olivLaw · European equity research
Lotus Bakeries LOTB.BR
Belgium · Euronext Brussels · ISIN BE0003604155 · Vertical: Listed companies from Belgium
Lotus Bakeries, a Belgium-based company, develops and sells biscuit and snack brands, mainly Biscoff, TREK, nākd and BEAR. Its 2025 annual report describes growth in all markets, and its brands are presented as drivers of a community-based and innovation-led strategy, with clear strengths in the natural snacks segment.
At the close of 05 Nov 2026, Lotus Bakeries (LOTB.BR) stock was 14,080.00 EUR (+0.57% on the day), with market capitalisation 11.4 bn EUR, P/E 66.4 on diluted EPS of 211.89 EUR over the last 12 months, dividend yield 0.54%, beta 0.44, 52-week range 7,270.00–14,080.00 EUR.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: ESEF annual reports and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 81.2
- overbought (≥ 70)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 12,226.28 – 14,195.72
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.94 · band width 14.9%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 12,662.80 / 11,242.65
- uptrend (price > SMA50 > SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- 384.38 / 312.96
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | EURO STOXX 50 | vs EURO STOXX 50 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +14.5% | +0.4% | +14.1 pp | — |
| 3 months | +23.1% | −3.3% | +26.3 pp | — |
| 6 months | +31.1% | +4.0% | +27.1 pp | — |
| Year to date | +79.4% | +8.1% | +71.3 pp | — |
| 1 year | +86.2% | +10.7% | +75.5 pp | +6.3% |
| 3 years | +94.5% | +50.1% | +44.4 pp | −6.5% |
| 5 years | +148.8% | +43.6% | +105.2 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 100 percentile of its own 2-quarter history (min 37.0, median 47.3, max 57.5; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.2 bn | 1.4 bn |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +10.0% |
| Net income | 152.6 m | 172.3 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | +12.9% |
| Diluted EPS | 187.54 | 211.89 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | +13.0% |
| net % | 12.4% | 12.7% |
| Free cash flow | unavailable | unavailable |
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 121.9 m EUR
- Financial debt
- 312.3 m EUR
- Net debt
- 190.4 m EUR
- Equity
- 859.6 m EUR
- Total assets
- 1.5 bn EUR
- Debt / equity
- 0.36x
- Current ratio
- 1.49x
- ROE
- 20.9%
- ROA
- 11.8%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (EUR)
Margins
Income statement · EUR
| Line | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.2 bn | 1.4 bn | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Operating income | 201.5 m | 227.6 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 36.6 m | 40.2 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| EBITDA | 238.1 m ≈ | 267.8 m ≈ | esef· 07 Apr 2026derived |
| Pre-tax income | 199.3 m | 225.2 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Income tax | 46.8 m | 52.9 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Net income | 152.6 m | 172.3 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 187.54 | 211.89 | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 813.1 k | 813.0 k | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | 57.87 | 76.00 | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · EUR
| Line | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 98.3 m | 121.9 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Receivables | 166.5 m | 193.3 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Inventories | 90.5 m | 103.8 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Current assets | 399.1 m | 504.2 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 580.4 m | 648.1 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 230.1 m | 222.8 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 150.4 m | 147.9 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Total assets | 1.4 bn | 1.5 bn | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 216.3 m | 247.6 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | 100.8 m | 62.4 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | 180.5 m | 249.9 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 339.0 m | 339.5 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Equity | 791.2 m | 859.6 m | esef· 07 Apr 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | 812.4 k | 812.3 k | esef· 07 Apr 2026derived |
