olivlawolivlaw

olivLaw · European equity research

Oncopeptides AB ONCO.ST

Sweden · Nasdaq Stockholm · ISIN SE0009414576 · Vertical: Listed companies from Sweden

1.70SEK−1.39% · 1 dayClose 05 Nov 2026

Oncopeptides AB develops and commercialises Pepaxti, a peptide-linked medicine for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, built on its patented PDC platform. The company is still in the European commercial launch phase with large operating losses, which makes sales growth and financing the key points to watch.

At the close of 05 Nov 2026, Oncopeptides AB (ONCO.ST) stock was 1.70 SEK (−1.39% on the day), with market capitalisation 385.7 m SEK, beta 0.62, 52-week range 1.27–5.80 SEK.

Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: ESEF annual reports and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.

Market cap
385.7 m SEK
shares as of 31 Dec 2025
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
Diluted EPS TTM -1.10 · TTM to 31 Dec 2025
E/P (TTM)
-64.71%
TTM to 31 Dec 2025
Dividend yield
unavailable
Beta (2y)
0.62
Volatility (1y) 103%
52-week range
1.275.80

Price history

Loading chart…

Technical reading

RSI (14)
43.8
weak (30–45)
Bollinger (20, 2)
1.17 – 2.50
in the lower half of the band · %B 0.40 · band width 72.0%
SMA 50 / 200
1.93 / 1.80
mixed trend
MACD (12, 26, 9)
-0.09 / -0.09
MACD below signal

Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).

Performance

CompanyEURO STOXX 50vs EURO STOXX 50Vertical median
1 month−17.2%−0.6%−16.5 pp—
3 months+5.9%−4.2%+10.1 pp—
6 months+33.8%+4.3%+29.4 pp—
Year to date−64.6%+7.5%−72.1 pp—
1 year−66.1%+9.9%−76.0 pp−8.5%
3 years−76.9%+49.8%−126.8 pp+12.3%
5 years−65.0%+42.8%−107.8 pp—
Max drawdown (1y)
−78.2%
28 Nov 2025 → 08 May 2026
Max drawdown (5y)
−97.3%
16 Aug 2022 → 08 May 2026
Compound annual growth (5y)
−18.9%
EURO STOXX 50 +7.4%

Price returns, dividends excluded.

Quarterly results

ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).

E/P over time

E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.

Fiscal years

Fiscal year2022202320242025
Revenue8.4 m35.2 m31.6 m71.1 m
Revenue YoYunavailable+321.5%−10.1%+124.7%
Net income-338.0 m-249.1 m-284.6 m-249.6 m
Net income YoYunavailableunavailableunavailableunavailable
Diluted EPS-4.11-2.76-1.71-1.10
Diluted EPS YoYunavailableunavailableunavailableunavailable
net %-4,044.9%-707.3%-899.3%-350.9%
Free cash flow-423.0 m-279.6 m-260.9 m-222.9 m

Balance sheet & financial health

Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025

Cash
82.3 m SEK
Financial debt
126.7 m SEK
Net debt
44.4 m SEK
Equity
-58.9 m SEK
Total assets
135.4 m SEK
Debt / equity
unavailable
Current ratio
2.61x
ROE
unavailable
ROA
-131.5%
FCF margin
-313.4%

Financial statements (source on every figure)

Revenue and net income (SEK)

Margins

Income statement · SEK

Revenue
2023
35.2 m
2024
31.6 m
2025
71.1 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Cost of revenue
2023
-1.1 m
2024
2.7 m
2025
2.5 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Gross profit
2023
36.3 m
2024
29.0 m
2025
68.7 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Research & development
2023
106.9 m
2024
121.2 m
2025
103.0 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Operating income
2023
-253.4 m
2024
-283.5 m
2025
-224.7 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Interest expense
2023
5.8 m
2024
16.6 m
2025
32.7 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Pre-tax income
2023
-248.4 m
2024
-284.2 m
2025
-248.2 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Income tax
2023
664.0 k
2024
—
2025
—

esef· 09 Jul 2024verified

Net income
2023
-249.1 m
2024
-284.6 m
2025
-249.6 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Diluted EPS
2023
-2.76
2024
-1.71
2025
-1.10

