olivlawolivlaw

olivLaw · European equity research

Martela Oyj MARAS.HE

Finland · Nasdaq Helsinki · Vertical: Listed companies from Finland

0.60EUR+0.33% · 1 dayClose 05 Nov 2026

Martela Oyj is one of the Nordic leaders in workplace solutions, designing, implementing and maintaining work and learning environments from specification to maintenance. In fiscal 2025 revenue returned to growth, but the company still reported a slightly negative operating result and negative equity in a Nordic market that remains weak.

At the close of 05 Nov 2026, Martela Oyj (MARAS.HE) stock was 0.60 EUR (+0.33% on the day), with market capitalisation 2.8 m EUR, dividend yield 0.00%, beta 0.33, 52-week range 0.43–1.13 EUR.

Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: ESEF annual reports and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.

Market cap
2.8 m EUR
shares as of 31 Dec 2025
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
Diluted EPS TTM -0.75 · TTM to 31 Dec 2025
E/P (TTM)
-125.00%
TTM to 31 Dec 2025
Dividend yield
0.00%
DPS 12m 0.00
Beta (2y)
0.33
Volatility (1y) 58%
52-week range
0.431.13

Price history

Loading chart…

Technical reading

RSI (14)
56.9
strong (55–70)
Bollinger (20, 2)
0.52 – 0.64
in the upper half of the band · %B 0.68 · band width 19.8%
SMA 50 / 200
0.55 / 0.56
mixed trend
MACD (12, 26, 9)
0.01 / 0.01
MACD above signal

Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).

Performance

CompanyEURO STOXX 50vs EURO STOXX 50Vertical median
1 month+21.7%−0.6%+22.4 pp—
3 months+5.3%−4.2%+9.4 pp—
6 months+27.7%+4.3%+23.3 pp—
Year to date−16.7%+7.5%−24.2 pp—
1 year−41.7%+9.9%−51.7 pp−1.2%
3 years−54.2%+49.8%−104.0 pp+6.8%
5 years−73.9%+42.8%−116.7 pp—
Max drawdown (1y)
−62.3%
11 Nov 2025 → 15 May 2026
Max drawdown (5y)
−88.4%
12 Aug 2022 → 15 May 2026
Compound annual growth (5y)
−23.6%
EURO STOXX 50 +7.4%

Price returns, dividends excluded.

Quarterly results

ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).

E/P over time

E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.

Fiscal years

Fiscal year202320242025
Revenue94.4 m86.7 m93.7 m
Revenue YoYunavailable−8.2%+8.1%
Net income-3.5 m-8.7 m-3.5 m
Net income YoYunavailableunavailableunavailable
Diluted EPS-0.77-1.87-0.75
Diluted EPS YoYunavailableunavailableunavailable
net %-3.7%-10.0%-3.7%
Free cash flowunavailableunavailableunavailable

Balance sheet & financial health

Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025

Cash
2.6 m EUR
Financial debt
13.2 m EUR
Net debt
10.6 m EUR
Equity
-2.0 m EUR
Total assets
45.8 m EUR
Debt / equity
unavailable
Current ratio
0.75x
ROE
unavailable
ROA
-6.9%
FCF margin
unavailable

Financial statements (source on every figure)

Revenue and net income (EUR)

Margins

Income statement · EUR

Revenue
2023
94.4 m
2024
86.7 m
2025
93.7 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Operating income
2023
-2.4 m
2024
-6.5 m
2025
-1.1 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Interest expense
2023
1.6 m
2024
1.8 m
2025
2.3 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Pre-tax income
2023
-3.3 m
2024
-8.2 m
2025
-3.2 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Income tax
2023
222.0 k
2024
482.0 k
2025
304.0 k

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Net income
2023
-3.5 m
2024
-8.7 m
2025
-3.5 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Diluted EPS
2023
-0.77
2024
-1.87
2025
-0.75

