olivlawolivlaw

olivLaw · European equity research

NanoGroup S.A. NNG.WA

Poland · GPW Warszawa · ISIN PLNNGRP00011 · Vertical: Listed companies from Poland

2.28PLN−0.44% · 1 dayClose 05 Nov 2026

NanoGroup S.A. is a Warsaw-based Polish holding company that coordinates three biotechnology and nanotechnology subsidiaries focused on oncology and transplantology. The company funds its work through share issues and private investment agreements, and its 2023 annual report flags a material uncertainty about going concern.

At the close of 05 Nov 2026, NanoGroup S.A. (NNG.WA) stock was 2.28 PLN (−0.44% on the day), with market capitalisation 46.1 m PLN, beta -0.02, 52-week range 2.28–3.12 PLN.

Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: ESEF annual reports and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.

Market cap
46.1 m PLN
shares as of 31 Dec 2023
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
Diluted EPS TTM -0.33 · TTM to 31 Dec 2023
E/P (TTM)
-14.47%
TTM to 31 Dec 2023
Dividend yield
unavailable
Beta (2y)
-0.02
Volatility (1y) 29%
52-week range
2.283.12

Price history

Loading chart…

Technical reading

RSI (14)
34.1
weak (30–45)
Bollinger (20, 2)
2.27 – 2.41
in the lower half of the band · %B 0.08 · band width 6.1%
SMA 50 / 200
2.41 / 2.46
downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
MACD (12, 26, 9)
-0.04 / -0.03
MACD below signal

Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).

Performance

CompanyEURO STOXX 50vs EURO STOXX 50Vertical median
1 month−7.7%−0.6%−7.0 pp—
3 months−6.7%−4.2%−2.6 pp—
6 months−9.0%+4.3%−13.3 pp—
Year to date−14.0%+7.5%−21.5 pp—
1 year−6.9%+9.9%−16.9 pp+7.1%
3 years+123.5%+49.8%+73.7 pp+3.3%
5 years−55.3%+42.8%−98.1 pp—
Max drawdown (1y)
−27.1%
24 Nov 2025 → 02 Nov 2026
Max drawdown (5y)
−82.3%
08 Nov 2021 → 17 Nov 2023
Compound annual growth (5y)
−14.9%
EURO STOXX 50 +7.4%

Price returns, dividends excluded.

Quarterly results

ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).

E/P over time

E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.

Fiscal years

Fiscal year202120222023
Revenue492.5 k139.5 k2.0 k
Revenue YoYunavailable−71.7%−98.6%
Net income-10.0 m-838.6 k-7.9 m
Net income YoYunavailableunavailableunavailable
Diluted EPS-0.61-0.04-0.33
Diluted EPS YoYunavailableunavailableunavailable
net %-2,031.6%-600.9%-390,778.6%
Free cash flow-2.7 m-3.7 m-4.8 m

Balance sheet & financial health

Fiscal year 2023 · 31 Dec 2023

Cash
537.6 k PLN
Financial debt
unavailable PLN
Net debt
unavailable PLN
Equity
5.2 m PLN
Total assets
8.6 m PLN
Debt / equity
unavailable
Current ratio
0.56x
ROE
-121.9%
ROA
-56.7%
FCF margin
-239,570.8%

Financial statements (source on every figure)

Revenue and net income (PLN)

Margins

Income statement · PLN

Revenue
2021
492.5 k
2022
139.5 k
2023
2.0 k

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Operating income
2021
-10.6 m
2022
-784.6 k
2023
-7.9 m

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Depreciation & amortisation
2021
64.3 k
2022
62.2 k
2023
35.4 k

esef· 01 May 2024verified

EBITDA
2021
-10.5 m ≈
2022
-722.4 k ≈
2023
-7.9 m ≈

esef· 01 May 2024derived

Interest expense
2021
108.1 k
2022
1.4 k
2023
4.5 k

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Pre-tax income
2021
-10.7 m
2022
-783.5 k
2023
-7.9 m

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Income tax
2021
-12.0 k
2022
-12.0 k
2023
0

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Net income
2021
-10.0 m
2022
-838.6 k
2023
-7.9 m

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Diluted EPS
2021
-0.61
2022
-0.04
2023
-0.33

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Balance sheet · PLN

Cash
2021
4.0 m
2022
2.5 m
2023
537.6 k

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Inventories
2021
48.4 k
2022
46.5 k
2023
63.4 k

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Current assets
2021
5.1 m
2022
2.9 m
2023
836.1 k

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Property, plant & equipment, net
2021
432.1 k
2022
295.5 k
2023
485.9 k

