olivLaw · US equity research
Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. OMEX
Water Transportation · SIC 4400 · Vertical: Water Transportation (SIC 4400)
Odyssey Marine Exploration discovers and develops seafloor mineral resources, with a portfolio spanning phosphate in Mexico, minerals in the Cook Islands and gold in Papua New Guinea. The company is merging with American Ocean Minerals, a transaction that values the combined entity at approximately 900 million USD.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. (OMEX) stock was 11.72 USD (+4.64% on the day), with market capitalisation 27.5 m USD, beta 0.44, 52-week range 0.51–13.87 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q3 2026): revenue of 108.9 k USD (+78.6% YoY), net income of -4.6 m USD, diluted EPS -1.98 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 62.3
- strong (55–70)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- -6.59 – 16.06
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.81 · band width 478.1%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 2.35 / 1.44
- uptrend (price > SMA50 > SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- 2.94 / 1.99
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +1,725.5% | −1.1% | +1,726.6 pp | — |
| 3 months | +1,477.4% | −0.5% | +1,477.8 pp | — |
| 6 months | +801.5% | +4.4% | +797.1 pp | — |
| Year to date | +498.0% | +12.3% | +485.6 pp | — |
| 1 year | +554.7% | +13.5% | +541.2 pp | +21.5% |
| 3 years | +225.6% | +76.4% | +149.1 pp | +64.8% |
| 5 years | +92.8% | +63.7% | +29.1 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q3 2026 · 30 Sept 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 | Q3 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 136.1 k | 135.0 k | 135.0 k | 61.0 k | 22.7 k | 22.5 k | 77.9 k | 108.9 k |
| SG&A | 1.7 m | 1.8 m | 3.8 m | 1.4 m | 4.0 m | 5.8 m | 7.1 m | 3.9 m |
| Operating income | -1.4 m | -2.2 m | -4.4 m | -2.1 m | -4.7 m | -6.4 m | -7.7 m | -4.4 m |
| Interest expense | 1.2 m | 1.2 m | 1.2 m | 1.4 m | 1.2 m | 172.3 k | 214.6 k | 290.1 k |
| Pre-tax income | -7.2 m | -415.7 k | -17.1 m | -13.5 m | -17.4 m | 177.9 k | -9.4 m | -4.6 m |
| Income tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net income | -5.0 m | 2.2 m | -14.8 m | -13.1 m | -17.4 m | 347.3 k | -9.3 m | -4.6 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.14 ≈ | 0.01 | -0.48 | -7.86 | -0.11 ≈ | -0.04 | -0.16 | -1.98 |
| Operating cash flow | -1.8 m | -2.0 m | -2.0 m ≈ | -2.1 m ≈ | -2.8 m | -3.8 m | -4.7 m ≈ | -6.0 m ≈ |
| Capex | -4.0 k | 0 | 0 ≈ | 1.6 k ≈ | 14.5 k | — | — | — |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | ⚠ 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3.3 m | 3.1 m | 2.0 m | 921.2 k | 183.9 k | 9.3 k | 768.7 k | 353.7 k |
| Revenue YoY | +162.4% | −6.2% | −33.7% | −54.8% | — | −94.9% | +8,141.4% | −54.0% |
| Net income | -5.2 m | -10.4 m | -14.8 m | -10.0 m | -22.1 m | 5.3 m | 15.7 m | -43.1 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | — | unavailable | +192.9% | −375.2% |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | unavailable | -1.41 | -0.75 | -1.28 | 0.27 | 0.07 | -1.10 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | — | unavailable | −74.1% | −1,671.4% |
| net % | -157.9% | -339.7% | -726.7% | -1,080.8% | -12,004.2% | 57,315.5% | 2,037.0% | -12,180.6% |
| Free cash flow | -6.5 m | -5.5 m | -9.2 m | -5.4 m | -11.7 m | -11.5 m | 558.0 k | -8.9 m |
The series breaks before 2022: earlier years come from the original reports of the issuer of that time, later years from a subsequent filing that restated the perimeter (a separation, discontinued operations). The year-on-year change across the break is not shown.