Cash flow · EUR
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- score weight coverage: 58.3% of at least 60%
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 11.4 bn EUR
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
58% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 707.48 – 4,916.25 EUR.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (EUR per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDA707.48 – 1,462.69 (Mid 1,248.97)6 companies used · median multiple 4.5x · quartiles 2.9x – 5.1xCFEB.BR, DEME.BR, FOU.BR, JEN.BR, MIKO.BR, MOUR.BR
- Peers: P/E2,180.84 – 4,916.25 (Mid 3,066.20)24 companies used · median multiple 14.5x · quartiles 10.3x – 23.2xACKB.BR, AGS.BR, AZE.BR, BAR.BR, BEKB.BR, BELYS.BR, BPOST.BR, CAMB.BR, CFEB.BR, COLR.BR, DECB.BR, DEME.BR, DIE.BR, ECONB.BR, ELI.BR, EVS.BR, FAGR.BR, FLOB.BR, FOU.BR, IBAB.BR, JEN.BR, KIN.BR, MELE.BR, MOUR.BR
- Dividend discount (DDM)1,033.60 – 1,409.45 (Mid 1,192.62)
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 3.0%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.5%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 8.5%
- Terminal growth
- 2.0%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: score weight coverage: 58.3% of at least 60%
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | 17.2% | 85 (vs peers) | 18% |
| Net margin · Quality | 12.7% | 85 (vs peers) | 11% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | 0.7x | 22 (vs peers) | 18% |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.5x | 57 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 66.4x | 7 (vs peers) | 18% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | 43.4x | 13 (vs peers) | 18% |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 0.5% | 8 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet32/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality85/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partial8/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Valuation10/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
LOTUS BAKERIES (LOTB.BR). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 1.4 bn EUR in 2025; YoY growth 10.0%; net margin 12.7%; ROE 20.9%; net debt/EBITDA 0.7x.
The estimated value range is 1,033.60–1,462.69 EUR per share (median of 3 methods, agreement: medium); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 1,248.97 EUR, the price of 14,080.00 EUR leaves a potential of -91.1% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of -1,027.3% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
Insufficient data for a verdict (score weight coverage: 58.3% of at least 60%).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- ROIC: 17.2%
- Net margin: 12.7%
What contradicts it
- Net debt / EBITDA: 0.7x
- P/E (TTM): 66.4x
- EV/EBITDA: 43.4x
- Shareholder yield (distributions): 0.5%
- The price is above the estimated value range
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Interest coverage, FCF yield, Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Listed companies from Belgium · same country · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELI.BRElia Group | 11.9 bn | 23.3 | 9.6% | 13.6% | −2.0% | +28% / +34% |
| LOTB.BRLotus Bakeries | 11.4 bn | 66.4 | 20.9% | 12.7% | +10.0% | +82% / +76% |
| GBLB.BRGroupe Bruxelles Lambert - Groep Brussel Lambert | 10.6 bn | 82.4 | 0.8% | 2.1% | +1.0% | +6% / +9% |
| DIE.BRD'ieteren Group | 9.7 bn | 23.2 | — | 5.3% | −1.5% | +22% / +16% |
| ACKB.BRAckermans & Van Haaren | 8.8 bn | 22.2 | 8.4% | 7.6% | +18.6% | +22% / +77% |
| COLR.BRColruyt Group | 4.4 bn | 14.6 | 9.4% | 2.9% | +3.1% | +12% / −6% |
| DEME.BRDeme Group | 4.2 bn | 12.2 | 15.5% | 8.3% | +1.3% | +21% / +72% |
| AZE.BRAzelis Group | 2.9 bn | 16.1 | 6.6% | 4.3% | +1.5% | +29% / −42% |
| MELE.BRMelexis | 2.1 bn | 12.4 | 30.7% | 18.4% | −3.3% | −1% / −38% |
| BEKB.BRNV Bekaert SA | 2.1 bn | 30.7 | 3.1% | 1.8% | −6.4% | +10% / −5% |
| FAGR.BRFagron | 1.8 bn | 22.2 | 16.7% | 9.2% | +14.3% | +15% / +40% |
| KIN.BRKinepolis Group | 1.4 bn | 33.9 | 19.3% | 7.0% | −4.5% | +62% / +11% |
| JEN.BRJensen Group | 706.9 m | 17.2 | 15.1% | 9.1% | +13.3% | +28% / +111% |
