olivLaw · US equity research
Planet Image International Ltd YIBO
Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC · SIC 3577 · Vertical: Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC (SIC 3577)
Planet Image International Ltd (YIBO) makes and sells compatible toner cartridges, mainly for North American and European markets, with some operations in China. Revenue rose slightly in fiscal 2025, but the company reported a net loss, largely driven by share-based compensation, and in December 2025 it restructured by selling several online subsidiaries.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Planet Image International Ltd (YIBO) stock was 1.10 USD (+5.77% on the day), with beta 0.79, 52-week range 0.74–1.36 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 52.0
- neutral
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 0.97 – 1.17
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.65 · band width 18.5%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 1.14 / 1.05
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.02 / -0.03
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +4.8% | −2.0% | +6.8 pp | — |
| 3 months | −5.2% | −2.2% | −3.0 pp | — |
| 6 months | −6.8% | +4.3% | −11.0 pp | — |
| Year to date | +15.8% | +10.6% | +5.2 pp | — |
| 1 year | −15.4% | +10.5% | −25.8 pp | −19.6% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +73.7% | unavailable | +3.2% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +61.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 141.5 m | 142.1 m | 150.2 m | 149.8 m | 155.2 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +0.4% | +5.7% | −0.3% | +3.6% |
| Net income | 4.9 m | 7.2 m | 7.8 m | 7.1 m | -8.3 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | +47.1% | +7.4% | −8.5% | −216.0% |
| Diluted EPS | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.13 | -0.14 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | +41.7% | +5.9% | −27.8% | −207.7% |
| net % | 3.5% | 5.1% | 5.2% | 4.7% | -5.3% |
| Free cash flow | 4.6 m | 6.3 m | 16.9 m | -3.3 m | -3.3 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 52.9 m USD
- Financial debt
- 8.5 m USD
- Net debt
- -44.4 m USD
- Equity
- 57.9 m USD
- Total assets
- 154.1 m USD
- Debt / equity
- 0.15x
- Current ratio
- 1.57x
- ROE
- -14.4%
- ROA
- -5.6%
- FCF margin
- -2.1%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 141.5 m | 142.1 m | 150.2 m | 149.8 m | 155.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 92.7 m | 87.1 m | 91.3 m | 97.5 m | 109.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 48.8 m | 55.0 m | 59.0 m | 52.3 m | 45.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Research & development | 5.4 m | 6.8 m | 6.6 m | 6.2 m | 9.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | 3.1 m | 11.3 m | 12.7 m | 6.9 m | -11.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 1.3 m | 1.2 m | 1.3 m | 1.1 m | 1.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | 4.4 m ≈ | 12.5 m ≈ | 14.0 m ≈ | 8.0 m ≈ | -9.9 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 1.2 m | 1.2 m | 540.0 k | 175.0 k | -279.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | 4.9 m | 7.4 m | 8.6 m | 7.5 m | -6.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 7.0 k | 139.0 k | 840.0 k | 414.0 k | 2.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | 4.9 m | 7.2 m | 7.8 m | 7.1 m | -8.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.13 | -0.14 | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 42.1 m | 42.1 m | 42.1 m | 52.9 m | 57.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 41.2 m | 36.8 m | 45.1 m | 43.0 m | 52.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | — | 24.9 m | 31.3 m | 31.6 m | 50.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | — | 21.1 m | 17.5 m | 20.6 m | 14.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | — | 105.5 m | 118.6 m | 115.5 m | 127.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | — | 9.0 m | 8.5 m | 8.2 m | 7.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | — | 118.6 m | 130.3 m | 138.9 m | 154.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | — | 17.8 m | 22.5 m | 26.1 m | 27.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | — | 31.0 m | 26.2 m | 23.4 m | 143.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | — | — | — | — | 8.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | — | 77.7 m | 82.4 m | 79.9 m | 80.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | — | 79.5 m | 83.1 m | 82.0 m | 96.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 16.4 m † | 25.1 m † | 33.1 m † | 56.9 m † | 57.9 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 6.4 m | 7.5 m | 17.9 m | -2.1 m | -2.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 1.9 m | 1.2 m | 995.0 k | 1.1 m | 825.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | 4.6 m ≈ | 6.3 m ≈ | 16.9 m ≈ | -3.3 m ≈ | -3.3 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -1.9 m | -1.2 m | -987.0 k | -17.9 m | 3.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -1.6 m | 4.4 m | -4.7 m | 1.5 m | 6.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
