olivLaw · US equity research
Planet Green Holdings Corp. PLAG
Canned, Frozen & Preservd Fruit, Veg & Food Specialties · SIC 2030 · Vertical: Food products (SIC 203x)
Planet Green Holdings is a Nevada holding company with operations in China and Canada, active in fermented dark tea, online advertising and, until recently, chemical fuels. The company is in deep transition, with revenues falling in 2025 and a major net loss, but with strong growth in tea sales in the first half of 2026. The going concern situation nevertheless remains marked by significant uncertainty.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG) stock was 0.37 USD (−0.35% on the day), with market capitalisation 5.2 m USD, beta 0.18, 52-week range 0.34–5.81 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 790.2 k USD (+25,146.1% YoY), net income of -906.2 k USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 32.8
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 0.23 – 0.77
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.25 · band width 107.4%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 0.62 / 1.55
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.09 / -0.09
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −50.8% | −1.1% | −49.7 pp | — |
| 3 months | −37.5% | −0.5% | −37.1 pp | — |
| 6 months | −82.3% | +4.4% | −86.7 pp | — |
| Year to date | −83.2% | +12.3% | −95.5 pp | — |
| 1 year | −78.9% | +13.5% | −92.5 pp | −4.2% |
| 3 years | −93.2% | +76.4% | −169.6 pp | −32.4% |
| 5 years | −97.3% | +63.7% | −160.9 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.5 m | 938.6 k | 840.3 k | 3.1 k | 771.6 k | 521.7 k | 6.4 m | 790.2 k |
| Cost of revenue | 1.4 m | 830.5 k | 785.5 k | 1.7 k | 743.3 k | 512.4 k | 442.4 k | 733.4 k |
| Gross profit | 95.9 k | 108.1 k | 54.9 k | 1.5 k | 28.3 k | 9.2 k | 1.5 m | -703.3 k |
| Research & development | 13.9 k | 13.7 k | 16.3 k | 20.1 k | 17.4 k | 16.3 k | 12.4 k | 836 |
| Operating income | -405.2 k | -882.7 k | -621.5 k | -295.2 k | -3.4 m | -13.1 m | 554.3 k | -1.2 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 527.2 k ≈ | — | 217.1 k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest expense | 20.5 k | 23.6 k | 22.5 k | 2.2 k | 48.5 k | 47.4 k | 49.1 k | 303 |
| Pre-tax income | -329.2 k | -970.4 k | -644.7 k | -302.7 k | -3.4 m | -13.1 m | 502.9 k | -1.2 m |
| Income tax | — | — | — | — | 11.3 k | 9 | — | 8.8 k |
| Net income | -1.2 m | -3.3 m | -796.9 k | -773.6 k | -12.1 m | -13.3 m | 311.9 k | -906.2 k |
| Diluted EPS | -0.16 ≈ | -0.46 ≈ | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating cash flow | 948.0 k ≈ | 377.0 k | -345.3 k | -1.7 m ≈ | 697.5 k ≈ | -457.1 k | 4.6 m | -5.1 m ≈ |
| Capex | 52 ≈ | -6.4 k | 2.5 k | 7 ≈ | 11 ≈ | 2.4 k | — | — |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | ⚠ 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | ⚠ 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 6.8 m | 1.1 m | 3.6 m | 37.8 m | 44.8 m | 17.7 m | 4.7 m | 3.0 m |
| Revenue YoY | +33.6% | — | +228.9% | +937.9% | +18.5% | — | −73.4% | −35.2% |
| Net income | 16.8 m | 2.9 m | -11.1 m | -10.0 m | -25.8 m | -20.8 m | -7.3 m | -27.0 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | — | −475.0% | unavailable | unavailable | — | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | 6.91 | -0.81 | -1.09 | -0.39 | -0.43 | -0.29 | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | — | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | — | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | 246.5% | 266.4% | -303.7% | -26.5% | -57.7% | -118.0% | -156.2% | -887.2% |
| Free cash flow | -14.6 m | -6.0 m | -4.2 m | -1.9 m | unavailable | -5.3 m | 810.6 k | -1.8 m |
The series breaks before 2019, 2023: earlier years come from the original reports of the issuer of that time, later years from a subsequent filing that restated the perimeter (a separation, discontinued operations). The year-on-year change across the break is not shown.
