olivLaw · US equity research
Solowin Holdings AXG
Security Brokers, Dealers & Flotation Companies · SIC 6211 · Vertical: Security Brokers, Dealers & Flotation Companies (SIC 6211)
Solowin Holdings (AXG) is a regulated fintech company based in Hong Kong that in fiscal 2026 repositioned itself toward digital assets and AI infrastructure. Revenue grew roughly tenfold in one year, yet the company remains loss-making and its figures are still small against its stated ambitions. It matters because it is attempting to link traditional finance with tokenized economies.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Solowin Holdings (AXG) stock was 1.71 USD (+2.09% on the day), with market capitalisation 26.5 m USD, beta -9.43, 52-week range 0.04–10.84 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 50.2
- neutral
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- -3.78 – 6.62
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.53 · band width 733.8%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 1.45 / 2.97
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- 0.35 / 0.32
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +1,528.6% | −2.0% | +1,530.6 pp | — |
| 3 months | −38.5% | −2.2% | −36.3 pp | — |
| 6 months | −54.5% | +4.3% | −58.8 pp | — |
| Year to date | −58.4% | +10.6% | −69.0 pp | — |
| 1 year | −52.9% | +10.5% | −63.4 pp | −11.1% |
| 3 years | −31.3% | +73.7% | −105.0 pp | +60.5% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +61.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3.3 m | 4.5 m | 4.3 m | 2.8 m | 28.0 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +36.8% | −3.6% | −34.3% | +895.0% |
| Net income | -979.0 k | 1.3 m | -4.6 m | -8.5 m | -13.3 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | −437.7% | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | -0.09 | 0.11 | -0.33 | -0.53 | -0.11 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | −400.0% | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | -30.1% | 30.3% | -106.2% | -302.9% | -47.4% |
| Free cash flow | -5.8 m | -451.0 k | -5.7 m | -1.1 m | -15.5 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2026 · 31 Mar 2026
- Cash
- 16.8 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 25.1 m USD
- Total assets
- 50.7 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 1.55x
- ROE
- -89.1%
- ROA
- -42.2%
- FCF margin
- -55.3%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3.3 m | 4.5 m | 4.3 m | 2.8 m | 28.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Operating income | 196.0 k | 61.0 k | 3.0 k | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Jul 2024verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | — | — | 23.0 k | 81.0 k | 131.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| EBITDA | — | — | 26.0 k ≈ | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Jul 2024derived |
| Interest expense | 229.0 k | — | — | 5.0 k | — | SEC (XBRL)· 30 Jun 2025verified |
| Pre-tax income | -979.0 k | 1.3 m | -4.4 m | -8.5 m | -13.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Income tax | — | — | 155.0 k | 19.0 k | — | SEC (XBRL)· 30 Jun 2025verified |
| Net income | -979.0 k | 1.3 m | -4.6 m | -8.5 m | -13.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -0.09 | 0.11 | -0.33 | -0.53 | -0.11 | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 10.4 m | 12.0 m | 13.7 m | 16.1 m | 124.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 977.0 k | 1.9 m | 2.1 m | 3.8 m | 16.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Receivables | — | 309.0 k | 220.0 k | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Jul 2024verified |
| Current assets | — | 9.7 m | 12.8 m | 9.7 m | 37.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | — | 32.0 k | 150.0 k | 157.0 k | 319.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Goodwill | — | — | — | — | 47.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | — | 64.0 k | 77.0 k | 86.0 k | 607.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Total assets | 9.5 m | 10.2 m | 15.4 m | 12.3 m | 50.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | — | — | — | 5.0 k | — | SEC (XBRL)· 30 Jun 2025verified |
| Current liabilities | — | 6.8 m | 6.0 m | 7.5 m | 24.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 7.5 m | 6.9 m | 6.5 m | 7.6 m | 25.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Equity | 2.0 m † | 3.3 m | 8.9 m | 4.7 m | 25.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | — | — | 15.5 m | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 26 Jul 2024verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -5.7 m | -443.0 k | -5.6 m | -1.1 m | -15.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Capex | 17.0 k | 8.0 k | 141.0 k | 88.0 k | 186.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -5.8 m ≈ | -451.0 k ≈ | -5.7 m ≈ | -1.1 m ≈ | -15.5 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | 114.0 k | 225.0 k | -1.4 m | 287.0 k | 4.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 1.5 m | -341.0 k | 6.7 m | 2.4 m | 21.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Aug 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 4 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 26.5 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
27% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -47.4% | 12 (vs peers) | 23% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 84.7% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 31% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.5x | 62 (on a fixed band) | 15% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -58.6% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 31% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial62/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial12/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Solowin Holdings, Ltd. (AXG). Latest full fiscal year: 2026; data up to 2026-03-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 28.0 m USD in 2026; YoY growth 895.0%; net margin -47.4%; ROE -88.9%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 84.7%
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -47.4%
- FCF yield: -58.6%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Security Brokers, Dealers & Flotation Companies (SIC 6211) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 29 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSMorgan Stanley | 292.3 bn | 14.9 | 18.0% | — | unavailable | +10% / +135% |
| BLKBlackRock, Inc. | 179.9 bn | 28.0 | 12.3% | 24.1% | +89.3% | +11% / +55% |
| SCHWSchwab Charles Corp | 154.4 bn | 16.1 | 20.3% | 38.8% | +22.0% | −4% / +46% |
| RJFRaymond James Financial, Inc. | 31.1 bn | 14.1 | 18.5% | 13.6% | +6.6% | +3% / +54% |
| SEICSei Investments Company | 12.9 bn | 18.9 | 28.9% | 28.1% | +8.1% | +34% / +85% |
| FRHCFreedom Holding Corp. | 11.9 bn | 73.8 | 11.2% | 6.5% | +9.3% | +42% / +129% |
| JEFJefferies Financial Group Inc. | 10.5 bn | 11.5 | 8.6% | 7.5% | +2.9% | −11% / +44% |
| MKTXMarketaxess Holdings Inc | 5.8 bn | 19.5 | 23.3% | 35.2% | +3.6% | +1% / −31% |
| SFStifel Financial Corp | 5.1 bn | 10.3 | 16.4% | 14.3% | +6.7% | −10% / +79% |
| IBKRInteractive Brokers Group, Inc. | 5.0 bn | 17.1 | 91.3% | 179.4% | +23.4% | +20% / +300% |
| PIPRPiper Sandler Companies | 5.0 bn | 6.0 | 23.6% | 14.5% | +24.3% | −16% / +82% |
| MIAXMiami International Holdings, Inc. | 3.5 bn | 12.5 | 28.9% | 19.8% | +19.6% | −23% / unavailable |
| WTWisdomTree, Inc. | 3.0 bn | 38.2 | 18.7% | 13.3% | +15.4% | +81% / +208% |
| JSMNavient Corporation | 1.5 bn | — | -2.0% | — | −15.6% | −21% / −19% |
| MTCMmtec, Inc. | 534.8 m | — | -272.7% | -6,944.3% | −56.8% | +97% / −42% |
| SIEBSiebert Financial Corp. | 75.2 m | — | -1.3% | -1.1% | +12.3% | −43% / −3% |
| DOMHDominari Holdings Inc. | 39.8 m | — | -315.4% | -51.6% | +487.0% | −65% / −28% |
| LGHLLion Group Holding Ltd. | 34.3 m | — | -27.4% | -52.8% | unavailable | −100% / −100% |
| COHNCohen & Co Inc. | 33.0 m | 1.9 | 33.3% | 5.6% | +246.2% | −33% / +66% |
| AXGSolowin Holdings, Ltd. | 26.5 m | — | -88.9% | -47.4% | +895.0% | −53% / −31% |
| GLXYGalaxy Digital Inc. | 1.4 k | — | -16.7% | -0.5% | +41.8% | −47% / unavailable |
| HOODRobinhood Markets, Inc. | 0 | 40.3 | 21.3% | 39.0% | +51.6% | −32% / +893% |
| VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc. | — | 8.7 | 33.6% | 13.5% | +26.2% | +48% / +195% |
| TIGRUp Fintech Holding Limited | — | 63.7 | 22.6% | 28.0% | +56.3% | −55% / −11% |
| FUTUFutu Holdings Ltd | 0 | 75.9 | 33.3% | 49.6% | +67.8% | −42% / +82% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for AXG from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 03 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (03 Nov 2026), 6-K (22 Oct 2026), 6-K (19 Oct 2026), 6-K (02 Oct 2026), 6-K (21 Sept 2026), 6-K (21 Aug 2026).
In brief
Solowin Holdings (AXG) is a regulated fintech company based in Hong Kong that in fiscal 2026 repositioned itself toward digital assets and AI infrastructure. Revenue grew roughly tenfold in one year, yet the company remains loss-making and its figures are still small against its stated ambitions 1. It matters because it is attempting to link traditional finance with tokenized economies.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company holds multiple licenses in Hong Kong, Singapore, the US and Canada, plus the first stablecoin issuer license granted in Bahrain 1.
- Rapid revenue and asset growth shows genuine commercial traction in the new business model 1.
- The Hong Kong brokerage and asset management portfolio gives an existing revenue base not dependent solely on digital assets 1.
Weaknesses
- The company remains loss-making, and expenses rose faster than revenue in fiscal 2026 1.
- Revenue is concentrated among a small number of institutional clients, making results vulnerable if one major client is lost 1.
- The strategy changed recently and many business lines are at an early stage of commercialization and not yet proven 1.
Opportunities
- If stablecoin adoption for B2B payments and remittances grows, the AX ONE payment platform could expand the volume it processes 1.
- Shariah-compliant stablecoins are described as a nearly untapped niche, which could offer an early advantage 1.
- Tokenization of real-world assets could become a source of recurring fees if FERION attracts more projects 1.
Threats
- Regulatory changes in Hong Kong, the US, Bahrain or the EU could limit stablecoin or tokenization activities 1.