4 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- score weight coverage: 59.6% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: unavailable
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
60% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/Salesunavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · input data missing
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: score weight coverage: 59.6% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin · Quality | 29.4% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 18% |
| EBIT margin · Quality | -7.3% | 44 (vs peers) | 14% |
| FCF margin · Quality | -2.1% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 14% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 3.0% | 12 (on a fixed band) | 29% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) · Growth | 3.6% | 24 (vs peers) | 14% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.6x | 46 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| EV/Sales · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial46/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Growth16/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Quality13/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/1 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Planet Image International Limited (YIBO). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 155.2 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 3.6%; net margin -5.3%; ROE -14.4%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (score weight coverage: 59.6% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
What contradicts it
- Gross margin: 29.4%
- FCF margin: -2.1%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 3.0%
- Revenue growth (YoY): 3.6%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): Net debt / EBITDA, EV/Sales, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions).
Versus the vertical median
Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC (SIC 3577) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 17 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 286.5 bn | 875.5 | 1.7% | 2.7% | +24.5% | +84% / +137% |
| FTNTFortinet, Inc. | 94.1 bn | 41.6 | 153.1% | 29.0% | +14.2% | +58% / +144% |
| LOGILogitech International S.A. | 13.2 bn | 16.7 | 38.2% | 16.4% | +6.3% | −18% / +6% |
| CRSRCorsair Gaming, Inc. | 1.4 bn | 41.4 | 5.8% | 2.5% | +11.9% | +104% / +3% |
| EVLVEvolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 871.2 m | — | -4.9% | -3.0% | +40.5% | −25% / +20% |
| MITKMitek Systems, Inc. | 861.4 m | 40.7 | 9.2% | 11.4% | +4.4% | +115% / +69% |
| SSYSStratasys Ltd. | 587.3 m | — | -12.7% | -18.9% | −3.7% | −22% / −38% |
| IMMRImmersion Corporation | 237.8 m | 21.6 | 3.5% | 0.6% | +11.2% | +1% / +10% |
| RDCMRadcom Ltd. | 168.7 m | 14.3 | 11.4% | 16.8% | +17.2% | −22% / +29% |
| XRXXerox Holdings Corp | 155.0 m | — | -128.0% | -11.9% | +12.9% | −58% / −92% |
| MYNDMynd.ai, Inc. | 126.0 m | — | -995.5% | -32.2% | −37.2% | −56% / −97% |
| INVEInve Technologies, Inc. | 64.0 m | — | -10.9% | -62.9% | −19.3% | −22% / −62% |
| TACTTransact Technologies Inc | 54.4 m | — | -1.3% | -0.8% | +18.7% | +19% / −22% |
| LINKInterlink Electronics, Inc | 52.3 m | — | -10.5% | -7.9% | +1.8% | −8% / −39% |
| WETHWetouch Technology Inc. | 11.6 m | 1.2 | 6.0% | 17.6% | +6.8% | −57% / unavailable |
| AIMDAinos, Inc. | 5.4 m | — | -196.3% | -106,283.3% | +499.0% | −65% / −95% |
| VTIXVirtuix Holdings Inc. | — | — | — | -543.2% | +18.4% | unavailable / unavailable |
| YIBOPlanet Image International Limited | — | — | -14.4% | -5.3% | +3.6% | −15% / unavailable |
1- and 3-year price returns: for YIBO from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 31 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (16 Sept 2026), 6-K (30 Apr 2026).
