olivLaw · US equity research
MIND Technology, Inc. MIND
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical Sys · SIC 3812 · Vertical: Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical Sys (SIC 3812)
MIND Technology supplies technology to the oceanographic, hydrographic, seismic and maritime security industries through its Seamap unit, which designs and sells marine seismic equipment. The company faces weak demand: firm orders have shrunk sharply, and its after-market business of spare parts and service is supporting revenue. Revenue was 40.9 mn USD in fiscal 2026.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND) stock was 3.70 USD (−4.88% on the day), with market capitalisation 33.6 m USD, P/E 41.1 on diluted EPS of 0.09 USD over the last 12 months, beta 1.59, 52-week range 3.70–14.29 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2027): revenue of 5.6 m USD (−58.5% YoY), net income of -1.7 m USD (−189.9% YoY), diluted EPS -0.19 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 34.3
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 3.73 – 4.63
- below the lower band · %B -0.04 · band width 21.4%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 4.26 / 6.23
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.14 / -0.10
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −18.3% | −2.0% | −16.3 pp | — |
| 3 months | −29.9% | −2.2% | −27.8 pp | — |
| 6 months | −44.1% | +4.3% | −48.4 pp | — |
| Year to date | −57.9% | +10.6% | −68.5 pp | — |
| 1 year | −68.1% | +10.5% | −78.6 pp | +3.2% |
| 3 years | −18.9% | +73.7% | −92.5 pp | +78.7% |
| 5 years | −79.0% | +61.7% | −140.7 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2027 · 31 Jul 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 | Q3 '26 | Q4 '26 | Q1 '27 | Q2 '27 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 12.1 m | 15.0 m | 7.9 m | 13.6 m | 9.7 m | 9.8 m | 9.7 m | 5.6 m |
| Cost of revenue | 6.7 m | 8.5 m | 4.6 m | 6.7 m | 5.2 m | 5.8 m | 5.6 m | 3.5 m |
| Gross profit | 5.4 m | 6.6 m | 3.3 m | 6.8 m | 4.5 m | 4.0 m | 4.1 m | 2.1 m |
| Research & development | 562.0 k | 562.0 k | 380.0 k | 311.0 k | 506.0 k | 389.0 k | 310.0 k | 407.0 k |
| SG&A | 2.8 m | 3.0 m | 3.4 m | 3.6 m | 3.0 m | 3.3 m | 3.5 m | 3.3 m |
| Operating income | 1.9 m | 2.8 m | -658.0 k | 2.7 m | 774.0 k | 78.0 k | 14.0 k | -1.8 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 221.0 k | 220.0 k | 225.0 k | 217.0 k | 212.0 k | 219.0 k | 228.0 k | 224.0 k |
| Interest expense | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pre-tax income | 1.7 m | 2.7 m | -676.0 k | 2.6 m | 778.0 k | 200.0 k | 65.0 k | -1.7 m |
| Income tax | 396.0 k | 671.0 k | 294.0 k | 670.0 k | 716.0 k | 471.0 k | 476.0 k | 18.0 k |
| Net income | 1.3 m | 2.0 m | -970.0 k | 1.9 m | 62.0 k | -271.0 k | -411.0 k | -1.7 m |
| Diluted EPS | 2.87 | — | -120.00 | 0.24 | 0.01 | — | -50.00 | -0.19 |
| Operating cash flow | 2.3 m ≈ | 2.1 m | 4.1 m | -1.2 m ≈ | 894.0 k ≈ | -1.2 m | -1.3 m | -1.8 m ≈ |
| Capex | 67.0 k ≈ | 224.0 k | 237.0 k | 182.0 k ≈ | 93.0 k ≈ | 151.0 k | 48.0 k | 108.0 k ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 48.3 m | 42.9 m | 42.7 m | 21.2 m | 23.1 m | 25.0 m | 46.9 m | 40.9 m |
| Revenue YoY | +17.7% | −11.0% | −0.6% | −50.3% | +8.9% | +8.2% | unavailable | −12.6% |
| Net income | -21.1 m | -19.8 m | -11.3 m | -20.3 m | -15.1 m | -8.8 m | 5.1 m | 750.0 k |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | −85.2% |
| Diluted EPS | -1.82 | -1.78 | -1.10 | -1.80 | -1.31 | -0.92 | 4.32 | 0.09 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | −97.9% |
| net % | -43.6% | -46.2% | -26.4% | -95.7% | -65.3% | -35.3% | 10.8% | 1.8% |
| Free cash flow | 312.0 k | -6.3 m | -6.9 m | -6.5 m | -18.0 m | -3.5 m | 214.0 k | 1.9 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2026 · 31 Jan 2026
- Cash
- 19.1 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 41.4 m USD
- Total assets
- 49.3 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 6.03x
- ROE
- 2.2%
- ROA
- 1.7%
- FCF margin