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Goodwill
2021
0
2022
0
2023
0

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Intangibles (excl. goodwill)
2021
14.4 m
2022
15.8 m
2023
7.3 m

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Total assets
2021
20.3 m
2022
19.2 m
2023
8.6 m

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Current liabilities
2021
4.5 m
2022
1.4 m
2023
1.5 m

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Total liabilities
2021
11.9 m
2022
11.4 m
2023
3.5 m

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Equity
2021
8.4 m
2022
7.8 m
2023
5.2 m

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Shares outstanding at year end
2021
15.6 m
2022
16.8 m
2023
20.2 m

esef· 01 May 2024derived

Cash flow · PLN

Operating cash flow
2021
-2.7 m
2022
-3.7 m
2023
-4.8 m

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Capex
2021
50.0 k
2022
8.4 k
2023
75.9 k

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Free cash flow
2021
-2.7 m ≈
2022
-3.7 m ≈
2023
-4.8 m ≈

esef· 01 May 2024derived

Investing cash flow
2021
-3.9 m
2022
-806.9 k
2023
-3.7 m

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Financing cash flow
2021
749.2 k
2022
3.0 m
2023
6.5 m

esef· 01 May 2024verified

Computed indicators

Growth

Revenue growth (YoY)
-98.6%
computed by olivLawFY 2023
Revenue CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
Revenue CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
Net income CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EPS growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
EPS CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
EPS CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
FCF growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive

Profitability

Gross margin
unavailable
input data missing
EBITDA margin
-389,623.3%
computed by olivLawFY 2023
EBIT margin
-391,377.2%
computed by olivLawFY 2023
Net margin
-390,778.6%
computed by olivLawFY 2023
FCF margin
-239,570.8%
computed by olivLawFY 2023

Returns

ROE
-136.5%
computed by olivLawFY 2023 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
ROA
-56.7%
computed by olivLawFY 2023 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
ROIC
unavailable
input data missing
ROCE
-110.6%
computed by olivLawFY 2023 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
Payout ratio (EPS)
unavailable
input data missing
Payout ratio (FCF)
unavailable
input data missing

Balance sheet

Net debt
unavailable
input data missing
Net debt / EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
Debt / equity
unavailable
input data missing
Interest coverage
-1,749.0x
computed by olivLawFY 2023

Liquidity

Current ratio
0.6x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
Quick ratio
0.5x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
Cash ratio
0.4x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2023

Cash

Operating cash flow
-4.8 m PLN
computed by olivLawFY 2023
Capital expenditure
75.9 k PLN
computed by olivLawFY 2023
Free cash flow
-4.8 m PLN
computed by olivLawFY 2023
FCF conversion
unavailable
insufficient data
Cash conversion
unavailable
insufficient data

Efficiency

Days sales outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Days inventory outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Days payables outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Cash conversion cycle
unavailable
input data missing

Market and valuation

Market capitalisation
46.1 m PLN
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
Enterprise value
unavailable
input data missing
Market cap / net income TTM
unavailable
insufficient data
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
insufficient data
Earnings yield
-14.5%
computed by olivLawFY 2023
P/B
10.3x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
P/S
22,845.5x
computed by olivLawFY 2023 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBIT
unavailable
input data missing
EV/Sales
unavailable
input data missing
P/FCF
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
FCF yield
-10.5%
computed by olivLawFY 2023 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
Dividend yield
unavailable
no dividend in the structured statements; a missing line is not a confirmed zero
Shareholder yield (distributions)
unavailable
input data missing

1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.

Valuation

olivLaw classification

Insufficient data
What is missing
  • indicators available: 4 of at least 6
  • score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%
  • valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.

Closing price

2.28 PLN

05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series

Market cap: 46.1 m PLN

Key indicators

Market capitalisation
46.1 m PLN
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
insufficient data
P/B
10.3x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
ROE
-136.5%
computed by olivLawFY 2023 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2023
Net margin
-390,778.6%
computed by olivLawFY 2023
Revenue growth (YoY)
-98.6%
computed by olivLawFY 2023
Dividend yield
unavailable
no dividend in the structured statements; a missing line is not a confirmed zero

Coverage and freshness

25/37 reporting lines present
Latest full fiscal year: 2023
Latest reported period: 31 Dec 2023
Latest balance sheet date: 31 Dec 2023
Share count (cover of the latest filing), as of: 31 Dec 2023
Source: esefpublished 01 May 2024
verified 79derived 3

The data is older than the freshness threshold.