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 3.5 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- -75.5 m USD
- Total assets
- 15.8 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 0.37x
- ROE
- unavailable
- ROA
- -251.0%
- FCF margin
- -2,506.3%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 2.0 m | 921.2 k | 183.9 k | 9.3 k | 768.7 k | 353.7 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| SG&A | 3.7 m | 6.3 m | 9.4 m | 6.8 m | 9.7 m | 11.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | -12.6 m | -15.0 m | -17.9 m | -10.3 m | -12.0 m | -13.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Interest expense | 6.9 m | 10.8 m | 2.3 m | 5.0 m | 6.5 m | 4.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -21.1 m | -16.1 m | -29.8 m | -3.9 m | 6.2 m | -48.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -14.8 m | -10.0 m | -22.1 m | 5.3 m | 15.7 m | -43.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -1.41 | -0.75 | -1.28 | 0.27 | 0.07 | -1.10 | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 10.5 m | 13.3 m | 17.3 m | 20.1 m | 28.4 m | 39.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 6.2 m | 2.3 m | 1.4 m | 4.0 m | 4.8 m | 3.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | 160.3 k | 268.9 k | 7.5 k | 110.3 k | 285.8 k | 67.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 6.9 m | 3.3 m | 4.0 m | 4.9 m | 5.8 m | 4.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 614.8 k | 479.1 k | 2.9 m | 524.7 k | 534.0 k | 474.8 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 11.8 m | 8.9 m | 13.9 m | 22.8 m | 18.5 m | 15.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 1.5 m | 1.8 m | 2.3 m | 345.4 k | 748.4 k | 770.8 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 53.9 m | 52.6 m | 41.8 m | 31.5 m | 22.5 m | 11.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 69.7 m | 71.4 m | 102.5 m | 108.7 m | 97.6 m | 91.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | -57.9 m | -67.0 m | -88.7 m | -85.9 m | -79.1 m | -75.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -9.2 m | -5.4 m | -10.2 m | -10.2 m | 642.3 k | -8.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 0 | 19.1 k | 1.5 m | 1.3 m | 84.4 k | 16.1 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -9.2 m ≈ | -5.4 m ≈ | -11.7 m ≈ | -11.5 m ≈ | 558.0 k ≈ | -8.9 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | 0 | 323.0 k | -2.5 m | -1.0 m | -84.4 k | -173.6 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 15.1 m | 1.2 m | 11.9 m | 13.8 m | 212.0 k | 7.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 5 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 27.5 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
33% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · input data missing
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -13,366.3% | 0 (vs peers) | 19% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 24.4% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 25% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -12.7x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 19% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.1x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 13% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -63.0% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 25% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet0/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
ODYSSEY MARINE EXPLORATION, INC. (OMEX). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-09-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 353.7 k USD in 2025; YoY growth -54.0%; net margin -13,366.3%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 33.3% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 24.4%
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -13,366.3%
- Interest coverage: -12.7x
- Current ratio: 0.1x
- FCF yield: -63.0%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Water Transportation (SIC 4400) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 21 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCLRoyal Caribbean Cruises Ltd | 89.1 bn | 19.7 | 41.7% | 23.8% | +8.8% | +25% / +210% |
