olivLaw · US equity research
Maison Solutions Inc. MSS
Retail-Grocery Stores · SIC 5411 · Vertical: Retail-Grocery Stores (SIC 5411)
Maison Solutions operates a specialty grocery chain offering traditional Asian food to Asian-American communities, with seven supermarkets in California and Arizona and a center-satellite network still being built. Revenue has grown quickly after the Lee Lee acquisition, reaching about 94.8 million USD in the first nine months of fiscal 2025, which puts the balance between expansion and debt under focus.
At the close of 30 Oct 2026, Maison Solutions Inc. (MSS) stock was 1.02 USD (−10.96% on the day), with market capitalisation 17.7 m USD, beta 0.68, 52-week range 1.02–34.90 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q4 2024): revenue of 16.9 m USD (+19.3% YoY), net income of -2.8 m USD (−938.8% YoY), diluted EPS -0.14 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 29.6
- oversold (≤ 30)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 0.96 – 1.78
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.07 · band width 60.2%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 1.51 / 5.66
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.14 / -0.11
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −38.9% | −0.9% | −37.9 pp | — |
| 3 months | −24.8% | +1.2% | −26.0 pp | — |
| 6 months | −83.4% | +4.8% | −88.2 pp | — |
| Year to date | −93.6% | +10.7% | −104.3 pp | — |
| 1 year | −97.1% | +11.1% | −108.2 pp | −0.0% |
| 3 years | −99.6% | +80.7% | −180.4 pp | +16.3% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +64.6% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q4 2024 · 30 Apr 2024
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q1 '23 | Q2 '23 | Q3 '23 | Q4 '23 | Q1 '24 | Q2 '24 | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 11.4 m | 14.2 m | 15.6 m | 14.2 m | 13.8 m | 13.8 m | 13.6 m | 16.9 m |
| Cost of revenue | 9.1 m | 11.1 m | 11.6 m | 11.1 m | 10.6 m | 10.6 m | 10.4 m | 14.7 m |
| Gross profit | 2.3 m | 3.1 m | 4.0 m | 3.1 m | 3.1 m | 3.1 m | 3.2 m | 2.2 m |
| Operating income | -521.0 k | 649.4 k | -48.3 k | 3.5 k | -216.7 k | 253.8 k | -307.2 k | -2.4 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 125.0 k | 86.7 k | 53.4 k | 61.9 k | 57.9 k | 52.0 k | 70.6 k | 86.7 k |
| Interest expense | 31.6 k | 28.8 k | -76.1 k | 47.1 k | 46.6 k | 30.0 k | 19.4 k | 28.3 k |
| Pre-tax income | — | — | 1.3 m | 558.4 k | 92.2 k | 238.6 k | -376.9 k | -2.9 m |
| Income tax | 17.9 k | 72.2 k | 99.1 k | 147.3 k | 118.9 k | 147.2 k | 158.7 k | 15.8 k |
| Net income | -597.0 k | 529.2 k | 988.5 k | 331.2 k | -104.9 k | 91.5 k | -549.0 k | -2.8 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.02 ≈ | -0.01 | 0.01 | -0.03 | -0.14 ≈ |
| Operating cash flow | 519.6 k | -1.6 m ≈ | 1.4 m ≈ | 120.0 k | 596.5 k | -120.4 k ≈ | -1.4 m ≈ | -2.6 m |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 42.0 m | 55.4 m | 58.0 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +32.0% | +4.8% |
| Net income | 655.0 k | 1.3 m | -3.3 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | +91.1% | −366.8% |
| Diluted EPS | -0.04 | 0.08 | -0.19 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | −337.5% |
| net % | 1.6% | 2.3% | -5.8% |
| Free cash flow | 1.4 m | 434.8 k | unavailable |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2024 · 30 Apr 2024
- Cash
- 2.1 m USD
- Financial debt
- 2.6 m USD
- Net debt
- 487.0 k USD
- Equity
- 10.7 m USD
- Total assets
- 82.4 m USD
- Debt / equity
- 0.24x
- Current ratio
- 0.49x
- ROE
- -58.0%
- ROA
- -5.7%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 42.0 m | 55.4 m | 58.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Cost of revenue | 33.7 m | 42.9 m | 46.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Gross profit | 8.3 m | 12.5 m | 11.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Operating income | -826.6 k | 83.6 k | -2.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 397.6 k | 326.9 k | 267.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| EBITDA | -428.9 k ≈ | 410.5 k ≈ | -2.4 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024derived |
| Interest expense | — | 31.4 k | 124.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2025verified |
| Pre-tax income | — | 2.0 m | -2.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Income tax | 27.7 k | 336.5 k | 440.6 k | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Net income | 655.0 k | 1.3 m | -3.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Diluted EPS | -0.04 | 0.08 | -0.19 | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 16.0 m | 16.0 m | 17.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2025verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 898.1 k | 2.6 m | 2.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2025verified |
