From books

Negating something by using it as its own instrument is less convincing than negating it through a different object.

Zhuangzi · Zhuangzi · -300 · capitolul 21 minute readpublic domain
Using a finger to show that a finger is not a finger is not as good as using a horse to show that a horse is not a horse.Zhuangzi · Zhuangzi · -300 · capitolul 2

Whoever denies a thing using that very thing stays trapped in a circle of self-contradiction.

The line comes from the chapter on equalizing things, where Zhuangzi dismantles philosophical disputation. A finger used to show that a finger is not a finger contradicts itself — the instrument belongs to the very thing being denied. A horse, being something else, can serve as evidence without self-contradiction. The deeper point: the language and categories we use to describe the world are themselves suspect, and anyone building arguments on their own assumptions stays trapped in a circle. Many debates, Zhuangzi implies, are such circles in disguise.

Why it mattersUseful when arguing: check whether your tools of proof already assume what you are trying to deny.

ToolequalsPremiseassumedSelf-contradictionCircularargument
An argument using its own premise closes into a circle

Shelves

Back to the feed