olivLaw · US equity research
Loop Industries, Inc. LOOP
Chemicals & Allied Products · SIC 2800 · Vertical: Chemicals & Allied Products (SIC 2800)
Loop Industries is a technology company developing a patented process to depolymerize waste PET and polyester fiber into virgin-quality monomers for food-grade packaging and textiles. The company is at a critical stage, as its India joint venture has been rescaled and financing remains an essential condition.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Loop Industries, Inc. (LOOP) stock was 0.27 USD (+1.53% on the day), with market capitalisation 13.0 m USD, beta 1.07, 52-week range 0.24–1.63 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2027): revenue of 117.0 k USD, net income of -3.0 m USD, diluted EPS -0.06 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 33.6
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 0.20 – 0.42
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.30 · band width 71.2%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 0.41 / 0.95
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.05 / -0.05
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −38.1% | −1.1% | −37.0 pp | — |
| 3 months | −61.2% | −0.5% | −60.8 pp | — |
| 6 months | −81.0% | +4.4% | −85.4 pp | — |
| Year to date | −73.4% | +12.3% | −85.7 pp | — |
| 1 year | −83.2% | +13.5% | −96.7 pp | +3.3% |
| 3 years | −91.9% | +76.4% | −168.4 pp | −23.2% |
| 5 years | −98.3% | +63.7% | −162.0 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2027 · 31 Aug 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 | Q3 '26 | Q4 '26 | Q1 '27 | Q2 '27 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 52.0 k | 10.8 m | 252.0 k | 0 | 86.0 k | 176.0 k | 179.0 k | 117.0 k |
| Cost of revenue | — | — | 114.0 k | 0 | — | — | 179.0 k | 113.0 k |
| Research & development | 1.4 m | 1.1 m | 1.3 m | 843.0 k | 967.0 k | 290.0 k | 962.0 k | 540.0 k |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 132.0 k | 126.0 k | 100.0 k | 96.0 k | 94.0 k | 94.0 k | 84.0 k | 83.0 k |
| Interest expense | 110.0 k | 329.0 k | 419.0 k | 419.0 k | 436.0 k | 430.0 k | 436.0 k | 460.0 k |
| Net income | -11.9 m | 6.9 m | -3.4 m | -3.2 m | -2.9 m | -2.7 m | -3.4 m | -3.0 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.25 | — | -0.07 | -0.07 | -0.06 | — | -0.07 | -0.06 |
| Operating cash flow | -1.9 m ≈ | 6.5 m | -3.1 m | -2.5 m ≈ | -1.8 m ≈ | -2.7 m | -1.2 m | -1.2 m ≈ |
| Capex | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 173.0 k | 153.0 k | 10.9 m | 514.0 k |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | −11.6% | +7,017.0% | −95.3% |
| Net income | -17.5 m | -14.5 m | -36.3 m | -44.9 m | -21.3 m | -21.1 m | -15.1 m | -12.3 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | -0.44 | -0.32 | -0.26 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | -12,312.7% | -13,782.4% | -138.3% | -2,392.8% |
| Free cash flow | -9.5 m | -11.5 m | -24.2 m | -45.4 m | -35.0 m | -23.2 m | -2.1 m | unavailable |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2026 · 28 Feb 2026
- Cash
- 2.4 m USD
- Financial debt
- 3.0 m USD
- Net debt
- 679.0 k USD
- Equity
- -9.6 m USD
- Total assets
- 8.6 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 1.31x
- ROE
- unavailable
- ROA
- -90.6%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | 173.0 k | 153.0 k | 10.9 m | 514.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | — | — | — | — | 218.0 k | 381.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Gross profit | — | — | — | — | 10.7 m ≈ | 133.0 k ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026derived |
| Research & development | 18.7 m | 27.7 m | 17.3 m | 11.4 m | 6.6 m | 3.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 775.7 k | 548.2 k | 550.0 k | 535.0 k | 524.0 k | 384.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Interest expense | 82.0 k | 154.3 k | — | — | 618.0 k | 1.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | — | — | — | — | -15.1 m | -12.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Income tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Net income | -36.3 m | -44.9 m | -21.3 m | -21.1 m | -15.1 m | -12.