olivLaw · US equity research
Bloomia Holdings, Inc. TULP
Agricultural Production-Crops · SIC 0100 · Vertical: Agricultural Production-Crops (SIC 0100)
Bloomia Holdings, trading on Nasdaq as TULP, produces and sells fresh cut tulips grown hydroponically in U.S. greenhouses from bulbs sourced mainly from the Netherlands. The company is under pressure as bulb costs rose and production waste weighed on margins, while a debt restructuring cut its total debt to 21.7 million USD at June 30, 2026.
At the close of 03 Nov 2026, Bloomia Holdings, Inc. (TULP) stock was 2.25 USD (−0.44% on the day), with market capitalisation 10.9 m USD, dividend yield 217.78%, beta 0.21, 52-week range 2.11–5.25 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q4 2026): revenue of 21.8 m USD (+223.5% YoY), net income of -5.3 m USD, diluted EPS -1.11 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 36.8
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 1.99 – 2.74
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.35 · band width 31.8%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 2.91 / 3.62
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.19 / -0.22
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −16.7% | −1.1% | −15.6 pp | — |
| 3 months | −34.8% | −0.5% | −34.3 pp | — |
| 6 months | −43.2% | +4.4% | −47.6 pp | — |
| Year to date | −34.8% | +12.3% | −47.1 pp | — |
| 1 year | −49.8% | +13.5% | −63.3 pp | −24.3% |
| 3 years | −56.0% | +76.4% | −132.4 pp | −25.1% |
| 5 years | −69.6% | +63.7% | −133.3 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q4 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q1 '24 | Q2 '24 | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q3 '26 | Q4 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 8.0 m | 16.8 m | 6.6 m | 6.2 m | 5.2 m | 6.7 m | 14.4 m | 21.8 m |
| Cost of revenue | 6.3 m | 12.8 m | 5.2 m | 6.8 m | 5.2 m | 6.3 m | 11.6 m | 17.2 m |
| Gross profit | 1.7 m | 4.0 m | 1.4 m | -582.0 k | -60.0 k | 484.0 k | 2.9 m | 4.6 m |
| SG&A | 3.4 m | — | 2.8 m | 3.3 m | 3.0 m | 2.8 m | 2.9 m | 3.0 m |
| Operating income | -1.6 m | -118.0 k | -1.4 m | -3.9 m | -3.0 m | -2.3 m | -20.0 k | -11.5 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 300.0 k | 808.0 k ≈ | 820.0 k | 713.0 k | 874.0 k | — | — | 961.0 k |
| Interest expense | 212.0 k | 324.0 k ≈ | 392.0 k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pre-tax income | -1.8 m | -1.1 m | -2.2 m | -4.4 m | -4.1 m | -3.3 m | -1.2 m | -5.4 m |
| Income tax | -347.0 k | -201.0 k | -736.0 k | -1.0 m | -721.0 k | -661.0 k | -405.0 k | 1.2 m |
| Net income | -1.2 m | -534.0 k | -1.1 m | -2.9 m | -2.9 m | -2.3 m | -765.0 k | -5.3 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.67 | -0.42 | -0.64 | -1.66 | -1.61 | -1.29 | -0.43 | -1.11 ≈ |
| Operating cash flow | 1.5 m | 3.5 m ≈ | -7.6 m | -1.5 m | -9.9 m | — | — | 7.2 m |
| Capex | 230.0 k | 271.0 k ≈ | 47.0 k | 466.0 k | 46.0 k | — | — | 141.0 k |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | ⚠ 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 33.2 m | 21.5 m | 17.5 m | 19.5 m | 18.8 m | unavailable | 37.8 m | 48.1 m |
| Revenue YoY | +25.8% | — | −18.8% | +11.6% | −3.6% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Net income | 1.4 m | -5.6 m | -4.6 m | -3.5 m | 10.0 m | 2.4 m | -5.7 m | -11.2 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | — | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | −76.0% | −337.9% | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | 0.12 | -3.27 | -2.66 | -2.01 | 5.59 | 1.36 | -3.24 | -4.43 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | — | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | −75.7% | −338.2% | unavailable |
| net % | 4.2% | -25.9% | -26.4% | -18.1% | 53.4% | unavailable | -15.2% | -23.2% |
| Free cash flow | unavailable | -2.7 m | -1.6 m | -3.1 m | 10.7 m | 479.0 k | -5.2 m | -4.4 m |
The series breaks before 2019: earlier years come from the original reports of the issuer of that time, later years from a subsequent filing that restated the perimeter (a separation, discontinued operations). The year-on-year change across the break is not shown.
