olivLaw · US equity research
Nano Dimension Ltd. NNDM
Printed Circuit Boards · SIC 3672 · Vertical: Printed Circuit Boards (SIC 3672)
Nano Dimension designs industrial equipment for manufacturing electronics and mechanical parts, from 3D printing to SMT assembly. The company is in a deep reorganization, selling product lines and cutting costs, and its quarterly revenue is rising thanks to the Essemtec line while losses remain large, with revenue of 102.4 million USD in 2025 and 433.3 million USD in cash at June 30, 2026.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) stock was 1.32 USD (−2.94% on the day), with market capitalisation 278.3 m USD, beta 0.94, 52-week range 1.23–2.14 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 29.0 m USD (+12.1% YoY), net income of -6.8 m USD, diluted EPS -0.03 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 34.0
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 1.29 – 1.54
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.13 · band width 17.9%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 1.51 / 1.64
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.05 / -0.04
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −18.0% | −1.1% | −16.9 pp | — |
| 3 months | −15.4% | −0.5% | −14.9 pp | — |
| 6 months | −30.5% | +4.4% | −34.9 pp | — |
| Year to date | −14.3% | +12.3% | −26.6 pp | — |
| 1 year | −17.0% | +13.5% | −30.5 pp | +4.6% |
| 3 years | −48.6% | +76.4% | −125.0 pp | +124.2% |
| 5 years | −77.2% | +63.7% | −140.9 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 14.4 m | 25.8 m | 29.7 m | 29.0 m |
| Cost of revenue | 8.6 m | 18.8 m | 17.6 m | 15.7 m |
| Gross profit | 5.8 m | 7.0 m | 12.1 m | 13.3 m |
| Research & development | 5.9 m | 8.1 m | 8.2 m | 5.8 m |
| Operating income | -41.9 m | -41.6 m | -64.5 m | -20.6 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 574.0 k | 7.7 m ≈ | 3.7 m | 2.3 m ≈ |
| Interest expense | 1.7 m | 234.0 k | 246.0 k | 247.0 k |
| Pre-tax income | -25.5 m | -11.3 m | -69.7 m | -6.7 m |
| Income tax | 23.0 k | 76.0 k | 0 | 150.0 k |
| Net income | -25.3 m | -181.0 m | -69.7 m | -6.8 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.12 | -0.83 | -0.34 | -0.03 |
| Operating cash flow | -7.5 m | — | -7.1 m | — |
| Capex | 295.0 k | 166.0 k ≈ | 167.0 k | 46.0 k ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | ⚠ 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 5.1 m | 7.1 m | 3.4 m | 9.4 m | 43.6 m | 56.3 m | 57.8 m | 102.4 m |
| Revenue YoY | +515.2% | +38.6% | −51.9% | — | +365.6% | +29.1% | +2.6% | +77.3% |
| Net income | -15.5 m | -8.4 m | -48.5 m | 47.0 k | -227.4 m | -56.0 m | -98.8 m | -293.3 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | — | −483,978.7% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | -2.38 | -1.13 | -0.83 | -0.88 | -0.23 | -0.45 | -1.36 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | — | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | -303.7% | -118.1% | -1,426.7% | 0.5% | -521.2% | -99.4% | -171.1% | -286.3% |
| Free cash flow | unavailable | unavailable | -11.0 m | -52.4 m | -101.4 m | -114.2 m | -59.2 m | unavailable |
The series breaks before 2021: earlier years come from the original reports of the issuer of that time, later years from a subsequent filing that restated the perimeter (a separation, discontinued operations). The year-on-year change across the break is not shown.
