olivLaw · US equity research
Zevia PBC ZVIA
Bottled & Canned Soft Drinks & Carbonated Waters · SIC 2086 · Vertical: Bottled & Canned Soft Drinks & Carbonated Waters (SIC 2086)
Zevia PBC is a better-for-you beverage company selling zero sugar soda, energy drinks and tea sweetened with stevia in the U.S. and Canada. It enters 2026 with a new chief executive and net sales up 10.4% in the first half of 2026, though it remains loss-making. Net sales of 161.3 million dollars in fiscal 2025 and 45.0 million dollars in the second quarter of 2026 show the current size of the business.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Zevia PBC (ZVIA) stock was 1.20 USD (+2.56% on the day), with beta 1.04, 52-week range 1.12–2.71 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q3 2026): revenue of 48.3 m USD (+18.4% YoY), net income of -2.1 m USD, diluted EPS -0.03 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 46.1
- neutral
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 1.14 – 1.28
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.43 · band width 11.9%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 1.28 / 1.43
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.02 / -0.02
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −0.8% | −1.1% | +0.3 pp | — |
| 3 months | −29.8% | −0.5% | −29.4 pp | — |
| 6 months | +0.8% | +4.4% | −3.6 pp | — |
| Year to date | −48.3% | +12.3% | −60.6 pp | — |
| 1 year | −48.1% | +13.5% | −61.6 pp | +25.3% |
| 3 years | −42.0% | +76.4% | −118.4 pp | +37.5% |
| 5 years | −90.1% | +63.7% | −153.7 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q3 2026 · 30 Sept 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 | Q3 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 39.5 m | 38.0 m | 44.5 m | 40.8 m | 37.9 m | 46.1 m | 45.0 m | 48.3 m |
| Cost of revenue | 20.0 m | 19.0 m | 22.8 m | 22.2 m | 19.8 m | 23.8 m | 23.0 m | 25.9 m |
| Gross profit | 19.4 m | 19.0 m | 21.7 m | 18.6 m | 18.1 m | 22.3 m | 22.0 m | 22.4 m |
| Operating income | -6.3 m | -6.4 m | -1.0 m | -2.9 m | -1.5 m | -2.4 m | -2.9 m | -2.2 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 288.0 k | 252.0 k | 236.0 k | 202.0 k | 178.0 k | 168.0 k | 182.0 k | 163.0 k |
| Pre-tax income | -6.8 m | -6.3 m | -634.0 k | -2.9 m | -1.3 m | -2.3 m | -2.9 m | -2.2 m |
| Income tax | 23.0 k | 41.0 k | 17.0 k | -32.0 k | 28.0 k | 37.0 k | 12.0 k | -5.0 k |
| Net income | -5.8 m | -5.2 m | -697.0 k | -2.7 m | -1.3 m | -2.3 m | -2.8 m | -2.1 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.10 ≈ | -0.08 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.02 ≈ | -0.03 | -0.04 | -0.03 |
| Operating cash flow | -2.0 m | -2.9 m | -1.4 m ≈ | 116.0 k ≈ | -507.0 k | 1.6 m | 2.3 m ≈ | 1.5 m ≈ |
| Capex | 45.0 k | 11.0 k | 34.0 k ≈ | 181.0 k ≈ | 81.0 k | 270.0 k | 124.0 k ≈ | 169.0 k ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 110.0 m | 138.2 m | 163.2 m | 166.4 m | 155.0 m | 161.3 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +25.6% | +18.1% | +2.0% | −6.8% | +4.0% |
| Net income | -6.1 m | -87.7 m | -47.6 m | -28.3 m | -20.0 m | -9.9 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | -1.33 | -0.81 | -0.41 | -0.34 | -0.15 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | -5.5% | -63.4% | -29.2% | -17.0% | -12.9% | -6.2% |
| Free cash flow | -4.1 m | -20.9 m | -23.4 m | unavailable | -1.3 m | -5.0 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 25.4 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 35.6 m USD
- Total assets
- 63.6 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 2.08x
- ROE
- -25.3%
- ROA
- -15.1%
- FCF margin
- -3.1%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 110.0 m | 138.2 m | 163.2 m | 166.4 m | 155.0 m | 161.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 60.5 m | 74.2 m | 93.2 m | 91.7 m | 83.1 m | 83.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 49.5 m | 63.9 m | 70.0 m | 74.8 m | 71.9 m | 77.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Operating income | -5.5 m | -87.4 m | -47.9 m | -28.9 m | -23.7 m | -11.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 932.0 k | 997.0 k | 1.3 m | 1.6 m | 1.3 m | 868.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| EBITDA | -4.5 m ≈ | -86.4 m ≈ | -46.5 m ≈ | -27.3 m ≈ | -22.3 m ≈ | -10.9 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026derived |
| Pre-tax income | -6.1 m | -87.6 m | -47.6 m | -28.3 m | -23.7 m | -11.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Income tax | 0 | 34.0 k | 65.0 k | 52.0 k | 66.0 k | 54.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Net income | -6.1 m | -87.7 m | -47.6 m | -28.3 m | -20.0 m | -9.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | — | -1.33 | -0.81 | -0.41 | -0.34 | -0.15 | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | — | 34.5 m | 43.5 m | 50.6 m | 58.7 m | 66.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 14.9 m | 43.1 m | 47.4 m | 32.0 m | 30.7 m | 25.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Receivables | 6.9 m | 9.0 m | 11.1 m | 11.1 m | 10.8 m | 11.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Inventories | 20.8 m | 31.5 m | 27.6 m | 34.6 m | 18.6 m | 20.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Current assets | 44.2 m | 117.1 m | 88.7 m | 82.7 m | 61.9 m | 58.