Score by group

25% · Insufficient data

Estimated value range

unavailable — no valuation assumptions for the reporting currency

Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.

Valuation methods

    Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)

    Risk-free rate
    6.5%
    Equity risk premium
    6.0%
    Beta (default)
    1.00
    Cost of equity
    12.5%
    Terminal growth
    3.0%

    Factor scorecard

    Insufficient data

    Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

    FactorValueScoreWeight used
    ROIC · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
    Net margin · Quality-390,778.6%0 (vs peers)25%
    FCF conversion · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
    Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growthunavailableunavailable—
    EPS CAGR 3Y · Growthunavailableunavailable—
    Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheetunavailableunavailable—
    Interest coverage · Balance sheet-1,749.0x0 (on a fixed band)25%
    Current ratio · Balance sheet0.6x0 (on a fixed band)17%
    P/E (TTM) · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
    EV/EBITDA · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
    FCF yield · Valuation-10.5%0 (on a fixed band)33%
    Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—
    Payout ratio (FCF) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—

    Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.

    Score groups

    • Balance sheet0/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
    • Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
    • Quality· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
    • Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
    • Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value

    A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.

    Memo

    NanoGroup Spółka Akcyjna (NNG.WA). Latest full fiscal year: 2023; data up to 2023-12-31.

    Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 2.0 k PLN in 2023; YoY growth -98.6%; net margin -390,778.6%; ROE -136.5%.

    Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.

    Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).

    Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.

    What supports the thesis

    No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.

    What contradicts it

    • Net margin: -390,778.6%
    • Interest coverage: -1,749.0x
    • Current ratio: 0.6x
    • FCF yield: -10.5%

    Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).

    Versus the vertical median

    Listed companies from Poland · same country · compared with 39 companies

    Multiples and returns vs the median

    P/E
    —
    vertical median 12.1x
    EV/EBITDA
    —
    vertical median —
    P/S
    22,845.5x
    vertical median 1.3x
    above median (+1,785,564.6%)
    P/B
    10.3x
    vertical median 1.0x
    above median (+952.3%)
    ROE
    -136.5%
    vertical median 8.9%
    below median (−1,628.8%)
    Net margin
    -390,778.6%
    vertical median 2.8%
    below median (−13,856,054.3%)
    EBIT margin
    -391,377.2%
    vertical median 6.3%
    below median (−6,180,082.6%)
    Revenue YoY
    -98.6%
    vertical median 9.9%
    below median (−1,099.9%)
    Net debt/EBITDA
    —
    vertical median —
    Dividend yield
    —
    vertical median 3.6%

    Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)

    Companies in the vertical

    Market capP/EROENet marginRevenue YoY1A / 3A
    BDX.WABudimex Spółka Akcyjna19.3 bn36.141.5%6.2%+8.9%+21% / +36%
    ACP.WAAsseco Poland S.A.19.2 bn38.17.8%2.9%+19.8%+19% / +202%
    BFT.WABenefit Systems Spółka Akcyjna18.1 bn131.120.8%7.2%+99.9%+74% / +221%
    ASE.WAAsseco South Eastern Europe Spółka Akcyjna3.7 bn19.818.1%12.0%+36.5%+7% / +52%
    1AT.WAAtal Spółka Akcyjna2.3 bn6.429.8%22.2%−1.3%+7% / +8%
    ATT.WAGrupa Azoty Spółka Akcyjna1.7 bn—-37.9%-20.8%−45.1%−10% / −22%
    ARH.WAArchicom Spółka Akcyjna1.3 bn12.115.9%22.1%−21.6%+13% / +89%
    ACT.WAAction S.A.997.4 m27.18.3%1.5%+6.1%+70% / +170%
    BRS.WABoryszew Spółka Akcyjna889.2 m8.36.3%1.6%+8.4%−24% / −26%
    AGO.WAAgora Spółka Akcyjna601.9 m—-14.2%-9.2%+15.2%+40% / +21%
    AMB.WAAmbra S.A.468.0 m7.616.4%7.0%+12.9%+5% / −33%
    ATC.WAArctic Paper Spółka Akcyjna357.2 m1.416.3%7.0%−27.5%−38% / −75%
    ATG.WA"atm Grupa Spółka Akcyjna"299.3 m11.18.9%11.6%−22.0%−11% / +3%
    ART.WAArtifex Mundi S.A.226.6 m17.435.7%33.3%+51.9%+46% / +12%
    APN.WAAPLISENS Spółka Akcyjna194.6 m9.511.4%13.8%+21.8%−1% / −21%
    BMC.WABumech Spółka Akcyjna155.7 m—-3.4%-3.9%−40.0%−37% / −49%
    ALI.WAALTUS Spolka Akcyjna153.9 m16.87.9%16.9%+30.3%+34% / +48%
    BBT.WABoomBit Spółka Akcyjna71.4 m4.520.7%6.4%−16.5%−19% / −57%
    BBD.WABbi Development S.A.54.1 m1.136.0%208.3%+50.2%+1% / +9%
    NNG.WANanoGroup Spółka Akcyjna46.1 m—-136.5%-390,778.6%−98.6%−22% / +146%
    ALG.WAAll in! Games Spółka Akcyjna39.8 m——-156.9%−72.2%−27% / −56%
    BMX.WABioMaxima Spółka Akcyjna37.0 m63.21.2%1.3%−67.5%−29% / −45%
    06N.WAMagna Polonia Spółka Akcyjna31.3 m0.5115.4%964.7%+13.0%−28% / −42%
    BCM.WABETACOM Spółka Akcyjna26.7 m17.68.0%0.9%+21.3%+8% / +4%
    AWM.WAAirway Medix Spółka Akcyjna14.3 m—-25.8%-117,400.0%−97.7%−23% / −43%

