaw score 66/100, methodological classification: neutral profile (score, margin of safety and method agreement together; not a judgement of the right price). Not investment advice.
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- ROIC: 16.5%
- Net margin: 25.7%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 14.8%
- EPS CAGR 3Y: 74.7%
- Net debt / EBITDA: 0.3x
- EV/EBITDA: 6.8x
- Payout ratio (FCF): 2.3%
- The price is below the estimated value range
What contradicts it
- FCF conversion: 42.3%
- Current ratio: 0.9x
- Shareholder yield (distributions): 0.1%
- The valuation methods diverge
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): Interest coverage.
Versus the vertical median
Metal Mining (SIC 1000) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 26 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHPBhp Group Limited | 406.8 bn | 45.2 | 19.5% | 17.6% | −7.9% | +46% / +31% |
| SCCOSouthern Copper Corp | 149.3 bn | 23.0 | 53.2% | 37.3% | +17.4% | +35% / +163% |
| RIORio Tinto PLC | 106.2 bn | 13.9 | 17.0% | 17.3% | +7.4% | +18% / +22% |
| FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc. | 89.9 bn | 29.2 | 21.8% | 16.2% | +1.8% | +46% / +68% |
| HBMHudbay Minerals Inc. | 8.8 bn | 15.4 | 19.7% | 25.7% | +9.4% | +50% / +376% |
| CLFCleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 7.3 bn | — | -8.5% | -2.4% | −3.0% | −2% / −25% |
| BVNBuenaventura Mining Co Inc | 7.3 bn | 18.1 | 12.6% | 34.9% | +40.1% | +16% / +202% |
| MPMP Materials Corp. | 6.4 bn | — | -4.1% | -19.9% | +10.1% | −42% / +126% |
| EROEro Copper Corp | 3.2 bn | 12.2 | 34.6% | 33.6% | +67.1% | +21% / +150% |
| NEXANexa Resources S.A. | 1.6 bn | 11.9 | 14.6% | 4.4% | +8.5% | +70% / +103% |
| IEIvanhoe Electric Inc. | 1.2 bn | — | -8.4% | -1,138.7% | +11.8% | −46% / −32% |
| USARUSA Rare Earth, Inc. | 1.1 bn | — | -23.6% | -2,159.3% | unavailable | −39% / −20% |
| TMCTMC the metals Co Inc. | 1.0 bn | 4.2 | -1,123.2% | — | unavailable | −67% / +103% |
| USASAmericas Gold And Silver Corporation | 986.9 m | — | -61.6% | -74.1% | +17.7% | −31% / +413% |
| ASMAvino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 769.3 m | 79.0 | 7.0% | 12.2% | +50.8% | −15% / +746% |
| LARLithium Argentina AG | 682.1 m | — | -9.5% | — | +12.9% | −24% / −21% |
| SGMLSigma Lithium Corporation | 626.1 m | — | -67.4% | -45.6% | −27.3% | −50% / −81% |
| GSMFerroglobe PLC | 547.5 m | — | -25.9% | -12.8% | −18.8% | −34% / −49% |
| ALOYRealloys Inc. | 459.5 m | — | -155.8% | -5,144.4% | −5.3% | −5% / +68% |
| THMInternational Tower Hill Mines Ltd | 455.2 m | — | -2.8% | — | unavailable | −10% / +222% |
| LZMLifezone Metals Limited | 336.9 m | — | -16.7% | -1,289.2% | +652.2% | +1% / −60% |
| USAUU.s. Gold Corp. | 186.4 m | — | -55.2% | — | −30.9% | −35% / +239% |
| PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp. | 83.9 m | — | -46.1% | — | −54.7% | −20% / +146% |
| WWRWestwater Resources, Inc. | 52.5 m | — | -19.1% | — | unavailable | −57% / −33% |
| COPRIdaho Copper Corporation | 25.7 m | — | -187.5% | — | −63.5% | unavailable / unavailable |
1- and 3-year price returns: for HBM from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 14.47 Total return -35% · Per year -35% | 25.46 Total return 15% · Per year 15% | 38.19 Total return 72% · Per year 72% |
| 3 years | 17.10 Total return -23% · Per year -8% | 33.55 Total return 51% · Per year 15% | 54.82 Total return 147% · Per year 35% |
| 5 years | 20.21 Total return -9% · Per year -2% | 44.22 Total return 100% · Per year 15% | 78.67 Total return 255% · Per year 29% |
- Exit P/E± 8.39
- Net margin± 5.87
- Annual revenue growth± 4.39
- Annual dilution± 0.49
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 27 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (30 Oct 2026), 6-K (23 Oct 2026), 6-K (21 Oct 2026), 6-K (28 Sept 2026), 6-K (31 Jul 2026), 6-K (29 Jul 2026).
In brief
Hudbay Minerals Inc. is a Canadian company that files annual reports with the SEC on Form 40-F under the US-Canada multijurisdictional disclosure system. The source document is the report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed March 27, 2026, which includes audited financial statements and management's discussion and analysis.