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 204.7 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 552.0 m USD
- Total assets
- 638.2 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 10.02x
- ROE
- -41.5%
- ROA
- -38.1%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3.4 m | 9.4 m | 43.6 m | 56.3 m | 57.8 m | 102.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 2.3 m | 9.4 m | 29.6 m | 30.3 m | 32.9 m | 68.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 1.1 m | 1.1 m | 14.1 m | 26.1 m | 24.9 m | 34.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Research & development | 9.9 m | 41.7 m | 75.8 m | 65.1 m | 39.6 m | 30.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| SG&A | 20.3 m | — | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 11 Mar 2021verified |
| Operating income | — | — | -171.5 m | -129.3 m | -89.6 m | -140.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | — | — | — | 2.0 m | 2.6 m | 20.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | — | — | — | -127.3 m ≈ | -87.0 m ≈ | -119.9 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 13.2 m | 428.0 k | 79.5 m | 367.0 k | 668.0 k | 111.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -48.5 m | -205.7 m | -228.0 m | -57.0 m | -99.5 m | -107.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | — | -4.9 m | 264.0 k | 62.0 k | 397.0 k | -7.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -48.5 m | 47.0 k | -227.4 m | -56.0 m | -98.8 m | -293.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -1.13 | -0.83 | -0.88 | -0.23 | -0.45 | -1.36 | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | — | — | — | 248.0 k | 218.3 k | 215.7 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 585.3 m | 853.6 m | 686.3 m | 309.6 m | 317.2 m | 204.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | 3.3 m | 11.2 m | 19.4 m | 18.4 m | 16.9 m | 32.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 676.1 m | 1.3 bn | 1.1 bn | 894.0 m | 789.3 m | 525.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 5.1 m | 7.7 m | 5.8 m | 16.7 m | 14.1 m | 24.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | — | — | — | — | 0 | 40.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 4.4 m | — | — | 2.2 m | 2.2 m | 19.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 689.3 m | 1.4 bn | 1.2 bn | 1.1 bn | 902.5 m | 638.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | — | — | — | — | 4.2 m | 12.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | — | — | — | 38.0 k | 138.0 k | — | SEC (XBRL)· 12 May 2025verified |
| Current liabilities | 6.7 m | 32.0 m | 37.0 m | 34.5 m | 30.1 m | 52.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 22.1 m | 45.7 m | 53.2 m | 48.6 m | 41.8 m | 86.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 667.1 m | 1.3 bn | 1.2 bn | 1.0 bn | 860.8 m | 552.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | 172.1 m | 257.4 m | 258.6 m | 238.6 m | 215.8 m | — | SEC (XBRL)· 12 May 2025verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -9.6 m | -42.6 m | -92.1 m | -105.1 m | -57.0 m | — | SEC (XBRL)· 12 May 2025verified |
| Capex | 1.4 m | 9.8 m | 9.4 m | 9.1 m | 2.2 m | 1.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -11.0 m ≈ | -52.4 m ≈ | -101.4 m ≈ | -114.2 m ≈ | -59.2 m ≈ | — | SEC (XBRL)· 12 May 2025derived |
| Investing cash flow | -86.8 m | -496.7 m | -67.7 m | -166.6 m | 140.1 m | — | SEC (XBRL)· 12 May 2025verified |
| Financing cash flow | 677.7 m | 804.2 m | -5.3 m | -105.4 m | -74.4 m | — | SEC (XBRL)· 12 May 2025verified |
| Share repurchases | — | — | — | 96.4 m | 69.8 m | — | SEC (XBRL)· 12 May 2025verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
4 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 5 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 51.1% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 278.3 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
51% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the input exists, but its latest figure is far older than the latest reported period: not used
- Peers: EV/Salesunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 51.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin · Quality | 38.8% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 21% |
| EBIT margin · Quality | -117.4% | 0 (vs peers) | 17% |
| FCF margin · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 32.9% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 33% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) · Growth | 77.3% | 100 (vs peers) | 17% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 10.7x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 13% |
| EV/Sales · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Growth100/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Quality0/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/1 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
NANO DIMENSION LTD. (NNDM). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 102.4 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 77.3%; net margin -135.2%; ROE -28.7%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 51.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 32.9%
- Revenue growth (YoY): 77.3%
- Current ratio: 10.7x
What contradicts it
- Gross margin: 38.8%
- EBIT margin: -117.4%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF margin, Net debt / EBITDA, EV/Sales, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions).