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
- Cash
- 1.5 m USD
- Financial debt
- 20.7 m USD
- Net debt
- 19.2 m USD
- Equity
- 13.8 m USD
- Total assets
- 84.4 m USD
- Debt / equity
- 1.50x
- Current ratio
- 1.69x
- ROE
- unavailable
- ROA
- -13.2%
- FCF margin
- -9.2%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 17.5 m | 19.5 m | 18.8 m | — | 37.8 m | 48.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 533.0 k | 0 | 15.5 m | — | 31.3 m | 40.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 2.9 m | 3.2 m | 3.3 m | — | 6.5 m | 7.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| SG&A | — | — | — | 3.5 m | 13.2 m | 11.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Operating income | -4.8 m | -4.8 m | -2.4 m | -3.5 m | -6.7 m | -16.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 477.0 k | 60.0 k | 59.0 k | 7.0 k | 2.6 m | 3.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| EBITDA | -4.4 m ≈ | -4.7 m ≈ | -2.4 m ≈ | -3.5 m ≈ | -4.1 m ≈ | -13.2 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026derived |
| Pre-tax income | 0 | 273.0 k | -2.3 m | -3.0 m | -9.2 m | -14.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Income tax | -191.0 k | 42.0 k | 6.0 k | 20.0 k | -2.3 m | -579.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Net income | -4.6 m | -3.5 m | 10.0 m | 2.4 m | -5.7 m | -11.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -2.66 | -2.01 | 5.59 | 1.36 | -3.24 | -4.43 | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 1.7 m | 1.8 m | 1.8 m | 1.8 m | 1.8 m | 2.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | 4.90 | — | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 11 Mar 2021verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 7.1 m | 3.9 m | 14.4 m | 16.1 m | 1.8 m | 1.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Receivables | 5.9 m | 5.2 m | 0 | — | 2.2 m | 5.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Inventories | 85.0 k | 19.0 k | 29.0 k | 0 | 13.4 m | 5.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Current assets | 14.0 m | 10.4 m | 20.8 m | 16.6 m | 18.8 m | 17.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 75.0 k | 113.0 k | 0 | 35.0 k | 11.3 m | 10.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Goodwill | — | — | — | 0 | 10.7 m | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 0 | — | — | 0 | 25.6 m | 21.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Total assets | 14.3 m | 10.7 m | 21.0 m | 16.7 m | 100.0 m | 84.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 3.1 m | 2.5 m | 138.0 k | 32.0 k | 3.0 m | 2.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | 464.0 k | 0 | — | 0 | 1.8 m | — | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2025verified |
| Long-term debt | 590.0 k | — | — | 0 | 38.5 m | 20.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 6.4 m | 6.6 m | 7.4 m | 1.1 m | 7.8 m | 10.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Equity | 7.7 m | 3.2 m † | 13.4 m | 15.5 m | 11.9 m | 13.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -1.6 m | -3.0 m | 10.7 m | 518.0 k | -4.1 m | -4.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Capex | 61.0 k | 106.0 k | 0 | 39.0 k | 1.2 m | 433.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -1.6 m ≈ | -3.1 m ≈ | 10.7 m ≈ | 479.0 k ≈ | -5.2 m ≈ | -4.4 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | 139.0 k | -90.0 k | -29.0 k | 1.5 m | -35.1 m | -433.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 1.1 m | -187.0 k | 39.0 k | -473.0 k | 24.9 m | 5.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 21 Sept 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 14.0 k | — | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 11 Mar 2021verified |
| Share repurchases | — | — | 0 | 482.0 k | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 01 Apr 2024verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 4 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 29.2% of at least 60%
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
03 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 10.9 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
29% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 64.39 – 86.59 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the reported interest expense is far older than the latest period (the filer changed its XBRL tag): a stale figure is not used
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)64.39 – 86.59 (Mid 73.86)
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 29.2% of at least 60%
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | -36.6% | 14 (vs peers) | 36% |
| Net margin · Quality | -23.2% | 36 (vs peers) | 21% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.7x | 74 (on a fixed band) | 14% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -40.6% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 29% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial74/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality23/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
BLOOMIA HOLDINGS, INC. (TULP). Latest full fiscal year: 2026; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 48.1 m USD in 2026; net margin -23.2%; ROE -87.9%.