| BAR.BRBarco | 563.5 m | 9.1 | 7.9% | 6.7% | −9.9% | −48% / −59% |
| IBAB.BRIon Beam Applications | 487.2 m | 39.5 | 10.7% | 2.1% | +24.5% | +48% / +52% |
| DECB.BRDeceuninck | 341.3 m | 24.6 | 4.3% | 1.7% | −4.5% | +8% / +8% |
| CAMB.BRCampine | 272.3 m | 12.2 | 28.6% | 6.1% | +13.4% | −12% / +161% |
| CFEB.BRAannemingsmaatschappij Cfe | 266.8 m | 11.1 | 9.9% | 2.0% | −5.3% | +22% / +48% |
| MOUR.BRMoury Construct | 261.2 m | 10.7 | 21.3% | 13.1% | −4.0% | +11% / +76% |
| EVS.BREvs Broadcast Equipment | 245.9 m | 6.0 | 20.8% | 21.7% | +14.3% | −49% / −36% |
| BPOST.BRBpost | 229.8 m | 3.5 | 6.3% | 1.5% | −2.6% | −39% / −75% |
| ECONB.BREconocom Group | 210.7 m | 40.5 | 1.2% | 0.2% | +4.3% | −1% / −36% |
| IMMO.BRImmobel | 172.2 m | — | -7.4% | -25.2% | −32.8% | −24% / −36% |
| MONNI.BRKeyware Technologies | 171.0 m | 162.0 | 3.5% | 4.5% | −5.9% | −5% / −17% |
| HYSG.BRHybrid Software Group PLC | 121.3 m | — | -2.5% | -5.5% | +7.2% | −4% / +13% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for LOTB.BR from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (EUR)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 8,789.73 Total return -37% · Per year -37% | 15,500.64 Total return 11% · Per year 11% | 23,295.03 Total return 66% · Per year 66% |
| 3 years | 9,499.08 Total return -31% · Per year -12% | 18,754.55 Total return 35% · Per year 11% | 30,805.75 Total return 121% · Per year 30% |
| 5 years | 10,265.68 Total return -25% · Per year -6% | 22,691.51 Total return 65% · Per year 11% | 40,738.04 Total return 194% · Per year 24% |
- Exit P/E± 4,688.64
- Net margin± 3,282.05
- Annual revenue growth± 2,559.28
- Annual dilution± 275.78
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Lotus Bakeries, a Belgium-based company, develops and sells biscuit and snack brands, mainly Biscoff, TREK, nākd and BEAR. Its 2025 annual report describes growth in all markets, and its brands are presented as drivers of a community-based and innovation-led strategy, with clear strengths in the natural snacks segment.
SWOT
Strengths
- A portfolio of strong brands, with Biscoff recognised in several markets, and a solid position in the natural snacks segment.
- A community and consumer-dialogue strategy that provides useful insight for packaging and communication.
- A stronger local presence in several markets, with dedicated teams and well-established distribution partners.
Weaknesses
- Dependence on a few major brands could make performance sensitive to changes in demand for those products.
- Exposure to markets where private labels dominate may limit the ability to sustain premium prices.
- Rapid expansion of formats and distribution can create operational and cost pressures.
Opportunities
- Rising demand for natural and better-for-you snacks could open new categories for the nākd and TREK brands.
- Collaborations with brands and sports events can extend awareness and attract new customers.
- Extending Biscoff into away-from-home channels in more countries could add volume and visibility.
Threats
- Price pressure from private labels and new competitors could reduce profit margins.
- Rapid shifts in consumer preferences could make some products less relevant.
- Changes in raw material and packaging costs could affect profitability if they cannot be passed on to prices.
Risks
- Concentration on a few brandshigh
A large share of growth depends on Biscoff and a few product lines. A reputational problem or a drop in demand could have a significant impact.
- Pressure from private labelsmedium
In Spain and other markets, private labels could gain share if the difference in taste and brand is no longer clearly perceived by consumers.
- Raw material costsmedium
Ingredients and packaging could become more expensive, and the company may find it hard to pass the full increase on to final prices.
- Execution of expansionmedium
Rapid launch of new formats and entry into new channels could create logistics or quality problems if processes do not keep pace.
- Regulatory changeslow
Rules on food labelling, sugar and ingredients could change how products are presented and sold.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the company's brands keep growing in several markets, growth could be supported by household penetration and format expansion.