In brief
Planet Image International Ltd (YIBO) makes and sells compatible toner cartridges, mainly for North American and European markets, with some operations in China. Revenue rose slightly in fiscal 2025, but the company reported a net loss, largely driven by share-based compensation, and in December 2025 it restructured by selling several online subsidiaries.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company holds a large patent portfolio registered in the U.S., Europe and China, giving it legal protection that few export competitors match 1.
- Local presence with sales teams, warehouses and customer service in the U.S. and Europe supports fast delivery and close relationships with offline customers 1.
- Short time to market after new printer models appear is a competitive advantage the company reports 1.
Weaknesses
- The company reported a net loss in 2025 after a profit the year before, while revenue grew only slightly 1.
- Reliance on U.S. and export markets leaves the company exposed to tariff changes and trade policy shifts 1.
- Margins narrowed due to lower selling prices and higher material costs, while selling expenses rose 1.
Opportunities
- Exiting online channels and selling subsidiaries could simplify the structure and focus resources on offline sales and more stable markets 1.
- If tariffs ease or stabilize, the company could win back part of its lost share in the U.S. market 1.
- Demand in Asia, where the company already reported higher revenue, could offset pressure from Western markets 1.
Threats
- New tariffs or trade restrictions between the U.S., China and the EU could raise costs and reduce competitiveness 1.
- Original printer makers may sue for patent infringement, which could generate substantial legal costs 1.
- Geopolitical tensions and oil price moves could raise freight costs and disrupt supply chains 1.
Risks
- Export dependence and tariff policyhigh
Operations depend heavily on exports to the U.S. and Europe, where tariffs and trade rules can change quickly, with direct effects on costs and prices 1.
- Inventory obsolescence riskmedium
Launches of new printer models can make existing cartridges incompatible, which could lead to losses on research, production and marketing costs tied to obsolete stock 1.
- Pricing and raw material pressuremedium
The company may be unable to maintain selling prices, and raw material prices depend on markets and supply chains, which could weigh on margins 1.
- Intellectual property disputesmedium
The company's patents and trademarks could be challenged or infringed by third parties, and defending them can be costly and distracting for management 1.
- China and legal framework riskmedium
Operations in China are subject to local regulation, and political or legal changes, including those affecting Hong Kong, could affect activity and the transfer of funds 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If tariffs stabilize, the company could regain share in the U.S. market, and its patent portfolio and local presence in Europe could support its niche position 1.
- The December 2025 restructuring, which sold the online subsidiaries, could lower costs and focus the company on its core business 1.
- Growth in Asia could provide revenue less exposed to U.S.-China trade tensions 1.
What would break the thesis
- The company moved from profit to a net loss in 2025, and price and margin pressure could persist if competition stays intense 1.
- Dependence on the U.S. market, where revenue share has declined, could expose the company to further tariff measures or additional demand decline 1.
- China-related, legal and fund-transfer risks could limit the company's ability to finance or expand its business 1.
What to watch
- Completion of the transfer of Proimage B.V. and closure of the Walmart online store2026
- Development of U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports and their effect on sales to U.S. dealers2026
- Trend in gross margin and selling expenses after the one-off effects of 2025Q1 2026
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 31 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (16 Sept 2026), 6-K (30 Apr 2026).
The business
The ownership structure is simple: the company holds all subsidiaries directly, without a VIE structure, and its offshore holding company is in the Cayman Islands. Its principal executive offices are in Jiangxi Province, China 1.
Segments
ODM and white-label cartridges for offline customers
Most sales go to offline overseas customers who own their brands or resell white-label products to end consumers. These sales are handled by local teams in the U.S. and Europe, supported by warehouses in California, South Carolina, the Netherlands, the UK, France and Italy 1.
Self-branded products and the China market
The company sells its Shiyin and Tiancai brands in the domestic PRC market through dealers, but this part of the business is much smaller than export sales 1.
Online channel being wound down
The Walmart online store currently sells only remaining pre-Disposition stock and household products, and will cease operating once that inventory is sold 1.
Market context
The compatible cartridge market is marked by rapid technological change and frequent launches of new printer models, which forces manufacturers to keep updating their products. The company focuses on North America and Europe, where the global compatible cartridge market has seen steady growth 1.