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 991.0 k | 3.2 m | 4.6 m | 2.1 m | 1.3 m | 867.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 3.9 m | 4.2 m | 4.4 m | 3.5 m | 3.2 m | 3.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Total assets | 50.0 m | 125.0 m | 98.9 m | 90.9 m | 68.0 m | 63.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 9.0 m | 13.5 m | 8.0 m | 21.2 m | 15.3 m | 17.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 14.1 m | 20.4 m | 17.1 m | 27.7 m | 24.2 m | 28.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 14.3 m | 20.4 m | 17.1 m | 29.1 m | 25.0 m | 28.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Equity | -196.8 m | 104.6 m | 81.8 m | 61.8 m | 42.9 m | 35.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -3.3 m | -17.8 m | -20.8 m | -16.3 m | -1.0 m | -4.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Capex | 805.0 k | 3.1 m | 2.6 m | — | 283.0 k | 307.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -4.1 m ≈ | -20.9 m ≈ | -23.4 m ≈ | — | -1.3 m ≈ | -5.0 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -805.0 k | -33.1 m | 27.4 m | 805.0 k | -283.0 k | -307.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 15.8 m | 79.1 m | -2.3 m | 25.0 k | 0 | -289.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Feb 2026verified |
| Share repurchases | — | 17.0 k | 0 | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 10 Mar 2023verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 3 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 18.8% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: unavailable
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
19% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 3 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 18.8% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -4.8% | 13 (vs peers) | 33% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -0.4% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 44% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.9x | 88 (on a fixed band) | 22% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial88/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial0/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial13/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Zevia PBC (ZVIA). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-09-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 161.3 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 4.0%; net margin -4.8%; ROE -18.0%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 3 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 18.8% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Current ratio: 1.9x
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -4.8%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -0.4%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Bottled & Canned Soft Drinks & Carbonated Waters (SIC 2086) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 9 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp | 47.8 bn | 22.4 | 25.7% | 23.1% | +10.7% | +30% / +77% |
| CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc. | 7.8 bn | 104.3 | 10.5% | 4.2% | +85.5% | −25% / −38% |
| FIZZNational Beverage Corp. | 3.5 bn | 20.2 | 40.1% | 14.8% | −1.7% | +11% / −21% |
| COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 1.5 bn | 2.5 | 90.0% | 7.5% | +4.8% | +25% / +178% |
| REEDReed's, Inc. | 12.0 m | — | -14,800.0% | -63.5% | −10.2% | −80% / −92% |
| AKO-AAndina Bottling Co Inc | — | — | 25.2% | 8.0% | +3.7% | +18% / +105% |
| FMXMexican Economic Development, Inc. | — | — | 12.0% | 5.1% | −9.9% | +36% / +3% |
| ZVIAZevia PBC | — | — | -18.0% | -4.8% | +4.0% | −48% / −42% |
| KOFCoca Cola Femsa Sab De Cv | — | 82.6 | — | — | +18.2% | +33% / +38% |
| CCEPCOCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS plc | — | — | 23.8% | 9.3% | +2.3% | +26% / +91% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for ZVIA from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 05 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 8-K (04 Nov 2026 · results), 10-Q (04 Nov 2026).
In brief
Zevia PBC is a better-for-you beverage company selling zero sugar soda, energy drinks and tea sweetened with stevia in the U.S. and Canada. It enters 2026 with a new chief executive and net sales up 10.4% in the first half of 2026, though it remains loss-making. Net sales of 161.3 million dollars in fiscal 2025 and 45.0 million dollars in the second quarter of 2026 show the current size of the business 13.
SWOT
Strengths
Weaknesses
- The company has not been profitable in the periods reviewed, and net losses continued in fiscal 2025 and the first half of 2026 13.
- Reliance on a few large customers makes sales sensitive to decisions by a small number of retailers 1.
- Most sales come from one product category, soda, which concentrates risk 1.
Opportunities
Risks
- Intense competitionhigh
Much larger competitors can react quickly with new products, pricing or promotion, which could limit growth 1.
- Customer concentrationhigh
The ten largest customers account for a major share of sales, and losing an important customer could affect results 1.
- Persistent lossesmedium
The company has reported net losses over several consecutive years, and the path to profitability remains uncertain 13.
