olivLaw · US equity research
Peabody Energy Corporation BTU
Bituminous Coal & Lignite Surface Mining · SIC 1221 · Vertical: Coal mining (SIC 122x)
Peabody is one of the largest producers of metallurgical and thermal coal in the world, with operations in the United States and Australia. It sold 122.0 million tons of coal in 2025, and in the second quarter of 2026 reported results weighed down by the cost of commissioning the Centurion mine, with prospects of improvement in the second half of the year.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) stock was 17.02 USD (−17.62% on the day), with market capitalisation 2.1 bn USD, dividend yield 1.76%, beta 0.72, 52-week range 17.02–39.50 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 1.0 bn USD (+12.7% YoY), net income of -90.6 m USD, diluted EPS -0.74 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 18.7
- oversold (≤ 30)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 19.18 – 26.55
- below the lower band · %B -0.29 · band width 32.2%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 25.32 / 27.84
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -1.42 / -1.01
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −33.3% | −1.1% | −32.2 pp | — |
| 3 months | −25.4% | −0.5% | −24.9 pp | — |
| 6 months | −31.8% | +4.4% | −36.2 pp | — |
| Year to date | −42.7% | +12.3% | −55.0 pp | — |
| 1 year | −42.1% | +13.5% | −55.7 pp | −1.6% |
| 3 years | −28.2% | +76.4% | −104.6 pp | −13.5% |
| 5 years | +46.2% | +63.7% | −17.5 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.1 bn | 1.1 bn | 937.0 m | 890.1 m | 1.0 bn | 1.0 bn | 973.3 m | 1.0 bn |
| SG&A | 20.6 m | 26.3 m | 23.6 m | 23.5 m | 27.4 m | 30.5 m | 31.6 m | 23.3 m |
| Operating income | 120.1 m | 40.1 m | 31.9 m | -38.4 m | -81.4 m | 7.8 m | -44.2 m | -105.4 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 84.7 m | 95.6 m | 92.1 m | 93.4 m | 100.0 m | 99.0 m | 109.5 m | 107.5 m |
| Interest expense | 9.7 m | 11.8 m | 11.5 m | 11.1 m | 10.0 m | 11.3 m | 10.7 m | 12.7 m |
| Pre-tax income | 138.2 m | 61.9 m | 43.2 m | -28.3 m | -70.0 m | 21.6 m | -41.4 m | -122.9 m |
| Income tax | 25.7 m | 23.6 m | 4.9 m | -2.7 m | -3.4 m | 10.0 m | -16.0 m | -37.0 m |
| Net income | 101.3 m | 63.2 m | 34.4 m | -27.6 m | -70.1 m | 20.8 m | -32.4 m | -90.6 m |
| Diluted EPS | 0.74 | 0.46 ≈ | 0.27 | -0.23 | -0.58 | 0.17 ≈ | -0.27 | -0.74 |
| Operating cash flow | 359.9 m ≈ | 119.8 m | 119.9 m | 23.2 m ≈ | 122.0 m ≈ | 68.6 m | 30.0 m | -1.4 m ≈ |
| Dividends paid | 9.4 m ≈ | 9.1 m | 9.1 m | 9.2 m ≈ | 9.2 m ≈ | 9.0 m | 9.2 m | 9.1 m ≈ |
| Share repurchases | 100.0 m ≈ | 0 | 0 | 0 ≈ | 0 ≈ | 0 | — | — |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 5.6 bn | 4.6 bn | 2.9 bn | 3.3 bn | 5.0 bn | 4.9 bn | 4.2 bn | 3.9 bn |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | −17.2% | −37.7% | +15.2% | +50.1% | −0.7% | −14.4% | −8.9% |
| Net income | 544.4 m | -211.3 m | -1.9 bn | 371.4 m | 1.3 bn | 815.6 m | 403.5 m | -42.5 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | −138.8% | unavailable | unavailable | +255.2% | −38.2% | −50.5% | −110.5% |
| Diluted EPS | 4.43 | -2.04 | -19.14 | 3.22 | 8.31 | 5.00 | 2.70 | -0.43 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | −146.0% | unavailable | unavailable | +158.1% | −39.8% | −46.0% | −115.9% |
| net % | 9.8% | -4.6% | -65.0% | 11.2% | 26.5% | 16.5% | 9.5% | -1.1% |
| Free cash flow | 1.2 bn | 392.0 m | -201.1 m | 236.9 m | 952.1 m | 687.2 m | 205.2 m | -77.7 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 575.3 m USD
- Financial debt
- 15.2 m USD
- Net debt
- -560.1 m USD
- Equity
- 3.6 bn USD
- Total assets
- 5.8 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- 0.00x
- Current ratio
- 1.85x
- ROE
- -1.2%
- ROA
- -0.7%
- FCF margin
- -2.0%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 2.9 bn | 3.3 bn | 5.0 bn | 4.9 bn | 4.2 bn | 3.9 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| SG&A | 99.5 m | 84.9 m | 88.8 m | 90.7 m | 91.0 m | 105.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Operating income | -1.7 bn | 432.2 m | 1.4 bn | 1.1 bn | 445.3 m | -80.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 346.0 m | 308.7 m | 317.6 m | 321.4 m | 343.0 m | 384.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| EBITDA | -1.4 bn ≈ | 740.9 m ≈ | 1.7 bn ≈ | 1.4 bn ≈ | 788.3 m ≈ | 304.4 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 139.8 m | 183.4 m | 140.3 m | 59.8 m | 46.9 m | 43.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -1.9 bn | 370.2 m | 1.3 bn | 1.1 bn | 516.1 m | -33.