Versus the vertical median
Printed Circuit Boards (SIC 3672) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 11 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSCelestica Inc. | 29.8 bn | 22.4 | 30.2% | 6.8% | +28.5% | −31% / +777% |
| FLEXFlex Ltd. | 28.5 bn | 27.9 | 19.1% | 3.4% | +8.1% | +31% / +303% |
| JBLJabil Inc | 26.6 bn | 26.5 | 66.7% | 2.9% | +20.6% | +23% / +124% |
| TTMITtm Technologies, Inc. | 7.7 bn | 29.3 | 14.3% | 7.0% | +19.0% | +5% / +389% |
| SANMSanmina Corporation | 7.7 bn | 25.7 | 11.8% | 2.4% | +7.4% | −8% / +187% |
| PLXSPlexus Corp. | 5.5 bn | 30.5 | 12.6% | 4.6% | +1.8% | +45% / +103% |
| BHEBenchmark Electronics, Inc. | 2.3 bn | 42.2 | 5.0% | 1.9% | +0.1% | +45% / +162% |
| CTSCts Corporation | 1.8 bn | 24.4 | 13.0% | 12.9% | +5.2% | +46% / +60% |
| KEKimball Electronics, Inc. | 619.8 m | 22.9 | 4.8% | 2.0% | −3.7% | −11% / +5% |
| NNDMNano Dimension Ltd. | 278.3 m | — | -28.7% | -135.2% | +77.3% | −17% / −49% |
| ELTKEltek Ltd. | 42.0 m | 52.1 | 1.9% | 1.6% | +11.3% | −27% / −49% |
| KTCCKey Tronic Corp | 16.2 m | — | -51.3% | -12.4% | −17.4% | −44% / −64% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for NNDM from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Nano Dimension designs industrial equipment for manufacturing electronics and mechanical parts, from 3D printing to SMT assembly. The company is in a deep reorganization, selling product lines and cutting costs, and its quarterly revenue is rising thanks to the Essemtec line while losses remain large, with revenue of 102.4 million USD in 2025 1 and 433.3 million USD in cash at June 30, 2026 3.
SWOT
Strengths
- The Essemtec line reached record performance and drives revenue growth, and gross margin improved markedly from the prior year 3.
- The company has a diversified industrial customer base, from aerospace and defense to medical and electronics 1.
- The portfolio combines hardware, software and materials, which can give customers an integrated solution 1.
Weaknesses
Opportunities
- Sales of product lines and the headquarters lease could substantially reduce cash burn and free up capital 3.
- Demand from aerospace, defense and satellite customers could support growth in the SMT line and other products 3.
- Reshoring and the need for parts at the point of need could create demand for additive manufacturing 1.
Threats
- Trade tariffs and inflation can raise import costs and reduce margins or demand 1.
- Compliance requirements under national security agreements with the U.S. government could raise costs and restrict operations 1.
- Disputes with shareholders and frequent management changes could affect investor confidence and execution of strategy 13.
Risks
- Lack of profitabilityhigh
The company could never reach profitability if revenue does not grow enough relative to costs, which would keep pressure on cash 12.
- Strategy in transitionhigh
The shift from acquisitions to a narrower portfolio and the sale of product lines could cause operational disruption and further losses 13.
- National security conditionsmedium
Interim agreements with the U.S. government impose strict supply and audit requirements, and failure to comply could bring penalties 1.
- Trade tariffsmedium
Higher tariffs can raise the cost of materials and imported products, affecting margins and competitiveness 1.
- Asset impairmentmedium
Non-financial assets and goodwill could face further impairments if the performance of acquired units does not improve 12.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the Essemtec line keeps growing and margins hold, the company could become a more focused and efficient business.