- Tariffs and raw material costsmedium
Higher tariffs and aluminum prices could reduce gross margin if selling prices cannot be adjusted 12.
- Leadership changelow
A new chief executive in 2026 may bring changes in strategy and execution whose effects are hard to predict 23.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If sales growth continues through the first half of 2026 and gross margin holds steady, the company could move toward profitability faster 3.
- The zero sugar brand holds a clear position in a category where consumers seek healthier products, which could support long-term growth 1.
- Savings from the productivity program and the warehouse restructuring could lower costs and support brand investment 12.
What would break the thesis
- The company was unprofitable in 2026 so far, and compensation and restructuring costs could delay reaching profitability 13.
- Competition from large producers could limit shelf space and force price cuts, which would hurt margins 1.
- Dependence on a few large customers and a single product category makes the company vulnerable to changes in retailer decisions 1.
What to watch
- Delivery against full-year 2026 net sales guidance2026
- Gross margin trend and aluminum cost developmentsQ3 2026
- Completion of the warehouse restructuring and the savings announcedQ3 2026
- New chief executive's strategy and its effect on distribution and marketingnext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 05 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 8-K (04 Nov 2026 · results), 10-Q (04 Nov 2026).
The business
Zevia PBC is a Delaware public benefit corporation based in Los Angeles that develops, markets and distributes zero sugar, zero calorie beverages sweetened naturally. Its products are made with a handful of simple ingredients, contain no artificial sweeteners, and are sold through major grocery, drug, warehouse club, mass, natural, convenience and e-commerce retailers 1. Products are manufactured by third-party contract manufacturers in the U.S. and Canada, which keeps the model asset-light 1. Packaging is exclusively aluminum cans, and the company says it has never sold a beverage in a plastic bottle 1.
The company has focused on brand building and distribution while remaining unprofitable. Net loss attributable to Zevia PBC was 9.9 million dollars in fiscal 2025, compared with 20.0 million dollars in 2024, and equity-based compensation rose in the first half of 2026 after a brand endorsement agreement with a musician 13. The Productivity Initiative launched in 2024 reduced costs, and a new warehouse restructuring aims at further savings 2.
The customer base is concentrated: the ten largest customers represented 75% of net sales in 2025, and there are no long-term commitments with them 1. The balance sheet carries no debt, with cash on hand and an unused credit line 3.
Segments
Soda
Soda is the flagship product, released in 2008, and accounted for approximately 95% of net sales in 2025, offered in 20 flavors across multiple formats 1. The company sees significant growth opportunities in this line 1.
Market context
Zevia operates in the North American soft drink market, where consumers increasingly seek products with less sugar and no artificial ingredients 1. The company says it has helped consumers avoid over 103,000 metric tons of sugar since 2011, though this is its own estimate 1. The market remains competitive, and better-for-you sodas draw large players and new entrants 1.
Demand depends on consumers' disposable income. The company notes that inflation and reduced discretionary spending may affect sales, and tariffs may raise aluminum and other input costs 12. If these pressures persist, margins could stay under pressure.
Trends
- Zero sugar and clean label demandtailwind
Consumers are more health conscious and increasingly avoid added sugar and artificial colors, which favors the Zevia brand 1.
- Competitive pressure in functional sodaheadwind
Large producers such as PepsiCo and the Coca-Cola Company have moved into the better-for-you segment, and shelf space is increasingly contested 1.
- Tariffs and input costsheadwind
Tariffs and aluminum price volatility have increased cost of goods sold, and the company expects those costs to keep rising 12.
- Brand investment and distribution resetmixed
The company has stepped up marketing and changed its distribution approach, which could accelerate growth if the new management executes well 13.
Competitive position
Competitors include large companies with far greater financial resources, such as The Coca-Cola Company, Keurig Dr Pepper, PepsiCo, National Beverage Corp., Monster Energy and Red Bull 1. Competition also extends to prebiotic soda brands such as Poppi and Olipop, as well as regional and private label producers 1.
Large brands have the scale to respond quickly through pricing, promotion or new products. Zevia can compete on its clean label, no artificial ingredients positioning, but remains smaller than most rivals 1.
- The Coca-Cola CompanyKO
Multinational with far greater financial resources that has entered the functional soda segment 1.
- PepsiCoPEP
Large competitor that acquired a prebiotic soda brand and is focusing on the better-for-you segment 1.
- Keurig Dr PepperKDP
Large beverage competitor with resources that allow it to change pricing or promotion 1.
- Poppi
Prebiotic soda brand cited as a direct rival in the functional soda segment 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Quarterly report04 Nov 2026
- Current report04 Nov 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report23 Oct 2026Material agreement · Item 3.02 · Item 3.03 · Amendments to articles or bylaws · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report05 Aug 2026
- Current report05 Aug 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report15 Jun 2026Shareholder vote
- Current report15 Jun 2026Departure or appointment of officers · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report18 May 2026Material agreement · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report06 May 2026
- Current report06 May 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Zevia PBC · 25 Feb 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Zevia PBC · 05 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Zevia PBC · 05 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.