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Dividend per share
2023
0.10
2024
0.00
2025
—

esef· 18 Mar 2025derived

Balance sheet · EUR

Cash
2023
5.1 m
2024
3.9 m
2025
2.6 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Receivables
2023
19.1 m
2024
18.6 m
2025
15.2 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Inventories
2023
9.2 m
2024
10.9 m
2025
7.8 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Current assets
2023
33.4 m
2024
33.4 m
2025
25.6 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Property, plant & equipment, net
2023
14.4 m
2024
14.7 m
2025
14.7 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Total assets
2023
55.7 m
2024
54.7 m
2025
45.8 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Short-term debt
2023
4.3 m
2024
7.2 m
2025
—

esef· 18 Mar 2025verified

Long-term debt
2023
13.8 m
2024
13.5 m
2025
13.2 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Current liabilities
2023
31.9 m
2024
39.6 m
2025
34.2 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Total liabilities
2023
46.1 m
2024
53.5 m
2025
47.7 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Equity
2023
9.6 m
2024
1.2 m
2025
-2.0 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Shares outstanding at year end
2023
4.6 m
2024
4.6 m
2025
4.6 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026derived

Cash flow · EUR

Operating cash flow
2023
320.0 k
2024
111.0 k
2025
4.1 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Investing cash flow
2023
-2.3 m
2024
-363.0 k
2025
-450.0 k

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Financing cash flow
2023
-4.3 m
2024
-738.0 k
2025
-4.9 m

esef· 18 Mar 2026verified

Dividends paid
2023
452.0 k
2024
0
2025
—

esef· 18 Mar 2025verified

Computed indicators

Growth

Revenue growth (YoY)
8.1%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Revenue CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
Revenue CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
Net income CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EPS growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
EPS CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
EPS CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
FCF growth (YoY)
unavailable
input data missing

Profitability

Gross margin
unavailable
input data missing
EBITDA margin
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT margin
-1.1%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Net margin
-3.7%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
FCF margin
unavailable
input data missing

Returns

ROE
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
ROA
-6.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
ROIC
unavailable
equity is negative: buybacks shrink the invested capital and ROIC would come out large without meaning anything
ROCE
-9.1%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Payout ratio (EPS)
unavailable
insufficient data
Payout ratio (FCF)
unavailable
input data missing

Balance sheet

Net debt
10.6 m EUR
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Net debt / EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
Debt / equity
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
Interest coverage
-0.5x
computed by olivLawFY 2025

Liquidity

Current ratio
0.7x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Quick ratio
0.5x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Cash ratio
0.1x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025

Cash

Operating cash flow
4.1 m EUR
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Capital expenditure
unavailable
input data missing
Free cash flow
unavailable
input data missing
FCF conversion
unavailable
input data missing
Cash conversion
unavailable
input data missing

Efficiency

Days sales outstanding
66 days
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Days inventory outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Days payables outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Cash conversion cycle
unavailable
input data missing

Market and valuation

Market capitalisation
2.8 m EUR
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Enterprise value
13.3 m EUR
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Market cap / net income TTM
unavailable
insufficient data
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
insufficient data
Earnings yield
-125.0%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
P/B
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
P/S
0.0x
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBIT
unavailable
insufficient data
EV/Sales
0.1x
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
P/FCF
unavailable
input data missing
FCF yield
unavailable
input data missing
Dividend yield
0.0%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Shareholder yield (distributions)
0.0%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025

1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.

Valuation

olivLaw classification

Insufficient data
What is missing
  • indicators available: 4 of at least 6
  • score weight coverage: 22.9% of at least 60%
  • valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.

Closing price

0.60 EUR

05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series

Market cap: 2.8 m EUR

Key indicators

Market capitalisation
2.8 m EUR
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
insufficient data
P/B
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
ROE
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
Net margin
-3.7%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Revenue growth (YoY)
8.1%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Dividend yield
0.0%
computed by olivLawFY 2025

Coverage and freshness

24/37 reporting lines present
Latest full fiscal year: 2025
Latest reported period: 31 Dec 2025
Latest balance sheet date: 31 Dec 2025
Share count (cover of the latest filing), as of: 31 Dec 2025
Source: esefpublished 18 Mar 2026
verified 72derived 5

Score by group

23% · Insufficient data

Estimated value range

unavailable — no valuation method could be computed

Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.