- The position of nākd in the natural snacks segment could become a medium-term growth driver if demand for snacks with short ingredient lists remains high.
- The community strategy and partnerships could build loyalty, which might reduce sensitivity to competitors' prices.
What would break the thesis
- If private labels continue to gain share, price pressure could limit margin growth for the company's brands.
- Dependence on Biscoff could become a vulnerability if demand for this category falls or if reputational issues arise.
- Higher raw material and packaging costs could reduce profitability if they cannot be offset by prices or efficiency.
What to watch
- Development of Biscoff household penetration in Australia and Spain2026
- Market share of nākd in Spain and the United Kingdom2026
- Pressure from private labels in the biscuit category2026
- Effect of raw material costs on marginsnext annual report
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
Lotus Bakeries builds its business around a portfolio of proprietary brands and a Lotus™ Natural Foods division. According to the 2025 annual report, the company focuses on brands it considers love brands, such as Lotus Biscoff, and on health-oriented snacks such as nākd and TREK. Its strategy combines product innovation, wider distribution and partnerships with other brands and restaurant chains.
The growth model relies on dialogue with consumers and on building communities rather than one-way communication. The company says sports events and partnerships, such as the one with Golazo, provide insight into consumer preferences that feed into packaging, communication and in-store presence.
The company links its 2025 performance to consistent local execution: national distribution in Australia, in-store presence in Spain and sustained media campaigns. The report also describes format expansion, so the same brand reaches different consumption moments, from daily snacks to desserts.
Segments
Biscoff (biscuits and spreads)
Biscoff is the main brand and has the biggest impact on growth. In Australia, the report shows household penetration above 24%, and in Spain the brand is the second-largest biscuit brand by household penetration 1.
nākd (natural snacks)
nākd is positioned as a bar made only of fruit and nuts, with no further processing. The report says that six years after launch it became the number one brand of cereal bars in Spain in 2025, by value 1.
TREK and Kiddylicious
TREK expanded its portfolio with a vegan protein bar with Biscoff spread and became the fastest-growing brand in its category in the United Kingdom in the first half of 2025. Kiddylicious grew as a baby snack brand and strengthened its leading position in the United Kingdom 1.
Market context
The 2025 annual report indicates that the company's brands performed strongly in all markets, with four countries highlighted as examples: Australia, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States. Biscoff's market in Australia grew after revenue doubled in 2024, while in Spain the biscuit market is dominated by private labels, which makes competitive pricing relevant for the brand 1.
The better-for-you snacks market in the United Kingdom is described as one of the most developed and competitive in the world. The report says demand is high for natural products with short ingredient lists, which favours brands with a clear positioning.
Trends
- Demand for natural snackstailwind
Consumers increasingly look for snacks with natural ingredients and short ingredient lists. This trend supports nākd and other better-for-you brands, but it also attracts competitors.
- Pressure from private labelsheadwind
In some markets private labels dominate sales, which may force brands to justify their price through taste and differentiation.
- Community-based marketingmixed
Partnerships with sports events and content creators can raise loyalty and word of mouth among consumers, but they require ongoing investment.
- Distribution and format expansionmixed
Launching new formats and entering away-from-home channels can bring growth, but may also increase operational complexity.
Competitive position
The company competes in its markets with private labels and with other snack and biscuit producers. The report describes the biscuit segment in Spain as highly price-sensitive, and competition in the better-for-you category as intense, especially in the United Kingdom.
The advantage the company describes comes from brand image, the distinctiveness of the Biscoff taste and its community strategy. If these elements weaken, pressure from private labels or new entrants could increase.
- Private labels (retailer brands)
The report notes that private labels account for a major share of biscuit sales in Spain, making them the main price competitor.
- Better-for-you snack producers
Competition in the United Kingdom and other markets comes from brands promoting natural snacks with short ingredient lists.
- Biscuit and cereal bar producers
Traditional biscuit and cereal bar brands compete for the same consumption moments.
- Quick service restaurant partners
Collaborations with restaurant chains can bring visibility but also compete for consumer attention.