| Receivables | — | 315.4 k | 111.9 k | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Inventories | 2.3 m | 3.0 m | 6.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Current assets | 9.1 m | 8.3 m | 14.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2025verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 552.4 k | 671.5 k | 2.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Goodwill | — | 2.2 m | 14.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2025verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 15.3 k | 197.3 k | 8.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Total assets | 26.1 m | 34.6 m | 82.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Accounts payable | 3.4 m | 3.1 m | 5.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Long-term debt | — | 2.6 m | 2.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Current liabilities | 7.5 m | 8.4 m | 28.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Total liabilities | 26.9 m | 33.8 m | 71.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Equity | -847.0 k | 792.3 k | 10.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 1.5 m | 484.2 k | -3.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
| Capex | 58.5 k | 49.4 k | — | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Jul 2023verified |
| Free cash flow | 1.4 m ≈ | 434.8 k ≈ | — | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Jul 2023derived |
| Investing cash flow | -3.3 m | 1.9 m | -10.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Aug 2025verified |
| Financing cash flow | 2.0 m | -746.6 k | 13.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 13 Aug 2024verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 1 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 4.2% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
30 Oct 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 17.7 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
4% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the input exists, but its latest figure is far older than the latest reported period: not used
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · input data missing
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · input data missing
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 1 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 4.2% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.7x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 100% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Maison Solutions Inc. (MSS). Latest full fiscal year: 2024; data up to 2026-01-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 58.0 m USD in 2024; YoY growth 4.8%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 1 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 4.2% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
What contradicts it
- Current ratio: 0.7x
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, Net margin, FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Retail-Grocery Stores (SIC 5411) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 10 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRKroger Co | 39.4 bn | 36.4 | 14.3% | 0.7% | +0.4% | +5% / +47% |
| ACIAlbertsons Companies, Inc. | 6.2 bn | — | -2.3% | -0.1% | +3.5% | −26% / −40% |
| SFMSprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 4.6 bn | 9.5 | 33.5% | 5.4% | +14.1% | −37% / +18% |
| WMKWeis Markets, Inc | 1.8 bn | 18.5 | 7.4% | 2.0% | +3.5% | +17% / +14% |
| GOGrocery Outlet Holding Corp. | 1.3 bn | — | -38.1% | -8.0% | unavailable | −5% / −53% |
| NGVCNatural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. | 661.2 m | 13.9 | 21.6% | 3.5% | +7.2% | −11% / +128% |
| VLGEAVillage Super Market, Inc. | 179.8 m | 3.4 | 10.3% | 2.2% | +3.7% | +36% / +75% |
| HOSTHost Digital Inc. | 92.5 m | — | -207.8% | -13.3% | +12.7% | −86% / unavailable |
| MSSMaison Solutions Inc. | 17.7 m | — | — | — | +4.8% | −97% / −100% |
| TBBBBbb Foods Inc | — | — | -69.6% | -3.6% | +36.1% | +107% / unavailable |
| IMKTAIngles Markets, Incorporated | — | — | 6.3% | 1.9% | −5.4% | +22% / +5% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for MSS from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Maison Solutions operates a specialty grocery chain offering traditional Asian food to Asian-American communities, with seven supermarkets in California and Arizona and a center-satellite network still being built. Revenue has grown quickly after the Lee Lee acquisition, reaching about 94.8 million USD in the first nine months of fiscal 2025 3, which puts the balance between expansion and debt under focus.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company has a customer base focused on Asian-American communities and a cultural understanding of their shopping habits, supported by a team with experience from established Asian chains 1.