    1- and 3-year price returns: for NNG.WA from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.

    olivLaw engine forecast

    The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.

    The engine has no published run for this company yet.

    Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)

    Illustrative scenarios

    Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.

    Bear
    Allowed range: -50 … 50%
    Allowed range: -100 … 100%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100
    Allowed range: -10 … 20%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100%
    Base
    Allowed range: -50 … 50%
    Allowed range: -100 … 100%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100
    Allowed range: -10 … 20%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100%
    Bull
    Allowed range: -50 … 50%
    Allowed range: -100 … 100%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100
    Allowed range: -10 … 20%
    Allowed range: 0 … 100%
    Nothing is saved.

    Estimated price (PLN)

    Estimated priceBearBaseBull
    1 years
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    3 years
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    5 years
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    insufficient data
    Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
    What moves the 3-year price the most

      AI analysis

      AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

      In brief

      NanoGroup S.A. is a Warsaw-based Polish holding company that coordinates three biotechnology and nanotechnology subsidiaries focused on oncology and transplantology. The company funds its work through share issues and private investment agreements, and its 2023 annual report flags a material uncertainty about going concern.

      SWOT

      Strengths

      • A portfolio of projects in oncology and transplantology at advanced development stages, some with published or positively assessed results 1.
      • Funding and investment agreements with private partners, providing a source of capital for the next stages 1.
      • A clear business model based on development up to the preclinical stage followed by commercialisation through partners, aligned with sector practice 1.

      Weaknesses

      • The group does not yet earn revenue from selling projects, which makes its dependence on external funding very high 1.
      • The annual report includes a material uncertainty about the company's ability to continue as a going concern 1.
      • Capitalised development costs are challenged by the supervisor, and some could need to be impaired 1.

      Opportunities

      • If some projects reach licensing or sale, revenue could change the group's financial profile 1.
      • Private investor interest in the NanOX and Polepi projects could open new sources of capital 1.
      • European innovation funding programmes could support co-financing applications filed by the subsidiaries 1.

      Threats

      • Failure to obtain funding could slow or halt research activity, as management warns 1.
      • Geopolitical risks linked to cooperation with partners in China could affect the supply chain 1.
      • Repaying a European grant, if a review goes against the group, could weigh on its financial position 1.

      Risks

      • Going concernhigh

        The report flags a material uncertainty tied to the success of the share issue, the execution of investment agreements and consulting results; if financing does not materialise, activity could be slowed 1.

      • Impairment of capitalised costshigh

        The supervisor recommended impairment for projects with unfinished development; if this requirement applies, reported results and equity could fall significantly 1.

      • Dependence on contract conditionsmedium

        Payment of some investments depends on meeting technical milestones such as autotransplants and patent filings; failing them could cancel unpaid amounts 1.

      • Grant repayment riskmedium

        The provision set up for a POIR grant has not yet been released, although final reports were filed; an adverse outcome could create payment obligations 1.

      • Geopolitical exposurelow

        Cooperation with Chinese partners could be affected by health restrictions or political tensions, which the report acknowledges as a general risk 1.

      Investment thesis

      What would need to be true (bull case)

      • If the NanOX and Polepi projects meet their set technical stages and find partners, the group's value could rise considerably from its current capital base.
      • Private investment already contracted suggests some investor confidence, which could ease the next rounds of funding.
      • A holding structure with three specialised subsidiaries could allow each project to be monetised separately through licensing or sale.

