olivLaw · US equity research
MIND C.T.I. Ltd. MNDO
Services-Computer Programming Services · SIC 7371 · Vertical: Services-Computer Programming Services (SIC 7371)
MIND C.T.I. Ltd. develops convergent billing and customer care software for telecom operators, plus enterprise messaging and UC analytics services. Total revenues fell 9.3% in 2025 to 19.4 million USD, and the company replaced its annual dividend with a share repurchase program.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, MIND C.T.I. Ltd. (MNDO) stock was 0.90 USD (+1.12% on the day), with market capitalisation 18.3 m USD, P/E 6.9 on diluted EPS of 0.13 USD over the last 12 months, dividend yield 24.44%, beta 0.25, 52-week range 0.87–1.26 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 42.1
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 0.86 – 0.96
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.38 · band width 10.5%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 0.97 / 1.05
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.03 / -0.03
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −8.2% | −1.1% | −7.1 pp | — |
| 3 months | −15.9% | −0.5% | −15.4 pp | — |
| 6 months | −10.9% | +4.4% | −15.3 pp | — |
| Year to date | −21.1% | +12.3% | −33.4 pp | — |
| 1 year | −15.1% | +13.5% | −28.6 pp | −42.9% |
| 3 years | −51.6% | +76.4% | −128.0 pp | −39.6% |
| 5 years | −72.2% | +63.7% | −135.9 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 0 percentile of its own 9-quarter history (min 7.8, median 9.0, max 10.7; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 18.1 m | 22.7 m | 23.4 m | 26.3 m | 21.6 m | 21.6 m | 21.4 m | 19.5 m |
| Revenue YoY | +0.4% | +25.0% | +3.1% | +12.7% | −18.2% | +0.3% | −0.8% | −9.3% |
| Net income | 5.1 m | 5.1 m | 5.4 m | 5.9 m | 5.3 m | 5.2 m | 4.6 m | 2.6 m |
| Net income YoY | −8.5% | −1.3% | +6.3% | +10.5% | −11.1% | −2.3% | −10.4% | −43.8% |
| Diluted EPS | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.13 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | −6.9% | −7.4% | +8.0% | +7.4% | −10.3% | −3.8% | −12.0% | −40.9% |
| net % | 28.3% | 22.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | 24.5% | 23.9% | 21.6% | 13.4% |
| Free cash flow | 4.4 m | 6.6 m | 6.4 m | 6.8 m | 4.4 m | 4.0 m | 4.1 m | 4.0 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 8.1 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 23.0 m USD
- Total assets
- 30.2 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 3.83x
- ROE
- 11.0%
- ROA
- 8.6%
- FCF margin
- 20.3%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 23.4 m | 26.3 m | 21.6 m | 21.6 m | 21.4 m | 19.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 11.2 m | 12.5 m | 10.0 m | 10.7 m | 10.7 m | 9.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 12.2 m | 13.9 m | 11.5 m | 10.9 m | 10.7 m | 9.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Research & development | 4.0 m | 4.0 m | 3.5 m | 3.5 m | 3.4 m | 4.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | 5.5 m | 6.8 m | 5.5 m | 4.7 m | 4.4 m | 2.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 200.0 k | 194.0 k | 193.0 k | 196.0 k | 186.0 k | 270.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | 5.7 m ≈ | 7.0 m ≈ | 5.7 m ≈ | 4.9 m ≈ | 4.6 m ≈ | 2.4 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 23.0 k | 49.0 k | 60.0 k | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Mar 2023verified |
| Pre-tax income | 5.8 m | 6.9 m | 5.6 m | 5.5 m | 5.0 m | 2.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 459.0 k | 936.0 k | 330.0 k | 359.0 k | 334.0 k | 163.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | 5.4 m | 5.9 m | 5.3 m | 5.2 m | 4.6 m | 2.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.13 | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 20.1 m | 20.3 m | 20.4 m | 20.5 m | 20.6 m | 20.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.22 | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 8.3 m | 4.2 m | 5.3 m | 3.0 m | 4.5 m | 8.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | — | — | 2.4 m | 2.3 m | 2.5 m | 1.