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | — | — | — | -0.44 | -0.32 | -0.26 | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | — | — | — | 47.5 m | 47.6 m | — | SEC (XBRL)· 29 May 2025verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Revenue − Cost of revenue.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 35.2 m | 44.1 m | 29.6 m | 7.0 m | 13.0 m | 2.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Receivables | — | — | — | 351.0 k | 639.0 k | 755.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Inventories | — | 0 | 727.0 k | 102.0 k | 82.0 k | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Current assets | 37.6 m | 52.1 m | 36.4 m | 8.0 m | 13.9 m | 3.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 3.5 m | 5.7 m | 2.5 m | 10.6 m | 1.7 m | 1.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 1.0 m | 1.0 m | 1.2 m | 1.5 m | 1.7 m | 1.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Total assets | 43.4 m | 59.2 m | 40.6 m | 20.6 m | 18.6 m | 8.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 8.1 m | 9.8 m | 2.5 m | 2.3 m | 2.0 m | 729.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | 938.1 k | 0 | 62.0 k | 100.0 k | 312.0 k | 605.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | 1.5 m | 3.4 m | 3.2 m | 3.2 m | 2.8 m | 2.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 9.1 m | 9.8 m | 3.6 m | 2.4 m | 4.0 m | 2.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 10.6 m | 13.2 m | 6.8 m | 6.4 m | 18.2 m | 18.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Equity | 32.8 m † | 46.0 m † | 33.7 m † | 14.1 m † | 367.0 k † | -9.6 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Oct 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -22.5 m | -40.6 m | -34.9 m | -18.0 m | -2.1 m | -10.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Capex | 1.7 m | 4.8 m | 81.0 k | 5.2 m | 0 | — | SEC (XBRL)· 29 May 2025verified |
| Free cash flow | -24.2 m ≈ | -45.4 m ≈ | -35.0 m ≈ | -23.2 m ≈ | -2.1 m ≈ | — | SEC (XBRL)· 29 May 2025derived |
| Investing cash flow | -3.0 m | -7.5 m | 21.3 m | -5.6 m | -2.0 m | -1.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 26.6 m | 57.0 m | 1.0 m | -63.0 k | 10.3 m | 678.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 27 May 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 3 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 18.8% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 13.0 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
19% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the input exists, but its latest figure is far older than the latest reported period: not used
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · input data missing
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 3 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 18.8% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -2,154.3% | 7 (vs peers) | 33% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 43.8% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 44% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.3x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 22% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial7/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Loop Industries, Inc. (LOOP). Latest full fiscal year: 2026; data up to 2026-08-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 514.0 k USD in 2026; YoY growth -95.3%; net margin -2,154.3%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 3 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 18.8% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 43.8%
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -2,154.3%
- Current ratio: 0.3x
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Chemicals & Allied Products (SIC 2800) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 14 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOLSSolstice Advanced Materials Inc. | 9.1 bn | 28.3 | 13.6% | 7.8% | +3.1% | +21% / unavailable |
| BCPCBalchem Corporation | 5.8 bn | 34.4 | 13.0% | 15.4% | +8.8% | +17% / +46% |
| PRMPerimeter Solutions, Inc. | 4.6 bn | — | -30.9% | -44.9% | +16.4% | +1% / +575% |
| NGVTIngevity Corporation | 2.5 bn | 50.1 | 64.4% | 4.7% | −2.7% | +41% / +90% |
| CCThe Chemours Company | 2.1 bn | — | -339.7% | -5.2% | +0.4% | +8% / −50% |
