olivLaw · US equity research
Serve Robotics Inc. SERV
General Industrial Machinery & Equipment, NEC · SIC 3569 · Vertical: General Industrial Machinery & Equipment, NEC (SIC 3569)
Serve Robotics develops and operates autonomous delivery robots on sidewalks and, since 2026, hospital robots after its Diligent Robotics acquisition. The company is at an early growth stage with still modest revenue, but it sits at the centre of the debate on automating last-mile logistics.
At the close of 30 Oct 2026, Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) stock was 2.60 USD (−8.45% on the day), with market capitalisation 225.4 m USD, beta 3.09, 52-week range 2.60–15.41 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 3.2 m USD (+404.4% YoY), net income of -64.1 m USD, diluted EPS -0.80 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 27.2
- oversold (≤ 30)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 2.04 – 4.93
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.19 · band width 83.0%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 4.18 / 7.31
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.46 / -0.43
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −44.1% | −0.9% | −43.2 pp | — |
| 3 months | −45.6% | +1.2% | −46.8 pp | — |
| 6 months | −72.3% | +4.8% | −77.2 pp | — |
| Year to date | −75.0% | +10.7% | −85.7 pp | — |
| 1 year | −80.0% | +11.1% | −91.2 pp | −25.2% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +80.7% | unavailable | +29.4% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +64.6% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 222.0 k | 176.0 k | 440.0 k | 642.0 k | 687.0 k | 882.0 k | 3.0 m | 3.2 m |
| Cost of revenue | 378.0 k | 832.0 k | 1.9 m | 3.5 m | 5.1 m | 7.6 m | 12.0 m | 12.0 m |
| Gross profit | -156.0 k | -656.0 k | -1.5 m | -2.9 m | -4.4 m | -6.7 m | -9.0 m | -8.8 m |
| Research & development | 5.0 m | 6.8 m | 6.9 m | 9.1 m | 13.4 m | 15.9 m | 19.0 m | 20.3 m |
| Operating income | -8.4 m | -13.6 m | -15.0 m | -22.6 m | -34.8 m | -40.3 m | -51.8 m | -66.1 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 9.0 k ≈ | 273.0 k | 475.0 k | 817.0 k ≈ | 2.1 m ≈ | 4.8 m | 6.3 m | — |
| Interest expense | 34.0 k | 33.0 k | 3.0 k | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pre-tax income | — | — | -13.2 m | -20.9 m | — | — | -49.7 m | -64.2 m |
| Income tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3.7 m | -648.0 k | -36.2 k |
| Net income | -8.0 m | -13.1 m | -13.2 m | -20.9 m | -33.0 m | -34.3 m | -49.0 m | -64.1 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.20 | -0.28 ≈ | -0.23 | -0.36 | -0.54 | -0.47 ≈ | -0.65 | -0.80 |
| Operating cash flow | -5.5 m ≈ | -6.3 m | -9.5 m | -16.0 m ≈ | -25.2 m ≈ | -29.6 m | -41.4 m | -43.3 m ≈ |
| Capex | 4.6 m ≈ | 4.9 m | 3.5 m | 6.0 m ≈ | 11.3 m ≈ | 16.5 m | 1.4 m | 973.0 k ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | ⚠ 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | unavailable | 107.8 k | 207.5 k | 1.8 m | 2.7 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | unavailable | +92.5% | — | +46.2% |
| Net income | -54.6 k | -21.9 m | -24.8 m | -39.2 m | -101.4 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | — | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | -0.01 | -3.17 | -1.75 | -1.07 | -1.63 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | — | unavailable |
| net % | unavailable | -20,270.2% | -11,955.8% | -2,161.7% | -3,823.5% |
| Free cash flow | unavailable | -25.0 m | -16.0 m | -31.8 m | -117.6 m |
The series breaks before 2024: earlier years come from the original reports of the issuer of that time, later years from a subsequent filing that restated the perimeter (a separation, discontinued operations). The year-on-year change across the break is not shown.