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 19.7 m | 20.5 m | 20.3 m | 19.7 m | 18.9 m | 16.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 159.0 k | 175.0 k | 225.0 k | 216.0 k | 156.0 k | 126.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 8.1 m | 7.9 m | 7.8 m | 7.9 m | 7.7 m | 10.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 702.0 k | 522.0 k | 374.0 k | 266.0 k | 135.0 k | 1.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 32.4 m | 33.1 m | 31.7 m | 31.6 m | 30.7 m | 30.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | — | — | — | 989.0 k | 769.0 k | 546.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 5.6 m | 5.6 m | 5.2 m | 4.5 m | 3.3 m | 4.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 9.3 m | 9.4 m | 7.9 m | 7.1 m | 6.4 m | 7.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 23.1 m † | 23.7 m † | 23.8 m † | 24.5 m † | 24.3 m † | 23.0 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | 20.0 m | 20.1 m | 20.1 m | 20.1 m | 20.4 m | 20.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 6.5 m | 6.9 m | 4.6 m | 4.1 m | 4.1 m | 4.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 68.0 k | 82.0 k | 130.0 k | 64.0 k | 10.0 k | 27.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | 6.4 m ≈ | 6.8 m ≈ | 4.4 m ≈ | 4.0 m ≈ | 4.1 m ≈ | 4.0 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -34.0 k | -5.7 m | 1.8 m | -1.5 m | 2.3 m | 4.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -4.8 m | -5.2 m | -5.2 m | -4.8 m | -4.9 m | -4.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 4.8 m | 5.2 m | 5.2 m | 4.8 m | 4.9 m | 4.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
4 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 18.3 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
77% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the reported interest expense is far older than the latest period (the filer changed its XBRL tag): a stale figure is not used
- Peers: EV/Salesunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin · Quality | 51.0% | 27 (on a fixed band) | 14% |
| EBIT margin · Quality | 10.7% | 61 (vs peers) | 11% |
| FCF margin · Quality | 20.3% | 81 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -3.3% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 22% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) · Growth | -9.3% | 32 (vs peers) | 11% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 3.8x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 8% |
| EV/Sales · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | 21.6% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 17% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 24.6% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 6% |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Growth11/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Quality54/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Returns100/100 · 1/1 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
MIND CTI LTD (MNDO). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 19.5 m USD in 2025; YoY growth -9.3%; net margin 13.4%; ROE 11.0%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- FCF margin: 20.3%
- Current ratio: 3.8x
- FCF yield: 21.6%
- Shareholder yield (distributions): 24.6%
What contradicts it
- Gross margin: 51.0%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -3.3%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): Net debt / EBITDA, EV/Sales.
Versus the vertical median
Services-Computer Programming Services (SIC 7371) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 32 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFYInfosys Limited | 49.6 bn | 16.1 | 29.0% | 16.4% | +3.9% | −30% / −30% |
| ZSZscaler Inc | 36.6 bn | — | -2.9% | -1.9% | +25.4% | −11% / +14% |
| CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 29.4 bn | 12.0 | 17.4% | 11.8% | +7.0% | −15% / −7% |
| VRSNVerisign Inc | 28.5 bn | 33.6 | — | 49.1% | +6.4% | +26% / +50% |