The estimated value range is 64.39–86.59 USD per share (median of 1 methods, agreement: single method); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 73.86 USD, the price of 2.25 USD leaves a potential of 3,182.7% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of 97.0% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 29.2% of at least 60%).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Current ratio: 1.7x
- The price is below the estimated value range
What contradicts it
- ROIC: -36.6%
- FCF yield: -40.6%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Agricultural Production-Crops (SIC 0100) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 11 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTVACorteva, Inc. | 8.2 bn | 8.1 | 4.0% | 5.7% | +2.9% | +21% / +81% |
| DMCDel Monte Corporation | 1.4 bn | 16.8 | 4.0% | 1.9% | +1.0% | −21% / +26% |
| AGROAdecoagro S.A. | 1.3 bn | 10.3 | 7.1% | 6.1% | +16.9% | +14% / −19% |
| DOLEDole plc | 1.3 bn | 21.9 | 4.5% | 0.6% | +8.2% | −4% / +20% |
| VFFVillage Farms International, Inc. | 358.3 m | 16.4 | 7.6% | 9.8% | +10.2% | −26% / +271% |
| LMNRLimoneira Company | 190.7 m | — | -25.7% | -33.0% | −16.6% | −24% / −31% |
| AGRZAgroz Inc. | 42.0 m | 48.0 | 25.6% | 8.6% | unavailable | −98% / unavailable |
| LOCLLocal Bounti Corporation | 22.1 m | — | — | -130.5% | +26.8% | −61% / −73% |
| TULPBloomia Holdings, Inc. | 10.9 m | — | -87.9% | -23.2% | unavailable | −50% / −56% |
| SEEDOrigin Agritech Limited | 8.6 m | — | — | -58.4% | −20.6% | −49% / −64% |
| EDBLEdible Garden AG Incorporated | 1.4 m | — | -197.1% | -51.0% | −7.6% | −100% / −100% |
| LNDBrasilAgro – Brazilian Agricultural Real Estate Company | — | — | 6.3% | 15.7% | +13.8% | −12% / −32% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for TULP from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Bloomia Holdings, trading on Nasdaq as TULP, produces and sells fresh cut tulips grown hydroponically in U.S. greenhouses from bulbs sourced mainly from the Netherlands. The company is under pressure as bulb costs rose and production waste weighed on margins, while a debt restructuring cut its total debt to 21.7 million USD at June 30, 2026 2.
SWOT
Strengths
- Consolidated position among U.S. growers, based on hydroponics, year-round production and long-standing supplier relationships 1.
- Greenhouse automation that allows faster scaling of production and reduced dependence on seasonal labor 1.
- The 2026 debt restructuring significantly reduced financial obligations and improved the balance sheet structure 2.
Weaknesses
- High dependence on a few retail customers, with no long-term purchase commitments 1.
- Net losses and goodwill impairment in fiscal 2026 show that results remain vulnerable to cost and production shocks 2.
- Significant debt with floating interest and covenant breaches during the year, although waivers were obtained from the lender 1.
Opportunities
- Growing demand for tulips outside the peak season, including birthdays and weddings, where Southern Hemisphere supply can contribute 1.
- Bulb prices for fiscal 2027 near historical averages, which could improve margins if the market stays stable 2.
- Diversifying the customer base and exploring new distribution channels, as stated by management 2.
Threats
- Changes in tariffs and the euro exchange rate that can raise the cost of bulbs imported from the Netherlands 1.
- Production losses caused by disease or pests across the industry, which can reduce stock availability at peak periods 2.
- Competition from importers and from retailers diversifying their supply, with possible loss of customers or market share 1.
Risks
- Customer concentrationhigh
A small number of customers generate most revenue, without long-term commitments. If one of these customers significantly reduces orders, revenue could fall substantially 1.
- Bulb costs and tariffshigh
Bulbs are the largest raw material purchase, and any cost increase the company cannot pass on to customers affects profitability 1.
- Financial covenants and credithigh
The company was in breach of financial covenants during fiscal 2026 and obtained waivers, with no assurance the lender will grant further waivers 1.
- Control by major stockholdersmedium
The largest stockholder and its affiliates hold a majority stake, which allows them to influence important decisions and can make transactions difficult without their support 1.
- Limits on tax loss carryforwardslow
The rights offering could lead to limits on the use of net operating loss carryforwards if an ownership change occurs under U.S. tax rules 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- The debt restructuring and lower interest costs could give the company a more robust balance sheet to support investment in automation and waste control 2.