| CCLCarnival Corp Ltd. | 42.1 bn | 13.7 | 24.0% | 11.4% | +6.4% | +21% / +108% |
| BIPBrookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. | 11.3 bn | 42.4 | 7.7% | 11.0% | +9.8% | +6% / +46% |
| NCLHNorwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. | 8.5 bn | 10.2 | 31.2% | 8.2% | +3.7% | +1% / +22% |
| KEXKirby Corporation | 6.8 bn | 19.7 | 10.4% | 10.2% | +3.0% | +13% / +67% |
| MATXMatson, Inc. | 6.3 bn | 14.2 | 17.2% | 13.4% | −2.3% | +94% / +121% |
| INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. | 4.9 bn | 6.4 | 37.4% | 62.0% | −11.4% | +88% / +118% |
| GLNGGolar Lng Limited | 4.5 bn | 69.2 | 3.4% | 16.7% | +51.1% | +21% / +108% |
| TDWTidewater Inc | 3.7 bn | 14.9 | 19.5% | 18.3% | +0.5% | +36% / +22% |
| SEAL-PASeapeak LLC | 2.0 bn | 76.8 | — | 4.1% | −10.4% | −2% / −2% |
| NATNORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS Ltd | 1.5 bn | 117.0 | 2.6% | 4.2% | −16.6% | +93% / +81% |
| FLNGFLEX LNG Ltd. | 1.5 bn | 19.5 | 9.8% | 21.5% | −2.4% | +6% / −7% |
| GLOP-PAGasLog Partners LP | 1.2 bn | — | -1.7% | -7.2% | −21.9% | −2% / +4% |
| CMDBCostamare Bulkers Holdings Limited | 441.3 m | — | -11.2% | -6.3% | unavailable | +11% / unavailable |
| KNOPKNOT Offshore Partners LP | 297.6 m | 12.8 | — | 6.4% | +14.4% | −12% / +63% |
| EDRYEurodry Ltd. | 110.7 m | — | -4.0% | — | +8.9% | +195% / +93% |
| OMEXOdyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. | 27.5 m | — | — | -13,366.3% | −54.0% | +555% / +226% |
| USEAUnited Maritime Corp | 22.7 m | — | -11.0% | -16.4% | −16.8% | +44% / −1% |
| RUBIRubico Inc. | 778.7 k | 0.0 | 6.6% | 11.2% | −2.8% | −100% / unavailable |
| DLNGDynagas Lng Partners LP | — | 2.3 | 12.9% | — | −100.0% | −13% / +20% |
| TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd. | — | 8.8 | 18.5% | 36.9% | −22.6% | +54% / +79% |
| VIKViking Holdings Ltd | — | 35.5 | 263.5% | 17.7% | +21.9% | +37% / unavailable |
1- and 3-year price returns: for OMEX from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 11 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 10-Q (02 Nov 2026).
In brief
Odyssey Marine Exploration discovers and develops seafloor mineral resources, with a portfolio spanning phosphate in Mexico, minerals in the Cook Islands and gold in Papua New Guinea. The company is merging with American Ocean Minerals, a transaction that values the combined entity at approximately 900 million USD 2.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company has more than three decades of experience in deep-ocean technology and a team with expertise in exploration, archaeology and environmental work 1.
- A diversified project portfolio, from phosphate to gold and polymetallic nodules, reduces reliance on any single project 1.
- The NAFTA arbitral award gives the company a substantial financial claim against Mexico, although it remains under challenge in court 1.
Weaknesses
- The company has posted operating losses in nearly every year since inception and reports a going concern uncertainty 1.
- A history of restatements and reporting delays has led to internal control weaknesses in the past 1.
- Many projects depend on government permits and concessions that have previously been cancelled or contested 1.
Opportunities
- Completing the merger with American Ocean Minerals could create a larger combined entity with additional funding 2.
- If Phosagmex permits are obtained, the project could generate fertilizer revenue for markets in Mexico and North America 1.
- Demand for diversified sources of critical minerals could sustain investor and government interest in the company's projects 1.
Threats
- Changes in the legal regime of the jurisdictions where it operates could delay or block offshore projects 1.
- Campaigns by non-governmental organizations could raise costs and delay project timelines 1.
- A challenge to the arbitral award or litigation tied to past restatements could weigh on investor confidence 1.
