olivLaw · US equity research
NuScale Power Corporation SMR
Fabricated Plate Work (Boiler Shops) · SIC 3443 · Vertical: Fabricated metal products (SIC 344x)
NuScale Power develops small modular reactors (SMRs) based on light water technology, with a 77 MWe module, and is the only SMR company with an NRC-certified design in the United States. Its relevance is rising amid demand for carbon-free baseload power for data centers and the Romanian project, where operating losses remain high while liquidity stays solid.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) stock was 5.13 USD (−4.47% on the day), with market capitalisation 1.2 bn USD, beta 3.06, 52-week range 5.13–37.91 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 75.0 k USD (−99.1% YoY), net income of -47.5 m USD, diluted EPS -0.13 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 30.7
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 4.64 – 7.06
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.20 · band width 41.3%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 7.66 / 10.69
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.65 / -0.71
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −33.2% | −1.1% | −32.1 pp | — |
| 3 months | −45.3% | −0.5% | −44.9 pp | — |
| 6 months | −62.1% | +4.4% | −66.4 pp | — |
| Year to date | −63.8% | +12.3% | −76.1 pp | — |
| 1 year | −85.6% | +13.5% | −99.1 pp | +5.0% |
| 3 years | +48.7% | +76.4% | −27.7 pp | +83.6% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 475.0 k | 34.2 m | 13.4 m | 8.1 m | 8.2 m | 1.8 m | 565.0 k | 75.0 k |
| Cost of revenue | 295.0 k | 3.1 m | 6.4 m | 6.3 m | 5.5 m | 1.9 m | 544.0 k | 227.0 k |
| Gross profit | 180.0 k | 31.2 m | 7.0 m | 1.8 m | 2.7 m | -61.0 k | 21.0 k | -152.0 k |
| Research & development | 12.2 m | 9.4 m | 9.1 m | 11.8 m | 11.1 m | 13.5 m | 12.8 m | 18.4 m |
| Operating income | -41.0 m | -11.9 m | -35.3 m | -43.1 m | -538.4 m | -72.7 m | -57.5 m | -64.0 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | — | — | 313.0 k | 305.0 k ≈ | 293.0 k ≈ | — | 309.0 k | 334.0 k ≈ |
| Pre-tax income | -45.5 m | -178.4 m | -30.1 m | -37.6 m | -532.6 m | -63.8 m | -46.7 m | -50.1 m |
| Income tax | 12.0 k | 1.9 m | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net income | -17.5 m | -75.0 m | -14.0 m | -17.6 m | -273.3 m | -50.8 m | -44.0 m | -47.5 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.18 | -0.69 ≈ | -0.11 | -0.13 | -1.85 | — | -0.14 | -0.13 |
| Operating cash flow | -12.7 m ≈ | -26.4 m | -22.8 m | -33.3 m ≈ | -199.8 m ≈ | -203.7 m | -314.7 m | -58.2 m ≈ |
| Capex | 0 ≈ | 44.0 k | 67.0 k | -67.0 k ≈ | 141.0 k ≈ | 367.0 k | 1.5 m | 431.0 k ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 600.0 k | 2.9 m | 11.8 m | 22.8 m | 37.0 m | 31.5 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +377.0% | +312.4% | +93.2% | +62.4% | −15.0% |
| Net income | -88.4 m | -102.5 m | -25.9 m | -58.4 m | -136.6 m | -355.8 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.51 | -0.80 | -1.47 | -2.17 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | -14,731.2% | -3,581.2% | -219.5% | -255.9% | -368.8% | -1,130.3% |
| Free cash flow | -50.8 m | -101.1 m | -150.9 m | -185.0 m | -108.7 m | -460.1 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 836.4 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 1.1 bn USD
- Total assets
- 1.4 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 4.30x
- ROE
- -45.4%
- ROA
- -36.4%
- FCF margin
- -1,461.7%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 600.0 k | 2.9 m | 11.8 m | 22.8 m | 37.0 m | 31.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 355.0 k | 1.8 m | 7.3 m | 19.0 m | 4.9 m | 20.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 245.0 k | 1.1 m | 4.5 m | 3.8 m | 32.1 m | 11.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Research & development | 95.3 m | 94.4 m | 127.7 m | 156.1 m | 46.8 m | 45.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Operating income | -158.8 m | -174.3 m | -230.0 m | -275.6 m | -138.7 m | -689.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -88.4 m | -102.5 m | -141.6 m | -180.1 m | -346.5 m | -664.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Income tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 m | 322.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Net income | -88.4 m | -102.5 m | -25.9 m | -58.4 m | -136.6 m | -355.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.51 | -0.80 | -1.47 | -2.17 | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 0 | 0 | 50.8 m | 73.4 m | 93.2 m | 163.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 1.9 m | 77.1 m | 217.7 m | 120.3 m | 401.6 m | 836.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Receivables | — | 4.8 m | 11.2 m | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2023verified |
