olivLaw · US equity research
Edible Garden AG Incorporated EDBL
Agricultural Production-Crops · SIC 0100 · Vertical: Agricultural Production-Crops (SIC 0100)
Edible Garden AG grows organic herbs in controlled-environment greenhouses and sells them through thousands of US retail stores. It is now trying to expand into ready-to-drink beverages and clean nutrition through its Iowa plant, a major shift that raises questions about financing and execution while the company continues to report losses and going-concern doubts, with second-quarter 2026 revenue of $3.6 million.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Edible Garden AG Incorporated (EDBL) stock was 0.74 USD (+1.09% on the day), with market capitalisation 1.4 m USD, beta 1.26, 52-week range 0.70–738.00 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 3.6 m USD (+12.8% YoY), net income of -3.3 m USD, diluted EPS -18.79 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 26.5
- oversold (≤ 30)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 0.62 – 1.09
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.25 · band width 54.7%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 1.14 / 41.95
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.15 / -0.16
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −34.5% | −1.1% | −33.4 pp | — |
| 3 months | −62.6% | −0.5% | −62.2 pp | — |
| 6 months | −95.8% | +4.4% | −100.2 pp | — |
| Year to date | −99.7% | +12.3% | −112.0 pp | — |
| 1 year | −99.9% | +13.5% | −113.4 pp | −24.3% |
| 3 years | −100.0% | +76.4% | −176.4 pp | −25.1% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 2.6 m | 3.9 m | 2.7 m | 3.1 m | 2.8 m | 4.1 m | 3.3 m | 3.6 m |
| Cost of revenue | 1.9 m | 3.8 m | 2.6 m | 2.5 m | 2.5 m | 5.3 m | 4.4 m | 3.0 m |
| Gross profit | 699.0 k | 23.0 k | 88.0 k | 634.0 k | 273.0 k | -1.2 m | — | — |
| SG&A | 2.2 m | 2.8 m | 2.6 m | 4.0 m | 3.8 m | 4.5 m | 2.9 m | 3.1 m |
| Operating income | -1.5 m | -2.7 m | -2.9 m | -3.6 m | -3.6 m | -5.7 m | -6.7 m | -3.2 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 256.0 k ≈ | 258.0 k | 248.0 k | 234.0 k | 785.0 k ≈ | 653.0 k | 2.7 m | 654.0 k |
| Interest expense | 409.0 k | 275.0 k | 440.0 k | 389.0 k | 387.0 k | 207.0 k | 150.0 k | 163.0 k |
| Pre-tax income | — | — | — | -4.0 m | — | — | — | -3.3 m |
| Income tax | — | — | 0 | 0 | — | — | -3.4 m | 0 |
| Net income | -2.1 m | -3.1 m | -3.3 m | -4.0 m | -4.0 m | 3.9 m | -3.7 m | -3.3 m |
| Diluted EPS | 16.32 | — | -24.74 | -2,960.37 | 1.38 | — | -5.25 | -18.79 |
| Operating cash flow | -1.1 m ≈ | -1.8 m | -3.3 m | -3.4 m ≈ | -2.4 m ≈ | -2.7 m | 251.0 k | 644.0 k ≈ |
| Capex | 10.0 k ≈ | 126.0 k | 79.0 k | 54.0 k ≈ | 409.0 k ≈ | 96.0 k | 104.0 k | 3.3 m ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 10.5 m | 11.6 m | 14.0 m | 13.9 m | 12.8 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +9.9% | +21.6% | −1.4% | −7.6% |
| Net income | -5.5 m | -12.5 m | -10.2 m | -11.1 m | -17.3 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | unavailable | -1,541.79 | -685.62 | -117.64 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | -52.7% | -107.8% | -72.5% | -79.8% | -135.3% |
| Free cash flow | -4.2 m | -11.2 m | -9.6 m | -8.8 m | -12.4 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 1.1 m USD
- Financial debt
- 1.7 m USD
- Net debt
- 542.0 k USD
- Equity
- 12.5 m USD
- Total assets
- 20.6 m USD
- Debt / equity
- 0.13x
- Current ratio
- 0.82x
- ROE
- -208.9%
- ROA
- -106.6%
- FCF margin
- -97.1%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 10.5 m | 11.6 m | 14.0 m | 13.9 m | 12.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 9.9 m | 11.2 m | 13.2 m | 11.5 m | 13.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 648.0 k | 364.0 k | 822.0 k | 2.3 m | -204.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| SG&A | 5.6 m | 9.4 m | 10.0 m | 11.6 m | 15.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | — | -9.0 m | -9.9 m | -9.3 m | -15.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | — | 959.0 k | 1.5 m | 1.1 m | 1.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | — | -8.0 m ≈ | -8.4 m ≈ | -8.2 m ≈ | -13.9 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 617.0 k | 2.0 m | 390.0 k | 1.2 m | 1.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -5.5 m | -12.5 m | -10.2 m | -11.1 m | -17.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | — | — | -1,541.79 | -685.62 | -117.64 | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | — | — | 6.6 m | 21.8 k | 287.7 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 31.0 k | 110.0 k | 510.0 k | 3.5 m | 1.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | — | 1.1 m | 1.2 m | 2.0 m | 1.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | 360.0 k | 586.0 k | 678.0 k | 1.5 m | 1.