olivLaw · US equity research
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. ZGN
Apparel & Other Finishd Prods of Fabrics & Similar Matl · SIC 2300 · Vertical: Apparel & Other Finishd Prods of Fabrics & Similar Matl (SIC 2300)
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. is a luxury group focused on high-end menswear, with a vertically integrated supply chain (the Filiera) and three brands: ZEGNA, Thom Browne and TOM FORD FASHION. Revenues in 2025 were 1,916.9 million EUR, in a global personal luxury market estimated at around 358 billion EUR where discretionary demand is under pressure.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN) stock was 14.88 USD (+6.97% on the day), with beta 1.13, 52-week range 8.69–15.25 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 72.7
- overbought (≥ 70)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 12.12 – 14.41
- above the upper band · %B 1.21 · band width 17.2%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 12.80 / 12.44
- uptrend (price > SMA50 > SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- 0.37 / 0.23
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +18.7% | −1.1% | +19.8 pp | — |
| 3 months | −2.2% | −0.5% | −1.7 pp | — |
| 6 months | +15.0% | +4.4% | +10.6 pp | — |
| Year to date | +45.2% | +12.3% | +32.9 pp | — |
| 1 year | +51.2% | +13.5% | +37.7 pp | +6.7% |
| 3 years | +26.6% | +76.4% | −49.8 pp | +2.9% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
the price (USD) and the reports are in different currencies
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.3 bn | 1.0 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.9 bn | 1.9 bn | 1.9 bn |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | −23.2% | +27.4% | +15.5% | +27.6% | +2.2% | −1.5% |
| Net income | 21.7 m | -50.6 m | -136.0 m | 51.5 m | 121.5 m | 77.1 m | 98.6 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | −332.5% | unavailable | unavailable | +136.1% | −36.6% | +27.9% |
| Diluted EPS | 0.11 | -0.25 | -0.67 | 0.21 | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.38 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | −327.3% | unavailable | unavailable | +128.6% | −37.5% | +26.7% |
| net % | 1.6% | -5.0% | -10.5% | 3.4% | 6.4% | 4.0% | 5.1% |
| Free cash flow | 128.0 m | 43.3 m | 201.5 m | 97.3 m | 218.3 m | 179.0 m | 255.1 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 220.1 m EUR
- Financial debt
- 162.1 m EUR
- Net debt
- -58.0 m EUR
- Equity
- 1.1 bn EUR
- Total assets
- 2.8 bn EUR
- Debt / equity
- 0.15x
- Current ratio
- 1.59x
- ROE
- 9.5%
- ROA
- 3.5%
- FCF margin
- 13.3%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (EUR)
Margins
Income statement · EUR
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.0 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.9 bn | 1.9 bn | 1.9 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | — | 495.7 m | 564.8 m | 680.2 m | 650.1 m | 622.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | — | 796.7 m | 928.0 m | 1.2 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.3 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | -22.6 m | -94.0 m | 147.8 m | 208.1 m | 166.9 m | 139.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 166.2 m | 154.7 m | 171.9 m | 193.2 m | 224.8 m | 244.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | 143.7 m ≈ | 60.6 m ≈ | 319.7 m ≈ | 401.3 m ≈ | 391.6 m ≈ | 384.4 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 48.1 m | 43.8 m | 54.3 m | 68.1 m | 52.0 m | 50.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -31.6 m | -97.0 m | 101.1 m | 169.1 m | 130.6 m | 140.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 15.0 m | 30.7 m | 35.8 m | 33.4 m | 39.7 m | 30.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -50.6 m | -136.0 m | 51.5 m | 121.5 m | 77.1 m | 98.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -0.25 | -0.67 | 0.21 | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.38 | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 201.5 m | 203.5 m | 240.6 m | 252.4 m | 254.2 m | 261.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · EUR
