olivlawolivlaw

olivLaw · European equity research

Amigo Holdings PLC AMGO.L

United Kingdom · London Stock Exchange · ISIN GB00BFFK8T45 · Vertical: Listed companies from United Kingdom

0.02GBP−7.61% · 1 dayClose 05 Nov 2026

Amigo Holdings PLC is a UK company whose former lender serving customers with limited access to affordable credit entered an orderly wind-down from March 2023 and was placed into liquidation. It now operates only as a possible shell for a reverse takeover, so its future depends on whether such a transaction succeeds.

At the close of 05 Nov 2026, Amigo Holdings PLC (AMGO.L) stock was 0.02 GBP (−7.61% on the day), with market capitalisation 9.9 m GBP, beta 0.01, 52-week range 0.00–0.03 GBP.

Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: ESEF annual reports and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.

Market cap
9.9 m GBP
shares as of 31 Mar 2024
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
Diluted EPS TTM -2.70 · TTM to 31 Mar 2024
E/P (TTM)
-12,705.88%
TTM to 31 Mar 2024
Dividend yield
unavailable
Beta (2y)
0.01
Volatility (1y) 159%
52-week range
0.000.03

Price history

Loading chart…

Technical reading

RSI (14)
26.5
oversold (≤ 30)
Bollinger (20, 2)
0.02 – 0.03
below the lower band · %B -0.09 · band width 24.5%
SMA 50 / 200
0.03 / 0.02
mixed trend
MACD (12, 26, 9)
-0.00 / -0.00
MACD below signal

Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).

Performance

CompanyEURO STOXX 50vs EURO STOXX 50Vertical median
1 month−22.7%+0.4%−23.1 pp—
3 months−11.5%−3.3%−8.2 pp—
6 months−22.7%+4.0%−26.7 pp—
Year to date+165.6%+8.1%+157.5 pp—
1 year+466.7%+10.7%+456.0 pp+5.8%
3 yearsunavailable+50.1%unavailable+23.3%
5 years−81.7%+43.6%−125.3 pp—
Max drawdown (1y)
−50.9%
12 May 2026 → 24 Jul 2026
Max drawdown (5y)
−99.0%
08 Nov 2021 → 15 Jan 2024
Compound annual growth (5y)
−28.8%
EURO STOXX 50 +7.5%

Price returns, dividends excluded.

Quarterly results

ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).

E/P over time

E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.

Fiscal years

Fiscal year20232024
Revenue19.3 m3.5 m
Revenue YoYunavailable−81.9%
Net income-34.8 m-14.0 m
Net income YoYunavailableunavailable
Diluted EPS-7.30-2.70
Diluted EPS YoYunavailableunavailable
net %-180.3%-400.0%
Free cash flowunavailableunavailable

Balance sheet & financial health

Fiscal year 2024 · 31 Mar 2024

Cash
0 GBP
Financial debt
unavailable GBP
Net debt
unavailable GBP
Equity
-711.0 m GBP
Total assets
0 GBP
Debt / equity
unavailable
Current ratio
unavailable
ROE
unavailable
ROA
-12.8%
FCF margin
unavailable

Financial statements (source on every figure)

Revenue and net income (GBP)

Margins

Income statement · GBP

Revenue
2023
19.3 m
2024
3.5 m

esef· 10 Sept 2024verified

Pre-tax income
2023
-34.7 m
2024
-12.0 m

esef· 17 Feb 2026verified

Income tax
2023
100.0 k
2024
2.0 m

esef· 17 Feb 2026verified

Net income
2023
-34.8 m
2024
-14.0 m

esef· 17 Feb 2026verified

Diluted EPS
2023
-7.30
2024
-2.70

esef· 10 Sept 2024verified

Balance sheet · GBP

Cash
2023
0
2024
0

esef· 17 Feb 2026verified

Current assets
2023
218.0 m
2024
175.5 m

esef· 10 Sept 2024verified

Total assets
2023
219.1 m
2024
0

esef· 17 Feb 2026verified

Total liabilities
2023
206.5 m
2024
711.0 m

esef· 17 Feb 2026verified

Equity
2023
-697.0 m
2024
-711.0 m

esef· 17 Feb 2026verified

Shares outstanding at year end
2023
4.8 m
2024
466.7 m

esef· 17 Feb 2026derived

Cash flow · GBP

Operating cash flow
2023
78.8 m
2024
-5.0 m

esef· 17 Feb 2026verified

Financing cash flow
2023
-50.3 m
2024
5.0 m

esef· 17 Feb 2026verified

Computed indicators

Growth

Revenue growth (YoY)
-81.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2024
Revenue CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
Revenue CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT growth (YoY)
unavailable
input data missing
Net income growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
Net income CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EPS growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
EPS CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
EPS CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
FCF growth (YoY)
unavailable
input data missing