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 106.2 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 350.7 m USD
- Total assets
- 367.8 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 18.13x
- ROE
- -42.0%
- ROA
- -40.0%
- FCF margin
- -4,435.1%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | — | 107.8 k | 207.5 k | 1.8 m | 2.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | — | 1.1 m | 1.7 m | 1.9 m | 18.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | — | -1.0 m | -1.5 m | -75.0 k | -15.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Research & development | — | 13.6 m | 9.9 m | 24.3 m | 45.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | -54.6 k | -21.0 m | -20.7 m | -38.3 m | -112.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | — | — | — | 310.0 k | 8.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | — | — | — | -38.0 m ≈ | -104.6 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | — | 636.3 k | 2.3 m | 2.0 m | 3.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | — | — | — | -39.2 m | -105.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | — | — | 0 | 0 | -3.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -54.6 k | -21.9 m | -24.8 m | -39.2 m | -101.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -0.01 | -3.17 | -1.75 | -1.07 | -1.63 | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 5.0 m | 6.9 m | 14.2 m | 36.7 m | 62.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 8.0 m | 2.7 m | 6.8 k | 123.3 m | 106.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | — | 23.7 k | 3.0 k | 87.0 k | 851.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | — | 618.3 k | 774.3 k | 310.0 k | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 271 | 3.4 m | 1.5 m | 125.3 m | 241.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | — | 3.4 m | 48.4 k | 12.0 m | 47.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | — | — | — | 0 | 15.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | — | — | — | 0 | 31.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 271 | 8.5 m | 2.8 m | 139.6 m | 367.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 7.5 k | 162.0 k | 2.1 m | 4.9 m | 5.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 72.5 k | 3.9 m | 6.2 m | 6.8 m | 13.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 72.5 k | 21.0 m | 6.8 m | 7.9 m | 17.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 8.3 m † | -12.5 m † | -4.0 m † | 131.7 m † | 350.7 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -51.6 k | -21.4 m | -16.0 m | -21.5 m | -80.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | — | 3.6 m | 4.9 k | 10.3 m | 37.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | — | -25.0 m ≈ | -16.0 m ≈ | -31.8 m ≈ | -117.6 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | — | -4.1 m | -4.9 k | -10.3 m | -198.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 42.5 k | 20.2 m | 13.3 m | 155.1 m | 261.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 4 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
30 Oct 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 225.4 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
27% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -2,315.8% | 0 (vs peers) | 23% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 190.8% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 31% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 12.8x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 15% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -75.3% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 31% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial100/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 2.7 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 46.2%; net margin -2,315.8%; ROE -64.6%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 27.1% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 190.8%
- Current ratio: 12.8x
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -2,315.8%
- FCF yield: -75.3%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
General Industrial Machinery & Equipment, NEC (SIC 3569) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 14 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYMSymbotic Inc. | 22.9 bn | 789.3 | 1.8% | 0.3% | +25.7% | −53% / +11% |
| NDSNNordson Corporation | 18.0 bn | 32.6 | 17.8% | 18.6% | +3.8% | +39% / +52% |