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 1.2 m | 1.9 m | 2.6 m | 7.4 m | 5.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 2.6 m | 4.9 m | 3.9 m | 3.1 m | 10.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 0 | 50.0 k | 47.0 k | 43.0 k | 302.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 4.0 m | 7.0 m | 6.7 m | 11.9 m | 20.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 2.3 m | 1.7 m | 1.2 m | 2.3 m | 3.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | 4.2 m | 2.0 m | 387.0 k | 1.9 m | 1.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | 3.9 m | 4.3 m | 4.0 m | 544.0 k | 215.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 7.1 m | 4.8 m | 2.9 m | 6.2 m | 7.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 11.1 m | 9.1 m | 6.9 m | 7.8 m | 8.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | -7.1 m † | -2.2 m † | -288.0 k † | 4.1 m † | 12.5 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -4.1 m | -9.2 m | -8.5 m | -8.5 m | -11.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 151.0 k | 2.0 m | 1.0 m | 303.0 k | 638.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -4.2 m ≈ | -11.2 m ≈ | -9.6 m ≈ | -8.8 m ≈ | -12.4 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -151.0 k | -2.0 m | -1.0 m | -303.0 k | -987.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 4.3 m | 11.3 m | 10.0 m | 11.8 m | 10.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- score weight coverage: 43.8% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 1.4 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
44% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: score weight coverage: 43.8% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | -352.4% | 0 (vs peers) | 24% |
| Net margin · Quality | -51.0% | 18 (vs peers) | 14% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 3.5% | 29 (on a fixed band) | 19% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -21.1x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 14% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.7x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -554.9% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 19% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet0/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial29/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality7/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
EDIBLE GARDEN AG INCORPORATED (EDBL). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 12.8 m USD in 2025; YoY growth -7.6%; net margin -51.0%; ROE -197.1%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (score weight coverage: 43.8% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
What contradicts it
- ROIC: -352.4%
- Net margin: -51.0%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 3.5%
- Interest coverage: -21.1x
- Current ratio: 0.7x
- FCF yield: -554.9%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Agricultural Production-Crops (SIC 0100) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 11 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTVACorteva, Inc. | 8.2 bn | 8.1 | 4.0% | 5.7% | +2.9% | +21% / +81% |
| DMCDel Monte Corporation | 1.4 bn | 16.8 | 4.0% | 1.9% | +1.0% | −21% / +26% |
| AGROAdecoagro S.A. | 1.3 bn | 10.3 | 7.1% | 6.1% | +16.9% | +14% / −19% |
| DOLEDole plc | 1.3 bn | 21.9 | 4.5% | 0.6% | +8.2% | −4% / +20% |
| VFFVillage Farms International, Inc. | 358.3 m | 16.4 | 7.6% | 9.8% | +10.2% | −26% / +271% |
| LMNRLimoneira Company | 190.7 m | — | -25.7% | -33.0% | −16.6% | −24% / −31% |
| AGRZAgroz Inc. | 42.0 m | 48.0 | 25.6% | 8.6% | unavailable | −98% / unavailable |
| LOCLLocal Bounti Corporation | 22.1 m | — | — | -130.5% | +26.8% | −61% / −73% |
| TULPBloomia Holdings, Inc. | 10.9 m | — | -87.9% | -23.2% | unavailable | −40% / −54% |
| SEEDOrigin Agritech Limited | 8.6 m | — | — | -58.4% | −20.6% | −49% / −64% |
| EDBLEdible Garden AG Incorporated | 1.4 m | — | -197.1% | -51.0% | −7.6% | −100% / −100% |
| LNDBrasilAgro – Brazilian Agricultural Real Estate Company | — | — | 6.3% | 15.7% | +13.8% | −12% / −32% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for EDBL from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Edible Garden AG grows organic herbs in controlled-environment greenhouses and sells them through thousands of US retail stores. It is now trying to expand into ready-to-drink beverages and clean nutrition through its Iowa plant, a major shift that raises questions about financing and execution while the company continues to report losses and going-concern doubts, with second-quarter 2026 revenue of $3.6 million.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company has a vertically integrated platform with its own greenhouses, patented GreenThumb software and food-safety certifications 1.