- 4.7%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 42.7 m | 21.2 m | 23.1 m | 25.0 m | 46.9 m | 40.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 26.1 m | 13.9 m | 17.1 m | 22.1 m | 25.9 m | 22.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 13.0 m | 7.3 m | 6.0 m | 10.0 m | 21.0 m | 18.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Research & development | 1.9 m | 3.0 m | 3.6 m | 1.4 m | 1.9 m | 1.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| SG&A | 14.1 m | 12.6 m | 14.8 m | 12.9 m | 11.3 m | 13.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Operating income | -6.3 m | -14.3 m | -14.5 m | -5.7 m | 6.8 m | 2.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 2.5 m | 2.8 m | 2.2 m | 1.3 m | 944.0 k | 873.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| EBITDA | -3.8 m ≈ | -11.5 m ≈ | -12.3 m ≈ | -4.3 m ≈ | 7.8 m ≈ | 3.7 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026derived |
| Pre-tax income | -6.2 m | -13.5 m | -13.6 m | -5.4 m | 7.1 m | 2.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Income tax | 353.0 k | 536.0 k | -39.0 k | 699.0 k | 2.0 m | 2.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Net income | -11.3 m | -20.3 m | -15.1 m | -8.8 m | 5.1 m | 750.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -1.10 | -1.80 | -1.31 | -0.92 | 4.32 | 0.09 | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 12.1 m | 12.5 m | 13.8 m | 1.4 m | 4.1 m | 8.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 3.1 m | 4.6 m | 5.1 m | 778.0 k | 5.3 m | 19.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Receivables | 6.6 m | 4.7 m | 8.1 m | 3.2 m | 11.8 m | 12.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Inventories | 12.7 m | 11.5 m | 14.0 m | 11.0 m | 13.7 m | 11.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Current assets | 39.4 m | 26.8 m | 29.2 m | 22.2 m | 32.1 m | 44.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 5.4 m | 4.8 m | 4.3 m | 953.0 k | 890.0 k | 1.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 2.5 m | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2022verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 8.1 m | 6.8 m | 6.0 m | 3.6 m | 2.3 m | 1.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Total assets | 58.2 m | 39.8 m | 42.0 m | 32.9 m | 36.7 m | 49.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 1.8 m | 1.7 m | 2.0 m | 2.5 m | 2.6 m | 1.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 8.4 m | 7.8 m | 10.7 m | 8.9 m | 8.6 m | 7.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 10.6 m | 9.3 m | 11.8 m | 9.8 m | 9.4 m | 7.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Equity | 47.7 m † | 30.4 m † | 30.3 m † | 23.1 m † | 27.3 m † | 41.4 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -5.8 m | -6.4 m | -17.1 m | -2.9 m | 651.0 k | 2.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Capex | 1.0 m | 90.0 k | 834.0 k | 570.0 k | 437.0 k | 663.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -6.9 m ≈ | -6.5 m ≈ | -18.0 m ≈ | -3.5 m ≈ | 214.0 k ≈ | 1.9 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -2.1 m | 3.2 m | 5.4 m | 470.0 k | 20.0 k | -663.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 1.7 m | 4.5 m | 12.2 m | -1.9 m | -619.0 k | 11.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Share repurchases | — | 0 | 2.0 k | 1.0 k | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 01 May 2023verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 4 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 33.6 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
27% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the reported interest expense is far older than the latest period (the filer changed its XBRL tag): a stale figure is not used
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -6.8% | 25 (vs peers) | 23% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 17.9% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 31% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 6.9x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 15% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -11.5% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 31% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial100/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial25/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC (MIND). Latest full fiscal year: 2026; data up to 2026-07-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 40.9 m USD in 2026; YoY growth -12.6%; net margin -6.8%; ROE -6.8%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 17.9%
- Current ratio: 6.9x
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -6.8%