| RRXRegal Rexnord Corp | 10.5 bn | 32.4 | 4.8% | 5.4% | −1.6% | +12% / +33% |
| ESABESAB Corporation | 4.3 bn | 25.0 | 7.5% | 5.7% | +3.7% | −40% / +10% |
| OUSTOuster, Inc. | 2.1 bn | — | -18.0% | -26.0% | +52.5% | −11% / +679% |
| CHRNChronoscale Holdings Corporation | 2.1 bn | — | -42.0% | -70.3% | +459.4% | +167% / −12% |
| HSAIHesai Group | 1.9 bn | 28.3 | 6.9% | 14.4% | +52.1% | −49% / +26% |
| HLPHongli Group Inc. | 298.2 m | 135.3 | 3.5% | 9.9% | +39.0% | +165% / +89% |
| AZA2z Cust2mate Solutions Corp. | 269.0 m | — | -82.1% | -477.6% | +47.0% | −17% / +60% |
| SERVServe Robotics Inc. | 225.4 m | — | -64.6% | -2,315.8% | +46.2% | −80% / unavailable |
| TAYDTaylor Devices, Inc. | 180.2 m | 26.4 | 9.9% | 17.5% | −10.0% | +22% / +153% |
| RRRichtech Robotics Inc. | 20.1 m | — | -16.2% | -700.1% | +19.0% | −80% / unavailable |
| KITTNauticus Robotics, Inc. | 10.7 m | — | — | -1,132.2% | +191.8% | −98% / −100% |
| INLFInlif Limited | 1.2 m | — | -41.3% | -29.6% | +16.5% | −100% / unavailable |
| ATSATS Corp | — | — | -1.7% | -1.1% | −16.5% | −33% / −45% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for SERV from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Serve Robotics develops and operates autonomous delivery robots on sidewalks and, since 2026, hospital robots after its Diligent Robotics acquisition. The company is at an early growth stage with still modest revenue, but it sits at the centre of the debate on automating last-mile logistics 13.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company operates one of the largest commercial sidewalk robot fleets in the United States and has integrations with several delivery platforms 3. It has its own autonomy architecture and operational experience built over time 1.
- Expansion into hospitals through the Diligent acquisition diversifies revenue sources beyond food delivery 12. The company raised capital through share issues during the period analysed 1.
- The Gen3 hardware cost is substantially lower than the previous generation, supporting long-term unit economics 3.
Weaknesses
- The company is at an early stage, with modest revenue relative to large net losses and a history of losses 1. The accumulated losses show a continuing need for funding 12.
- Revenue is concentrated in a few large customers, which raises exposure to the loss of a partner 12.
- Dependence on single-source suppliers for complex components and on contract manufacturers could slow production or raise costs 1.
Opportunities
- If Diligent and Moxi expand to more hospitals, recurring revenue could become more predictable 12. New partnerships with delivery platforms and restaurants could extend geographic reach 3.
- Advertising on robots and monetization of fleet data could add revenue with higher margins 13.
- If regulation allows rapid expansion into new cities, the micro-depot model could reduce the cost of entering new neighbourhoods 3.
Risks
- Net losses and need for capitalhigh
The company has not been profitable and expects operating losses in the near term, which could make it necessary to raise capital on unfavourable terms 12.
- Customer concentrationhigh
A large share of revenue and receivables comes from a few customers, and losing one of them could significantly affect operations 12.
- Regulation of delivery devicesmedium
Regulatory changes on autonomy, size or number of robots could limit revenue and unit economics in some markets 1.
- Supply chainmedium
Shortages of semiconductors and reliance on single-source suppliers could delay production and raise costs 1.
- Integration of acquisitionsmedium
Integrating several acquisitions, including Diligent, could divert management attention and create unforeseen costs 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the fleet becomes a national delivery network with demand supported by large platforms, revenue could grow quickly from the current base 3.
- Expansion into hospitals could bring steadier revenue that is less seasonal than food delivery 12.
- Falling hardware costs and rising labour costs could improve robot economics over time 13.
What would break the thesis
- The company could keep posting large losses if revenue grows more slowly than research and operating spending 12.
- Revenue concentration in a few customers could make results vulnerable to contract or strategy changes by partners 12.
- Repeated need for capital could dilute existing shareholders if funding is not obtained on good terms 1.