- Sales growth in the second quarter of 2026 shows demand from existing and new retail accounts 3.
- Presence in thousands of retail stores gives a distribution base that could support new products 2.
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
- If no final supply agreement with the equipment partner is signed, the company could lose advance payments already made 1.
- Exchange listing and compliance rules could impose additional restrictions on the company 1.
- Input-cost inflation could compress margins, especially if prices cannot be passed on to customers 1.
Risks
- Going-concern doubthigh
Auditors have expressed substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern, and investors could lose their entire investment if financing is not obtained 1.
- Funding needhigh
Existing cash may not be enough to fund operations over the next twelve months, which could lead to dilution or costly borrowing 1.
- Iowa project executionhigh
A final agreement with Tetra Pak is not assured, and delays or extra costs could postpone RTD production 1.
- Customer concentrationmedium
Losing a major customer could seriously hurt revenue, since contracts are largely based on individual purchase orders 1.
- Exchange listing compliancemedium
If the company fails to maintain its Nasdaq listing, its shares could be delisted, reducing access to capital markets 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the Iowa RTD plant reaches planned production, the company could diversify revenue and improve long-term profitability 3.
- Rapid growth in cut-herb and condiment sales in the second quarter of 2026 suggests shelf demand may be solid 3.
- Lower selling, general and administrative costs in the second quarter could support operating results if the trend continues 3.
What would break the thesis
- The company continues to report net losses and has going-concern doubts, which could limit its access to capital 1.
- The RTD project is at an early stage, and if it is not completed on time, the investment made could fail to produce returns 1.
- Dependence on a few large customers leaves revenue exposed to changes in their purchasing policies 1.
What to watch
- Signing of the final supply agreement with the Iowa equipment partner2026
- How the company finances its operations and the manufacturing projectQ3 2026
- Trend in cut-herb and condiment sales at major customersQ3 2026
- Start of RTD production in Iowa, on the current plan2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
Edible Garden is a controlled environment agriculture (CEA) company that uses hydroponic and vertical greenhouses to grow organic herbs year-round, with a net loss of about $17.3 million in fiscal 2025 1. It operates in Michigan, Iowa and New Jersey, and its products were available in more than 6,000 retail locations as of June 30, 2026 2. Besides fresh produce, it sells beverages and supplements under the Pulp, Kick and Vitamin Whey brands 1.
Segments
Market context
The US market for controlled-environment and fresh organic produce is competitive, with low grocery-retail margins 1. The company depends heavily on a few large customers, which accounted for 88.2% of revenue in fiscal 2025 1, and expansion into the RTD beverage market could open a higher-margin category if the project is completed.
Trends
- Demand for organic and local foodtailwind
Consumer interest in fresh, local and traceable products could support herb sales in supermarket chains if the trend persists 1.
- Shift to functional beverages and clean nutritionmixed
Demand for functional beverages and shelf-stable nutrition could support the Farm-to-Formula strategy, but the Iowa project is still at an early stage 1.
- Financing costs and liquidityheadwind
The capital needed for the new production lines could limit financing options, especially if borrowing terms are costly or shareholders face dilution 1.
- Retail price pressureheadwind
Consolidation of grocery chains and pricing pressure from large customers could reduce margins if production costs rise faster than selling prices 1.
Competitive position
The company competes with fresh-herb growers and other controlled-environment agriculture operators, some with greater financial and operational resources 1. Competition in grocery retail is intense, and customer concentration makes the company vulnerable to losing a major account 1.
- Fresh herb growers in controlled environments
CEA and fresh-herb companies competing for shelf space in supermarkets, some larger and better funded, as the company itself notes 1.
- Sauce and condiment producers
Sauce and condiment brands competing with the Pulp line in the same grocery chains 1.
- Sports nutrition and nutritional beverage makers
Companies selling protein and sports supplements, a segment the company is trying to enter through its RTD line 1.
- Aseptic processing equipment suppliers
The Tetra Pak partner supplies equipment for the Iowa project, and other equipment makers could affect project timing and cost 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report30 Oct 2026Acquisition or disposition of assets · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Item 3.02
- Current report22 Oct 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report01 Oct 2026Material agreement · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Item 3.02 · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report02 Sept 2026Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report24 Aug 2026Other events
- Current report17 Aug 2026Departure or appointment of officers
- Quarterly report14 Aug 2026
- Current report14 Aug 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report11 Aug 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report07 Aug 2026Item 3.02
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Edible Garden AG Incorporated · 31 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Edible Garden AG Incorporated · 14 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Edible Garden AG Incorporated · 14 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.