Valuation methods

  • DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
  • Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · input data missing
  • Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
  • Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive

no valuation method could be computed

Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)

Risk-free rate
3.0%
Equity risk premium
5.5%
Beta (default)
1.00
Cost of equity
8.5%
Terminal growth
2.0%

Factor scorecard

Insufficient data

Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 22.9% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

FactorValueScoreWeight used
ROIC · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
Net margin · Quality-3.7%15 (vs peers)27%
FCF conversion · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growthunavailableunavailable—
EPS CAGR 3Y · Growthunavailableunavailable—
Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheetunavailableunavailable—
Interest coverage · Balance sheet-0.5x0 (on a fixed band)27%
Current ratio · Balance sheet0.7x0 (on a fixed band)18%
P/E (TTM) · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
EV/EBITDA · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
FCF yield · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns0.0%0 (on a fixed band)27%
Payout ratio (FCF) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—

Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.

Score groups

  • Balance sheet0/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
  • Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
  • Quality· partial15/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
  • Returns· partial0/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
  • Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value

A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.

Memo

Martela Oyj (MARAS.HE). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.

Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 93.7 m EUR in 2025; YoY growth 8.1%; net margin -3.7%.

Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.

Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 22.9% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).

Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.

What supports the thesis

No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.

What contradicts it

  • Net margin: -3.7%
  • Interest coverage: -0.5x
  • Current ratio: 0.7x
  • Shareholder yield (distributions): 0.0%

Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Payout ratio (FCF).

Versus the vertical median

Listed companies from Finland · same country · compared with 39 companies

Multiples and returns vs the median

P/E
—
vertical median 15.5x
EV/EBITDA
—
vertical median 6.3x
P/S
0.0x
vertical median 0.5x
below median (−93.9%)
P/B
—
vertical median 1.4x
ROE
—
vertical median 7.5%
Net margin
-3.7%
vertical median 2.9%
below median (−226.3%)
EBIT margin
-1.1%
vertical median 4.9%
below median (−122.8%)
Revenue YoY
8.1%
vertical median 1.2%
above median (+564.5%)
Net debt/EBITDA
—
vertical median -0.1x
Dividend yield
0.0%
vertical median 4.0%
below median (−100.0%)

Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)

Companies in the vertical

Market capP/EROENet marginRevenue YoY1A / 3A
FORTUM.HEFortum Oyj20.8 bn27.28.7%15.3%−14.0%+32% / +81%
ELISA.HEElisa Oyj5.6 bn16.327.0%15.2%+3.0%−8% / −15%
KALMAR.HEKalmar Oyj2.4 bn14.724.1%9.4%+1.2%+0% / unavailable
KCR.HEKonecranes Oyj2.2 bn5.620.3%9.5%−0.9%−4% / +134%
EXEL.HEExel Composites Oyj1.8 bn—-18.5%-5.3%+3.6%+163% / +74%
BITTI.HEBittium Oyj1.2 bn55.817.5%17.9%+40.1%+73% / +603%
ALMA.HEAlma Media Oyj1.2 bn21.223.0%16.9%+4.6%+9% / +57%
FIA1S.HEFinnair Oyj927.4 m50.42.9%0.6%+1.9%+54% / +22%
GRK.HEGRK Infra Oyj788.5 m18.327.8%4.9%+19.7%+52% / unavailable
HARVIA.HEHarvia Oyj768.7 m29.321.0%13.3%+13.5%−1% / +64%
ATRAV.HEAtria Oyj451.7 m11.19.8%2.2%+3.3%+13% / +57%
ANORA.HEAnora Group Oyj317.6 m57.81.4%0.8%−4.9%+26% / +11%
CAPMAN.HECapMan Oyj300.2 m23.16.8%20.9%+9.4%−8% / −20%
ICP1V.HEIncap Oyj261.0 m18.710.4%6.5%−6.7%−3% / +37%
FSECURE.HEF-Secure Oyj243.7 m10.943.4%15.3%−0.4%−17% / −23%
ASPO.HEAspo Oyj219.4 m9.315.4%5.0%+2.1%+2% / +9%
ETTE.HEEtteplan Oyj173.7 m16.48.8%2.9%+0.1%−27% / −51%
DIGIA.HEDigia Oyj131.6 m10.514.5%5.9%+5.5%−16% / −12%
ILKKA.HEIlkka Oyj93.8 m8.16.2%30.8%+22.6%+0% / +21%
CONSTI.HEConsti Oyj77.4 m11.615.3%2.0%+2.9%−8% / −6%
APETIT.HEApetit Oyj75.6 m8.48.2%5.4%+3.1%−14% / −3%
ESENSE.HEEnersense International Oyj74.9 m74.73.1%0.4%−27.7%+12% / +9%
CTH1V.HEComponenta Oyj66.1 m324.00.8%0.2%−4.6%+49% / +182%
KAMUX.HEKamux Oyj47.4 m10.34.2%0.5%+0.8%−40% / −77%
GLA1V.HEGlaston Oyj Abp42.1 m35.41.8%0.6%−4.2%−12% / −32%