| Current assets | 2.1 m | 86.1 m | 284.4 m | 154.5 m | 471.1 m | 1.3 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | — | 5.0 m | 4.8 m | 4.1 m | 2.4 m | 1.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Goodwill | — | 8.3 m | 8.3 m | 8.3 m | 8.3 m | 8.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | — | 1.2 m | 1.1 m | 882.0 k | 704.0 k | 527.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Total assets | 234.4 m | 121.2 m | 348.6 m | 224.9 m | 544.7 m | 1.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 0 | 305.0 k | 28.0 m | 44.9 m | 47.9 m | 286.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 49.9 k | 48.4 m | 38.6 m | 87.5 m | 89.7 m | 296.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 41.8 m | 52.8 m | 71.5 m | 95.5 m | 91.6 m | 299.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Equity | -39.6 m † | 66.3 m | 277.1 m | 129.3 m | 453.1 m | 1.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -47.2 m | -99.2 m | -148.6 m | -183.3 m | -108.7 m | -459.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Capex | 3.5 m | 2.0 m | 2.3 m | 1.7 m | 44.0 k | 508.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -50.8 m ≈ | -101.1 m ≈ | -150.9 m ≈ | -185.0 m ≈ | -108.7 m ≈ | -460.1 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -3.5 m | -2.0 m | -52.3 m | 48.3 m | -39.8 m | -411.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 38.5 m | 173.3 m | 368.1 m | 16.1 m | 429.8 m | 1.3 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Feb 2026verified |
| Share repurchases | 49.0 k | 17.0 k | 566.0 k | 0 | 0 | — | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2025verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 4 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 1.2 bn USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
27% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -3,888.7% | 0 (vs peers) | 23% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 38.7% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 31% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 37.9x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 15% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -64.1% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 31% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial100/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
NUSCALE POWER Corp (SMR). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 31.5 m USD in 2025; YoY growth -15.0%; net margin -3,888.7%; ROE -30.2%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 38.7%
- Current ratio: 37.9x
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -3,888.7%
- FCF yield: -64.1%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Fabricated metal products (SIC 344x) · same industry group (3-digit SIC) · compared with 9 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMIValmont Industries, Inc. | 8.1 bn | 15.9 | 30.8% | 12.1% | +0.7% | +2% / +92% |
| ACAArcosa, Inc. | 7.3 bn | 14.9 | 17.9% | 17.9% | +12.2% | +46% / +116% |
| GFFGriffon Corporation | 4.9 bn | 27.4 | 185.4% | 6.5% | −3.9% | +43% / +131% |
| PRLBProto Labs, Inc. | 1.6 bn | 46.6 | 5.1% | 6.0% | +6.4% | +31% / +84% |
| SMRNUSCALE POWER Corp | 1.2 bn | — | -30.2% | -3,888.7% | −15.0% | −86% / +49% |
| JBIJanus International Group, Inc. | 682.2 m | 20.7 | 6.0% | 3.7% | unavailable | −19% / −53% |
| IMSRTerrestrial Energy Inc. | 304.0 m | — | -36.8% | — | unavailable | −70% / unavailable |
| VATEInnovate Corp. | 74.1 m | — | — | -1.5% | +12.5% | +5% / −49% |
| TPCSTechprecision Corp | 53.6 m | — | -15.4% | -3.7% | −7.0% | +17% / −12% |
| MTENMingteng International Corporation Inc. | 8.4 m | — | -11.7% | -15.3% | +15.3% | −100% / unavailable |
1- and 3-year price returns: for SMR from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
NuScale Power develops small modular reactors (SMRs) based on light water technology, with a 77 MWe module, and is the only SMR company with an NRC-certified design in the United States. Its relevance is rising amid demand for carbon-free baseload power for data centers and the Romanian project, where operating losses remain high while liquidity stays solid 13.
SWOT
Strengths
- The design holds NRC certification and is the only SMR technology with such approval, which lowers regulatory risk for US customers 1.
- Strong liquidity allows the company to fund development activities without immediate financing pressure 3.
- The supplier network and executed agreements support readiness of the supply chain for future projects 3.
Weaknesses
- The company records significant operating losses and has not yet reached profitability, which could limit financial flexibility 12.