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Balance sheet · SEK

Cash
2023
173.4 m
2024
178.5 m
2025
82.3 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Inventories
2023
2.4 m
2024
4.4 m
2025
8.2 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Current assets
2023
202.9 m
2024
217.1 m
2025
117.7 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Property, plant & equipment, net
2023
8.2 m
2024
6.1 m
2025
3.8 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Intangibles (excl. goodwill)
2023
0
2024
0
2025
0

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Total assets
2023
238.4 m
2024
244.2 m
2025
135.4 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Long-term debt
2023
106.5 m
2024
121.9 m
2025
126.7 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Current liabilities
2023
44.9 m
2024
51.4 m
2025
45.1 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Total liabilities
2023
181.6 m
2024
189.9 m
2025
194.3 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Equity
2023
56.8 m
2024
54.3 m
2025
-58.9 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Shares outstanding at year end
2023
90.3 m
2024
166.4 m
2025
226.9 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026derived

Cash flow · SEK

Operating cash flow
2023
-279.5 m
2024
-260.6 m
2025
-222.9 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Capex
2023
116.0 k
2024
357.0 k
2025
0

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Free cash flow
2023
-279.6 m ≈
2024
-260.9 m ≈
2025
-222.9 m ≈

esef· 28 Oct 2026derived

Investing cash flow
2023
-116.0 k
2024
496.0 k
2025
0

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Financing cash flow
2023
106.9 m
2024
263.8 m
2025
128.6 m

esef· 28 Oct 2026verified

Computed indicators

Growth

Revenue growth (YoY)
124.7%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Revenue CAGR 3Y
104.2%
computed by olivLawFY 2022 → FY 2025
Revenue CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income CAGR 3Y
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EPS growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
EPS CAGR 3Y
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
EPS CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
FCF growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive

Profitability

Gross margin
96.6%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
EBITDA margin
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT margin
-315.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Net margin
-350.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
FCF margin
-313.4%
computed by olivLawFY 2025

Returns

ROE
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
ROA
-131.5%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
ROIC
unavailable
equity is negative: buybacks shrink the invested capital and ROIC would come out large without meaning anything
ROCE
-248.7%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Payout ratio (EPS)
unavailable
input data missing
Payout ratio (FCF)
unavailable
input data missing

Balance sheet

Net debt
44.4 m SEK
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Net debt / EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
Debt / equity
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
Interest coverage
-6.9x
computed by olivLawFY 2025

Liquidity

Current ratio
2.6x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Quick ratio
2.4x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Cash ratio
1.8x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025

Cash

Operating cash flow
-222.9 m SEK
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Capital expenditure
0 SEK
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Free cash flow
-222.9 m SEK
computed by olivLawFY 2025
FCF conversion
unavailable
insufficient data
Cash conversion
unavailable
input data missing

Efficiency

Days sales outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Days inventory outstanding
939 days
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Days payables outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Cash conversion cycle
unavailable
input data missing

Market and valuation

Market capitalisation
385.7 m SEK
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Enterprise value
430.1 m SEK
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Market cap / net income TTM
unavailable
insufficient data
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
insufficient data
Earnings yield
-64.7%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
P/B
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
P/S
5.4x
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBIT
unavailable
insufficient data
EV/Sales
6.0x
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
P/FCF
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
FCF yield
-57.8%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Dividend yield
unavailable
no dividend in the structured statements; a missing line is not a confirmed zero
Shareholder yield (distributions)
unavailable
input data missing

1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.

Valuation

olivLaw classification

Insufficient data
What is missing
  • indicators available: 5 of at least 6
  • score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%
  • valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.

Closing price

1.70 SEK

05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series

Market cap: 385.7 m SEK

Key indicators

Market capitalisation
385.7 m SEK
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
insufficient data
P/B
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
ROE
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
Net margin
-350.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Revenue growth (YoY)
124.7%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Dividend yield
unavailable
no dividend in the structured statements; a missing line is not a confirmed zero

Coverage and freshness

26/37 reporting lines present
Latest full fiscal year: 2025
Latest reported period: 31 Dec 2025
Latest balance sheet date: 31 Dec 2025
Share count (cover of the latest filing), as of: 31 Dec 2025
Source: esefpublished 28 Oct 2026
verified 108derived 4

Score by group

33% · Insufficient data

Estimated value range

unavailable — no valuation assumptions for the reporting currency

Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.