- Cost reductions, asset sales and the exit from a costly headquarters lease could meaningfully improve cash flow in coming quarters.
- Demand from aerospace, defense and AI-related electronics could support revenue growth in the remaining segments.
What would break the thesis
- The company is still losing money and could use up its cash reserves before restructuring measures take full effect.
- Repeated leadership changes, shareholder litigation and the suspension of guidance could erode investor confidence.
- Product line sales could reduce future revenue, and demand for 3D printing remains uncertain in the current phase of the industrial cycle.
What to watch
- Completion of the Markforged sale to Stratasys and its effect on cashsecond half of 2026
- Quarterly results of the Essemtec line and gross margin trendQ3 2026
- Whether 2026 financial guidance is reinstatednext quarterly report
- Progress on headquarters cost cuts and annualized cash burn reduction2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
Nano Dimension provides industrial manufacturing solutions for the design and production of electronics and mechanical parts, combining hardware, software and materials science 1. Its range includes DragonFly additively manufactured electronics, Essemtec surface-mount technology, Global Inkjet Systems printing hardware, Markforged printers and Markforged binder jetting for metal 1.
The company grew through acquisitions from 2021, but from 2025 it changed direction: it stopped new deals, discontinued unprofitable product lines and acquired Desktop Metal, which later filed for Chapter 11 1. Its principal office is in Waltham, Massachusetts, and from January 1, 2026 it is a U.S. domestic issuer rather than a foreign private issuer 1.
In 2026 management continued the restructuring: the sale of Markforged to Stratasys, the disposal of the AME and Fabrica lines, cuts to headquarters costs and suspension of 2026 financial guidance 3. These steps aim to reduce cash burn and focus on the lines management sees as core 3.
Segments
Essemtec (SMT)
Essemtec, which makes flexible pick-and-place and dispensing equipment for circuit boards, was the main growth driver in the second quarter of 2026, delivering a record quarterly performance supported by electronics, AI-related and aerospace demand 3. The company describes SMT as the next frontier in high-mix electronic assembly 1.
Markforged (industrial 3D printing)
Markforged contributed 14.1 million USD to second quarter 2026 revenue, down from the prior year, though orders in aerospace and defense remained active 3. The sale to Stratasys, expected to close in the second half of 2026, would remove this line from the portfolio 3.
Market context
The company operates in industrial machinery for additive manufacturing and electronics assembly, where traditional subtractive manufacturing is limited in flexibility and lead time 1. Management believes additive manufacturing is at an inflection point linked to Industry 4.0, reshoring and the need for parts at the point of need 1.
The sources do not give total market size, but the company notes that U.S. trade tariffs and macroeconomic instability can affect demand and margins in this segment 12.
Trends
- Reshoring of manufacturingtailwind
Geopolitical tensions and supply chain problems push Western firms to bring production closer, and additive manufacturing could support this through local production and in-house IP 1.
- Industry 4.0 and AItailwind
Integration of robotics, IoT and AI into production creates demand for smarter equipment, and management points to Essemtec orders linked to AI and aerospace applications 13.
- U.S. trade tariffsheadwind
Tariffs on products imported into the U.S. raise costs and could reduce margins or push customers toward local alternatives, with uncertain effects on demand 1.
- Sector consolidationmixed
The Desktop Metal bankruptcy and the Markforged sale show pressure on 3D printer makers; consolidation could help stronger firms but weakens others 12.
Competitive position
The sources note that the markets the company serves are competitive and that pricing is affected by rivals, without naming specific competitors 1. According to management the company differentiates through integrated hardware, software and materials and achieves gross margins above many rivals 1.
The Markforged sale to Stratasys shows that one of the important rivals in industrial 3D printing is becoming part of a direct competitor, which could change market dynamics 3.
- StratasysSSYS
Buyer of Markforged in the 2026 transaction, so an actor strengthening its position in industrial 3D printing 3.