Risks
- Continuing operating losseshigh
The company reported operating losses and a going concern paragraph in its audit report, which could limit access to additional funding 1.
- Internal control risksmedium
The material weakness identified after the restatement has been remediated, but the company cannot assure that no further deficiencies will arise, which could affect reporting 1.
- Uncertainty over permits and concessionshigh
Permits can be refused, revoked or not honored, and Mexican concessions were cancelled and later reinstated, showing how fragile these rights can be 1.
- Litigation and arbitration proceedingsmedium
Mexico has sought to set aside the NAFTA arbitral award in an Ontario court, and the outcome could affect the value of the claim 1.
- Mineral price riskmedium
Mineral prices can fluctuate considerably between discovery and sale, which could change project economics 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If permits are obtained and projects reach production, the diversified portfolio and technical experience could support long-term growth.
- The merger with American Ocean Minerals could create a larger entity with additional capital for project development.
- Demand for critical minerals and government interest in diversified sources could support the monetization of the company's resources.
What would break the thesis
- The company has not yet secured a final environmental permit for any major project, and delays could extend the period of losses.
- A history of restatements and reporting delays could weigh on investor confidence and the cost of financing.
- Opposition from non-governmental organizations and legal uncertainty could block or raise the cost of offshore projects.
What to watch
- Completion of the American Ocean Minerals merger and the shareholder voteQ3 2026
- Resolution of concession fee issues and reinstatement of the Phosagmex concessions2026
- Ontario court decision on Mexico's application to set aside the NAFTA arbitral awardnext 10-K
- Trend in operating losses and the going concern assessmentnext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 11 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 10-Q (02 Nov 2026).
The business
Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. describes its mission as discovering, validating and developing high-value seafloor mineral resources in an environmentally responsible manner 1. The company has a diversified portfolio that includes projects it controls directly and projects in which it holds a minority stake and provides services, and since 2024 it has expanded through joint venture contracts 1. Beyond mineral projects, it offers specialized marine services to clients, including deep-ocean shipwreck exploration and archaeology at depths up to 6,000 meters 1.
Segments
Cook Islands projects (CIC and OML)
Odyssey holds approximately 13.4% of the outstanding equity units of CIC Limited, which explores an area within the Cook Islands' exclusive economic zone 1. Its stake in Ocean Minerals, LLC, initially around 6.28%, was affected by a termination agreement from October 2024 that preserved the units already held 1.
Market context
Global demand for critical minerals has increased significantly, while existing supply chains face structural constraints and geopolitical risks 1. The company presents itself as a U.S.-based firm interested in ocean mineral resources that could support domestic economic resilience and national security, provided they are evaluated within established regulatory frameworks 1.
Trends
- Rising demand for critical mineralstailwind
If demand for critical minerals keeps rising, seafloor resources could become an alternative supply source for producers in the United States and its allies 1.
- Government interest in supply chain securitytailwind
National security and industrial resilience objectives cited by the company could help support offshore projects that comply with regulatory frameworks 1.
- Legal uncertainty in maritime jurisdictionsheadwind
Ocean exploration legislation is often unclear, and changes in government or policy could delay or cancel required permits 1.
- Opposition from non-governmental organizationsheadwind
Organizations opposed to seafloor mineral extraction could slow projects, and some may use disinformation in the media 1.
Competitive position
The reviewed sources do not explicitly identify exchange-listed competitors; the company notes that dredging and diamond mining have long been carried out in shallow waters 1. Direct competition comes from other companies developing subsea exploration projects and from producers of minerals from land-based sources 1.
- American Ocean Minerals Corporation
Counterparty to an April 2026 merger agreement that would make it a wholly owned subsidiary if the transaction is completed 2.
- Capital Latinoamericano, S.A. de C.V.
Local partner in the Phosagmex joint venture, contributing knowledge of the Mexican market and agricultural industries 1.
- Royal Boskalis Westminster
Member of the consortium supporting CIC Limited in the Cook Islands 1.