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Income tax | 8.0 m | 22.8 m | -38.8 m | 308.8 m | 108.8 m | 8.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Net income | -1.9 bn | 371.4 m | 1.3 bn | 815.6 m | 403.5 m | -42.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -19.14 | 3.22 | 8.31 | 5.00 | 2.70 | -0.43 | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 97.7 m | 112.0 m | 157.2 m | 154.3 m | 141.9 m | 121.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | — | — | — | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.30 | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 709.2 m | 954.3 m | 1.3 bn | 969.3 m | 700.4 m | 575.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Receivables | 244.8 m | 350.5 m | 465.5 m | 389.7 m | 359.3 m | 314.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Inventories | 261.6 m | 226.7 m | 296.1 m | 351.8 m | 393.4 m | 383.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Current assets | 1.4 bn | 1.8 bn | 2.4 bn | 2.0 bn | 1.8 bn | 1.6 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 3.1 bn | 3.0 bn | 2.9 bn | 2.8 bn | 3.1 bn | 3.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Total assets | 4.7 bn | 4.9 bn | 5.6 bn | 6.0 bn | 6.0 bn | 5.8 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 745.7 m | 872.1 m | 905.5 m | 965.5 m | 811.7 m | 827.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | 44.9 m | 59.6 m | 13.2 m | 13.5 m | 15.8 m | 15.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 790.6 m | 931.7 m | 918.7 m | 979.0 m | 827.5 m | 842.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 3.7 bn | 3.1 bn | 2.3 bn | 2.4 bn | 2.2 bn | 2.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Equity | 981.3 m | 1.8 bn | 3.3 bn | 3.6 bn | 3.7 bn | 3.6 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -9.7 m | 420.0 m | 1.2 bn | 1.0 bn | 606.5 m | 333.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Capex | 191.4 m | 183.1 m | 221.5 m | 348.3 m | 401.3 m | 411.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -201.1 m ≈ | 236.9 m ≈ | 952.1 m ≈ | 687.2 m ≈ | 205.2 m ≈ | -77.7 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -206.7 m | -131.5 m | -28.7 m | -342.6 m | -598.1 m | -346.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 193.4 m | -43.4 m | -681.6 m | -460.3 m | -276.0 m | -85.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.6 m | 37.6 m | 36.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
| Share repurchases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 347.7 m | 183.1 m | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Feb 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
Score: 30 / 100
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
score < 40
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 2.1 bn USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
- Valuation22
- Returns25
- Quality6
- Balance sheet70
- Growth0
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 3.94 – 22.21 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Peers: EV/EBITDA13.40 – 22.21 (Mid 16.97)5 companies used · median multiple 8.1x · quartiles 5.8x – 11.4xAMR, ARLP, CNR, HCC, NRP
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)3.94 – 5.30 (Mid 4.52)
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Unattractive profile · Score 30/100
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | -6.4% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 15% |
| Net margin · Quality | -4.3% | 17 (vs peers) | 9% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -8.1% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 12% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | -2.7x | 100 (vs peers) | 15% |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -5.0x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 2.0x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 6% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | 8.1x | 40 (vs peers) | 15% |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -9.3% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 12% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 1.8% | 25 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet70/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial0/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality6/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partial25/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Valuation22/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 3.9 bn USD in 2025; YoY growth -8.9%; net margin -4.3%; ROE -5.0%; net debt/EBITDA -2.7x.