- Revenue is volatile and depends on a small number of contracts, including those with RoPower and ENTRA1 12.
- Obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement and partner arrangements could reduce resources available to shareholders 1.
Opportunities
Risks
- Dependence on a small number of contractshigh
Revenue and outlook depend on agreements with ENTRA1, TVA and RoPower, and failure to sign them could affect the growth plan.
- Persistent operating losseshigh
The company records large losses and could need additional funding if revenue is delayed.
- Financing delays for the Romanian projectmedium
The pre-EPC phase depends on securing financing, which could postpone the Doicesti project schedule.
- Tax Receivable Agreement obligationsmedium
The agreement may require substantial payments, and an accelerated payment could exceed actual tax benefits.
- Supply chain and executionlow
Limited suppliers and manufacturing delays could affect delivery of NPM modules.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- NRC-certified design and solid liquidity could allow the company to be first to capture demand for baseload nuclear power.
- If the TVA agreement becomes binding, the project could become an important reference for nuclear expansion in the United States.
- A supplier network of more than sixty partners could shorten delivery times for future projects.
What would break the thesis
- Large operating losses and the lack of recurring revenue could force the company to fund development with new capital.
- If contracts with TVA or RoPower do not materialize, the growth plan could be postponed significantly.
- Tax Receivable Agreement obligations and regulatory risks could reduce resources available to shareholders.
What to watch
- Signing of a binding power purchase agreement with TVA2026
- Securing financing and starting the pre-EPC phase for Doicesti2026
- Trend in operating losses and R&D spendingQ3 2026
- ENTRA1 progress in negotiating projects with data center customersnext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
NuScale aims to commercialize modular small nuclear plants based on the Light Water Nuclear Reactor NuScale Power Module, a unit that can generate 77 MWe and can scale from one to twelve modules on one site 1. The company argues that its passive design, with natural circulation and no coolant pumps, simplifies the system and reduces capital and operating costs 1. So far revenue has come from engineering and licensing fees, and over the longer term the company expects revenue from NPM sales and from services over each plant's life 1.
Segments
NPM module sales
The company expects a significant share of revenue to come from selling NPM modules to governments, utilities and industrial or technology companies 1. To date this activity has not produced significant revenue, and firm contracts are still under negotiation 12.
Services and licensing
Planned services include licensing support, testing, training, fuel supply and program management, which could generate recurring revenue from about five years before commercial operation 1. Licensing revenue, such as from the RoPower technology agreement, has so far played an important role in revenue 1.
Market context
Demand for carbon-free baseload power is being driven by data center and artificial intelligence growth, and US policy and recent executive action aim to expand nuclear capacity 12. The NRC approved in May 2025 the six-module 77 MWe design, allowing US customers to use an expedited licensing route 1. However, capturing this demand depends on signing firm contracts, which had not been concluded as of the sources 23.
Trends
- Rising electricity demand from data centerstailwind
Growing power use by data centers and AI could support demand for baseload nuclear power, which has a high capacity factor 12.
- Policy support for nuclear energytailwind
The May 2025 executive order and the goal of expanding nuclear capacity support rapid deployment of advanced technologies, but execution still depends on approvals and financing 12.
- Delays in contracting projectsheadwind
The Doicesti project awaits financing before pre-EPC work, and the TVA agreement is still non-binding, which could postpone expected revenue 23.
- Rising development and administrative costsmixed
Research and administrative expenses rose in 2026 as the company expands commercial activity, which could increase losses until revenue is contracted 2.
Competitive position
The analyzed sources do not detail direct competitors, but the company cites other nuclear reactor technologies and fossil or other carbon-free generators as competitive pressures 13. Other SMR designs, such as fast neutron or molten salt reactors, could compete for the same contracts, although water-cooled designs are considered lower technological risk 1.
- Other light water reactor developers
The company refers to competition from other nuclear technologies without naming specific firms in the sources 1.
- Fast neutron and molten salt reactor developers
These SMR technologies are cited as alternatives, but the sources name no specific firms 1.
- Coal and natural gas power producers
The sources mention fossil fuels as competing baseload sources without naming companies 1.