- Traditional dredging and marine extraction operators
Companies conducting dredging and extraction in shallow waters, described in the source as activities with minimal adverse impact when mitigated 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Nava de croazieră de lux Villa Vie Odyssey a plecat din Cambodgia, doar cu angajații la bord, după ce a abandonat peste 200 de pasageri pe țărm: „Încă am lucruri de luat”Libertatea.ro · 05 Nov 2026 · RO
- O „ultimă încercare disperată”. Pasagerii „croazierei fără sfârșit” au încercat să cumpere nava Odyssey pentru a-și continua călătoriaDigi24 · 03 Nov 2026 · RO
- Watch: Fuel crisis strands 200 passengers aboard luxury cruise ship OdysseyEuronews — News (EN) · 29 Oct 2026 · EN
- A cruise ship was their home. Now residents of Villa Vie Odyssey must leave.The Japan Times · 29 Oct 2026 · EN
- The Odyssey to You Can See Everything : Movie runtimes are longerSurge — GDELT DOC · 23 Oct 2026 · RO
- US auto regulator closes airbag defect petition in about 807,000 Honda Odyssey carsCNA (Channel NewsAsia) · 29 Sept 2026 · EN
- Indian AI firm backed by Dune and Odyssey visual effects studio valued at $2 billion in fundraiseCNBC World · 24 Sept 2026 · EN
- The 2.5-hour AI-generated Odyssey movie is 2.5 hours too longThe Verge · 16 Sept 2026 · EN
- Nolan's 'Odyssey' tops S. Korean box office for 40th straight dayYonhap News (KR, EN) · 14 Sept 2026 · EN
- Spider-Man, Odyssey Help Power Box Office ComebackBloomberg Markets · 07 Sept 2026 · EN
- „The Odyssey” depășește „Spider-Man: Brand New Day” în box-office-ul mondialG4Media · 07 Sept 2026 · RO
- 'The Odyssey' tops weekend box office for 5th weekYonhap News (KR, EN) · 07 Sept 2026 · EN
- Filmul lui Nolan, „The Odyssey”, depășește „Spider-Man: Brand New Day” la box-office-ul mondialMediafax · 06 Sept 2026 · RO
- 'The Odyssey' tops 10 mln admissions in S. KoreaYonhap News (KR, EN) · 06 Sept 2026 · EN
- „The Odyssey”, filmul lui Christopher Nolan, depășește 1 miliard de dolari la box-office-ul internaționalMediafax · 04 Sept 2026 · RO
- A summer odyssey: Female dotterels seek multiple mates across Northern EuropePhys.org · 02 Sept 2026 · EN
- (LEAD) Korean films set for back-to-back release after 'The Odyssey,' 'Spider-Man' hypeYonhap News (KR, EN) · 31 Aug 2026 · EN
- Korean films set for back-to-back release after 'The Odyssey,' 'Spider-Man' hypeYonhap News (KR, EN) · 31 Aug 2026 · EN
- 'The Odyssey' becomes most-watched foreign film in S. Korea this yearYonhap News (KR, EN) · 30 Aug 2026 · EN
- 'The Odyssey' becomes fastest film to top 8 mln admissions in S. Korea this yearYonhap News (KR, EN) · 28 Aug 2026 · EN
SEC filings
- Quarterly report02 Nov 2026
- Current report16 Oct 2026Departure or appointment of officers · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report14 Sept 2026Material agreement · Creation of a direct financial obligation
- Quarterly report11 Aug 2026
- Current report24 Jul 2026Delisting notice
- Current report03 Jun 2026Shareholder vote
- Quarterly report12 May 2026
- Proxy statement21 Apr 2026
- Current report14 Apr 2026Item 3.02 · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report08 Apr 2026Material agreement · Item 3.02 · Departure or appointment of officers · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. · 31 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. · 11 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. · 17 Mar 2015
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.