olivLaw · US equity research
TDH Holdings, Inc. PETZ
Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others) · SIC 6531 · Vertical: Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others) (SIC 6531)
TDH Holdings, Inc. is a holding company whose operations are now focused on acquiring, leasing and managing commercial properties for small and medium-sized business tenants. After exiting pet food production and its restaurant segment, revenue now depends almost entirely on commercial rents, and the company reported an operating loss in 2025.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 05 Nov 2026, TDH Holdings, Inc. (PETZ) stock was 1.20 USD (−3.23% on the day), with market capitalisation 12.4 m USD, P/E 7.1 on diluted EPS of 0.17 USD over the last 12 months, beta 0.18, 52-week range 0.81–1.70 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 43.6
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 1.19 – 1.30
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.12 · band width 9.0%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 1.30 / 1.20
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.02 / -0.02
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −7.7% | −5.9% | −1.7 pp | — |
| 3 months | −21.6% | −4.6% | −16.9 pp | — |
| 6 months | +23.7% | +0.2% | +23.5 pp | — |
| Year to date | +31.9% | +7.4% | +24.4 pp | — |
| 1 year | +13.2% | +8.2% | +5.0 pp | −36.0% |
| 3 years | −11.8% | +68.4% | −80.2 pp | −18.1% |
| 5 years | −98.5% | +56.5% | −155.0 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 50 percentile of its own 4-quarter history (min 4.8, median 10.4, max 11,280.0; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | ⚠ 2020 | 2021 | ⚠ 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 23.7 m | 12.6 m | 622.8 k | 1.1 m | 24.7 k | 754 | 563.7 k | 1.3 m |
| Revenue YoY | −18.3% | −46.6% | — | +73.6% | — | −97.0% | +74,664.7% | +122.0% |
| Net income | -14.2 m | -8.6 m | -874.7 k | -6.1 m | 803.7 k | -23.6 m | 2.7 m | 1.8 m |
| Net income YoY | −12,452.6% | unavailable | — | unavailable | — | −3,039.7% | unavailable | −33.0% |
| Diluted EPS | -1.49 | -0.41 | -0.38 | -1.17 | 0.10 | -2.29 | 0.26 | 0.17 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | −15,000.0% | unavailable | — | unavailable | — | −2,390.0% | unavailable | −34.6% |
| net % | -60.1% | -68.2% | -140.4% | -566.1% | 3,250.4% | -3,133,444.6% | 476.2% | 143.8% |
| Free cash flow | -7.8 m | -5.7 m | -2.2 m | unavailable | unavailable | -572.1 k | -2.1 m | -2.0 m |
The series breaks before 2020, 2022: earlier years come from the original reports of the issuer of that time, later years from a subsequent filing that restated the perimeter (a separation, discontinued operations). The year-on-year change across the break is not shown.
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 19.1 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 30.7 m USD
- Total assets
- 40.3 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 5.08x
- ROE
- 6.2%
- ROA
- 4.9%
- FCF margin
- -161.8%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 622.8 k | 1.1 m | 24.7 k | 754 | 563.7 k | 1.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 449.7 k | 770.0 k | 105.6 k | 976 | 325.3 k | 1.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 173.1 k | 311.1 k | -80.8 k | -222 | 238.4 k | -11.7 k | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Operating income | -496.2 k | -3.7 m | -3.0 m | -6.2 m | -1.8 m | -1.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 72.3 k | 466.7 k | 17.1 k | 22.6 k | 111.6 k | 221.2 k | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| EBITDA | -423.9 k ≈ | -3.2 m ≈ | -3.0 m ≈ | -6.2 m ≈ | -1.7 m ≈ | -1.6 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 1.2 m | 14.5 k | -43.1 k | 14.3 k | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2024verified |
| Pre-tax income | 1.7 m | -4.1 m | 1.1 m | -8.4 m | 1.9 m | 1.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Income tax | -900 | — | — | — | 182 | — | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Apr 2025verified |