1- and 3-year price returns: for MARAS.HE from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.

olivLaw engine forecast

The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.

The engine has no published run for this company yet.

Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)

Illustrative scenarios

Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.

Bear
Allowed range: -50 … 50%
Allowed range: -100 … 100%
Allowed range: 0 … 100
Allowed range: -10 … 20%
Allowed range: 0 … 100%
Base
Allowed range: -50 … 50%
Allowed range: -100 … 100%
Allowed range: 0 … 100
Allowed range: -10 … 20%
Allowed range: 0 … 100%
Bull
Allowed range: -50 … 50%
Allowed range: -100 … 100%
Allowed range: 0 … 100
Allowed range: -10 … 20%
Allowed range: 0 … 100%
Nothing is saved.

Estimated price (EUR)

Estimated priceBearBaseBull
1 years
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
3 years
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
5 years
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
What moves the 3-year price the most

    AI analysis

    AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

    In brief

    Martela Oyj is one of the Nordic leaders in workplace solutions, designing, implementing and maintaining work and learning environments from specification to maintenance. In fiscal 2025 revenue returned to growth, but the company still reported a slightly negative operating result and negative equity in a Nordic market that remains weak.

    SWOT

    Strengths

    • Leading position in Nordic workplace solutions, with a Lifecycle model that covers design, implementation and maintenance.
    • High customer satisfaction, supported by independent surveys cited by the company.
    • Own production in Finland and Poland, with a short and local supplier chain.

    Weaknesses

    • Equity is negative at the end of fiscal 2025, which raises questions about solvency.
    • The operating result remains negative, although it improved from the previous year.
    • The business depends on projects, which makes short-term predictability difficult.

    Opportunities

    • The return to the office and the need for spaces suited to hybrid work could increase demand for transformation services.
    • The Workplace as a Service model and digital sales channels could bring more stable revenue.
    • Demand for sustainable and refurbishable furniture could favour the company's circular solutions.

    Threats

    • A weak Nordic economy and geopolitical uncertainty could lead clients to postpone investments.
    • Price competition could prevent margins from recovering.
    • Short-term financing conditions could weaken liquidity if demand remains low.

    Risks

    • Demand uncertaintyhigh

      An uncertain economic environment and postponed investments could reduce revenue and results, especially in large projects.

    • Liquidity and negative equityhigh

      Negative equity and lease liabilities could make financing more costly if liquidity deteriorates.

    • Margin pressuremedium

      Price competition could limit the improvement in profitability even if volumes grow.

    • Project predictabilitymedium

      The project-based nature of the industry makes short-term forecasts of revenue and cash receipts difficult.