- Wind and solar power producers
Intermittent renewables compete for carbon-free demand, though they do not provide firm baseload power 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Nuclearelectrica cere angajamente ferme de la NuScale pentru proiectul SMR de la Doiceşti. Directorul general, Mihai Gioară: Avem datoria să ne asigurăm că riscurile nu sunt suportate disproporţionat de partea românăZiarul Financiar · 29 Oct 2026 · RO
- Nuclearelectrica cere angajamente ferme de la NuScale pentru proiectul SMR de la Doicești. Mihai Gioară: Avem datoria să ne asigurăm că riscurile nu sunt suportate disproporționat de partea românăMediafax · 29 Oct 2026 · RO
- Doosan Enerbility wins SMR supply deal from US firm NuScale PowerKorea Times — Business · 29 Oct 2026 · EN
- Doosan Enerbility wins SMR supply deal from U.S. firm NuScale PowerYonhap News (KR, EN) · 29 Oct 2026 · EN
- Program de guvernare Niculescu - Au dispărut SMR-urile dorite de americanii NuScale la Doicești, prezente la Tomac, Veștea și Mureșan. România va propune proiecte în 2027Profit.ro · 16 Oct 2026 · RO
- SMR-urile de la Doicești: Americanii de la NuScale nu au îndeplinit peste 80% din condiții și au ieșit din negocieri – Nuclearelectrica vrea să caute alte tehnologii americaneCursDeGuvernare.ro · 11 Oct 2026 · RO
- SMR-urile de la Doicești: Americanii de la NuScale nu au îndeplinit peste 80% din condiții și au ieșit din negocieri - Nuclearelectrica vrea să caute alte tehnologii americane - Curs De GuvernareCursDeGuvernare.ro · 11 Oct 2026 · RO
- Americanii de la NuScale au refuzat condițiile României pentru mini-reactoarele de la Doicești și propun opțiuni pe acțiuni în loc de garanțiiLibertatea.ro · 10 Oct 2026 · RO
- Cristian Bușoi: Peste 80% dintre condițiile pentru proiectul SMR de la Doicești nu sunt îndeplinite. Nuclearelectrica cere măsuri privind NuScaleEconomedia · 10 Oct 2026 · RO
- Scandalul SMR-urilor de la Doiceşti intră într-o nouă etapă: Nuclearelectrica spune că 80% din condiţiile deciziei finale de investiţie nu sunt îndeplinite şi că partenerul american NuScale „a încetat a mai da curs acestor discuţii”Ziarul Financiar · 09 Oct 2026 · RO
- Fondul lui George Soros a ieşit complet din acţionariatul NuScale, compania americană care ar urma să furnizeze reactoarele modulare mici de la Doiceşti, proiect aflat în centrul scandalului de la NuclearelectricaZiarul Financiar · 02 Oct 2026 · RO
- ″UN MOMENT ISTORIC: Tocmai am aprobat prima autorizație de construire a unui reactor modular mic comercial din SUA". GE Vernova-Hitachi le-a ″luat fața″ celor de la NuScale, care vor SMR-uri și în România, la DoiceștiProfit.ro · 30 Sept 2026 · RO
- Oklo Climbs 5% as Nuclear Names Bounce Back From Last Week’s Selloff; NuScale Power Gains 4%, Uranium Energy Rises 3%Yahoo Finance — News · 21 Sept 2026 · EN
- NuScale Power Just Solved a Major Engineering Hurdle: Is the Stock a Buy?Yahoo Finance — News · 16 Sept 2026 · EN
- Not Oklo. Not NuScale. This Nuclear Stock Is Going to Be the Biggest Winner of the AI Power Boom.Yahoo Finance — News · 14 Sept 2026 · EN
- If You're Still Holding NuScale, Here's 1 Catalyst That Might Make You SellYahoo Finance — News · 14 Sept 2026 · EN
- Oklo vs. NuScale vs. TMC: 3 Speculative Bets, Ranked By Which One Pays Off First.Yahoo Finance — News · 13 Sept 2026 · EN
- Prediction: NuScale Power Stock Doesn't Get Halfway Back to Its Old High Before 2029Yahoo Finance — News · 13 Sept 2026 · EN
- Is NuScale Power a Millionaire Maker?Yahoo Finance — News · 12 Sept 2026 · EN
- NuScale Power Stock Jumps 15% in 1 Day. Here's How Nuclear Energy Investors Should Respond.Yahoo Finance — News · 12 Sept 2026 · EN
SEC filings
- Current report11 Aug 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report05 Aug 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report05 Aug 2026
- Current report02 Jun 2026Shareholder vote
- Quarterly report07 May 2026
- Current report07 May 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement15 Apr 2026
- Current report08 Apr 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report26 Feb 2026Material agreement · Termination of a material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Annual report26 Feb 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / NuScale Power Corporation · 26 Feb 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / NuScale Power Corporation · 05 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / NuScale Power Corporation · 05 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.