| Net income | -874.7 k | -6.1 m | 803.7 k | -23.6 m | 2.7 m | 1.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -0.38 | -1.17 | 0.10 | -2.29 | 0.26 | 0.17 | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 2.3 m | 5.2 m | 8.0 m | 10.3 m | 10.3 m | 10.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 6.6 m | 18.0 m | 20.0 m | 13.1 m | 15.7 m | 19.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Receivables | 168.5 k | 36.8 k | 29.3 k | 5.0 k | 5.7 k | 75.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Inventories | 247.2 k | 51.4 k | 987 | — | 5.7 k | 75.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Current assets | 10.5 m | 31.1 m | 33.8 m | 27.2 m | 28.8 m | 34.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 6.6 m | 781.7 k | 698.0 k | 657.1 k | 2.4 m | 2.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 1.0 m | 653.1 k | 481.8 k | 426.3 k | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2024verified |
| Total assets | 18.5 m | 32.0 m | 36.5 m | 28.9 m | 33.3 m | 40.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 3.2 m | 506.9 k | 491.9 k | 66.0 k | 122.3 k | 90.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 19.1 m | 19.7 m | 14.7 m | 3.4 m | 4.2 m | 6.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 19.3 m | 24.5 m | 15.4 m | 3.9 m | 5.9 m | 9.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Equity | -892.8 k | 13.4 m | 21.2 m | 25.0 m | 27.4 m | 30.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | — | — | — | 10.3 m | 10.3 m | 10.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -2.2 m | -3.3 m | -2.1 m | -564.4 k | -234.0 k | -1.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Capex | 47.1 k | — | — | 7.7 k | 1.9 m | 244.1 k | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -2.2 m ≈ | — | — | -572.1 k ≈ | -2.1 m ≈ | -2.0 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | 3.4 m | -1.6 m | -1.3 m | -6.1 m | 2.8 m | 6.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -1.1 m | 18.0 m | 6.1 m | -6.8 k | — | -1.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Apr 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Market and valuation
9 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 5 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 52.2% of at least 60%
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 12.4 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
52% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 3.19 – 6.88 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- Net asset value (NAV)unavailable · input data missing
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
- Peers: P/B3.19 – 6.88 (Mid 5.83)10 companies used · median multiple 2.0x · quartiles 1.1x – 2.3xAGNT, COMP, DOUG, FTHM, JLL, LHAI, MMI, OPAD, OPEN, VAC
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 52.2% of at least 60%
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE · Quality | 6.2% | 77 (vs peers) | 13% |
| EBITDA margin · Quality | -128.6% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 17% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 269.9% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 17% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| P/B · Valuation | 0.4x | 91 (vs peers) | 38% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 7.1x | 83 (vs peers) | 17% |
| Dividend yield · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (EPS) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Growth100/100 · 1/1 factors with a value
- Quality33/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation89/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
TDH Holdings, Inc. (PETZ). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 1.3 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 122.0%; net margin 143.8%; ROE 6.2%.
The estimated value range is 3.19–6.88 USD per share (median of 1 methods, agreement: single method); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 5.83 USD, the price of 1.20 USD leaves a potential of 385.6% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of 79.4% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 52.2% of at least 60%).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- ROE: 6.2%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 269.9%
- P/B: 0.4x
- P/E (TTM): 7.1x
- The price is below the estimated value range
What contradicts it
- EBITDA margin: -128.6%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, Dividend yield, Payout ratio (EPS).
