olivLaw · European equity research
A.G. BARR p.l.c. BAG.L
United Kingdom · London Stock Exchange · ISIN GB00B6XZKY75 · Vertical: Listed companies from United Kingdom
A.G. Barr is a UK soft drinks company with more than 150 years of history, whose brand portfolio, led by IRN-BRU, generates the majority of its revenue, with most products made in its own sites. In fiscal 2025/26 the company raised its total dividend by 11.0%, and it now focuses on integrating recent acquisitions, which makes the evolution of margins and growth a point of attention.
At the close of 05 Nov 2026, A.G. BARR p.l.c. (BAG.L) stock was 6.03 GBP (+0.00% on the day), with market capitalisation 671.9 m GBP, P/E 14.4 on diluted EPS of 0.42 GBP over the last 12 months, dividend yield 2.86%, beta 0.16, 52-week range 5.42–7.08 GBP.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: ESEF annual reports and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 66.2
- strong (55–70)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 5.45 – 6.05
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.97 · band width 10.3%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 5.83 / 6.25
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- 0.05 / 0.00
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | EURO STOXX 50 | vs EURO STOXX 50 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +8.1% | +0.4% | +7.7 pp | — |
| 3 months | −1.1% | −3.3% | +2.1 pp | — |
| 6 months | −2.6% | +4.0% | −6.5 pp | — |
| Year to date | −3.4% | +8.1% | −11.5 pp | — |
| 1 year | −10.8% | +10.7% | −21.5 pp | +7.3% |
| 3 years | +18.5% | +50.1% | −31.6 pp | +23.3% |
| 5 years | +22.1% | +43.6% | −21.5 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 0 percentile of its own 3-quarter history (min 15.3, median 16.1, max 16.3; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 400.0 m | 420.4 m | 437.3 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +5.1% | +4.0% |
| Net income | 38.5 m | 39.7 m | 47.1 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | +3.1% | +18.6% |
| Diluted EPS | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.42 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | +3.5% | +18.0% |
| net % | 9.6% | 9.4% | 10.8% |
| Free cash flow | 30.7 m | 29.1 m | 20.6 m |
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2026 · 31 Jan 2026
- Cash
- 61.4 m GBP
- Financial debt
- 40.0 m GBP
- Net debt
- -21.4 m GBP
- Equity
- 345.6 m GBP
- Total assets
- 514.2 m GBP
- Debt / equity
- 0.12x
- Current ratio
- 1.67x
- ROE
- 14.2%
- ROA
- 9.9%
- FCF margin
- 4.7%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (GBP)
Margins
Income statement · GBP
| Line | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 400.0 m | 420.4 m | 437.3 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 245.8 m | 256.1 m | 260.0 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 154.2 m | 164.3 m | 177.3 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Operating income | 50.1 m | 51.7 m | 61.6 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Interest expense | 200.0 k | 500.0 k | 700.0 k | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | 51.3 m | 53.2 m | 62.6 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Income tax | 12.8 m | 13.5 m | 15.9 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Net income | 38.5 m | 39.7 m | 47.1 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.42 | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.17 | esef· 22 Apr 2026derived |
Balance sheet · GBP
| Line | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 33.6 m | 21.4 m | 61.4 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Receivables | 63.8 m | 76.8 m | 82.2 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Inventories | 36.5 m | 31.7 m | 31.7 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Current assets | 153.9 m | 173.9 m | 196.3 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 109.0 m | 118.0 m | 145.6 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Total assets | 401.7 m | 432.9 m | 514.2 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | — | 0 | 40.0 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 73.6 m | 76.4 m | 117.7 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Equity | 292.7 m | 317.6 m | 345.6 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | 111.3 m | 110.9 m | 111.4 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026derived |
Cash flow · GBP
| Line | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 48.5 m | 48.3 m | 51.0 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Capex | 17.8 m | 19.2 m | 30.4 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | 30.7 m ≈ | 29.1 m ≈ | 20.6 m ≈ | esef· 22 Apr 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -8.1 m | -39.3 m | -23.3 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -19.7 m | -21.2 m | 12.3 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 14.7 m | 17.2 m | 19.2 m | esef· 22 Apr 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
Score: 52 / 100
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
(margin_of_safety <= -0.25 & agreement in ['high', 'medium'])
Closing price
05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 671.9 m GBP
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
- Quality44
- Returns40
- Balance sheet89
- Valuation48
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation assumptions for the reporting currency
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 6.5%
- Equity risk premium
- 6.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 12.5%
- Terminal growth
- 3.0%
Factor scorecard
Unattractive profile · Score 52/100
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | 14.8% | 54 (vs peers) | 17% |
| Net margin · Quality | 10.8% | 51 (vs peers) | 10% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | 43.7% | 20 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | 88.0x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.7x | 72 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 14.4x | 56 (vs peers) | 17% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | 3.1% | 38 (on a fixed band) | 13% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 2.9% | 41 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | 93.2% | 38 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet89/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality44/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Returns40/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Valuation48/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
A.G. BARR P.L.C. (BAG.L). Latest full fiscal year: 2026; data up to 2026-01-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 437.3 m GBP in 2026; YoY growth 4.0%; net margin 10.8%; ROE 14.4%.
