olivLaw · US equity research
Global Ship Lease, Inc. GSL
Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight · SIC 4412 · Vertical: Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight (SIC 4412)
Global Ship Lease owns mid-sized and smaller containerships that it charters to container liner companies under fixed-rate contracts. Charter revenue reached 766.5 million USD in fiscal 2025, and its fleet of 71 ships with 423,003 TEU remains central to the company's strategy amid sustained demand for its vessels.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) stock was 40.13 USD (−0.40% on the day), with market capitalisation 1.4 bn USD, P/E 3.5, dividend yield 5.28%, beta 0.81, 52-week range 31.68–46.40 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 31.8
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 39.03 – 45.48
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.17 · band width 15.3%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 43.95 / 40.63
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.95 / -0.79
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −12.5% | −1.1% | −11.4 pp | — |
| 3 months | −6.0% | −0.5% | −5.5 pp | — |
| 6 months | −3.6% | +4.4% | −7.9 pp | — |
| Year to date | +14.5% | +12.3% | +2.2 pp | — |
| 1 year | +29.3% | +13.5% | +15.7 pp | +30.6% |
| 3 years | +122.9% | +76.4% | +46.5 pp | +35.8% |
| 5 years | +74.2% | +63.7% | +10.5 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
EPS unavailable in the issuer's structured filings (e.g. a partnership reports per unit, not per share).
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | ⚠ 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 157.1 m | 261.1 m | 282.8 m | 448.0 m | 645.6 m | 674.8 m | 711.1 m | 766.5 m |
| Revenue YoY | −1.4% | — | +8.3% | +58.4% | +44.1% | +4.5% | +5.4% | +7.8% |
| Net income | -57.4 m | 39.8 m | 41.6 m | 171.5 m | 292.9 m | 304.5 m | 353.6 m | 416.5 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | — | +4.3% | +312.6% | +70.8% | +4.0% | +16.1% | +17.8% |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | — | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | -36.5% | 15.3% | 14.7% | 38.3% | 45.4% | 45.1% | 49.7% | 54.3% |
| Free cash flow | 36.3 m | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
The series breaks before 2019: earlier years come from the original reports of the issuer of that time, later years from a subsequent filing that restated the perimeter (a separation, discontinued operations). The year-on-year change across the break is not shown.
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 273.9 m USD
- Financial debt
- 689.1 m USD
- Net debt
- 415.3 m USD
- Equity
- 1.8 bn USD
- Total assets
- 2.9 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- 0.38x
- Current ratio
- 2.04x
- ROE
- 25.5%
- ROA
- 15.9%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 282.8 m | 448.0 m | 645.6 m | 674.8 m | 711.1 m | 766.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | 104.8 m | 237.5 m | 354.2 m | 343.2 m | 379.1 m | 435.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 47.0 m | 61.6 m | 81.3 m | 91.7 m | 100.0 m | 122.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | 151.7 m ≈ | 299.1 m ≈ | 435.5 m ≈ | 434.9 m ≈ | 479.1 m ≈ | 557.1 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 65.4 m | 5.8 m | 21.5 m | 44.8 m | 40.7 m | 39.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | 41.6 m | 171.6 m | 292.9 m | 304.9 m | 353.6 m | 416.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 49.0 k | 56.0 k | -50.0 k | 448.0 k | 1.0 k | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | 41.6 m | 171.5 m | 292.9 m | 304.5 m | 353.6 m | 416.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | — | 0.77 | 1.40 | 1.51 | 1.65 | 2.12 | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026derived |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 80.8 m | 67.3 m | 120.1 m | 138.6 m | 141.4 m | 273.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | 2.5 m | 3.2 m | 3.7 m | 4.7 m | 12.5 m | 49.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | 6.3 m | 11.4 m | 12.2 m | 15.8 m | 18.9 m | 14.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 98.6 m | 143.4 m | 237.0 m | 295.7 m | 301.2 m | 627.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 1.1 bn | 1.7 bn | 1.6 bn | 1.7 bn | 1.9 bn | 2.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2021verified |
| Total assets | 1.3 bn | 2.0 bn | 2.1 bn | 2.2 bn | 2.4 bn | 2.9 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 10.6 m | 13.2 m | 22.8 m | 17.6 m | 26.3 m | 61.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | 76.7 m | 190.3 m | 189.8 m | 193.3 m | 145.3 m | 147.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | 692.8 m | 880.1 m | 744.6 m | 619.2 m | 538.8 m | 541.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 112.2 m | 244.8 m | 261.8 m | 280.4 m | 264.0 m | 306.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 809.5 m | 1.3 bn | 1.1 bn | 987.4 m | 909.8 m | 1.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 464.7 m | 712.6 m | 966.5 m | 1.2 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.8 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | — | 36.5 m | 36.0 m | 35.2 m | 35.4 m | 35.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 104.4 m | 248.0 m | 327.5 m | 375.0 m | 430.1 m | 528.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Investing cash flow | -39.6 m | -463.0 m | -9.9 m | -152.0 m | -254.6 m | -351.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -120.2 m | 318.5 m | -243.3 m | -212.2 m | -208.6 m | -84.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 27.9 m | 50.5 m | 53.2 m | 58.4 m | 76.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Mar 2026verified |