- Bulb prices contracted for fiscal 2027 could return to historical levels, and if production losses are limited, margins could recover 2.
- U.S. hydroponic production with supply from two hemispheres can serve demand beyond the peak season, an advantage that importers of cut flowers find hard to replicate 1.
What would break the thesis
- Dependence on a few large customers and the lack of long-term commitments can make revenue volatile, especially if a major retailer changes suppliers 1.
- Goodwill impairment and net losses in fiscal 2026 show that asset bases and profitability may be more fragile than stable revenue suggests 2.
- A concentrated shareholder structure and dependence on one business segment can limit the influence of minority shareholders and make strategic correction difficult 1.
What to watch
- Gross margin trend after contracting bulb prices for fiscal 2027Q1 2027
- Effectiveness of the new mite treatment and the level of production waste2027
- Changes in tariffs on bulbs imported from the Netherlands2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
The operating model runs through a multi-step supply chain: bulbs are bought in the Netherlands or the Southern Hemisphere, kept in cooled storage, shipped by sea, rooted, grown in greenhouses, harvested and delivered to customers. Southern Hemisphere bulbs are generally used from August to December and Northern Hemisphere bulbs the rest of the year, allowing year-round production. Importing bulbs rather than stems lowers logistics costs and carbon footprint, but exposes the company to tariffs and euro exchange rate moves 1.
Segments
Fresh cut tulips grown in U.S. greenhouses
This is the core segment, operated through Bloomia with hydroponic greenhouses in the United States. Sales are concentrated in a few mass-market retailers, four of which accounted for about 59% of revenue in fiscal 2026 1.
Market context
The U.S. cut flower market is estimated at over 8 billion USD, of which about 80% is imported, and tulips account for roughly 15% of overall cut flower sales 1. The company says high barriers to entry, including the need for high volumes and efficient operations, limit competition. Demand for tulips is also growing outside the peak season for events such as birthdays and weddings, which creates room for producers able to supply year-round 1.
Trends
- Bulb prices and the euromixed
Poor harvests in the Netherlands raised the average bulb price 21% in fiscal 2026, and a stronger euro increased import costs 12. Contracts for fiscal 2027 could ease this pressure.
- Tariffs on imported bulbsheadwind
Dutch bulbs face a 15% U.S. tariff, and the company tries to pass cost increases on to customers, though it is unlikely that customers will absorb all of them 1. Changes to tariffs through trade negotiations could affect margins in either direction.
- Automated greenhouse productiontailwind
Investment in automation of the U.S. greenhouse allows production to scale faster, improves efficiency and reduces dependence on seasonal labor, which could support margins over the medium term 1.
- Production losses and mite controlheadwind
In a broader industry challenge around mite treatment, the greenhouse suffered excess waste in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, and the company invested in a new treatment to reduce the risk of recurrence 2.
Competitive position
Bloomia competes with local U.S. producers and with foreign producers who import cut tulips, mainly from the Netherlands 1. The stated advantage combines hydroponics with strong supplier relationships, enabling year-round production, better quality and longer shelf life. Competition can also come indirectly from retailers supplied by other growers or from online flower delivery websites 1.
Importers of cut flowers ship stems by air, which means higher costs and greater tariff exposure, whereas the company imports bulbs, which it describes as a cost advantage. Competition on price, quality and the ability to fill orders at seasonal peaks remains intense 1.
- Local North American cut flower growers
Growers in the U.S. and Canada that compete for the same retail channels, not named individually in the analysed sources 1.
- Dutch tulip importers
Suppliers that bring cut flowers from the Netherlands, mainly by air, and are the principal external competitors 1.
- Retailers with alternative sourcing
Retail chains that can diversify their flower sourcing, which directly affects the company's market share 1.
- Online flower delivery platforms
Digital flower services that compete indirectly for end-consumer demand, as described in the annual report's risk factors 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Proxy statement09 Oct 2026
- Annual report21 Sept 2026
- Current report21 Sept 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report13 May 2026
- Current report13 May 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report17 Apr 2026Material agreement · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report03 Apr 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report13 Feb 2026
- Current report13 Feb 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report30 Jan 2026Amendments to articles or bylaws · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Bloomia Holdings, Inc. · 21 Sept 2026
- [2] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Bloomia Holdings, Inc. · 21 Sept 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.