Valuation methods

    Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)

    Risk-free rate
    6.5%
    Equity risk premium
    6.0%
    Beta (default)
    1.00
    Cost of equity
    12.5%
    Terminal growth
    3.0%

    Factor scorecard

    Insufficient data

    Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

    FactorValueScoreWeight used
    ROIC · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
    Net margin · Quality-350.9%3 (vs peers)19%
    FCF conversion · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
    Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth104.2%100 (on a fixed band)25%
    EPS CAGR 3Y · Growthunavailableunavailable—
    Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheetunavailableunavailable—
    Interest coverage · Balance sheet-6.9x0 (on a fixed band)19%
    Current ratio · Balance sheet2.6x100 (on a fixed band)13%
    P/E (TTM) · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
    EV/EBITDA · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
    FCF yield · Valuation-57.8%0 (on a fixed band)25%
    Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—
    Payout ratio (FCF) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—

    Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.

    Score groups

    • Balance sheet40/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
    • Growth· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
    • Quality· partial3/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
    • Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
    • Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value

    A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.

    Memo

    Oncopeptides AB (ONCO.ST). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.

    Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 71.1 m SEK in 2025; YoY growth 124.7%; net margin -350.9%.

    Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.

    Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).

    Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.

    What supports the thesis

    • Revenue CAGR 3Y: 104.2%
    • Current ratio: 2.6x

    What contradicts it

    • Net margin: -350.9%
    • Interest coverage: -6.9x
    • FCF yield: -57.8%

    Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).

    Versus the vertical median

    Listed companies from Sweden · same country · compared with 39 companies

    Multiples and returns vs the median

    P/E
    —
    vertical median 22.9x
    EV/EBITDA
    —
    vertical median 5.3x
    P/S
    5.4x
    vertical median 1.1x
    above median (+384.6%)
    P/B
    —
    vertical median 1.4x
    ROE
    —
    vertical median 7.4%
    Net margin
    -350.9%
    vertical median 4.3%
    below median (−8,264.1%)
    EBIT margin
    -315.9%
    vertical median 6.0%
    below median (−5,355.5%)
    Revenue YoY
    124.7%
    vertical median 1.3%
    above median (+9,233.5%)
    Net debt/EBITDA
    —
    vertical median 1.5x
    Dividend yield
    —
    vertical median 2.5%

    Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)

    Companies in the vertical

    Market capP/EROENet marginRevenue YoY1A / 3A
    ALFA.STAlfa Laval AB223.0 bn27.019.4%11.9%+4.1%+21% / +38%
    BOL.STBoliden Ab143.0 bn15.213.3%10.1%+4.8%+12% / +81%
    CAST.STCastellum Aktiebolag66.6 bn71.01.2%9.8%−2.6%+27% / +6%
    AAK.STAak Ab (publ)47.5 bn13.917.2%7.5%+2.2%−31% / −14%
    CAMX.STCamurus AB42.5 bn58.519.5%32.5%+21.3%+16% / +55%
    BRAV.STBravida Holding AB30.1 bn24.513.7%4.4%−4.9%+84% / +123%
    ASKER.STAsker Healthcare Group AB29.8 bn60.59.8%2.9%+11.7%−18% / unavailable
    ALLEI.STAlleima AB22.7 bn33.84.1%3.6%−5.4%+11% / +19%
    BURE.STBure Equity AB22.6 bn—-21.0%—unavailable+20% / +19%
    AQ.STAQ Group AB19.7 bn29.214.9%7.5%+6.0%+14% / +119%
    ALTRA.STAltra Fastigheter AB18.4 bn33.93.0%15.1%−2.2%+9% / +19%
    ATT.STAttendo AB (publ)16.8 bn20.715.1%4.3%+0.1%+34% / +223%
    AFRY.STAfry Ab14.9 bn18.76.2%3.1%−5.2%−17% / +4%
    ATRLJ-B.STAtrium Ljungberg AB14.0 bn17.12.9%23.9%−2.0%−33% / −44%
    ALIG.STAlimak Group AB (publ)12.7 bn21.38.2%8.8%−3.2%−18% / +50%
    ACAD.STAcadeMedia AB12.7 bn15.512.7%4.3%+9.7%+22% / +138%
    APOTEA.STApotea AB (publ)10.7 bn46.831.3%3.2%+10.1%+15% / unavailable
    BOOZT.STBoozt AB10.6 bn37.910.4%3.6%+0.5%+58% / +44%
    BUFAB.STBufab AB (publ)5.0 bn9.215.1%6.9%−7.4%+36% / +110%
    ACTI.STActive Biotech AB (publ)4.9 bn—-84.5%—unavailable−32% / −77%
    CEVI.STCellaVision AB4.7 bn30.818.0%20.2%+4.9%+20% / +12%
    COOR.STCoor Service Management Holding AB4.7 bn18.213.0%2.2%+16.7%+1% / +25%
    BHG.STBHG Group AB4.5 bn31.12.5%1.4%+6.2%−18% / +113%
    CARA.STCarasent AB (publ)1.8 bn51.74.1%10.1%+24.9%−8% / +87%
    BICO.STBICO Group AB1.7 bn—-46.0%-72.7%−13.3%+16% / −51%