      What would break the thesis

      • The absence of sales revenue and the going-concern uncertainty could force shareholder dilution through further share issues.
      • If the supervisor requires impairment of capitalised development costs, reported equity could fall substantially.
      • Dependence on partners and complex contractual conditions could delay or cancel expected inflows.

      What to watch

      • Outcome of the series L share issue and payment of the eCapital investment2024
      • Supervisor's decision on impairment of capitalised development costs2024
      • Final review of POIR grants and release of the related provision2024
      • Achievement of technical milestones in investor contracts, deadline end of 20252025

      Products, market & competition

      AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

      The business

      NanoGroup S.A. (the Issuer) is the parent of a group developing innovative medical technologies in nanotechnology, focused on oncology and transplantology. The company does not conduct R&D itself but coordinates and oversees three subsidiaries: NanoVelos S.A., NanoSanguis S.A. and NanoThea S.A. 1. The business model takes projects to the preclinical stage and then sells or licenses them to partners who continue development with their own funding 1. According to the report, the group did not yet generate sales revenue from finished projects at the reporting date 1.

      The strategy adopted in April 2023 sets a common model in biotechnology: in-house research in the group's own laboratory for early stages, and collaboration with international companies and institutions for later stages 1. As a result, the group's value depends largely on its ability to attract investors or partners for projects such as System NanOX or the Polepi product 1.

      The legal structure includes the Issuer registered in Poland at its Warsaw address, and subsidiaries active in nanotechnology and biotechnology product development 1. The consolidated report for 2023 was approved by the management board on 25 April 2024 and audited by an external firm 1.

      Segments

      NanoVelos S.A. (oncology)

      The subsidiary NanoVelos S.A. handles the Polepi product, a nanoparticle system with epirubicin tested in ovarian cancer models. A scientific paper on its efficacy was published in January 2024, and in February 2024 a first batch of 5 litres was produced at a Chinese partner 1.

      NanoSanguis S.A. (transplantology)

      NanoSanguis S.A. develops the NanOX system for ex vivo organ preservation, including animal-model kidney transplant testing 1. The ENM TARBRAINFECT project was declared fully completed and positively assessed by NCBiR in February 2024 1.

      NanoThea S.A.

      NanoThea S.A. is the third subsidiary of the group, but the annual report in the source provided does not detail its project portfolio 1.

      Market context

      The group operates in biotechnology and medical technologies based on nanotechnology, a field the report describes as carrying very high technological and commercial risk 1. The company says its business model is typical for biotechnology in Poland and abroad 1.

      Access to funding is the decisive factor: the report shows that projects must find partners or buyers before revenue becomes significant, and until then capital comes from share issues, share sales and grants 1.

      Trends

      • Investor interest in private projectsmixed

        The agreements with eCapital and 5M SQUARE show that private investors may support development stages, if the technical goals set in the contracts can be met 1.

      • Pressure from regulatory recommendationsheadwind

        The financial supervisor asked for impairment or reconsideration of capitalised development costs for unfinished projects, which could reduce reported assets 1.

      • Commercial ties with Chinese partnersmixed

        Partnerships with Chinese manufacturers for Polepi provide production access but also introduce the geopolitical risk the report mentions explicitly 1.

      • Grants and European programmesmixed

        Public programme financing remains important, but repaying grants already received could affect results if reviews conclude unfavourably 1.

      Competitive position

      The source report does not name competitors. The group places its activity within Polish and international biotechnology, where competition for partners and funding is implicit in the business model described 1.

      The declared advantage is a portfolio of preclinical-stage projects in both oncology and transplantology, combined with international collaborations 1. Differentiation, however, depends on proving efficacy, which is not yet commercially demonstrated 1.

      • Clairfield International SA

        Group that assisted the subsidiaries in finding investors and partners; relevant as an intermediary rather than a direct competitor 1.

      • Guangdong Sunho Pharmaceutical

        Manufacturing partner for Polepi; not a competitor, but it influences supply capacity 1.

      • eCapital sp. z o.o.

        Private investor with a staged funding agreement; relevant to project financing 1.

      • 5M SQUARE sp. z o.o.

        Private investor with a share subscription offer conditional on a patent application milestone 1.

      News & filings

      In the press

      No news in our archive over the last 180 days.

      Annual reports (ESEF)

      Sources

      1. [1] Annual report, fiscal year ended 2023-12-31 (ESEF) · SEC / NanoGroup S.A. · 31 Dec 2023

      Figures computed by olivLaw from ESEF annual reports and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.