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 317.3 m | 459.8 m | 254.3 m | 296.3 m | 219.1 m | 220.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | 138.8 m | 160.4 m | 177.2 m | 240.5 m | 248.8 m | 227.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | 321.5 m | 338.5 m | 410.9 m | 522.6 m | 521.0 m | 506.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 1.2 bn | 1.4 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.2 bn | 1.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 244.1 m | 111.5 m | 126.1 m | 159.6 m | 204.8 m | 211.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 387.8 m | 425.2 m | 455.9 m | 572.3 m | 614.4 m | 554.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 2.4 bn | 2.5 bn | 2.4 bn | 2.8 bn | 2.8 bn | 2.8 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 188.3 m | 223.0 m | 270.9 m | 314.1 m | 309.8 m | 326.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | 558.7 m | 471.6 m | 184.9 m | 113.3 m | 196.4 m | 162.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 535.5 m | 702.3 m | 867.0 m | 1.0 bn | 852.9 m | 750.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 645.0 m | 644.3 m | 732.3 m | 900.9 m | 982.9 m | 1.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | — | 242.3 m | 242.8 m | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 06 Apr 2023verified |
Cash flow · EUR
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 70.9 m | 281.2 m | 146.4 m | 275.4 m | 279.1 m | 335.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 27.6 m | 79.7 m | 49.1 m | 57.0 m | 100.1 m | 80.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | 43.3 m ≈ | 201.5 m ≈ | 97.3 m ≈ | 218.3 m ≈ | 179.0 m ≈ | 255.1 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | 92.6 m | -82.0 m | -57.3 m | 21.8 m | -126.0 m | -109.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -49.1 m | -64.1 m | -297.0 m | -250.5 m | -234.5 m | -215.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 20 Mar 2026verified |
| Share repurchases | 0 | 455.0 m | 0 | 0 | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 05 Apr 2024verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
Score: 64 / 100
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: unavailable
Price and reporting are in different currencies; market indicators are unavailable.
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
- Balance sheet44
- Growth86
- Quality66
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 4.16 – 18.05 EUR.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (EUR per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDA6.50 – 18.05 (Mid 7.03)7 companies used · median multiple 4.3x · quartiles 4.0x – 11.3xAS, CRI, GIII, GIL, JRSH, LEVI, LULU
- Peers: P/E4.16 – 6.82 (Mid 5.93)10 companies used · median multiple 15.6x · quartiles 10.9x – 17.9xAS, BRIA, COLM, CRI, GIII, GIL, JRSH, LEVI, LULU, SGC
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 3.0%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.5%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 8.5%
- Terminal growth
- 2.0%
Factor scorecard
Neutral profile · Score 64/100
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | 10.9% | 55 (vs peers) | 17% |
| Net margin · Quality | 5.1% | 50 (vs peers) | 10% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | 258.7% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 8.7% | 72 (on a fixed band) | 14% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | 21.9% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 14% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | -0.2x | 50 (vs peers) | 17% |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | 2.8x | 19 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.6x | 66 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet44/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Growth86/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Quality66/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 1.9 bn EUR in 2025; YoY growth -1.5%; net margin 5.1%; ROE 10.1%; net debt/EBITDA -0.2x.
The estimated value range is 5.33–12.43 EUR per share (median of 2 methods, agreement: same basis (multiples on one peer group, not independent confirmations)); assumptions are illustrative. The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
olivLaw score 64/100, methodological classification: neutral profile (score, margin of safety and method agreement together; not a judgement of the right price). Groups assessed only in part: returns, valuation. Not investment advice.