| WITWipro Limited | 22.7 bn | 15.4 | 16.4% | 14.7% | −3.2% | −21% / −11% |
| EPAMEpam Systems, Inc. | 7.1 bn | 18.6 | 11.2% | 7.2% | +15.4% | −27% / −47% |
| DOCSDoximity, Inc. | 6.2 bn | 40.9 | 17.2% | 25.5% | +13.1% | −33% / +49% |
| DOXAmdocs Limited | 4.9 bn | 10.3 | 14.1% | 9.9% | +2.4% | −43% / −48% |
| RGTIRigetti Computing, Inc. | 3.7 bn | — | -43.8% | -1,787.4% | −34.3% | −56% / +958% |
| FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd. | 1.8 bn | 23.4 | 12.2% | 2.9% | +5.2% | −20% / +96% |
| MGRTMega Fortune Co Ltd | 1.6 bn | 698.9 | 21.1% | 16.1% | +233.3% | +1,864% / unavailable |
| PERIPerion Network Ltd. | 446.8 m | — | -1.1% | -1.8% | −11.7% | +12% / −59% |
| MFImF International Limited | 367.8 m | 36.4 | 3.9% | 232.8% | +29.4% | −68% / unavailable |
| IAInnovative Solutions And Support, Inc. | 353.7 m | 18.8 | 28.5% | 20.5% | +78.6% | +103% / +167% |
| GDEVGDEV Inc. | 176.1 m | 2.6 | — | 17.1% | −3.9% | −44% / −57% |
| ATGLAlpha Technology Group Ltd | 146.5 m | — | -184.7% | -952.0% | −40.2% | −61% / −39% |
| MLGOMicroAlgo Inc. | 135.7 m | 1.2 | 7.6% | 30.2% | −20.3% | −61% / −100% |
| MWCMicware Co., Ltd. | 82.0 m | 8.1 | 20.0% | 7.3% | unavailable | unavailable / unavailable |
| PDCPerpetuals.com Ltd | 74.9 m | — | -75.8% | -1,069.9% | −47.0% | −61% / −13% |
| CINTCI&T Inc | 73.8 m | 10.3 | 13.8% | 8.3% | +11.5% | −31% / −40% |
| CYCUCycurion, Inc. | 65.1 m | — | -76.7% | -98.0% | −14.8% | −91% / unavailable |
| XTIAXti Aerospace, Inc. | 37.7 m | — | — | -89.6% | +602.4% | −40% / −100% |
| MNDOMind Cti Ltd | 18.3 m | 6.9 | 11.0% | 13.4% | −9.3% | −15% / −52% |
| CHGAChange Agents Corporation | 17.8 m | — | -606.9% | -643.1% | +6.2% | −97% / −99% |
| RDNWRideNow Group, Inc. | 11.7 m | — | — | -0.8% | −10.5% | +7% / −9% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for MNDO from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 0.48 Total return -36% · Per year -36% | 0.86 Total return 9% · Per year 9% | 1.29 Total return 60% · Per year 60% |
| 3 years | 0.40 Total return -28% · Per year -10% | 0.80 Total return 29% · Per year 9% | 1.34 Total return 99% · Per year 26% |
| 5 years | 0.33 Total return -21% · Per year -5% | 0.75 Total return 47% · Per year 8% | 1.38 Total return 139% · Per year 19% |
- Exit P/E± 0.20
- Net margin± 0.14
- Annual revenue growth± 0.12
- Annual dilution± 0.01
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 18 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (06 Aug 2026), 6-K (24 Jun 2026), 6-K (26 May 2026), 6-K (11 May 2026), 6-K (31 Mar 2026).
In brief
MIND C.T.I. Ltd. develops convergent billing and customer care software for telecom operators, plus enterprise messaging and UC analytics services. Total revenues fell 9.3% in 2025 to 19.4 million USD 1, and the company replaced its annual dividend with a share repurchase program 1.
SWOT
Strengths
- A convergent billing platform installed for many operators worldwide and recognized for quality and reliability 1.
- A diversified revenue mix across billing, messaging and enterprise software, with services making up most of revenues 1.
- Development teams in Romania and Germany and a modular platform that allows relatively quick customization 1.
Weaknesses
- Revenues fell in 2025, and the company says it could not recruit new customers in 2024 or 2025 1.
- Reliance on a small number of large customers, one of which represents a significant share of revenues 1.
- The aurenz acquisition missed its objectives, and general and administrative and R&D expenses grew faster than revenues 1.
Opportunities
Risks
- Customer losses and price pressurehigh
The company says it could not attract new customers in 2024 or 2025, and competition and lower prices could reduce revenues and margins 1.
- Dependence on the telecom industryhigh
Its business depends largely on communications operators, which can cut budgets or merge, reducing demand 1.
- Customer concentrationmedium
One customer accounted for approximately 15% of total revenues in 2025, and the company expects to depend on a small number of changing customers 1.