Versus the vertical median
Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others) (SIC 6531) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 14 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JLLJones Lang LaSalle Incorporated | 17.1 bn | 16.2 | 14.7% | 3.9% | +11.4% | +15% / +141% |
| COMPCompass, Inc. | 7.0 bn | 166.1 | 3.6% | 0.6% | +23.7% | −12% / +315% |
| VACMarriott Vacations Worldwide Corp | 3.7 bn | — | -10.9% | -4.7% | +1.3% | +96% / +47% |
| OPENOpendoor Technologies Inc. | 1.7 bn | — | -235.1% | -49.1% | −15.2% | −77% / −41% |
| MMIMarcus & Millichap, Inc. | 1.1 bn | 76.9 | 2.4% | 1.8% | +8.5% | −2% / −17% |
| AGNTAgnt, Inc. | 644.0 m | — | -9.9% | -0.5% | +4.5% | −66% / −68% |
| OMHOhmyhome Limited | 297.2 m | — | -164.6% | -75.2% | +19.5% | −69% / −85% |
| DOUGDouglas Elliman Inc. | 142.7 m | 5.3 | 16.3% | 2.5% | +3.8% | −41% / −19% |
| LHAILinkhome Holdings Inc. | 15.5 m | — | -5.6% | -1.4% | +175.7% | −92% / unavailable |
| PETZTDH Holdings, Inc. | 12.4 m | 7.1 | 6.2% | 143.8% | +122.0% | +13% / −12% |
| OPADOfferpad Solutions Inc. | 11.7 m | — | -116.9% | -11.3% | −38.2% | +18% / −78% |
| FTHMFathom Holdings Inc. | 5.2 m | — | -79.0% | -6.3% | +25.4% | −88% / −94% |
| LRHCStratum Holdings Corp. | 1.4 m | — | — | -46.4% | +16.7% | −100% / unavailable |
| BEKEKE Holdings Inc. | — | 156.8 | 4.4% | 3.2% | +5.6% | +9% / +18% |
| NMRKNewmark Group, Inc. | — | 16.9 | 10.9% | 4.1% | +20.3% | −31% / +45% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for PETZ from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 0.80 Total return -33% · Per year -33% | 1.42 Total return 18% · Per year 18% | 2.12 Total return 77% · Per year 77% |
| 3 years | 0.95 Total return -21% · Per year -7% | 1.87 Total return 56% · Per year 16% | 3.06 Total return 155% · Per year 37% |
| 5 years | 1.13 Total return -6% · Per year -1% | 2.47 Total return 106% · Per year 16% | 4.40 Total return 267% · Per year 30% |
- Exit P/E± 0.47
- Net margin± 0.33
- Annual revenue growth± 0.24
- Annual dilution± 0.03
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 20 Apr 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (07 Oct 2026).
In brief
TDH Holdings, Inc. is a holding company whose operations are now focused on acquiring, leasing and managing commercial properties for small and medium-sized business tenants. After exiting pet food production and its restaurant segment, revenue now depends almost entirely on commercial rents, and the company reported an operating loss in 2025 1.
SWOT
Strengths
Weaknesses
- The main segment posted an operating loss in 2025, and the company has not yet shown recurring profit from its core activity 1.
- Revenue is small relative to administrative costs, including costs allocated from British Virgin Islands affiliates 1.
- The company depends on key executives and holds no key-man life insurance, so losing them could severely affect the business 1.
Opportunities
- Demand from small and medium-sized enterprises for commercial space could open opportunities to acquire and lease additional properties 1.
- If the company acquires and leases income-producing properties, it could expand its rental revenue base 1.
- The company could benefit from long-term property appreciation if the Missouri and Beijing markets keep their momentum 1.
Threats
- Intense competition from large property groups could push rents down or force costly concessions to keep tenants 1.
- Tenant bankruptcy or insolvency could lead to lost revenue and difficulty recovering amounts owed 1.
- PRC regulation and government control could restrict operations or access to US capital markets 1.
Risks
- Recurring operating losseshigh
The company has incurred losses in the past and it is uncertain whether it will avoid them, especially if it cannot expand its income-producing property portfolio 1.
- Tenant dependence and bankruptcyhigh
Most tenants are individuals or small businesses, and their insolvency could reduce rental collections and make recovery of amounts owed difficult 1.
- Geographic concentrationmedium
Properties are concentrated in Missouri and Beijing, so a local economic downturn could affect the company more than a diversified portfolio would 1.
- PRC regulatory riskhigh
PRC authorities may impose new rules, and missing approvals could lead to suspension of operations or restrictions on securities offerings 1.
- Dividend and fund transfer restrictionsmedium
The company relies on dividends from PRC subsidiaries, which are limited by statutory reserves and currency controls, potentially hindering fund transfers to the parent 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If demand from small and medium-sized enterprises for commercial space stays strong, rental revenue could keep growing, as management expects 1.
- With a single focused business model, the company could reduce costs and improve efficiency after exiting pet food production and restaurants 1.
- If acquired properties hold their value and generate steady rent, the company could earn appreciation gains and recurring long-term revenue 1.
What would break the thesis
- The company reported an operating loss in 2025, and if this persists the business could remain unprofitable 1.
- Competition from large property groups could pressure rents downward, and the company may need costly incentives to retain tenants 1.
- The company's history of exiting several business lines could suggest difficulty sustaining a stable long-term strategy 1.