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- FCF conversion: 258.7%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 8.7%
- EPS CAGR 3Y: 21.9%
What contradicts it
- Interest coverage: 2.8x
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Apparel & Other Finishd Prods of Fabrics & Similar Matl (SIC 2300) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 16 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASAmer Sports, Inc. | 17.9 bn | 42.2 | 7.9% | 6.5% | +26.7% | −14% / unavailable |
| LULUlululemon athletica inc. | 11.8 bn | 9.2 | 30.9% | 12.8% | +4.9% | −39% / −75% |
| GILGildan Activewear Inc. | 8.0 bn | 16.6 | 15.9% | 11.0% | +10.7% | −22% / +19% |
| COLMColumbia Sportswear Company | 3.6 bn | 18.4 | 12.7% | 6.0% | +0.9% | +32% / −9% |
| GIIIG III Apparel Group Ltd | 1.4 bn | 10.8 | 7.7% | 4.8% | −7.0% | +14% / +15% |
| CRICarter’s, Inc. | 1.2 bn | 5.5 | 22.9% | 7.4% | unavailable | +5% / −51% |
| LEVILevi Strauss & Co | 894.9 m | 15.9 | 25.8% | 8.8% | +4.1% | +8% / +54% |
| SGCSuperior Group Of Companies, Inc. | 224.5 m | 25.6 | 4.3% | 1.4% | +0.1% | +45% / +18% |
| JRSHJerash Holdings (US), Inc. | 73.8 m | 15.3 | 7.6% | 2.8% | +14.0% | +87% / +103% |
| PASWPing An Biomedical Co., Ltd. | 60.1 m | — | -28.4% | -37.6% | unavailable | +541% / unavailable |
| BRIABrilliA Inc | 34.5 m | 11.5 | 21.5% | 4.4% | +15.1% | −23% / unavailable |
| NCINeo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited | 12.8 m | 63.1 | 0.6% | 0.2% | −41.9% | −93% / unavailable |
| GOOSCanada Goose Holdings Inc. | — | — | 19.8% | 7.0% | +1.1% | −36% / −20% |
| UAUnder Armour, Inc. | — | — | -29.8% | -10.0% | −3.8% | +26% / −27% |
| LANVLanvin Group Holdings Limited | — | — | -200.4% | -50.3% | −22.9% | −60% / −79% |
| ZGNErmenegildo Zegna N.V. | — | — | 10.1% | 5.1% | −1.5% | +51% / +27% |
| FIGSFIGS, Inc. | 0 | 67.0 | 14.8% | 8.7% | +13.6% | +124% / +202% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for ZGN from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 20 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (22 Oct 2026), 6-K (08 Oct 2026), 6-K (03 Sept 2026), 6-K (24 Aug 2026), 6-K (23 Jul 2026).
In brief
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. is a luxury group focused on high-end menswear, with a vertically integrated supply chain (the Filiera) and three brands: ZEGNA, Thom Browne and TOM FORD FASHION. Revenues in 2025 were 1,916.9 million EUR 1, in a global personal luxury market estimated at around 358 billion EUR 1 where discretionary demand is under pressure.
SWOT
Strengths
- A heritage of more than a century in luxury menswear, with an integrated textile chain and control from raw material to finished product 1.
- A portfolio of three complementary brands covering different styles, occasions and client segments 1.
- A controlled DTC network and clienteling model that support higher gross margins and direct customer relationships 1.
Weaknesses
- The DTC model carries higher fixed costs, and new stores need a start-up period that can weigh on profitability 1.
- Heavy exposure to certain regions, especially Greater China, makes the group sensitive to a slowdown in local demand 1.
- Adjusted EBIT fell in 2025 compared with 2023, reflecting the pressure from retail investment and costs 1.
Opportunities
- A forecast return to growth in the luxury market in 2026, led by the United States, could support brand sales 1.
- Growing womenswear, leather goods and footwear, including through partnerships such as Norda Run, could widen the client base 1.
- Converting wholesale stores to directly operated stores in several countries could increase control over distribution 1.
Risks
- Dependence on brand imagehigh
Sales and the ability to charge premium prices depend on how the brands are perceived, which can be affected by design, service, collaborations or litigation 1.
- International and geopolitical exposurehigh
Operations across many countries expose the group to political, regulatory and sanctions risks, as well as tensions around Taiwan 1.
- DTC strategy and property costsmedium
Expanding the store network requires significant capital spending, carries risks on lease renewals and possible impairment charges 1.
- Raw material and energy costsmedium
Price swings and supply disruptions in raw materials and energy could raise costs and disrupt manufacturing 1.
- Currency risklow
Exchange rate movements could affect reported results, given the group's global footprint 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the luxury market returns to growth in 2026 and demand in Greater China stabilises, margins could benefit from the already consolidated DTC structure 1.
- Vertical integration through the Filiera and the heritage of the ZEGNA brand could sustain the competitive edge and the ability to hold premium pricing 1.
- If recently opened stores mature as planned, pressure on profitability from retail investment could ease 1.