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
Score: 80 / 100
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
score >= 65 · margin_of_safety >= 0.15 · agreement in ['high', 'medium']
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 1.4 bn USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
- Valuation84
- Balance sheet87
- Quality83
- Growth49
- Returns75
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 27.83 – 166.55 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the input exists, but its latest figure is far older than the latest reported period: not used
- Peers: EV/EBITDA57.49 – 166.55 (Mid 98.01)14 companies used · median multiple 7.1x · quartiles 4.5x – 11.5xCCEC, CMRE, DAC, DHT, DSX, ECO, EHLD, GNK, HSHP, LPG, NVGS, SMHI, TEN, ZIM
- Peers: P/E44.34 – 163.39 (Mid 84.47)27 companies used · median multiple 7.3x · quartiles 3.8x – 14.1xASC, CCEC, CISS, CMBT, CMRE, CTRM, DAC, DHT, DSX, ECO, EHLD, ESEA, FRO, GASS, GNK, IMPP, LPG, NMM, NVGS, PANL, PSHG, PXS, SHIP, STNG, TEN, TOPS, ZIM
- Dividend discount (DDM)27.83 – 37.43 (Mid 31.92)
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Attractive profile · Score 80/100
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | 20.6% | 81 (vs peers) | 14% |
| Net margin · Quality | 54.3% | 87 (vs peers) | 9% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 5.9% | 49 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | 0.7x | 73 (vs peers) | 14% |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | 11.2x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 2.0x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 6% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 3.5x | 83 (vs peers) | 14% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | 3.3x | 86 (vs peers) | 14% |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 5.3% | 75 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet87/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial49/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality83/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partial75/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Valuation84/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 766.5 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 7.8%; net margin 54.3%; ROE 25.5%; net debt/EBITDA 0.7x.
The estimated value range is 44.34–163.39 USD per share (median of 3 methods, agreement: medium); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 84.47 USD, the price of 40.13 USD leaves a potential of 110.5% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of 52.5% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
olivLaw score 80/100, methodological classification: attractive profile (score, margin of safety and method agreement together; not a judgement of the right price). Groups assessed only in part: growth, returns. Not investment advice.
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- ROIC: 20.6%
- Net margin: 54.3%
- Net debt / EBITDA: 0.7x
- Interest coverage: 11.2x
- Current ratio: 2.0x
- P/E (TTM): 3.5x
- EV/EBITDA: 3.3x
- Shareholder yield (distributions): 5.3%
- The price is below the estimated value range
What contradicts it
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, FCF yield, Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight (SIC 4412) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FROFrontline plc | 10.8 bn | 28.5 | 15.6% | 19.2% | −8.8% | +106% / +144% |
| CMBTCmb.tech NV | 5.4 bn | 3.8 | 49.1% | 92.6% | −23.9% | +56% / −5% |
| STNGScorpio Tankers Inc. | 4.4 bn | 12.1 | 11.4% | 36.7% | −24.6% | +48% / +57% |
| DHTDht Holdings, Inc. | 3.5 bn | 16.8 | 19.4% | 42.4% | −12.8% | +69% / +121% |
| ZIMZim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 3.4 bn | 7.1 | 11.9% | 6.9% | −18.1% | +39% / +306% |
| SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp. | 3.1 bn | 37.3 | 3.4% | 8.1% | −17.6% | +37% / +28% |
| ECOOkeanis Eco Tankers Corp. | 3.0 bn | 22.5 | 25.0% | 31.4% | −0.4% | +130% / +252% |
| DACDanaos Corporation | 2.8 bn | 5.7 | 13.7% | 47.4% | +2.8% | +56% / +117% |
| NMMNavios Maritime Partners L.P. | 2.5 bn | 8.6 | — | 21.2% | +0.8% | +57% / +232% |
| LPGDorian Lpg Ltd. | 2.1 bn | 6.5 | 28.3% | 55.0% | +36.3% | +99% / +17% |
| SFLSFL Corporation Ltd. | 1.7 bn | — | -2.5% | -3.6% | −18.9% | +42% / +3% |
| CMRECostamare Inc. | 1.6 bn | 4.6 | 15.9% | 41.5% | −1.2% | −14% / +30% |