- Desktop Metal
Company acquired and then placed in Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2025, illustrating the risks in metal 3D printing 1.
- Other SMT equipment makers
The sources do not name Essemtec's rivals, but the SMT assembly market has several global suppliers the company faces 1.
- Other industrial 3D printer makers
The sources mention general competitive pressure in industrial printing without naming other players 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- The Xbox Nano has a hidden cloud secretThe Verge · 03 Nov 2026 · EN
- 🇺🇦 ⚡ Ukraine has launched its first satellite, Obria Nano, for its own communica…Telegram — Intel Slava Z (pro-RU OSINT EN) · 27 Oct 2026 · EN
- Nano-wrinkles and actuation break up infectious biofilms on implantsPhys.org · 27 Oct 2026 · EN
- Enhanced Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect in Nano-Magnetic Metamaterials with Near-Perfect Coherent AbsorptionACS Nano · 21 Oct 2026 · EN
- Nano-Bioadhesives for Gastrointestinal Hemostasis and Healing: Integrating Artificial Intelligence for Precision Design and ApplicationACS Nano · 21 Oct 2026 · EN
- Krea 3 – Frontier Image Model 4× faster than Nano Banana ProHacker News · 15 Oct 2026 · EN
- Navigating the Renal Bio–Nano Interface: Physicochemical Rules for Crossing Barriers and Cellular TransportACS Nano · 15 Oct 2026 · EN
- Affirmative Action in Centralized College Admissions Systems -- by Nano Barahona, Cauê Dobbin, Sebastián OteroNBER — New Working Papers · 12 Oct 2026 · EN
- Celebrating 20 Years of Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics (SINANO), Chinese Academy of SciencesACS Nano · 07 Oct 2026 · EN
- Google lansează un nou model AI de generare de imagini, Nano Banana 2.1StartupCafe.ro · 07 Oct 2026 · RO
- Nano Delivery Systems for In Vivo CRISPR/Cas-Based Gene Therapy: From Vectors to Clinical OutcomesACS Nano · 06 Oct 2026 · EN
- Upgrading Mixed Textile Waste to Nano Onion-Like Fullerenes by the Two-Step Flash Joule HeatingACS Nano · 01 Oct 2026 · EN
- De Novo Design of Hydrogen-Bonding Networks for Deterministic Bio-Nano RecognitionJournal of the American Chemical Society · 01 Oct 2026 · EN
- Alibaba: noul AI Qwen Image 2.1 bate Google Nano Banana 2.0 - connect RomâniaSurge — Google News · 24 Sept 2026 · RO
- Alibaba: noul AI Qwen Image 2.1 bate Google Nano Banana 2.0 - connect RomâniaSurge — Google News · 24 Sept 2026 · RO
- 16GB iPod Nano 3G UpgradeHacker News · 24 Sept 2026 · EN
- Spin waves inside a nano-oscillator imaged for the first timePhys.org · 23 Sept 2026 · EN
- Why Nano Nuclear Energy Stock Is Powering Higher TodayYahoo Finance — News · 21 Sept 2026 · EN
- Eos Energy Enterprises vs. NANO Nuclear Energy: Which Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?Yahoo Finance — News · 20 Sept 2026 · EN
- US chip toolmaker Forge Nano bets on Taiwan for production: CEONikkei Asia · 18 Sept 2026 · EN
SEC filings
- Current report02 Oct 2026Item 4.01 · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report18 Aug 2026Departure or appointment of officers · Regulation FD disclosure
- Quarterly report07 Aug 2026
- Current report06 Aug 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report21 Jul 2026Material agreement · Item 5.01 · Departure or appointment of officers · Shareholder vote · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report21 Jul 2026Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report17 Jun 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report15 Jun 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report11 Jun 2026Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report27 May 2026Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Nano Dimension Ltd. · 31 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Nano Dimension Ltd. · 07 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Nano Dimension Ltd. · 06 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.