- FCF yield: -11.5%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical Sys (SIC 3812) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 8 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp | 78.2 bn | 17.4 | 26.1% | 10.4% | +2.2% | −4% / +16% |
| GRMNGarmin Ltd | 52.3 bn | 26.1 | 22.4% | 25.6% | +15.1% | +39% / +122% |
| LHXL3harris Technologies, Inc. | 51.7 bn | 25.9 | 10.3% | 5.2% | unavailable | −0% / +46% |
| TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc | 30.6 bn | 30.4 | 9.5% | 15.8% | +7.9% | +33% / +65% |
| DRSLeonardo DRS, Inc. | 9.5 bn | 26.1 | 13.2% | 9.4% | +12.8% | +4% / +93% |
| NNNextNav Inc. | 1.5 bn | — | -77.9% | -2,812.5% | −19.3% | −38% / +121% |
| LUNRIntuitive Machines, Inc. | 835.8 m | — | — | -26.6% | −7.9% | +5% / +248% |
| CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc. | 101.4 m | 20.3 | 8.4% | 17.6% | +30.7% | +2% / +52% |
| MINDMind Technology, Inc | 33.6 m | — | -6.8% | -6.8% | −12.6% | −68% / −19% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for MIND from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
MIND Technology supplies technology to the oceanographic, hydrographic, seismic and maritime security industries through its Seamap unit, which designs and sells marine seismic equipment. The company faces weak demand: firm orders have shrunk sharply, and its after-market business of spare parts and service is supporting revenue 123. Revenue was 40.9 mn USD in fiscal 2026 1.
SWOT
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Risks
- Customer concentrationhigh
A small number of customers generate most revenue, and losing one could seriously affect results 1.
- Order visibilityhigh
Firm backlog has fallen substantially, and visibility into fiscal 2027 is limited 2.
- International exposuremedium
Most revenue comes from abroad, exposing the company to currency swings, export restrictions and political instability 1.
- Single-source suppliermedium
A key material for solid streamers comes from one source, and a disruption could delay deliveries 1.
- Intellectual propertylow
Protection of proprietary technology relies on patents and contracts, and some countries offer weaker protection 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If demand for marine exploration and survey returns, orders could recover quickly and the after-market base could support the transition 3.
- With no debt and available cash, the company has flexibility for acquisitions or share repurchases 3.
- The expanded Huntsville facility and new products could add revenue in the coming years 2.
What to watch
- Development of Seamap backlog and new order intakeQ3 2027
- Gross margin and operating result after the second-quarter lossQ3 2027
- Resumption of large exploration projects and the path of the Middle East conflict2027
- Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA outlook for fiscal 2027 in the annual reportnext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
MIND Technology, Inc., headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas, was incorporated in 1987 and provides technology to the oceanographic, hydrographic, seismic and maritime security industries 1. The company operates in one segment, Seamap, which designs, manufactures and sells marine seismic equipment, with operations in the United States, Singapore, Malaysia and the United Kingdom 1. Customers include marine survey companies, seismic contractors, research institutes and operators of port facilities and offshore installations 1.
Segments
Seismic source and acquisition systems
Main products include the GunLink energy source controllers, the BuoyLink RGNSS positioning system and the SeaLink marine sensors and streamers, used in seismic surveys for energy and alternative energy projects 1.
Market context
Trends
- Geopolitical uncertainty and the Iran conflictheadwind
The ongoing conflict has disrupted customers, delayed payments and postponed projects, slowing orders 2. Management says the effects could be temporary if conditions stabilise 3.
- Renewed energy exploration demandtailwind
Customers have signalled a wish to move forward with sizable projects, and energy-security needs could support marine exploration activity over the longer term 3.
- Offshore wind and carbon capture projectstailwind
Applications for alternative energy projects such as offshore windfarms and carbon capture could widen the market for Seamap equipment 2.