What to watch
- Trend in commercial leasing revenue and operating result of the segmentFiscal 2026
- Ability to acquire and lease new income-producing properties2026
- Changes in PRC regulation and any restrictions on listing or access to US marketsNext annual report
- Occupancy and rent collection rates across the Missouri and Beijing portfolioQ1 2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 20 Apr 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (07 Oct 2026).
The business
TDH Holdings, Inc. was founded in 2002 in Qingdao as a pet food producer, an activity later halted after operational difficulties and court proceedings 1. Between 2021 and 2024 the company also ran a restaurant segment, which it discontinued in the second quarter of 2024 1. The company now concentrates on acquiring, leasing and managing commercial properties that generate rental income from commercial clients 1. It describes itself as a British Virgin Islands holding company with operations conducted through subsidiaries in Missouri, Nevada, the PRC, Belgium and Hong Kong 1.
Financially, revenue from continuing operations rose from 0.56 million USD in 2024 to 1.25 million USD in 2025, driven by commercial property leasing 1. The company expects revenue from its commercial leasing business to continue growing in the near term, but the segment posted an operating loss of approximately 1.82 million USD in 2025, partly due to administrative expenses allocated from British Virgin Islands affiliates 1. Net income for 2024 was approximately 2.68 million USD, though part of it came from investment income 1.
The legal structure is complex: the company has no operations of its own and relies on dividends and other distributions from subsidiaries, including PRC entities, where dividend payments and currency conversion are restricted 1. The company has not paid cash dividends and has no present plan to do so, intending to retain funds for business growth 1.
Segments
Commercial property leasing
This is the only active segment at the reporting date, generating rental revenue under lease agreements with commercial clients. Revenue was 1.25 million USD in 2025, compared with 0.56 million USD in 2024 1. Costs include lease and occupancy costs, depreciation and amortization, and agency service costs 1.
Restaurants (discontinued)
The restaurant segment, acquired in 2021, contributed food service revenue in 2022 to 2024, but was discontinued in the second quarter of 2024 because of high costs 1. It is no longer part of continuing operations.
Market context
The company operates in the commercial property leasing market in Missouri, United States, and Beijing, China, where its portfolio is concentrated 1. The source notes growing demand for commercial space from small and medium-sized enterprises, alongside intense competition among developers, owners and operators of real estate 1.
Economic conditions and competitive pressure in commercial real estate can affect occupancy and rent levels, and the source names large companies such as Dobe Group and Shanghai Golden Union Business Management as owners of numerous properties in China 1.
Trends
- Rising demand for commercial space from SMEstailwind
The company argues that demand from small and medium-sized enterprises provides stable rental income and property appreciation, which could support segment growth if that demand holds 1.
- Weak economic conditionsheadwind
The company said a difficult economic climate and intense competition weighed on its leasing segment in 2025, and a further slowdown could reduce occupancy 1.
- Shifting consumer behaviourmixed
Changes in consumer preferences and discretionary spending can affect tenants and demand for commercial space, which the source flags explicitly 1.
- PRC regulation and government controlheadwind
PRC authorities may change rules or impose additional requirements, which could affect operations and the offering of securities to foreign investors 1.
Competitive position
The company competes with numerous developers, owners and operators of real estate, many owning similar properties in the same submarkets 1. The source names Dobe Group and Shanghai Golden Union Business Management as large competitors with numerous properties across China 1.
Competition is based on property choice, quality, affordability and location, and offering space at rents below the company's current levels could lead to loss of existing or prospective tenants 1.
- Dobe Group
Company owning numerous properties in China, identified in the source as a large competitor in commercial real estate 1.
- Shanghai Golden Union Business Management
Company owning numerous properties in China and named as an important competitor in commercial leasing 1.
- Regional developers and operators
Smaller regional competitors offering space in the same submarkets, which can influence rent levels 1.
- Other commercial property owners in Beijing and Missouri
Owners offering similar space in the markets where the company operates, which can affect occupancy 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)07 Oct 2026
- Annual report (foreign issuer)20 Apr 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)17 Apr 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)09 Apr 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)18 Mar 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)12 Mar 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)13 Nov 2025
- Current report (foreign issuer)30 Oct 2025
- Current report (foreign issuer)26 Sept 2025
- Annual report (foreign issuer)28 Apr 2025
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / TDH Holdings, Inc. · 20 Apr 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.