    1- and 3-year price returns: for ONCO.ST from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.

    olivLaw engine forecast

    The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.

    The engine has no published run for this company yet.

    Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)

    Illustrative scenarios

    Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.

    Bear
    Allowed range: -50 … 50%
    Allowed range: -100 … 100%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100
    Allowed range: -10 … 20%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100%
    Base
    Allowed range: -50 … 50%
    Allowed range: -100 … 100%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100
    Allowed range: -10 … 20%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100%
    Bull
    Allowed range: -50 … 50%
    Allowed range: -100 … 100%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100
    Allowed range: -10 … 20%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100%
    Nothing is saved.

    Estimated price (SEK)

    Estimated priceBearBaseBull
    1 years
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    3 years
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    5 years
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    What moves the 3-year price the most

      AI analysis

      AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

      In brief

      Oncopeptides AB develops and commercialises Pepaxti, a peptide-linked medicine for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, built on its patented PDC platform. The company is still in the European commercial launch phase with large operating losses, which makes sales growth and financing the key points to watch.

      SWOT

      Strengths

      • Patented PDC platform that produces peptide-linked medicines with targeted release inside cancer cells.
      • Product approved in the European Union and the United Kingdom, giving the company a real commercial base.
      • Real-world evidence programmes, such as HARBOUR, that support the dialogue with prescribers.

      Weaknesses

      • Dependence on a single commercial product, which exposes the company to risks specific to that medicine.
      • Lack of in-house manufacturing capacity, which makes the company dependent on subcontractors.
      • Large operating losses, with a negative operating result for 2024.

      Opportunities

      • Wider reimbursement across more European countries could increase sales volume.
      • Broader acceptance of new data could encourage physicians to use the product earlier in treatment.
      • The OPDC3 candidate could widen the portfolio if its clinical results prove favourable.

      Threats

      • Price pressure from competitor patent expiries could reduce revenue.
      • The lingering negative perception after the US withdrawal could limit adoption in some markets.
      • Competition from companies with far greater resources could erode market share.

      Risks

      • Dependence on a single producthigh

        Revenue depends almost entirely on Pepaxti, so any delay or restriction in approval could seriously affect operations.

      • Shareholder dilutionmedium

        Options and share rights granted could reduce the stake of existing shareholders if fully exercised.

      • Reimbursement delayshigh

        Pricing and reimbursement procedures in each country can take a long time and could postpone revenue.

      • Dependence on subcontractorsmedium

        Disruptions at manufacturing or distribution suppliers could interrupt the supply of product.

      • Clinical study risksmedium

        Unfavourable results or slower studies for new candidates could reduce the value of the portfolio.

      Investment thesis

      What would need to be true (bull case)

      • If Pepaxti sales grow as reimbursement widens, the company could reach a revenue level that supports its operating costs.
      • If real-world data confirm clinical benefit, physicians could prescribe the product more often, strengthening its market position.
      • If OPDC3 produces positive results, the PDC platform could become a long-term growth driver.