| GSLGlobal Ship Lease, Inc. | 1.4 bn | 3.5 | 25.5% | 54.3% | +7.8% | +29% / +123% |
| TENTsakos Energy Navigation Limited | 1.4 bn | 10.5 | 9.1% | 20.1% | −0.7% | +91% / +132% |
| NVGSNavigator Holdings Ltd | 1.3 bn | 13.9 | 8.2% | 17.1% | +3.6% | +14% / +40% |
| CCECCapital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. | 1.2 bn | 7.3 | 12.0% | — | +62.0% | +2% / +57% |
| GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited | 1.1 bn | 13.9 | 8.9% | 15.5% | −19.1% | +31% / +59% |
| SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 987.8 m | 14.3 | 7.8% | 13.4% | −5.6% | +37% / +98% |
| ASCArdmore Shipping Corp | 752.3 m | 21.0 | 6.6% | 13.2% | −23.6% | +51% / +36% |
| HSHPHimalaya Shipping Ltd. | 719.3 m | 40.6 | 11.2% | 13.4% | +6.7% | +72% / +157% |
| PANLPangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. | 491.7 m | 10.1 | 11.0% | 6.7% | +17.8% | +7% / +7% |
| ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | 459.1 m | 3.3 | 33.1% | 60.1% | +7.0% | +8% / +172% |
| GASSStealthgas Inc. | 308.3 m | 5.1 | 9.2% | 35.0% | +3.5% | +21% / +24% |
| DSXDiana Shipping Inc. | 276.7 m | 21.7 | 3.5% | 8.3% | −6.4% | +21% / −30% |
| SMHISEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. | 241.4 m | — | -14.0% | -17.6% | −16.0% | +25% / −23% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for GSL from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 24.05 Total return -40% · Per year -40% | 42.49 Total return 6% · Per year 6% | 63.97 Total return 59% · Per year 59% |
| 3 years | 24.00 Total return -40% · Per year -16% | 47.64 Total return 19% · Per year 6% | 78.65 Total return 96% · Per year 25% |
| 5 years | 23.94 Total return -40% · Per year -10% | 53.41 Total return 33% · Per year 6% | 96.70 Total return 141% · Per year 19% |
- Exit P/E± 11.91
- Net margin± 8.34
- Annual revenue growth± 6.75
- Annual dilution± 0.70
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 16 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (13 Oct 2026), 6-K (07 Oct 2026), 6-K (15 Sept 2026), 6-K (06 Aug 2026), 6-K (05 Aug 2026), 6-K (14 Jul 2026).
In brief
Global Ship Lease owns mid-sized and smaller containerships that it charters to container liner companies under fixed-rate contracts. Charter revenue reached 766.5 million USD in fiscal 2025, and its fleet of 71 ships with 423,003 TEU remains central to the company's strategy amid sustained demand for its vessels.
SWOT
Strengths
- Fixed-rate long-term contracts provide predictable revenue, and the average remaining contract term supports visibility of results.
- The company has generated solid operating and net income in recent years and has increased its dividend, indicating internal funding capacity.
- A modern fleet, including fuel-efficient vessels, may attract customers seeking energy efficiency.
Weaknesses
- The company depends entirely on client payments, and if a client fails to meet its obligations revenue could drop sharply.
- Financial debt is substantial, which limits flexibility and could make additional capital harder to obtain.
- Ship management is outsourced to third parties, some of them affiliated, creating dependence and potential conflicts of interest.
Opportunities
- If demand for mid-sized ships remains solid, contract renewals could take place at better rates.
- Acquiring new ships could extend the fleet and generate additional revenue if long-term contracts are secured.
- Selling older ships can generate gains and renew the fleet without necessarily increasing fixed capital needs.
Threats
- Excess capacity in the container market could reduce charter rates at renewal and lower profitability.
- Geopolitical tensions and restrictive trade measures could disrupt container flows and affect the company's clients.
- Environmental regulation and decarbonisation requirements could raise compliance costs and investment needs for the fleet.
Risks
- Dependence on charterershigh
Revenue depends on the ability of charterers to pay and perform under their contracts. If a charterer ceases business or does not pay, the company could be left with idle ships.
- Substantial indebtednesshigh
Existing debt is significant and may limit the company's ability to raise additional funding. Debt agreement restrictions also reduce operating flexibility.
- Contract renewalmedium
Ships whose charters expire could be re-chartered at lower rates or for shorter periods, which would reduce revenue.
- Operating and fuel costsmedium
Higher crew and fuel costs could reduce profitability, particularly if they cannot be passed on to clients.
- Currency exposurelow
Revenue is in US dollars while part of expenses is in other currencies, so exchange rate movements could affect results.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If demand for the company's fleet stays sustained, contract renewals could take place at more favourable rates, supporting revenue and dividends.
- Revenue visibility from medium-term contracts could reduce volatility compared with spot-market exposure.
- Recent acquisitions of new ships, if followed by long-term contracts, could extend the revenue base without pressure on margins.