Profitability

Gross margin
unavailable
input data missing
EBITDA margin
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT margin
unavailable
input data missing
Net margin
unavailable
input data missing
FCF margin
unavailable
input data missing

Returns

ROE
unavailable
input data missing
ROA
unavailable
input data missing
ROIC
unavailable
equity is negative: buybacks shrink the invested capital and ROIC would come out large without meaning anything
ROCE
unavailable
input data missing
Payout ratio (EPS)
unavailable
input data missing
Payout ratio (FCF)
unavailable
input data missing

Balance sheet

Net debt
unavailable
input data missing
Net debt / EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
Debt / equity
unavailable
input data missing
Interest coverage
unavailable
input data missing

Liquidity

Current ratio
unavailable
input data missing
Quick ratio
unavailable
input data missing
Cash ratio
unavailable
input data missing

Cash

Operating cash flow
unavailable
input data missing
Capital expenditure
unavailable
input data missing
Free cash flow
unavailable
input data missing
FCF conversion
unavailable
input data missing
Cash conversion
unavailable
input data missing

Efficiency

Days sales outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Days inventory outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Days payables outstanding
unavailable
input data missing
Cash conversion cycle
unavailable
input data missing

Market and valuation

Market capitalisation
9.9 m GBP
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 30 Sept 2025
Enterprise value
unavailable
input data missing
Market cap / net income TTM
unavailable
input data missing
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
input data missing
Earnings yield
unavailable
input data missing
P/B
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
P/S
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBIT
unavailable
input data missing
EV/Sales
unavailable
input data missing
P/FCF
unavailable
input data missing
FCF yield
unavailable
input data missing
Dividend yield
unavailable
input data missing
Shareholder yield (distributions)
unavailable
input data missing

1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.

Valuation

olivLaw classification

Insufficient data
What is missing
  • indicators available: 0 of at least 6
  • score weight coverage: 0.0% of at least 60%
  • valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.

Closing price

0.02 GBP

05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series

Market cap: 9.9 m GBP

Key indicators

Market capitalisation
9.9 m GBP
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 30 Sept 2025
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
input data missing
P/B
unavailable
equity is negative: the ratio is not economically meaningful (not by itself insolvency; usually the result of buybacks)
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
ROE
unavailable
input data missing
Net margin
unavailable
input data missing
Revenue growth (YoY)
-81.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2024
Dividend yield
unavailable
input data missing

Coverage and freshness

13/37 reporting lines present
Latest full fiscal year: 2024
Latest reported period: 30 Sept 2025
Latest balance sheet date: 30 Sept 2025
Share count (cover of the latest filing), as of: 31 Mar 2024
Source: esefpublished 17 Feb 2026
verified 37derived 2

The data is older than the freshness threshold.

Score by group

0% · Insufficient data

Estimated value range

unavailable — no valuation assumptions for the reporting currency

Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.

Valuation methods

    Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)

    Risk-free rate
    6.5%
    Equity risk premium
    6.0%
    Beta (default)
    1.00
    Cost of equity
    12.5%
    Terminal growth
    3.0%

    Factor scorecard

    Insufficient data

    Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 0 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 0.0% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

    FactorValueScoreWeight used
    ROIC · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
    Net margin · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
    FCF conversion · Qualityunavailableunavailable—
    Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growthunavailableunavailable—
    EPS CAGR 3Y · Growthunavailableunavailable—
    Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheetunavailableunavailable—
    Interest coverage · Balance sheetunavailableunavailable—
    Current ratio · Balance sheetunavailableunavailable—
    P/E (TTM) · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
    EV/EBITDA · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
    FCF yield · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
    Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—
    Payout ratio (FCF) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—

    Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.

    Score groups

    • Balance sheet· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
    • Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
    • Quality· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
    • Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
    • Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value

    A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.

    Memo

    AMIGO HOLDINGS PLC (AMGO.L). Latest full fiscal year: 2024; data up to 2025-09-30.

    Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 3.5 m GBP in 2024; YoY growth -81.9%.

    Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.

    Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 0 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 0.0% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).

    Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.

    What supports the thesis

    No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.

    What contradicts it

    No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.

    Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, Net margin, FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, Current ratio, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).

