From books

The writer should observe his characters without condemning them, leaving the verdict to the reader.

Anton Cehov · Scrisori · 1900 · lui Aleksei Suvorin, 18881 minute readpublic domain
The artist should not be the judge of his characters and their conversations, but merely an unprejudiced witness.Anton Cehov · Scrisori · 1900 · lui Aleksei Suvorin, 1888

The writer is a witness, not a judge: the verdict belongs to the reader.

Chekhov complained in his letters that the literature of his day moralized too heavily: the hero was good or wicked by design. He proposed something else — a witness who records a whole person, motives and weaknesses included, without labeling him. The mechanism is psychological: if the author tells you whom to despise, you comply and stop thinking; if you see only deeds and words, the judgment becomes yours. That is how characters like Dr. Ragin came into being.

Why it mattersIt serves anyone who writes, and anyone who listens to people: staying a witness before judging produces better understanding than quick condemnation.

MoralizingauthorImpartialwitnessReader judges
Spectrum from moralizing to witness: in the middle, the reader judges alone

Shelves

Back to the feed