The estimated value range is 2.10–2.77 GBP per share (median of 3 methods, agreement: medium); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 2.38 GBP, the price of 6.03 GBP leaves a potential of -60.5% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of -153.5% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
olivLaw score 52/100, methodological classification: unattractive profile (score, margin of safety and method agreement together; not a judgement of the right price). Groups assessed only in part: growth. Not investment advice.
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Interest coverage: 88.0x
- Current ratio: 1.7x
What contradicts it
- FCF conversion: 43.7%
- The price is above the estimated value range
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, EV/EBITDA.
Versus the vertical median
Listed companies from United Kingdom · same country · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATS.LBritish American Tobacco P.L.C. | 104.3 bn | 13.5 | 16.5% | 30.3% | −1.0% | +7% / +88% |
| ABF.LAssociated British Foods PLC | 14.7 bn | 14.3 | 9.2% | 5.3% | −3.1% | −5% / −15% |
| 0EV1.LCarnival PLC | 5.5 bn | 4.1 | 46.7% | 13.4% | +6.4% | unavailable / unavailable |
| BAB.LBabcock International Group PLC | 5.1 bn | 24.7 | 34.7% | 4.1% | +7.2% | −10% / +158% |
| AUTO.LAutotrader Group PLC | 4.8 bn | 16.4 | 60.2% | 47.1% | +3.9% | −13% / −23% |
| BBY.LBalfour Beatty PLC | 4.2 bn | 16.3 | 23.2% | 2.8% | +15.2% | +20% / +160% |
| ABDN.LAberdeen Group PLC | 4.1 bn | 10.8 | 8.0% | 28.9% | −2.1% | +11% / +41% |
| BKG.LThe Berkeley Group Holdings PLC | 3.6 bn | 11.3 | 8.8% | 13.4% | −4.2% | −0% / −22% |
| BME.LB&M European Value Retail PLC | 2.9 bn | 17.4 | 21.2% | 2.8% | +3.7% | +68% / −51% |
| AJB.LAj Bell PLC | 2.4 bn | 22.8 | 49.9% | 33.1% | +18.0% | +8% / +128% |
| ASHM.LAshmore Group PLC | 1.4 bn | 13.9 | 13.1% | 71.6% | −0.1% | +28% / +18% |
| BCG.LBaltic Classifieds Group PLC | 1.2 bn | 23.2 | 15.8% | 57.6% | +6.9% | −99% / −99% |
| APN.LApplied Nutrition PLC | 763.6 m | 36.2 | 41.2% | 19.7% | +24.2% | +71% / unavailable |
| BAG.LA.G. Barr P.L.C. | 671.9 m | 14.4 | 14.4% | 10.8% | +4.0% | −7% / +26% |
| ASC.LAsos PLC | 494.5 m | — | -81.3% | -12.0% | −14.7% | +71% / +8% |
| ALFA.LAlfa Financial Software Holdings PLC | 486.8 m | 16.3 | 61.5% | 23.8% | +15.3% | −28% / +10% |
| AML.LAston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings PLC | 344.3 m | — | -93.4% | -39.2% | −20.6% | −45% / −85% |
| APTD.LAptitude Software Group PLC | 111.3 m | 28.5 | 7.2% | 6.2% | −7.3% | −30% / −23% |
| BMS.LBraemar PLC | 78.3 m | 39.2 | 2.7% | 1.7% | −4.4% | +13% / −11% |
| AMGO.LAmigo Holdings PLC | 9.9 m | — | — | — | −81.9% | +325% / +844% |
| ASBE.LAssociated British Engineering PLC | 605.3 k | — | -19.1% | — | unavailable | unavailable / unavailable |
| AMIF.LAmicorp Fs (uk) PLC | 221.6 k | 0.1 | 27.5% | 9.1% | +8.1% | unavailable / unavailable |
| AAF.LAirtel Africa PLC | — | — | 24.1% | 10.6% | +29.5% | −7% / +164% |
| AAL.LAnglo American PLC | — | — | -19.3% | -20.2% | +4.5% | +30% / +76% |
| ACG.LAcg Metals Limited | — | — | -80.3% | -32.0% | +134.8% | +60% / +63% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for BAG.L from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (GBP)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 3.59 Total return -38% · Per year -38% | 6.34 Total return 8% · Per year 8% | 9.56 Total return 62% · Per year 62% |
| 3 years | 3.45 Total return -36% · Per year -14% | 6.86 Total return 23% · Per year 7% | 11.36 Total return 100% · Per year 26% |
| 5 years | 3.31 Total return -34% · Per year -8% | 7.43 Total return 39% · Per year 7% | 13.50 Total return 146% · Per year 20% |
- Exit P/E± 1.72
- Net margin± 1.20
- Annual revenue growth± 0.99
- Annual dilution± 0.10
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
A.G. Barr is a UK soft drinks company with more than 150 years of history, whose brand portfolio, led by IRN-BRU, generates the majority of its revenue, with most products made in its own sites. In fiscal 2025/26 the company raised its total dividend by 11.0% 1, and it now focuses on integrating recent acquisitions, which makes the evolution of margins and growth a point of attention.