| OLNOlin Corporation | 2.1 bn | — | -12.2% | -3.3% | +3.7% | −14% / −62% |
| IOSPInnospec Inc. | 2.0 bn | 14.2 | 10.5% | 7.5% | −3.7% | +8% / −23% |
| HUNHuntsman Corporation | 1.7 bn | — | -11.8% | -5.8% | −5.8% | −5% / −60% |
| ECVTEcovyst Inc. | 1.1 bn | — | -9.6% | -7.1% | +20.9% | +8% / +5% |
| FMCFmc Corporation | 998.7 m | — | -226.7% | -151.2% | −18.3% | −55% / −88% |
| ACNTAscent Industries Co. | 124.0 m | — | -1.1% | -1.0% | −7.2% | −3% / +68% |
| CITRCitroTech Inc. | 54.8 m | — | -431.0% | -1,788.4% | +194.6% | unavailable / unavailable |
| LOOPLoop Industries, Inc. | 13.0 m | — | — | -2,154.3% | −95.3% | −83% / −92% |
| GUREGulf Resources, Inc. | 5.6 m | — | -32.4% | -134.4% | +231.8% | +3% / −80% |
| ADURAduro Clean Technologies Inc. | — | — | -133.8% | -5,253.1% | −31.5% | −26% / unavailable |
1- and 3-year price returns: for LOOP from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 15 Oct 2026; since then the company filed 10-Q (16 Oct 2026).
In brief
Loop Industries is a technology company developing a patented process to depolymerize waste PET and polyester fiber into virgin-quality monomers for food-grade packaging and textiles. The company is at a critical stage, as its India joint venture has been rescaled and financing remains an essential condition 13.
SWOT
Strengths
- The patented technology can process contaminated and colored waste, and five years of operating the Terrebonne facility offer practical validation 1.
- Active partnerships in India and Europe share capital risk and bring industrial experience 1.
- The final product is described as virgin quality and recyclable without degradation, which makes it attractive for food packaging 1.
Weaknesses
Opportunities
- If the India or European projects are completed, licenses and royalties could generate significant recurring revenue 1.
- Demand from apparel and packaging brands for recycled content could grow if regulations tighten 1.
- Rescaling the India project could reduce capital needs and speed construction, if financing is confirmed 3.
Threats
- A lack of financing could halt projects, and transactions depend on obtaining the necessary capital 13.
- Partners may end collaborations, as happened with a project in South Korea, which could affect growth plans 1.
- Competing recycling or virgin production technologies could become more competitive if costs shift 1.
Risks
- Going concernhigh
Management concluded that current resources are not sufficient to cover operations and obligations for the next twelve months, which could affect the company's ability to continue as a going concern 1.
- Financing of the India projecthigh
The company's equity contribution to the joint venture is not yet secured, and delayed financing could postpone construction and startup 3.
- Dependence on partnershigh
Many commercial agreements depend on building the India facility, and problems with the project could lead to renegotiation or termination of them 1.
- Technology scale-upmedium
The technology has not been tested at the size and cost required for commercial production, which could cause cost overruns or quality problems 1.
- Macroeconomic conditionsmedium
Market volatility, interest rates and trade tensions could reduce the availability of capital and demand for products 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the India and European projects are completed, the company could turn its patented technology into a stream of royalties and revenue from owned facilities in a growing recycling market 13.
- The technology has been validated over five years at Terrebonne, and the final product is described as recyclable indefinitely, which could attract industrial partners 1.
- Rescaling the India project could significantly reduce the capital required and accelerate the construction timeline, if financing is achieved 3.
What would break the thesis
- The company has recurring losses, minimal revenue and a serious liquidity problem, which could force shareholder dilution or changes to plans 13.
- Major projects are still in the financing and permitting stage, and a history of interrupted partnerships suggests execution risk 1.
- The technology has not yet been proven at commercial scale, and competition from recycling and virgin production could limit adoption 1.