SWOT
Strengths
- Audited financial statements with an unqualified opinion and internal control with a favourable auditor opinion.
- Reporting in US dollars with clear references to Canadian dollars, easing reading for international investors.
- Audit committee with members designated as financial experts and a published code of ethics.
Weaknesses
- The available report contains no operational details on production or projects, which limits evaluation.
- Much information is incorporated by reference from separate documents, complicating quick verification.
- Governance practices differ from those of US companies listed on the NYSE.
Opportunities
- If operational information in the annual information form confirms project development, transparency could support investor confidence.
- The dual Toronto and NYSE listing could attract a broader investor base.
- Standardised mine safety reporting could become a point of differentiation in investor dialogue.
Threats
- Multiple reporting requirements, Canadian and American, raise compliance costs.
- If financial restatements occurred, recovery of executive pay could become necessary.
- Operational risks of mining activity, described in the incorporated documents, could affect results.
Risks
- Lack of operational data in sourcemedium
The report contains no information on production, costs or projects, so assessment of operational risks remains incomplete.
- Financial statement restatementslow
If restatements were required, the compensation recovery policy could be triggered, with impact on reputation and costs.
- Mine safety risksmedium
Safety incidents, if they occurred, could bring sanctions and require reporting under the Dodd-Frank Act.
- Governance differenceslow
Canadian rules, less strict on some points, could differ from the expectations of US investors.
- Internal controllow
Even effective systems have inherent limits, and changing conditions could make controls less adequate.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- Audited financial statements with an unqualified opinion and a favourable internal control opinion could support investor confidence.
- Reporting in US and Canadian dollars makes the information accessible to a broad investor base.
- An audit committee with financial experts could reduce the risk of reporting errors.
What would break the thesis
- The lack of operational detail in the available source makes production performance hard to assess.
- Multiple reporting requirements could raise administrative costs without a clear benefit shown in the source.
- If mine safety risks materialised, sanctions and reputational pressure could follow.
What to watch
- Operational information in the annual information form (AIF)next 10-K
- Quarterly results and any restatements of financial statementsQ1 2027
- Changes to the compensation recovery policy2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 27 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (30 Oct 2026), 6-K (23 Oct 2026), 6-K (21 Oct 2026), 6-K (28 Sept 2026), 6-K (31 Jul 2026), 6-K (29 Jul 2026).
The business
The available source is only the cover page and exhibits of the Form 40-F for fiscal 2025, which describe the company's reporting structure and documents incorporated by reference, such as the annual information form (AIF), audited financial statements and MD&A. The financial statements are prepared under IFRS, and figures are expressed in US dollars with references to Canadian dollars. The company is a foreign private issuer listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and on the NYSE, applying Canadian governance rules.
The report contains no operational details on mining activity, production or projects, which according to the source are described in the annual information form incorporated by reference. The text indicates that Deloitte LLP audited the financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, with an unqualified opinion.
The governance structure includes an audit committee of four members, all designated audit committee financial experts under Commission rules, and the company has adopted a code of ethics applying to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller.
Segments
Financial reporting and annual documents
The company presents results through audited IFRS financial statements for 2025 and 2024, supplemented by management's discussion and analysis, documents incorporated by reference in the 40-F.
Governance and audit
The audit committee and code of ethics define the oversight framework, and the governance rules applied are largely Canadian rather than the NYSE standards applying to US domestic companies.
Market context
The source contains no data on metal markets or the company's market share, so no conclusions on sector size can be drawn. The report shows that activity is reported in US dollars with Canadian dollar references, which may matter for investors in both countries.
The Toronto and NYSE listings place the company under a dual regulatory framework, in which Canadian rules take precedence on several governance matters such as director independence and approval of equity compensation plans.
Trends
- Move to IFRS reportingmixed
Financial statements are prepared under IFRS, making results comparable with other Canadian issuers but harder to compare directly with companies reporting under US GAAP.
- Internal control requirementstailwind
Internal control over financial reporting was audited and the auditor expressed an unqualified opinion, which reduces the risk of undetected material errors, though no control system removes inherent limitations.
- Executive compensation recovery rulesheadwind
Companies must analyse recovery of executive pay in case of financial restatements, and the clawback policy is attached as an exhibit, adding a compliance task.
- Mine safety transparencymixed
Incident reporting requirements add administrative burden but give investors standardised information on operational risks.
Competitive position
The source does not identify the company's competitors. The text mentions only the regulatory framework and listing venues, not comparisons with other producers.
Comparisons with other issuers would require competitor reports, which are not part of the source available for this profile.
- Not named in source
The source does not name competitors, so no verifiable list can be established.
- Not named in source
Without competitor data, margins or costs cannot be compared.
- Not named in source
The lack of competition information limits analysis of market position.
- Not named in source
A full profile would need reports from other mining companies.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)30 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)23 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)21 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)28 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)31 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)29 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)30 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)24 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)28 May 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)20 May 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 40-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Hudbay Minerals Inc. · 27 Mar 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.