What would break the thesis
- If macroeconomic uncertainty persists, discretionary demand for luxury goods could stay weak and profit could keep declining 1.
- Dependence on Greater China and on international tourism makes revenues sensitive to a slowdown in those regions 1.
- Fixed costs in the DTC network and inflationary pressure could limit margin recovery if sales do not grow enough 1.
What to watch
- Sales trends by segment and region, especially in Greater ChinaQ1 2027
- Gross margin and Adjusted EBIT compared with 20252027
- Number of newly opened directly operated stores and wholesale-to-DTC conversionsnext 10-K
- Delivery of the 2026 luxury market forecast and US demand2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 20 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (22 Oct 2026), 6-K (08 Oct 2026), 6-K (03 Sept 2026), 6-K (24 Aug 2026), 6-K (23 Jul 2026).
The business
The group designs, produces, markets and distributes luxury menswear, footwear, leather goods and accessories, as well as womenswear (Thom Browne and TOM FORD FASHION) and children's clothing (Thom Browne) 1. Its integrated textile chain, from raw materials to finished goods, is central to the model. The direct-to-consumer (DTC) channel dominates sales, and at 31 December 2025 there were 471 directly operated stores in 35 countries 1.
Segments
Zegna segment
Includes the ZEGNA brand, the Textile line and the Other line, which mainly covers sales of finished garments to third-party brands and to Thom Browne and TOM FORD FASHION 1. The ZEGNA brand had 282 directly operated stores at the end of 2025 1.
Market context
The personal luxury market is driven less by price sensitivity and more by brand equity, heritage, exclusivity and quality 1. Bain-Altagamma expects growth of 3-5% at constant exchange rates in 2026, led by the United States, after the market declined in 2024 and was expected to fall about 2% in 2025 1.
Trends
- Focus on the DTC channelmixed
The share of DTC in branded sales rose steadily from 2023 to 2025, supporting higher gross margins. Higher fixed costs and the start-up period of new stores could, however, weigh on profitability in the near term 1.
- Macroeconomic uncertainty and discretionary demandheadwind
Demand for the group's products depends on consumer confidence, disposable income and international tourism. Macroeconomic uncertainty and geopolitical tensions have affected buying behaviour in some markets 1.
- Recovery in mainland Chinamixed
Greater China is a significant share of sales, but demand slowed in 2024 amid weaker consumer confidence and a shift toward overseas shopping. Signs of improvement in 2025 remain modest 1.
- Inflation and cost pressureheadwind
Inflation in recent years raised energy, raw material, logistics and labour costs. Moderation in 2024 and 2025 did not bring costs back to pre-pandemic levels, and a renewed rise could weigh on margins 1.
Competitive position
The group competes with other global luxury players, and in some emerging markets competitive pressure has grown as international and domestic competitors enter 1. Its stated advantages are heritage, the integrated Filiera and its controlled store network 1.
- Global luxury houses in menswear and accessories
Luxury companies with global operations that the filing cites as competitive pressure in emerging markets; the source does not name them.
- Local competitors in emerging markets
Local players with stronger positions in some markets, mentioned generically among the risk factors.
- International brands entering growth markets
Luxury producers expanding in markets such as Greater China and other emerging markets, per the declared risks.
- Multibrand retailers and online platforms
The wholesale channel includes multibrand stores and e-tailers, which are both customers and, in some cases, competitors for consumer attention.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Zegna’s (ZGN) Direct Sales Surge Can’t Fully Offset A Messier ProfitYahoo Finance — News · 04 Sept 2026 · EN
- Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. Q2 2026 Earnings Call SummaryYahoo Finance — News · 03 Sept 2026 · EN
- Ermenegildo Zegna H1 Earnings Call HighlightsYahoo Finance — News · 03 Sept 2026 · EN
The latest news item in our archive is from 04 Sept 2026; the newest SEC filing is from 22 Oct 2026. The press archive comes from the RSS feeds we follow and does not necessarily cover the latest event — the filings alongside do.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)22 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)08 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)03 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)03 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)24 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)23 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)09 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)26 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)30 Apr 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)30 Apr 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. · 20 Mar 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.