- Lumpy delivery timingmixed
Revenue fluctuates from quarter to quarter because of delivery schedules, cancellations and production delays, which makes results hard to forecast 2.
Competitive position
The company competes with other manufacturers of marine seismic, hydrographic and oceanographic equipment, some of which have substantially greater financial resources 1. Competition is based on technical capability, reliability, price, delivery terms and service 1.
- Marine seismic equipment manufacturers
Direct competitors in seismic acquisition and streamer systems, some with greater financial resources 1.
- Hydrographic equipment manufacturers
Competitors in survey sounding and seabed mapping systems 1.
- Oceanographic equipment manufacturers
Competitors in sensors and instruments for marine research 1.
- Maritime security technology providers
Competitors in passive sonar and acoustic array technologies, a direction the company is exploring 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- War for the Mind: Narrative Intelligence, AI, and the Fight in the Cognitive DomainModern War Institute (West Point) · 04 Nov 2026 · EN
- Budget 2027 being prepared for second reading with IMF cooperation in mind: PM Koretskyi, lawmakers hold meetingUkrinform (UA, EN) · 03 Nov 2026 · EN
- ‘Music is the most powerful way of connecting to what’s happening’: can this album change your mind about the climate crisis?The Guardian — Environment · 03 Nov 2026 · EN
- 'I've had people eating cat food': Rising cost of living top of mind for US votersBBC World News · 01 Nov 2026 · EN
- Christa Pike makes first public comments since failed execution: ‘There is pain in my mind and in my soul’The Guardian World · 30 Oct 2026 · EN
- Christa Pike describes 'pain in my mind and in my soul' in first statement after failed executionEuronews — News (EN) · 30 Oct 2026 · EN
- With China in mind, Japan eyes more realistic joint military exercisesThe Japan Times · 30 Oct 2026 · EN
- Man who slashed landlord to death had taken almost 100 pills, was possibly of unsound mindCNA (Channel NewsAsia) · 29 Oct 2026 · EN
- Hochul says Trump rallies are ‘poisoning’ Nicki Minaj’s mindThe Hill · 29 Oct 2026 · EN
- How to Not Change Your MindForeign Policy · 28 Oct 2026 · EN
- Why do people self-harm? The mind-body divide might hold some cluesPhys.org · 28 Oct 2026 · EN
- Making ‘mind pictures’ takes mental effortNature · 27 Oct 2026 · EN
- China’s Overcapacity Has a Mind of Its OwnForeign Policy · 26 Oct 2026 · EN
- Trump: ‘I don’t mind AOC that much’The Hill · 26 Oct 2026 · EN
- Un șir de stâlpișori ține loc de trotuar în Constanța. Amenajarea, ironizată de un consilier USR: „Făcut pe low-budget și low-mind”Adevărul · 25 Oct 2026 · RO
- MIND C . T . I . ( NASDAQ : MNDO ) & Asana ( NYSE : ASAN ) Financial ComparisonSurge — GDELT DOC · 24 Oct 2026 · RO
- Meghan Markle sparks fury as critics blast she lost her mind over disgusting moveSurge — GDELT DOC · 23 Oct 2026 · RO
- These funds can juice your tax-free portfolio income. Just be sure to mind the riskCNBC — Top News · 22 Oct 2026 · EN
- With climate-resilient crops in mind, study tackles flaw in photosynthesisPhys.org · 22 Oct 2026 · EN
- Helen Haines has lost both legs after alleged attack but ‘her heart and mind are in good shape’, husband saysThe Guardian World · 21 Oct 2026 · EN
SEC filings
- Quarterly report09 Sept 2026
- Current report08 Sept 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report23 Jul 2026Shareholder vote
- Quarterly report11 Jun 2026
- Current report10 Jun 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement01 Jun 2026
- Annual report20 Apr 2026
- Current report15 Apr 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report11 Dec 2025
- Current report09 Dec 2025Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2026-01-31 · SEC / MIND Technology, Inc. · 20 Apr 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-07-31 · SEC / MIND Technology, Inc. · 09 Sept 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / MIND Technology, Inc. · 08 Sept 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.