News & filings
In the press
- Greg Yaitanes, regizor al serialului Casa Dragonului, o pune pe vedeta din The White Lotus Brittany O’Grady la dispeceratul 911 - Martin Cid MagazineSurge — Google News · 31 Oct 2026 · RO
- În 1991, un mecanic a vândut cu 4.000 de lire un Lotus din 1972, ca să-și salveze casa. După 35 de ani, a găsit mașina pe eBay și a plătit de 4 ori mai mult ca s-o recuperezeLibertatea.ro · 22 Oct 2026 · RO
- Investiţie de peste 17 mil. euro la Băile Felix: Lotus Therm Resort & Spa devine primul resort termal Radisson Blu din RomâniaZiarul Financiar · 14 Oct 2026 · RO
- FOTO PREMIERĂ Radisson în România cu președintele Băncii Transilvania. Winners First semnează cu Radisson. Lotus Therm Resort & Spa va deveni Radisson Blu Resort & Spa Felix. Primul resort termal din România al branduluiProfit.ro · 14 Oct 2026 · RO
- Biscoff Cookies Were Supposed to Be Temporary. Then Passengers Fell in LoveHacker News · 13 Oct 2026 · EN
- Marca auto Lotus revine în RomâniaEconomedia · 26 Sept 2026 · RO
- OFICIAL FOTO Marcă auto celebră revine în România. Acord pentru ca mașinile Lotus să revină pe piața localăProfit.ro · 25 Sept 2026 · RO
- Mai vin mărci noi şi din UK, nu doar din China: Grupul Automobile Bavaria preia importul Lotus de la 1 octombrie. Michael Schmidt adaugă o nouă marcă de nişă după Corvette, INEOS Grenadier şi Rolls-RoyceZiarul Financiar · 25 Sept 2026 · RO
- Huagui Group : A Global Player Across Two RMB100 - Billion Aquatic Markets , as Honghu Lotus Root Ranks No . 1 in Antioxidant ContentSurge — GDELT DOC · 25 Sept 2026 · RO
- FOTO Marcă auto celebră revine în România. Acord semnat pentru ca mașinile Lotus să fie disponibile pentru clienții din RomâniaProfit.ro · 22 Sept 2026 · RO
- Lotus revine în România: mărcile de nişă pentru pasionaţi caută acum pieţe cu asfalt bun, iar România a început să intre în această categorie. Automobile Bavaria adaugă brandul britanic în portofoliuZiarul Financiar · 22 Sept 2026 · RO
- Fostul șef al echipei Lotus F1 va fi judecat – Riscă cinci ani de închisoare. A falimentat Bordeaux, Boavista și Royal Excel MouscronG4Media · 22 Sept 2026 · RO
- Lotus Notes and the dangers of starting from scratchHacker News · 09 Sept 2026 · EN
- Lotus cuts YoY losses by 63% in H1 2026Yahoo Finance — News · 28 Aug 2026 · EN
- Lotus Technology Q2 Earnings Call HighlightsYahoo Finance — News · 27 Aug 2026 · EN
- Lotus Technology completes acquisition of Lotus UKYahoo Finance — News · 26 Aug 2026 · EN
- Noul sezon „The White Lotus” se filmează într-un hotel exclusivist din Franța. Ce surprize au avut oaspețiiMediafax · 06 Aug 2026 · RO
- Lotus Elise e următorul supercar din Colecția „SuperMașini Sport”. Macheta metalică și revista, de joi la chioșcuri!Antena 3 CNN · 05 Aug 2026 · RO
- Biscoff Maker Lotus Gains 590% in Tough Decade For Snack FirmsBloomberg Markets · 30 Jun 2026 · EN
- Chinese-owned Lotus bets on hybrid SUV for US turnaroundNikkei Asia · 26 Jun 2026 · RO
Annual reports (ESEF)
- Annual report 202507 Apr 2026
- Annual report 202507 Apr 2026
Sources
- [1] Annual report, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 (ESEF) · SEC / Lotus Bakeries · 31 Dec 2025
Figures computed by olivLaw from ESEF annual reports and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.