- Acquisition and integration riskmedium
The aurenz integration missed its objectives, and future acquisitions could dilute shareholders or add debt 1.
- Cybersecurity and staffingmedium
Attacks on systems or loss of engineers in Romania could affect products and delivery capacity 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the new IoT and AI products gain traction, the company could renew its portfolio and offset the decline in billing 1.
- If acquisitions become profitable, revenue from enterprise software and UC analytics could grow substantially 1.
- Long-standing large customers could sustain a recurring revenue base, especially under the managed services model 1.
What would break the thesis
What to watch
- Trend in billing revenues and number of new customers wonQ1 2027
- aurenz results and achievement of performance objectives2027
- Progress of the share repurchase programnext 10-K
- Adoption of the IoT products and the AI chatbot2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 18 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (06 Aug 2026), 6-K (24 Jun 2026), 6-K (26 May 2026), 6-K (11 May 2026), 6-K (31 Mar 2026).
The business
Incorporated in Israel in 1995 and headquartered in Yoqneam, the company supplies convergent billing and customer care solutions for tier 2 and tier 3 service providers, including wireline, wireless, VoIP and MVNO operators 1. Its portfolio also includes PhonEX ONE, a system for telecom expense management and call accounting 1. Since 2019, through Message Mobile and GTX, MIND offers enterprise and wholesale messaging, and in January 2025 it acquired aurenz, a German UC analytics and call accounting provider 1. Development and support are concentrated in Iasi and Suceava, Romania 1.
Revenue comes from licenses, implementation fees, maintenance and monthly managed services for billing software, while messaging revenue depends on messages delivered 1. Services made up 96% of revenues and licenses 4% in 2025 1.
The company changed its capital return policy: annual dividends, which until 2025 were roughly the prior year's EBITDA, were discontinued in favor of a share repurchase program 1.
Segments
Billing and customer care
The billing segment generated 50% of total revenues in 2025, about 12.6 million USD 1. Revenues declined because of shrinking telecom markets and the loss of some customers 1.
Market context
The company operates in fragmented, highly competitive markets where larger rivals have more resources and name recognition 1. Its core segment depends on the communications industry, where consolidation and telcos shifting budgets toward 5G have reduced demand for billing systems 1. Europe accounted for 58.7% of revenues in 2025 and the Americas for 34.4% 1.
The company notes that artificial intelligence can let competitors replicate product capabilities quickly, which could put pressure on pricing and margins 1.
Trends
- Telecom operator consolidationheadwind
Consolidation in telecom has cost the company long-term customers, and it expects revenues and profitability may not hold in the near term 1.
- Artificial intelligencemixed
AI could open new products such as the chatbot integrated into billing, but it can also reduce differentiation and pressure prices if competitors use it more effectively 1.
- Operator 5G investmentheadwind
Operators have cut investment in billing platforms to prioritize 5G infrastructure, which limits demand for new projects 1.
- Acquisitions and integrationmixed
The aurenz acquisition added revenue but did not meet its 2025 performance objectives, showing integration risk 1. The company says it is actively evaluating other acquisitions 1.
Competitive position
Competition in billing software is intense, and larger competitors can offer bundled products or lower prices 1. Some rivals have lower cost structures and compete on price, and alliances among them could increase competitive pressure 1.
In enterprise software the main competitors are local companies, and the company points to rapid deployment, its convergent platform and long experience as advantages 1.
- Large billing and communications software vendors
The filing refers to competitors with greater financial resources and name recognition but does not name them 1.
- Lower-priced billing vendors
Competitors with lower cost structures that compete on price, not named in the source 1.
- Local enterprise software companies
The main competitors in enterprise software according to the source 1.
- Global messaging and CPaaS providers
Competition comes from messaging platforms and from apps that no longer rely on third-party messaging solutions, per the source 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)06 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)24 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)26 May 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)11 May 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)31 Mar 2026
- Annual report (foreign issuer)18 Mar 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)10 Mar 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)12 Nov 2025
- Current report (foreign issuer)11 Aug 2025
- Current report (foreign issuer)06 May 2025
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / MIND C.T.I. Ltd. · 18 Mar 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.