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 15.8 k USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- -2.2 m USD
- Total assets
- 11.3 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 0.58x
- ROE
- unavailable
- ROA
- -146.8%
- FCF margin
- -58.9%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3.6 m | 37.8 m | 44.8 m | 17.7 m | 4.7 m | 3.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 2.4 m | 33.9 m | 40.4 m | 16.1 m | 4.1 m | 2.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 1.3 m | 3.8 m | 4.4 m | 1.6 m | 554.6 k | 100.9 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Research & development | — | 808.4 k | 402.7 k | 54.9 k | 57.1 k | 70.2 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | -2.8 m | -6.2 m | -5.3 m | -6.6 m | -2.6 m | -17.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | — | 2.2 m | 1.3 m | 1.8 m | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 01 Apr 2024verified |
| EBITDA | — | -4.0 m ≈ | -4.0 m ≈ | -4.7 m ≈ | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 11 Apr 2025derived |
| Interest expense | 23.4 k | 283.7 k | 633.8 k | 10.7 k | 70.5 k | 155.5 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -11.2 m | -9.9 m | -15.3 m | -18.2 m | -2.6 m | -17.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | — | 56.5 k | 1.5 m | 35.3 k | — | 11.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -11.1 m | -10.0 m | -25.8 m | -20.8 m | -7.3 m | -27.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -1.09 | -0.39 | -0.43 | -0.29 | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 01 Apr 2024verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 10.1 m | 24.8 m | 59.5 m | 7.3 m | 7.3 m | 8.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 3.4 m | 750.7 k | 93.5 k | 270.3 k | 48.4 k | 15.8 k | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2026verified |
| Receivables | 835.4 k | 3.8 m | 3.0 m | 3.0 m | 56.3 k | 134.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2026verified |
| Inventories | 2.3 m | 7.8 m | 4.2 m | 1.4 m | 851.7 k | 599.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2026verified |
| Current assets | 13.5 m | 27.3 m | 13.8 m | 22.4 m | 14.9 m | 7.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 4.6 m | 23.0 m | 22.6 m | 12.3 m | 5.0 m | 4.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 2.3 m | 18.2 m | 4.7 m | 4.7 m | 4.7 m | 7.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 1.5 m | 4.2 m | 3.1 m | 980.0 k | 819.1 k | 709.2 k | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2026verified |
| Total assets | 22.0 m | 86.0 m | 60.7 m | 42.6 m | 25.4 m | 11.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 1.3 m | 6.2 m | 3.5 m | 3.0 m | 1.9 m | 1.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | — | 3.8 m | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2022verified |
| Long-term debt | 31.4 k | 380.3 k | 287.2 k | 3.8 m | 411.0 k | — | SEC (XBRL)· 11 Apr 2025verified |
| Current liabilities | 3.6 m | 34.4 m | 19.6 m | 23.2 m | 13.3 m | 13.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 3.7 m | 34.8 m | 20.1 m | 23.2 m | 13.7 m | 13.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2026verified |
| Equity | 18.3 m | 51.3 m | 40.6 m | 19.4 m | 11.7 m | -2.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -3.5 m | -519.4 k | -9.0 m | -5.3 m | 811.8 k | -1.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 695.5 k | 1.4 m | — | 26.4 k | 1.2 k | 4.8 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -4.2 m ≈ | -1.9 m ≈ | — | -5.3 m ≈ | 810.6 k ≈ | -1.8 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -852.8 k | -11.8 m | -3.9 m | 2.5 m | 190 | -4.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 238.4 k | 8.9 m | 10.8 m | 2.9 m | -837.6 k | 1.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 5 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 5.2 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
33% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -308.0% | 0 (vs peers) | 19% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -59.2% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 25% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -117.2x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 19% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.3x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 13% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -4.6% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 25% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet0/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial0/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
PLANET GREEN HOLDINGS CORP. (PLAG). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 3.0 m USD in 2025; YoY growth -35.2%; net margin -308.0%; ROE -706.0%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -308.0%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -59.2%
- Interest coverage: -117.2x
- Current ratio: 0.3x
- FCF yield: -4.6%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Food products (SIC 203x) · same industry group (3-digit SIC) · compared with 7 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KHCKraft Heinz Co | 30.1 bn | — | -9.0% | -14.0% | −3.5% | −0% / −28% |
| SJMJ M SMUCKER Co | 14.1 bn | 61.6 | 3.9% | 2.5% | +3.7% | +27% / +21% |
| LWLamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 7.8 bn | 30.8 | 14.2% | 3.8% | +2.5% | −4% / −43% |
| MZTIThe Marzetti Company | 3.1 bn | 17.7 | 16.8% | 9.1% | +1.1% | −33% / −32% |
| BRFHBarfresh Food Group Inc. | 8.8 m | — | -364.2% | -17.9% | +32.6% | −83% / −61% |
| PLAGPlanet Green Holdings Corp. | 5.2 m | — | -706.0% | -308.0% | −35.2% | −79% / −93% |
| FAMIFarmmi, Inc. | 538.9 k | — | -36.1% | -189.8% | −56.4% | −94% / −99% |
| SENEASeneca Foods Corporation | — | — | 12.2% | 5.6% | +8.2% | +21% / +200% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for PLAG from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Planet Green Holdings is a Nevada holding company with operations in China and Canada, active in fermented dark tea, online advertising and, until recently, chemical fuels. The company is in deep transition, with revenues falling in 2025 and a major net loss, but with strong growth in tea sales in the first half of 2026 12. The going concern situation nevertheless remains marked by significant uncertainty 12.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company has an integrated tea production process, from sourcing to distribution, with quality control at critical stages 1.
- Proprietary techniques for reshaping tea bricks offer a convenience advantage without sacrificing authenticity 1.
- The network of sales agents allows distribution to expand with modest fixed costs in regions without a direct presence 12.
Weaknesses
- Large net losses and high general and administrative expenses in 2025 point to a cost structure that is hard to sustain without revenue growth 1.
- Gross margins turned negative in the second quarter of 2026 because of promotion costs, indicating dependence on marketing spend 2.
- There is significant uncertainty about going concern, with a working capital deficit and debt high relative to assets 1.
Opportunities
- Integrating recent acquisitions and expanding the enterprise sales channel could support tea revenue growth 2.
- Demand for small formats and gifts could open new market segments for existing products 1.
- If margins stabilise, reducing reliance on promotion costs could improve results over the medium term 2.
Threats
- Chinese rules on overseas listings and oversight of China-based companies could limit access to capital 1.
- Fragmented competition and low entry barriers can pressure prices and reduce profitability 1.
- Currency restrictions on moving funds out of China could limit the use of cash for operations outside the country 2.
Risks
- Going concernhigh
Auditors and management flag major uncertainty about the company's ability to continue operating, with funding dependent on private placements and related parties 1.
- Liquidity and debthigh
The debt-to-assets ratio rose sharply in 2025 and available liquidity is limited, which could force the company to seek alternative financing on unfavourable terms 1.
- Chinese regulationhigh
Rapid changes in Chinese policy on overseas listings and data security could affect operations or the value of the shares 1.
- Margins under pressuremedium
High promotion costs led to negative gross margins in the second quarter of 2026, and sustaining sales could require continued spending 2.