What would break the thesis
- If new capacity enters the market faster than demand grows, charter rates could fall at renewal and reduce profit.
- High indebtedness could limit flexibility and make financing more expensive during periods of market stress.
- Dependence on a limited number of large clients could amplify the impact of any payment delay or contract default.
What to watch
- Renewal rates on charters expiring in the first half of the year2026
- Operating cost per ownership day and fuel price trendsQ1 2026
- Evolution of net debt and any new financing or share issuancenext 10-K
- Volume of contracts signed for recently delivered and newly acquired ships2026
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 16 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (13 Oct 2026), 6-K (07 Oct 2026), 6-K (15 Sept 2026), 6-K (06 Aug 2026), 6-K (05 Aug 2026), 6-K (14 Jul 2026).
The business
Global Ship Lease, Inc. is a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation that owns a fleet of mid-sized and smaller containerships chartered out under fixed-rate charters to reputable container shipping companies. The company was formed in 2007 to purchase and charter back 17 containerships from CMA CGM and has since expanded its fleet through several acquisitions, including the Poseidon Transaction in November 2018. Its business focuses on generating predictable income from medium-term contracts rather than spot market rates.
The business model depends critically on charterers' ability to meet payment obligations, since charter payments are the sole source of operating cash flow. For this reason the company maintains a portfolio of contracts with different expiry dates and several counterparties, while ship management is outsourced to third-party technical and commercial managers, some of them related parties. This structure limits fixed internal costs but makes performance dependent on external providers and management contract terms.
On the capital side, the company has financed acquisitions with bank debt and with issuances of Class A common shares and Series B preferred shares, and dividends to Class A shareholders have grown in recent years. The board attributed its latest dividend increase to sustained market demand for its fleet and progress in securing forward fixtures at attractive levels. This ties the distribution policy directly to the level of contracts already secured.
Segments
Medium and smaller containership charter
The main segment, which generates practically all operating income, consists of chartering containerships at fixed rates to container liner companies. Revenue from this segment was 766.5 million USD in 2025 and rose mainly because of higher rates on renewals and the addition of new vessels. The TEU-weighted average remaining charter term was 2.7 years at December 31, 2025.
Vessel acquisitions and disposals
The company also realised gains from selling older ships, which are treated separately from charter income. In 2025 four vessels were sold, a process that can change fleet composition but is not a regular revenue stream. The impact on results depends on timing and transaction prices.
Market context
Container trade volumes are estimated to have increased by approximately 5.0% in 2025 after a rebound in 2024. Historically the sector has been cyclical and affected by oversupply of capacity, which has produced periods of pressure on charter rates. Demand for mid-sized and smaller containerships depends on container trade across diverse regions, and its trajectory remains uncertain.
In the near term, market conditions depend on geopolitical tensions, trade tariffs and the amount of new capacity entering service. The company noted that the rate it will achieve on renewal depends on market conditions at that time. If demand stays solid, renewals could occur at favourable levels, while excess capacity could reduce charter rates.
Trends
- Sustained demand for mid-sized fleettailwind
The company said sustained market demand for its fleet supported its decision to raise the dividend. If this demand persists, it could support contract renewals at better rates.
- Geopolitical and trade tensionsheadwind
Conflicts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, along with tariffs and trade restrictions between major states, create uncertainty over trade flows and charterers' ability to pay. This could affect both volumes and the security of receivables.
- Rising operating costsheadwind
Vessel operating costs rose in 2025, partly due to more crew on board and engine maintenance. As the fleet ages these costs could rise further, reducing margins.
- Renewals at higher ratesmixed
Rates achieved on renewals contributed to higher revenue, but the effect depends on how many contracts reach expiry and on market conditions at that time. Results could vary significantly from year to year.
Competitive position
The analysed sources do not identify competitors by name or market share. The documents mention container shipping companies only as the company's main charterers, not as direct rivals in ship chartering. The charter market for mid-sized and smaller ships is therefore described as contested by several owners, without the sources indicating their number or position.
A fuller view of competition would require external data on other owners' fleets, which are not part of the material analysed. This profile is limited to statements in the company's official filings and cannot assess Global Ship Lease's relative position in the market.
- Container liner companies (charterers and counterparties)
The sources do not name direct rivals; container shipping companies appear as holders of charter contracts rather than as competitors.
- Other owners of mid-sized containerships
The documents mention a large number of owners in the charter market without identifying them.
- Spot containership charter market
Not a company but an alternative market segment that could attract clients if it becomes cheaper than long-term contracts.
- New ships built by third parties
The sources warn that new capacity could reduce charter rates, without naming specific builders or owners.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)13 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)07 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)15 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)06 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)05 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)14 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)24 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)18 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)09 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)05 Jun 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Global Ship Lease, Inc. · 16 Mar 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.