What to watch
- Revenue and net loss for the quarter ending September 30, 2026Q3 2026
- Delivery of the fiscal 2026 revenue guidance2026
- Development of hospital contracts and the number of Moxi robots in operation2027
- Regulatory changes on delivery robots in large citiesnext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
Serve Robotics Inc. designs, develops, deploys and operates low-emission autonomous robots built on a proprietary AI-enabled platform 1. Food delivery remains the main commercial application, through integrations with platforms such as Uber Eats and DoorDash 1. After acquiring Diligent Robotics in January 2026, the company extended its platform to hospitals, where Moxi robots support clinical staff with logistics tasks 12.
Revenue combines fleet services (delivery, branding advertising and data monetization) with software services, including licensing and engineering projects 1. The company intends to keep growing its fleet and partnerships, and to develop on-robot advertising and software 13.
The strategy rests on a data flywheel: more operational data leads to better models, better robots and eventually more revenue and deployments 3. For 2026 management says it wants to optimize fleet utilization and revenue per robot 3.
Segments
Sidewalk last-mile delivery
This is the main segment, with Gen3 robots offering higher top speed and longer range than the previous generation 13. Revenue is concentrated in a few large customers, so dependence on partner platforms is significant 12.
Market context
Trends
- Rising labour costsmixed
Labour shortages and wage inflation make human delivery more expensive, which could support robot adoption 1. The same inflationary pressure can, however, reduce discretionary consumer spending and orders 1.
- Regulation of personal delivery devicesmixed
Pressure to reclassify couriers as employees and caps on restaurant commissions may favour robotisation 1. Yet rules on delivery devices, robot caps or autonomy limits could restrict expansion 12.
- Falling hardware and network coststailwind
The company expects cameras, processors, batteries and sensors to get cheaper and mobile networks to get faster, which would lower the cost of building and operating robots 13.
- Variable demand for deliveriesheadwind
Demand depends on economic cycles, weather and partner matching algorithms, which makes robot utilization hard to forecast 2. If discretionary consumer spending falls, revenue per robot could be affected 1.
Competitive position
Competition includes operators of teleoperated delivery robots and delivery platforms developing their own automated solutions 1. The company argues that Level 4 autonomy lowers cost versus remotely operated robots, because one remote supervisor can monitor several deliveries at once 1.
Serve relies on integrations with major platforms and on fleet scale, but competitors may have more resources and greater market recognition 1. The documents do not explicitly name competitors with US tickers, so none are given a symbol.
- Teleoperated delivery robot operators
Cited in the risk factors as operators that rely on more intensive remote supervision than Serve 1.
- Delivery platforms with in-house solutions
Partner platforms that could develop or acquire their own automated delivery technology 1.
- Companies with competing autonomy technology
Firms developing sensors, autonomy and AI models for mobile robots that could compete for the same contracts 1.
- Hospital automation providers
Suppliers of logistics robots for medical institutions that compete with Moxi in the hospital segment 2.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Wonder Deal, $240M Cash, and 31% Short Interest. A Short Squeeze Could Be Brewing in Serve Robotics Stock.Yahoo Finance — News · 13 Sept 2026 · EN
- QuikBot vs. Serve Robotics (NASDAQ:SERV): Will Physical AI Be Won by Robots or the Infrastructure Behind Them?Yahoo Finance — News · 24 Aug 2026 · EN
- Uber Exits Serve Robotics Stake as Delivery Alliance UnravelsBloomberg Markets · 11 Aug 2026 · EN
The latest news item in our archive is from 13 Sept 2026; the newest SEC filing is from 05 Oct 2026. The press archive comes from the RSS feeds we follow and does not necessarily cover the latest event — the filings alongside do.
SEC filings
- Current report05 Oct 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report17 Aug 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report06 Aug 2026
- Current report06 Aug 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report24 Jun 2026Departure or appointment of officers · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report18 Jun 2026Shareholder vote
- Current report11 May 2026Termination of a material agreement · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report07 May 2026
- Current report07 May 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement24 Apr 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Serve Robotics Inc. · 12 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Serve Robotics Inc. · 06 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Serve Robotics Inc. · 05 Oct 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.