- The risk that stablecoins fail to hold their reference value could cause customer losses and scrutiny from authorities 1.
- Pressure from global stablecoin issuers and AI providers could compress profit margins 1.
Risks
- Persistent net losseshigh
The company could keep posting operating and net losses if revenue does not grow enough to cover the costs of its new business lines 1.
- Fragmented regulationhigh
Stablecoin and tokenization activities are subject to different frameworks across jurisdictions, and a lack of a license could lead to restrictions or product shutdowns 1.
- Stablecoin peg riskmedium
The value of stablecoins issued could fail to stay pegged to the reference currency, which could affect user confidence 1.
- Client concentrationmedium
Dependence on a few large institutional clients could make revenue unstable if they reduce spending 1.
- Execution riskmedium
The rapid and complex transformation could lead to execution errors or delays in obtaining required approvals 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If revenue from AI infrastructure and stablecoin payments keeps growing, the company could turn year-on-year growth into a recurring revenue model 1.
- The Bahrain license and the position in Shariah-compliant stablecoins could provide a regulatory advantage that is hard to copy 1.
- The Hong Kong brokerage and asset management base could support the company in periods when digital activity is slower 1.
What would break the thesis
- The net loss widened in fiscal 2026, and AI cloud costs nearly matched the segment's revenue, which could keep margins thin 1.
- Revenue growth starts from a small base, and the weight of institutional clients could make results highly volatile 1.
- If authorities in China or other jurisdictions impose further restrictions, the existing business could be limited 1.
What to watch
- Expansion of stablecoin licenses beyond Bahrain and the evolution of AX Coin2027
- Share of major institutional clients in total revenueQ1 2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 03 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (03 Nov 2026), 6-K (22 Oct 2026), 6-K (19 Oct 2026), 6-K (02 Oct 2026), 6-K (21 Sept 2026), 6-K (21 Aug 2026).
The business
The transformation was supported by the acquisition of AlloyX Group, completed in September 2025, which brought the AX ONE, FERION, AgentX, KOVAR and AXION platforms 1. The company kept its Hong Kong brokerage, asset management and wealth management business, licensed by the HKSFC 1. On stablecoins, subsidiary AX Coin Bahrain received in June 2026 the first full license granted by the Central Bank of Bahrain under its new stablecoin framework 1.
The share capital has two classes of ordinary shares, Class A with one vote per share and Class B with ten votes per share, resulting from the December 2024 reclassification 1. The net loss grew in fiscal 2026 on the back of AI cloud costs, IT spending and staff added through acquisitions 1.
Market context
The global stablecoin market capitalization surpassed 321 billion USD in April 2026, a new all-time high 1. Stablecoin settlement volume is forecast at 33 trillion USD in 2026, and cross-border payment volume could exceed 250 trillion USD annually by 2027 1. The market for tokenized real-world assets reached nearly 29 billion USD by the end of the first quarter of 2026 1.
The sources cited by the company suggest that stablecoin adoption within Shariah-compliant finance is still at an early stage, which could offer a niche for growth if adoption accelerates 1. Regulatory frameworks in Hong Kong, the US, Bahrain and the EU are consolidating, which may favor licensed issuers while raising compliance costs 1.
Trends
- Stablecoin regulationmixed
Laws such as the US GENIUS Act, Hong Kong's Stablecoins Ordinance and Bahrain's SIO Module create clear frameworks for licensed issuers, which could attract large institutions 1.
- Tokenization of real-world assetstailwind
Tokenized assets have grown quickly from about 3 billion USD in 2022, supporting demand for platforms such as FERION 1.
- Demand for AI infrastructuretailwind
Companies are adopting AI infrastructure for compliance and automation, which could lift AI service revenue if institutional clients stay engaged 1.
- Cross-border regulatory pressureheadwind
Mainland Chinese authorities have asked similar firms to comply for cross-border brokerage, which may limit access for clients in China 1.
Competitive position
Solowin competes with global stablecoin issuers, traditional financial institutions and alternative AI infrastructure providers, according to its own description 1. Competitive pressure could lead to lower fees for tokenization, payment processing and AI services 1.
In online brokerage, the company points to platforms that served Chinese clients without CSRC approval and drew rectification requests from regulators 1. Its stablecoin position, however, depends on obtaining and keeping licenses in several jurisdictions 1.
- Futu HoldingsFUTU
Online brokerage platform named in the source as the subject of a CSRC rectification request over cross-border operations 1.
- UP Fintech HoldingTIGR
Online brokerage platform named in the source alongside Futu for the same regulatory issue 1.
- Global stablecoin issuers
Companies issuing stablecoins on the global market are direct competitors for settlement share, according to the source 1.
- AI infrastructure providers
Alternative providers of enterprise AI services represent the competition for the AI Tokens segment 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)03 Nov 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)22 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)19 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)02 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)21 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)21 Aug 2026
- Annual report (foreign issuer)03 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)02 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)21 Apr 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)10 Apr 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2026-03-31 · SEC / Solowin Holdings · 03 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.