Patents matter a great deal in this segment, because original printer makers can challenge unlicensed cartridges in court. The company argues its patents let it defend its products and compete in markets where few Chinese producers are present 1.
Trends
- U.S.-China tariffsheadwind
Tariffs on Chinese imports into the U.S. raise the company's import costs and could reduce competitiveness in its largest market. The company has already seen lower demand in its offline dealer channel in the U.S. and has shifted effort toward Asia. A temporary tariff reduction exists, but there is no assurance it will be extended 1.
- Pricing and raw material cost pressureheadwind
Lower average selling prices and higher material costs tied to a shift toward new products reduced profitability in 2025. Raw materials such as OPC drums, toner and chips depend on market forces and transport costs 1.
- Geopolitical tensions and logistics costsmixed
The Russia-Ukraine war and Middle East tensions have raised maritime insurance costs and caused delivery delays. The company cut sales in Russia and Eastern Europe and says it has not been materially affected so far, but cannot rule out future impact 1.
- Share-based compensation and staffing investmentmixed
The 2025 equity incentive plan produced a large increase in compensation expense, while investment in staff and infrastructure raised selling costs. This effect may not recur in later years, but it dominated the 2025 result 1.
Competitive position
The company describes competition in compatible cartridges as intense, and it reported sales declines in 2024 in markets such as Russia, Germany, Mexico and Eastern Europe. Price competition and loss of market share are recurring risks in its filing 1.
Main rivals include other compatible cartridge makers and original printer brands, which hold patents and can take legal action against importers. The company differentiates itself through its patent portfolio, short time to market and local presence in the U.S. and Europe 1.
- Original printer brands
Original printer makers hold patents on cartridge drivers and can sue makers of compatible cartridges, which makes the company's own patents essential 1.
- Other compatible cartridge makers
The filing points to competition in European markets and in Russia, where several producers offer similar products at competitive prices 1.
- Export-focused Chinese toner producers
The company says it is one of few China-based manufacturers focused on North American and European markets, so competition comes from a limited number of players 1.
- Local distributors and dealers
Dealers and distributors in the U.S. and Europe may prefer products from other sources, and the company has already observed lower demand in this channel 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Italia amână transferul rachetelor Aster 30 către Ucraina din cauza unor dispute politice: Este sau nu justificată decizia?DefenseRomania.ro · 27 Oct 2026 · RO
- Neue Rolle : Jude Law soll bei Scapegoat von Ari Aster mitmachenSurge — GDELT DOC · 24 Sept 2026 · RO
- Aster Turns to Latin America, Africa as Mideast Oil Flows FalterBloomberg Markets · 09 Sept 2026 · EN
- Guvernul Giorgiei Meloni trimite Ucrainei, în secret, interceptoare SAMP/T și Aster 30, și radare care să detecteze atacurile RusieiAntena 3 CNN · 27 Aug 2026 · RO
- Italia evită opoziția politică internă: Guvernul de la Roma trimite în secret sisteme de apărare aeriană SAMP/T și rachete Aster 30 către UcrainaDefenseRomania.ro · 27 Aug 2026 · RO
- Franța acordă Ucrainei licența de producție pentru rachetele Aster destinate sistemului antiaerian care a doborât deja un avion de vânătoare rusescDefenseRomania.ro · 14 Jul 2026 · RO
- Macron says France will license Ukraine to produce SCALP cruise missiles, Aster interceptors, and AASM guided bombsMeduza English (independent RU/exile) · 13 Jul 2026 · EN
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)16 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)30 Apr 2026
- Annual report (foreign issuer)31 Mar 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)31 Dec 2025
- Current report (foreign issuer)04 Dec 2025
- Current report (foreign issuer)16 Sept 2025
- Current report (foreign issuer)04 Aug 2025
- Current report (foreign issuer)30 May 2025
- Annual report (foreign issuer)31 Mar 2025
- Current report (foreign issuer)12 Mar 2025
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Planet Image International Ltd · 31 Mar 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.