- The Lee Lee acquisition added revenue and gross profit, and quarterly results showed growth in both revenue and profitability 3.
- The JD.com partnership provides access to technology and sourcing, and the company can use this brand association in new stores 1.
Weaknesses
- The company has negative working capital and an accumulated deficit, and financing of the Lee Lee purchase depends on its ability to raise additional funds 1.
- The center-satellite model is at an early stage, and the Alhambra satellite store is only partly owned, with the model not yet tested at scale 1.
- Some transactions are with related parties of management, which raises the risk that terms may not match those available from unaffiliated third parties 1.
Opportunities
- The acquisition strategy could expand the store network, and a newly appointed chief operating officer could support integration of new stores 3.
- Consultancy work for East Coast stores could generate extra revenue without large inventory investment 3.
- Renovating California stores could attract more customers and boost sales 3.
Threats
- Competition in the existing store areas could intensify, and new Asian supermarkets opening nearby could reduce margins 3.
- Rising commodity, labour and occupancy costs could compress profitability if they cannot be passed on to customers 12.
- If sales do not grow enough, acquisition-related debt could become a serious financial burden 1.
Risks
- Success of the center-satellite modelhigh
The model is new, and the company cannot guarantee it will work as planned, which could affect its expansion plans 1.
- Debt and negative working capitalhigh
Bank debt and the financing of the Lee Lee acquisition could limit financial flexibility, and failure to meet loan covenants could trigger a default 1.
- Going concernhigh
The annual report notes uncertainty about the company's ability to continue operating if it cannot generate enough revenue or raise additional funds 1.
- Related-party transactionsmedium
Many transactions are with persons connected to management, which could create conflicts of interest and terms less favourable to the company 1.
- Dependence on the JD.com partnershipmedium
The collaboration with JD US is at a very early stage and can be terminated for material breach, which could affect technology plans 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If revenue growth seen in fiscal 2025 continues and the Lee Lee integration goes well, the company could turn the acquisition into a durable source of profit 3.
- Demand from the growing Asian-American community could support sales in existing and new stores 1.
- If the center-satellite model works, expansion costs could be lower than for a conventional supermarket chain 1.
What would break the thesis
- If revenue does not grow enough, the company could struggle to repay debt linked to the Lee Lee acquisition 1.
- Competition in California could intensify and reduce gross margins at existing stores 3.
- The center-satellite model is unproven, and if it does not work, investment in expansion could fail to generate returns 1.
What to watch
- Revenue and profit performance against fiscal 2025 guidancenext 10-K
- Progress in repaying the Lee Lee purchase price and bank debt2026
- Results of the Alhambra satellite store and development of the center-satellite model2027
- New acquisitions and their integration into the current portfolioQ1 2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
Maison Solutions Inc. is a specialty grocery retailer offering traditional Asian food and merchandise, particularly to Asian-American communities in the United States 1. The company currently operates seven traditional supermarkets organised as center stores, and its development model relies on a center-satellite network in which smaller neighbourhood stores receive supply from a central warehouse 1. Perishable products are a significant part of sales, at approximately 50% of net revenue in fiscal 2025 and 54% in fiscal 2024 1.