    Versus the vertical median

    Listed companies from United Kingdom · same country · compared with 39 companies

    Multiples and returns vs the median

    P/E
    —
    vertical median 16.3x
    EV/EBITDA
    —
    vertical median —
    P/S
    —
    vertical median 1.5x
    P/B
    —
    vertical median 2.1x
    ROE
    —
    vertical median 13.9%
    Net margin
    —
    vertical median 10.7%
    EBIT margin
    —
    vertical median 21.1%
    Revenue YoY
    -81.9%
    vertical median 7.9%
    below median (−1,138.8%)
    Net debt/EBITDA
    —
    vertical median —
    Dividend yield
    —
    vertical median 2.8%

    Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)

    Companies in the vertical

    Market capP/EROENet marginRevenue YoY1A / 3A
    BATS.LBritish American Tobacco P.L.C.104.3 bn13.516.5%30.3%−1.0%+7% / +88%
    ABF.LAssociated British Foods PLC14.7 bn14.39.2%5.3%−3.1%−5% / −15%
    0EV1.LCarnival PLC5.5 bn4.146.7%13.4%+6.4%unavailable / unavailable
    BAB.LBabcock International Group PLC5.1 bn24.734.7%4.1%+7.2%−10% / +158%
    AUTO.LAutotrader Group PLC4.8 bn16.460.2%47.1%+3.9%−13% / −23%
    BBY.LBalfour Beatty PLC4.2 bn16.323.2%2.8%+15.2%+20% / +160%
    ABDN.LAberdeen Group PLC4.1 bn10.88.0%28.9%−2.1%+11% / +41%
    BKG.LThe Berkeley Group Holdings PLC3.6 bn11.38.8%13.4%−4.2%−0% / −22%
    BME.LB&M European Value Retail PLC2.9 bn17.421.2%2.8%+3.7%+68% / −51%
    AJB.LAj Bell PLC2.4 bn22.849.9%33.1%+18.0%+8% / +128%
    ASHM.LAshmore Group PLC1.4 bn13.913.1%71.6%−0.1%+28% / +18%
    BCG.LBaltic Classifieds Group PLC1.2 bn23.215.8%57.6%+6.9%−99% / −99%
    APN.LApplied Nutrition PLC763.6 m36.241.2%19.7%+24.2%+71% / unavailable
    BAG.LA.G. Barr P.L.C.671.9 m14.414.4%10.8%+4.0%−7% / +26%
    ASC.LAsos PLC494.5 m—-81.3%-12.0%−14.7%+71% / +8%
    ALFA.LAlfa Financial Software Holdings PLC486.8 m16.361.5%23.8%+15.3%−28% / +10%
    AML.LAston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings PLC344.3 m—-93.4%-39.2%−20.6%−45% / −85%
    APTD.LAptitude Software Group PLC111.3 m28.57.2%6.2%−7.3%−30% / −23%
    BMS.LBraemar PLC78.3 m39.22.7%1.7%−4.4%+13% / −11%
    AMGO.LAmigo Holdings PLC9.9 m———−81.9%+325% / +844%
    ASBE.LAssociated British Engineering PLC605.3 k—-19.1%—unavailableunavailable / unavailable
    AMIF.LAmicorp Fs (uk) PLC221.6 k0.127.5%9.1%+8.1%unavailable / unavailable
    AAF.LAirtel Africa PLC——24.1%10.6%+29.5%−7% / +164%
    AAL.LAnglo American PLC——-19.3%-20.2%+4.5%+30% / +76%
    ACG.LAcg Metals Limited——-80.3%-32.0%+134.8%+60% / +63%

    1- and 3-year price returns: for AMGO.L from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.

    olivLaw engine forecast

    The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.

    The engine has no published run for this company yet.

    Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)

    Illustrative scenarios

    Scenarios are not available. input data missing

    AI analysis

    AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

    In brief

    Amigo Holdings PLC is a UK company whose former lender serving customers with limited access to affordable credit entered an orderly wind-down from March 2023 and was placed into liquidation. It now operates only as a possible shell for a reverse takeover, so its future depends on whether such a transaction succeeds.

    SWOT

    Strengths

    • The company has new funds secured in November 2025, subject to shareholder approval, giving it a financial base to explore an RTO transaction 1.
    • The wind-down process was carried out in an orderly way, with obligations to Scheme creditors met, which reduces the risk of major legal disputes 1.
    • The board has experience in financial services and corporate transactions, which could help evaluate any RTO offer 1.

    Weaknesses

    • The company no longer has lending operations and current revenue is effectively nil 1.
    • The main trading subsidiary has entered liquidation, meaning cash-generating assets have been exhausted or transferred 1.
    • The governance structure is reduced and several requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code are not met, as the annual report acknowledges 1.

    Opportunities

    • A successful RTO transaction could give the company a new business and a route to recovery for shareholders 1.
    • The funds obtained could support identifying mining-sector projects if shareholders approve the plan 1.
    • If a transaction completes, the company could take on a new structure better suited to a different kind of business.

    Threats

    • There is no certainty that the funds will be used successfully or that an RTO transaction will be completed 1.
    • If no suitable transaction emerges, the company could enter voluntary liquidation and shareholders could be left with no residual value 1.
    • Compliance and legal risks from the former lending business could persist even after liquidation 1.

    Risks

    • Uncertainty over the RTO transactionhigh

      If the transaction does not materialise, the company could be delisted and liquidated with no value left for shareholders 1.