What to watch
- Outcome of the special committee's work on financing the India project equity contributionQ3 2027
- Updated engineering cost estimate for the India facility2027
- Liquidity level and any new sources of capitalnext 10-Q
- Progress of the European license and milestone payments2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 15 Oct 2026; since then the company filed 10-Q (16 Oct 2026).
The business
Loop Industries aims to accelerate the shift from fossil-based PET and polyester fiber toward sustainable alternatives made from waste. Its technology depolymerizes bottles, packaging, carpets and textiles into the monomers DMT and MEG, which are purified and repolymerized into Loop™ PET resin of virgin quality, suitable for food-grade packaging 1. The company has operated its Terrebonne facility in Québec for five years, used mainly for research, development and customer demonstrations 1. Its commercialization model combines direct investments with partners, technology licensing and engineering services 1.
Near-term revenue comes from engineering services to the India joint venture, while longer-term income is expected from royalties and profits from owned facilities. Total revenue in fiscal 2026 was 514 thousand USD, compared with 10,889 thousand USD the prior year, which included a payment for the European license 1. The company reports recurring net losses and acknowledges that existing resources will not cover operations for at least the next twelve months 1.
For the quarter ended August 31, 2026, revenue was 117 thousand USD from engineering services and the net loss was 2,988 thousand USD 23. The board formed a special committee to find financing for the company's equity contribution to the India project 3.
Segments
Technology licensing
The company sells licenses for facilities built by partners, generating upfront payments and royalties. The first license, sold to a Reed Societe Generale group entity for a facility in Europe, brought an initial payment of 10.4 million USD 1. The European facility is planned for Schwarzheide, Germany, with operations expected by 2030 1.
Direct investment and the India joint venture
The India project, with Ester Industries, was originally sized at 70,000 tons per year but in October 2026 was rescaled to 45 kilotonnes per year to reduce capital needs 13. Initial total funding was estimated at 165-170 million USD, to be financed through debt and equity 1.
Market context
Most PET and polyester fiber used globally still comes from fossil feedstocks, while regulation and consumer pressure increase demand for recycled alternatives 1. Mechanical recycling has quality and feedstock limits, which leaves room for depolymerization technologies 1. The company argues its product could earn premium prices over fossil-based virgin resin, but this remains management's assumption 1.
Target customers are apparel and consumer goods companies seeking recycled materials to meet sustainability goals 1. The European market is opening up as a result of European Commission initiatives to modernize plastics recycling, but projects remain in engineering and permitting 1.
Competitive position
Mechanical recycling is the main alternative, but it produces resin of variable quality and cannot efficiently process blended textile waste 1. Other depolymerization technologies exist but, according to the company, often require high temperatures and pressures, increasing energy consumption 1.
The main competitors are producers of fossil-based virgin PET and operators of mechanical recycling, as well as other depolymerization developers, some of which may be more advanced at industrial scale 1. The company acknowledges that a more effective competing technology could affect adoption of its products 1.
- Fossil-based virgin PET producers
Traditional virgin PET resin suppliers are the main alternative on price and quality for customers 1.
- Mechanical recycling operators
Mechanical recyclers compete for the same PET waste streams, although their product has quality limitations 1.
- Other depolymerization technology developers
Other companies offering PET depolymerization may compete for licenses and industrial partners 1.
- Potential partners and licensees
Partners with which the company has signed or is negotiating agreements, such as Ester or the Reed group, could also choose other technologies 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Quarterly report16 Oct 2026
- Current report15 Oct 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report01 Oct 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report17 Sept 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report08 Sept 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report28 Aug 2026Shareholder vote
- Current report19 Aug 2026Material agreement · Other events
- Current report29 Jul 2026Delisting notice
- Quarterly report14 Jul 2026
- Current report14 Jul 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2026-02-28 · SEC / Loop Industries, Inc. · 27 May 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-08-31 · SEC / Loop Industries, Inc. · 15 Oct 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Loop Industries, Inc. · 15 Oct 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.