Customers can shop in store, place orders through a third-party app or a WeChat mini-program, with home delivery or in-store pickup 1. The company works with JD.com to upgrade its apps and in-store technology under a collaboration agreement with an initial term of 10 years 12. Management comes from well-known Asian supermarket chains, and the stated strategy includes acquisitions that complement the existing portfolio 13.
Recent growth was driven mainly by the Lee Lee acquisition, completed in April 2024, which added three stores in the Phoenix and Tucson metro areas 23. The company closed its Maison El Monte store in June 2025 as part of efforts to improve profitability 12. The filings also show negative working capital and substantial debt linked to the Lee Lee purchase, which makes financing a central topic 1.
Segments
Center stores
The seven traditional supermarkets, four in Los Angeles and three acquired through Lee Lee in Arizona, operate as center stores with storage space that supplies satellite stores 13. They sell vegetables, fruit, meat, seafood and Asian non-food items, and perishables are a major part of sales 1.
Satellite stores and the center-satellite model
Satellite stores are planned as smaller units in residential areas with younger populations, with a narrower range and fast delivery or in-store pickup 1. The first planned satellite is the Alhambra store, in which the company currently holds a 10% stake and intends to acquire the rest 1. The model has not yet been proven, and the company acknowledges it cannot guarantee its success 1.
Online and digital channels
Digital channels include the third-party Freshdeals24 app and a WeChat mini-program, both allowing online orders and in-store pickup 1. The JD.com collaboration aims to develop a new app and cashier-less in-store technology, but according to the company the partnership is at a very early stage 1.
Market context
Trends
- Growth of the Asian-American populationtailwind
The rapid growth of the Asian-American population supports demand for stores offering culturally specific products, and the company targets this expanding customer base 1. If this growth continues, demand for the specialised range could remain solid 1.
- Interest in healthy and fresh foodtailwind
Asian-American consumers are increasingly aware of the health benefits of food and are willing to pay a premium for fresh and clearly labelled products 1. This favours the vegetable and fruit range but also requires control of storage costs 1.
- Online commerce and digital orderingmixed
Growth in online grocery sales offers an extra channel for customers in areas without Asian stores, but it requires investment in apps and logistics 12. If these investments do not translate into sales, margins could be affected 1.
- Cost and inflation pressureheadwind
Inflation has raised purchase, occupancy and payroll costs, and minimum wage increases in California and Arizona add pressure on operating costs 12. If these costs cannot be fully passed on to customers, margins could decline 1.
Competitive position
Food retail is competitive, and the principal competitors named are 99 Ranch Market and H Mart for traditional supermarkets, and Weee! for online grocery 12. Many of these competitors have longer operating histories or greater financial resources than the company 1. The company has already noted that newly opened Asian supermarkets nearby reduced gross margin at one of its Monterey Park stores 3.
Competition could intensify if rivals open stores close to the company's locations, which could lead to lost sales, lower market share or pricing pressure 1. Entry by established food retailers into the same markets could also increase competitive pressure 1.
- 99 Ranch Market
Asian supermarket chain named by the company as a principal competitor for its traditional stores 1.
- H Mart
Korean supermarket chain named as a principal competitor in traditional supermarkets, with an extensive store network 1.
- Weee!
Online grocery retailer named as a principal competitor for online Asian food sales 12.
- JD.com
Strategic partner providing technology and sourcing services, and a major player in online commerce in China 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report29 Sept 2026Delisting notice · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report25 Aug 2026Delisting notice · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report28 Jul 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report27 Jul 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report23 Jul 2026Shareholder vote · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report20 Jul 2026Item 3.03 · Amendments to articles or bylaws · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report06 Jul 2026Material agreement · Acquisition or disposition of assets · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report06 Jul 2026Material agreement · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement23 Jun 2026
- Current report09 Jun 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-04-30 · SEC / Maison Solutions Inc. · 14 Aug 2025
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-01-31 · SEC / Maison Solutions Inc. · 17 Mar 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Maison Solutions Inc. · 18 Mar 2025
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.