    • Funds conditional on shareholder approvalhigh

      The funds obtained depend on a shareholder vote, and a failed vote could block the exploration plan 1.

    • Long-term viabilityhigh

      The annual report states that longer-term viability remains uncertain, as there is no certainty about raising the new funds or securing an RTO 1.

    • Departures from governance codemedium

      The company acknowledged several departures from the UK Corporate Governance Code, including the absence of a senior independent director and an internal audit function 1.

    • Operational risks during wind-downlow

      Staff reductions and the move to remote working could affect internal control and the management of remaining activities 1.

    Investment thesis

    What would need to be true (bull case)

    • If the RTO transaction completes successfully, the company could give shareholders a partial route to recovering value 1.
    • The funds secured in November 2025 provide a base for exploring new opportunities, subject to shareholder approval 1.
    • The wind-down was completed in an orderly way, which could reduce remaining legal uncertainty from past activity 1.

    What would break the thesis

    • The company no longer generates lending income, and remaining assets could prove insufficient to support a recovery 1.
    • The annual report warns that remaining value depends on a transaction that is not certain, which could lead to liquidation with nothing left for shareholders 1.
    • The reduced board and departures from governance requirements could complicate oversight of any new strategy 1.

    What to watch

    • Shareholder vote on approving the £1.5 million and the RTO exploration plan2026
    • Identification and announcement of any RTO transaction in the mining sector2026
    • Board decision on delisting and voluntary liquidation if no transaction emergesnext 10-K
    • Any distributions to shareholders or Scheme creditors from remaining assetsnext 10-K

    Products, market & competition

    AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

    The business

    Amigo was set up to provide affordable loans to people who could not easily obtain credit from mainstream lenders. From 23 March 2023, under the Fallback Solution of the Scheme of Arrangement, its trading subsidiary ALL stopped lending and began an orderly wind-down, transferring surplus cash to Scheme creditors. According to the annual report for the year ended 30 September 2025, the loan book was run off, sold or written off, and ALL entered liquidation on 29 September 2025 1.

    The board's priorities have shifted from lending to completing the subsidiary wind-down, realising assets to optimise returns for Scheme creditors, and preparing Amigo to operate as a shell for a potential RTO 1. In November 2025 the company announced that, subject to shareholder approval, it had secured £1.5 million of new funds to explore RTO opportunities in the mining sector 1.

    The annual report states that if no suitable transaction occurs, Amigo may seek shareholder approval to delist and enter voluntary liquidation, leaving shareholders with no residual value 1.

    Segments

    Lending to customers with limited credit access

    The historic segment, run through subsidiary ALL, stopped lending on 23 March 2023. The remaining loans were repaid, sold or written off, and payments to Scheme creditors were made in full, according to the annual report 1.

    Shell for a reverse takeover

    The only active strategic direction is using the company as a vehicle for a reverse takeover focused on the mining sector, financed by the £1.5 million secured in November 2025, subject to shareholder approval 1.

    Market context

    The market Amigo served was lending to people with limited access to mainstream credit. The annual report does not describe an active market for the company itself, since lending has stopped and remaining value depends on a strategic transaction 1.

    Because the company no longer has operating business, market interest could depend on the decision on a RTO transaction, the outcome of the shareholder vote and the progress of mining-sector plans 1.

    Trends

    • End of the lending cycleheadwind

      Exiting lending removed the company's main source of income, which reduces the operating base for any business recovery.

    • Interest in reverse takeoversmixed

      The board has said it is exploring RTO as a way to reduce investor losses, which offers a possible route to recovery if a suitable offer emerges 1.

    • New funds with conditionsmixed

      The funds secured in November 2025 are conditional on shareholder approval, and using them to explore RTO does not guarantee a transaction will be completed 1.

    • Liquidation and distribution processesheadwind

      Scheme creditor payments and the liquidation of subsidiaries steadily reduce available assets, so the value left for shareholders depends on what remains after these steps 1.

    Competitive position

    The annual report does not name direct competitors for the company's current activity. Since it no longer lends, the relevant competition could be with other companies seeking RTO or similar transactions 1.

    For a shell without operating business, competitive position depends more on capital structure and the ability to attract a suitable partner than on products or customer networks 1.

    • Other shell companies seeking RTO

      Other companies looking for reverse takeover transactions may compete for the same opportunities, although the annual report does not identify them.

    • Investors in the mining sector

      Investors funding mining projects could become partners or competitors for a transaction, depending on the structure of the offer.

    • Other lenders serving customers with limited credit access

      These lenders represent the market Amigo served before its wind-down but no longer compete directly with the company.

    • Restructuring advisory firms

      Advisers guiding wind-down or strategic transactions can influence the company's direction, though they are not direct competitors.

    News & filings

    Figures computed by olivLaw from ESEF annual reports and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.