The estimated value range is 8.67–13.75 USD per share (median of 2 methods, agreement: low); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 10.75 USD, the price of 17.02 USD leaves a potential of -36.9% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of -58.4% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
olivLaw score 30/100, methodological classification: unattractive profile (score, margin of safety and method agreement together; not a judgement of the right price). Groups assessed only in part: growth, returns. Not investment advice.
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Net debt / EBITDA: -2.7x
- Current ratio: 2.0x
What contradicts it
- ROIC: -6.4%
- Net margin: -4.3%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -8.1%
- Interest coverage: -5.0x
- FCF yield: -9.3%
- Shareholder yield (distributions): 1.8%
- The price is above the estimated value range
- The valuation methods diverge
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, P/E (TTM), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Coal mining (SIC 122x) · same industry group (3-digit SIC) · compared with 8 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCCWarrior Met Coal, Inc. | 4.3 bn | 18.5 | 10.4% | 12.5% | −14.1% | +3% / +45% |
| CNRCore Natural Resources, Inc. | 4.0 bn | 40.4 | 2.7% | 2.3% | +86.2% | +0% / −25% |
| ARLPAlliance Resource Partners LP | 3.2 bn | 12.2 | — | 12.3% | −10.4% | +3% / +20% |
| BTUPeabody Energy Corp | 2.1 bn | — | -5.0% | -4.3% | −8.9% | −42% / −28% |
| AMRAlpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | 2.0 bn | — | -3.0% | -2.2% | −28.0% | −3% / −45% |
| NRPNatural Resource Partners LP | 1.6 bn | 15.3 | — | — | −16.6% | +13% / +55% |
| METCRamaco Resources, Inc. | 310.0 m | — | -15.0% | -12.2% | −19.5% | −56% / −57% |
| ARECAmerican Resources Corporation | 106.5 m | 1.6 | 718.3% | — | −100.0% | −64% / −40% |
| NCNacco Industries, Inc. | — | 17.2 | 3.4% | 5.3% | +16.6% | −30% / −2% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for BTU from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 06 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 8-K (04 Nov 2026 · results).
In brief
Peabody is one of the largest producers of metallurgical and thermal coal in the world, with operations in the United States and Australia. It sold 122.0 million tons of coal in 2025 12, and in the second quarter of 2026 reported results weighed down by the cost of commissioning the Centurion mine, with prospects of improvement in the second half of the year 3.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company has a diversified mine base across the United States and Australia and a significant share of long-term contracts, which gives some predictability to revenue 1.
- The coal reserves it controls are substantial and are complemented by an active asset optimization program 1.
- The company reported a record low safety incidence rate in 2025, showing a high level of operational discipline 1.
Weaknesses
- Quarterly results are sensitive to the costs of commissioning the Centurion mine, which weighed on the second quarter of 2026 3.
- Take-or-pay obligations for transport and port can turn variable costs into fixed costs, even when halting operations would be more economical 1.
- Many long-term contracts are renegotiated periodically, and losing key customers could reduce revenue 1.
Opportunities
- The development of the Centurion mine could improve volumes and quality in the metallurgical segment if target production rates are reached 13.
- Rare earth and critical mineral projects in the Powder River Basin, backed by government grants, could open new revenue sources 3.
- Electricity demand from data centers could support thermal coal consumption in the United States 1.
Threats
- Competition from natural gas and renewables could reduce thermal coal demand for power generation over time 1.
- Coal prices are volatile and depend on factors hard to control, such as energy policy, tariffs and geopolitical tensions 12.
- The arbitration over the terminated Anglo acquisition could create additional costs or obligations if it is resolved unfavorably 1.
Risks
- Coal price volatilityhigh
Coal prices are shaped by demand, supply, costs and policy, and sharp declines could affect results and the value of reserves 1.
- Centurion mine performancehigh
If the Centurion mine does not reach target production rates, costs could stay elevated and results could be affected 3.