- Currency restrictionsmedium
Moving funds from China to the US holding company is subject to foreign exchange procedures, which could limit dividends and funding of foreign operations 12.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If tea sales from the second quarter of 2026 are maintained and promotion costs fall, the company could show solid revenue growth and a recovery in margins.
- Integrating Hubei Shengsili and expanding the agent network could build a broader distribution position in the tea segment.
- Disposing of the chemical business could simplify the structure and focus resources on tea and advertising.
What would break the thesis
- If losses and liquidity pressure continue, the company could remain dependent on additional financing on costly terms.
- Revenue growth in 2026 relies largely on heavy promotion spending, which could leave sales unprofitable.
- Chinese regulation and currency restrictions could limit the company's ability to use and transfer cash from China.
What to watch
- Trend in gross margin and promotion costs in teaQ3 2026
- Cash movements and financing supporting going concernnext 10-K
- Contribution of online advertising to revenue after new acquisitions2027
- Effect of Chinese regulation on listing and operations2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
Planet Green Holdings Corp. is headquartered in Flushing, New York, and is a Nevada holding company operating through subsidiaries in China and Canada 1. According to its reports, its activities include consumer products, chemical products and online advertising 1. In 2026, the main operations are the production and distribution of black and green tea and online advertising services, carried out through Xianning Bozhuang, Hubei Shengsili and Fast Approach Inc 2.
Segments
Tea products
The main segment is the production of dark tea, especially compressed brick tea known as Qingzhuan, with processing, controlled fermentation and distribution through direct sales, third-party distributors and sales agents 1. In the first half of 2026, tea sales rose substantially after the acquisition of Hubei Shengsili, but were accompanied by high promotion costs 2.
Market context
The Chinese tea market is highly competitive and fragmented, especially in the dark tea segment, with many regional producers and no dominant national leader 1. E-commerce and networks of sales agents have become increasingly important channels for reaching the market 12. Demand for smaller formats, gifts and convenient products is a factor shaping competition 1.
Trends
- Expansion of the distribution networkmixed
The company expanded sales through commissioned agents, which drove rapid revenue growth but also high promotion costs that eroded margins 12.
- Demand for convenient productstailwind
Miniature formats and easy-to-brew products respond to modern consumer preferences, which could support sales if margins stabilise 1.
- Chinese regulationheadwind
Chinese authorities can change rules on overseas listings and data security quickly, which could affect the company if enforcement extends to it 1.
- Fragmented competitionheadwind
Entry barriers are relatively low in local markets, which keeps pressure on prices and margins 1.
Competitive position
The company competes with established producers and brands in Hubei, Hunan, Guangxi and Yunnan, many with long histories and recognised origins, as well as small local processors and family workshops 1. Larger competitors have advantages of scale in sourcing, vertical integration and distribution 1. Planet Green differentiates through proprietary techniques for reshaping tea bricks that improve ease of use 1.
In advertising and fuels, competition is also intense, with pressure on prices and on project profitability 1. The lack of a dominant position in any niche limits the company's pricing power 1.
- Regional tea producers in Hubei and Hunan
Traditional producers with recognised origin and well-established distribution networks 1.
- Tea brands in Yunnan and Guangxi
Competitors with long experience in fermented tea, scale advantages and strong brands 1.
- Local processors and family workshops
Small players competing on flexible pricing and direct customer relationships 1.
- Online tea sellers
A competitive sales channel that can attract customers with prices and fast offers 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report20 Oct 2026Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report02 Oct 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement28 Sept 2026
- Current report21 Aug 2026Termination of a material agreement
- Quarterly report14 Aug 2026
- Current report13 Aug 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report21 Jul 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report14 Jul 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report17 Jun 2026Acquisition or disposition of assets · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report28 May 2026Departure or appointment of officers
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Planet Green Holdings Corp. · 31 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Planet Green Holdings Corp. · 14 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Planet Green Holdings Corp. · 21 Nov 2011
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.