    • Component deliverieslow

      Delays in components needed for production could affect delivery times of final products.

    Investment thesis

    What would need to be true (bull case)

    • If the return to the office and the need for hybrid spaces materialise, demand for Martela's transformation services could rise significantly.
    • The company has returned revenue to growth and reduced operating losses, and efficiency measures could keep improving profitability.
    • Leadership in customer satisfaction and the circular model could support market share over the long term.

    What would break the thesis

    • If the Nordic economy remains weak, clients could keep postponing purchases and revenue could fall again.
    • Negative equity and high debt could limit the company's financial flexibility.
    • Price competition could prevent margins from recovering even if volumes stabilise.

    What to watch

    • Revenue development against the guidance of a slight decline for 20262026
    • Comparable operating result and the effect of efficiency measures2026
    • Liquidity and any changes in financing terms2026
    • The annual general meeting decision on no dividend for 20252026

    Products, market & competition

    AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

    The business

    Final assembly and remanufacturing take place at the Nummela logistics centre in Finland, which also houses most R&D and purchasing. Upholstery components are assembled at the company's own plant in Poland, and table top and storage components are mainly made at subsidiary Kidex Oy in Kitee. In other countries sales are mostly made through a dealer network.

    In 2025 the company introduced new products, including the Oona family extended with stools, the PoGo and PreGo tables for collaborative learning and the Sono Work range. The company describes its strategy as focused on services across the whole life of the space rather than large one-off investments.

    Segments

    Furniture and workplace solutions

    The core segment includes office furniture, phone booths and ergonomic solutions for hybrid offices. In 2025 the company extended the Oona range and launched Sono Work, responding to demand for adaptable spaces.

    Transformation and Workplace as a Service services

    Services include planning, implementation, relocations and maintenance of spaces, together with the flexible Workplace as a Service model. They are an increasingly important part of the business, and management expects the share of services to grow.

    Market context

    The Nordic economy was weak in 2023-2025, which made customers cautious in purchasing decisions. Forecasts cited by the company indicate a slight growth in Nordic office furniture markets, with demand that could strengthen in the years ahead. Office occupancy rates have not yet returned to pre-pandemic levels.

    Price competition has increased because of the market decline in recent years, which pressures margins. The company does not expect a significant strengthening of demand in its main markets in 2026.

    Trends

    • Return to the office and hybrid worktailwind

      Companies are reconsidering office spaces to support hybrid work and collaboration, which can create demand for transformation projects and adaptable furniture.

    • Weak Nordic economyheadwind

      Economic weakness and geopolitical uncertainty are leading clients to postpone investments, which could prolong the period of low demand.

    • Focus on sustainability and the circular economytailwind

      EU circular economy rules and sustainability reporting push companies toward durable, refurbishable and leased furniture, an advantage for the Martela model.

    • Pressure on pricesheadwind

      Price competition in the industry has grown and weighs on profitability, which could limit the recovery of margins.

    Competitive position

    Martela operates in a Nordic market for office furniture and workplace services with many regional and international competitors. Competition runs on price, services and durable design, and the company differentiates itself through its Lifecycle model and transformation services.

    The company states that it achieved the highest customer satisfaction in its industry for the eleventh consecutive time in a survey commissioned from Taloustutkimus, which supports its market position. Price pressure nevertheless remains high.

    • Regional Nordic office furniture makers

      Local and regional manufacturers in the Nordics and Europe competing on furniture and fit-out services.

    • European office furniture manufacturers

      European companies with comparable office furniture ranges competing on design and sustainability.

    • International workplace solution providers

      International furniture and fit-out companies offering solutions for hybrid offices.

    • Office fit-out distributors and integrators

      Fit-out firms and integrators competing on workplace transformation projects.

    News & filings

    In the press

    No news in our archive over the last 180 days.

    Annual reports (ESEF)

    Sources

    1. [1] Annual report, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 (ESEF) · SEC / Martela Oyj · 31 Dec 2025

    Figures computed by olivLaw from ESEF annual reports and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.