- Anglo litigationmedium
The arbitration brought by Anglo subsidiaries could lead to damages if the company's position on the terminated agreements does not prevail 1.
- Take-or-pay obligationsmedium
Minimum payment commitments for transport and port could reduce operational flexibility, particularly when prices are low 1.
- Mining operational risksmedium
Safety incidents, equipment failures and geological conditions could interrupt production and increase costs 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the Centurion mine reaches its target rates in the second half of 2026, results in the metallurgical segment could return to positive territory 3.
- Long-term contracts and a significant backlog could give revenue a more predictable base 1.
- A strengthened capital structure and lower collateral needs could improve free cash flow if these measures are sustained 3.
What would break the thesis
What to watch
- Centurion mine production rates and cost trendsQ3 2026
- Premium HCC and Premium PCI prices against the company's guidanceQ3 2026
- Outcome of the Anglo arbitration2026
- Updated annual guidance and segment results in the next reportQ3 2026
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 06 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 8-K (04 Nov 2026 · results).
The business
The Centurion mine, an underground longwall metallurgical coal mine in Queensland, began full-scale longwall production in February 2026 and is presented by the company as a driver of higher quantity and quality of seaborne metallurgical output 1. Commissioning phases weighed on costs and volumes in the second quarter of 2026 3.
Market context
The seaborne metallurgical coal market was volatile in the first half of 2026, with the Premium HCC price up 29% 2. Chinese demand and domestic supply constraints supported prices, while Indian import demand moderated in the period 2. In thermal coal, Peabody realized higher average prices in the second quarter of 2026 than in the first, amid strong coal-fired generation in several Asian countries 3.
Trends
- Rising US electricity demandtailwind
Electricity demand linked to data centers and artificial intelligence could support thermal coal consumption and the deferral of plant retirements, which could give volumes more stability 1.
- Competition from natural gas and renewablesheadwind
Cheap natural gas and growing renewable generation keep reducing coal's share of power output, which could weigh on thermal prices and volumes 1.
- Metallurgical coal price volatilitymixed
Metallurgical coal prices swung sharply in 2026 under the influence of China's policy, India's steel growth and geopolitical tensions 2. This volatility could bring either gains or losses depending on how supply evolves.
- Trade and tariff policymixed
Tariffs and trade changes shape global coal flows and purchasing costs, and final effects remain uncertain if tariffs are extended or withdrawn 12.
Competitive position
In thermal coal, Peabody competes with natural gas, oil, nuclear, hydro, wind and solar, as well as other large coal producers. In metallurgical coal competition is among large international producers, and an important factor is the substitution of coal by other steelmaking technologies such as electric arc furnaces 1.
Competition rests on coal quality, delivered energy cost including transport, customer service and reliability of supply. Sources name firms such as Alliance Resource Partners, Core Natural Resources, Hallador Energy, BHP, Glencore and Warrior Met Coal among competitors 1.
- Alliance Resource PartnersARLP
A large US coal producer, listed in the US, named as a direct competitor in the thermal coal market 1.
- Core Natural ResourcesCNR
A US coal producer that appears in both the thermal and metallurgical competitor lists 1.
- Warrior Met CoalHCC
A US-listed metallurgical coal producer, named as an international competitor in metallurgical coal 1.
- Glencore
An international company with thermal and metallurgical coal operations, named as a major competitor in both segments 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Glencore, Peabody and Heeney Mull Coal Deals in VenezuelaBloomberg Markets · 30 Sept 2026 · EN
The latest news item in our archive is from 30 Sept 2026; the newest SEC filing is from 04 Nov 2026. The press archive comes from the RSS feeds we follow and does not necessarily cover the latest event — the filings alongside do.
SEC filings
- Current report04 Nov 2026Results of operations · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report16 Oct 2026Item 1.04 · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report09 Sept 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report28 Aug 2026Departure or appointment of officers · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report11 Aug 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report06 Aug 2026
- Current report29 Jul 2026Results of operations · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report01 Jul 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report15 Jun 2026Material agreement · Termination of a material agreement · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report02 Jun 2026Material agreement · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Item 3.02 · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Peabody Energy Corporation · 19 Feb 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Peabody Energy Corporation · 06 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Peabody Energy Corporation · 29 Jul 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.