      What would break the thesis

      • If reimbursement stays slow or prices fall, revenue could remain below expectations and losses could persist.
      • If the negative perception linked to earlier studies persists, adoption of the product could remain limited.
      • If financing is not secured in time, the company could be forced to scale back activity or issue new shares.

      What to watch

      • Pepaxti sales trends and reimbursement decisions in the main European countriesQ1 2027
      • Interim clinical results for the OPDC3 candidate2027
      • Financing needs and any new share issuesnext 10-K
      • Management commentary on guidance for the coming year and the status of the European launchQ1 2027

      Products, market & competition

      AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

      The business

      Oncopeptides is a Swedish biotechnology company listed on Nasdaq Stockholm under the ticker ONCO, focused on treatments for hard-to-treat cancers, mainly multiple myeloma. Its business rests on the patented PDC platform, which produces peptide-linked medicines that release cytotoxic agents rapidly inside cancer cells. The main commercial product is Pepaxti, approved in the European Union and EEA countries as well as the United Kingdom 1.

      The company has no manufacturing capacity of its own and relies on subcontractors for production, packaging, distribution and clinical studies. This model lowers fixed costs, but it makes subcontractor compliance with GMP and GCP standards essential for continuity of supply 1.

      Ownership and governance are concentrated: the largest shareholders, mainly venture capital funds, control a significant share of votes, and the company paid no dividend for 2024, preferring to reinvest in development 1.

      Segments

      Pepaxti (melphalan flufenamide)

      Pepaxti is the company's only commercial product, approved for adult patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least three prior lines of therapy and whose disease progressed after the last treatment, in combination with dexamethasone 1.

      PDC platform and pipeline candidates

      The PDC platform generates peptide-linked medicines; OPDC3 is the first candidate of the new generation and remains at an early clinical stage. Revenue from this segment depends on study results and future regulatory decisions, so it is uncertain in the short term 1.

      Market context

      The target market is multiple myeloma, a rare blood cancer where several classes of therapy already exist and where the inclusion of new medicines in national guidelines is slow. Market access depends on pricing, reimbursement and acceptance by physicians, which can delay revenue even after approval 1.

      Reimbursement procedures differ across European countries and can take a long time, and the company notes that patent expiries of competing immunomodulatory products could create price pressure if authorities consider Pepaxti similar to melphalan 1.

      Trends

      • Price pressure from patent expiriesheadwind

        Patent expiry for competing therapies could lower reference prices and might force the company to cut its price to keep reimbursement, which would reduce revenue 1.

      • Focus on real-world datatailwind

        Studies such as HARBOUR in Germany are used to generate data that support physician decisions and reimbursement access, which could accelerate adoption of the product 1.

      • Tighter European health-system scrutinymixed

        European authorities increasingly ask for evidence of relative therapeutic value, which can prolong price negotiations but may favour products with solid data 1.

      • Regulatory history from earlier studiesheadwind

        The US withdrawal and the safety warning linked to the OCEAN study continue to shape the views of prescribers and investors, which could limit adoption in some segments 1.

      Competitive position

      Oncopeptides competes with international pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, some with far greater financial, technical and distribution resources. Competition includes new therapies based on concepts different from peptide-linked medicines, which could attract physicians ahead of Pepaxti 1.

      Competitive risk is amplified because the large existing therapies for multiple myeloma already hold entrenched market shares. The company could lose ground if rivals develop products faster or achieve wider acceptance 1.

      • Large international pharmaceutical companies with multiple myeloma therapies

        Large companies with greater distribution and marketing resources, named in the source as principal competitors.

      • Developers of immunotherapies for cancer

        Companies developing new immunological therapies whose concepts could compete with the company's peptide platform.

      • Producers of combination therapies for multiple myeloma

        Companies offering competing treatment regimens for the same patient population.

      • Developers of new peptide-linked conjugates

        Companies working on similar technologies that could reach the market after the company's product.

      News & filings

      In the press

      No news in our archive over the last 180 days.

      Annual reports (ESEF)

      Sources

      1. [1] Annual report, fiscal year ended 2024-12-31 (ESEF) · SEC / Oncopeptides AB · 31 Dec 2024

      Figures computed by olivLaw from ESEF annual reports and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.