SWOT
Strengths
- A portfolio of UK brands with strong shares, particularly IRN-BRU, and a history of more than 150 years of brand recognition 1.
- High in-house production and an integrated supply model that give control over cost and quality 1.
- Stated financial discipline, with medium-term growth and margin targets and a dividend policy linked to performance 1.
Weaknesses
- A significant dependence on one brand, IRN-BRU, which contributes a large share of revenue and could make the company vulnerable to demand shifts 1.
- Recent acquisitions could temporarily affect efficiency and profitability, and their integration is still under way 1.
- Volumes were negatively affected in the short term by pricing decisions and commercial investment in fiscal 2025/26 1.
Opportunities
- Expansion into functional and premium non-alcoholic segments, where consumer demand is rising and the company already has brands 1.
- Investment in production capacity and the Boost insourcing could reduce costs and extend the in-house range 1.
- International expansion through a distributor-led model, reinforced by the Fentimans acquisition, could add revenue 1.
Threats
- Cost pressure from energy, ingredients and logistics, which could hit margins if it cannot be passed on through prices 1.
- Tighter regulation on sugar and advertising, which could limit sales of some products 1.
- Extreme weather and supply chain pressures, which could affect production and crop supply 1.
Risks
- ESG reputational riskmedium
A negative perception of the company's environmental strategy by customers and consumers could affect brand trust, and the company has introduced a No Deforestation policy to mitigate this 1.
- Raw material and energy costshigh
Volatility in energy and ingredient costs could compress margins if prices cannot be adjusted in time 1.
- Concentration on IRN-BRUmedium
Dependence on one brand for a large share of revenue could amplify the impact of lower demand for that product 1.
- Acquisition integrationmedium
Integrating Innate-Essence, Frobishers and Fentimans could delay expected synergies and affect efficiency in the near term 1.
- Sugar product regulationlow
HFSS legislation and advertising restrictions could limit the visibility of some products in retail if they tighten 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- The company has a portfolio of UK brands with high recognition, and if demand for functional and premium non-alcoholic drinks keeps growing, this could support further growth 1.
- In-house production and supply chain integration could lead to better margins if the factory investments and insourcing deliver the expected effects 1.
- The dividend policy, with a reported increase in fiscal 2025/26, suggests the financial discipline the company says it maintains, which could support long-term investor confidence 1.
What would break the thesis
- If energy and ingredient costs stay volatile, margins could be compressed and the medium-term margin targets could be hard to reach 1.
- Heavy dependence on IRN-BRU could make revenue vulnerable if demand for this brand falls or stronger competitors emerge 1.
- Recent acquisitions could dilute efficiency in the short term, and management acknowledges they may affect profitability metrics 1.
What to watch
- Evolution of operating margin against the 14-16% target rangenext 10-K
- Progress of the integration of Innate-Essence, Frobishers and Fentimans2027
- Delivery of the 60% Scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction target by FY20302030
- Timetable for the Boost insourcing, to be completed by the end of 20272027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
A.G. Barr p.l.c. is a UK soft drinks company that manages its brand portfolio from four hubs in the UK: Cumbernauld, Middlebrook (Bolton), Milton Keynes and London 1. The company says it produces over 80% of its soft drinks in-house 1 and states its purpose as 'building great brands, for everyone' 1. Its integrated model, with control over the supply chain and customer service, is described as a key differentiator 1. The core portfolio includes three core soft drinks brands, IRN-BRU, Rubicon and Boost, alongside challenger brands 1.
In fiscal 2025/26 the company acquired Innate-Essence, Frobishers and Fentimans, expanding into functional hydration, premium non-alcoholic drinks and international distribution 1. According to the report, IRN-BRU accounts for 32% of total revenue, and the portfolio includes 16 brands 1. The group has around 1,000 employees 1.
The company describes its strategy in five growth platforms introduced in fiscal 2025/26 1. The core brands receive most of the marketing investment, while supply chain efficiency, asset investment and channel execution are the operational priorities 1. Growth through acquisitions is used to diversify, but management warns that acquisitions can affect efficiency and profitability metrics in the short term 1.
Segments
Core soft drinks brands
IRN-BRU, Rubicon and Boost are the company's main growth brands and receive most of the marketing investment 1. IRN-BRU accounts for 32% of total revenue 1. The company says these brands have significant headroom, and that growth will not be linear 1.
Premium and functional brands
Bundaberg, Fentimans and Frobishers are positioned for demand for premium non-alcoholic alternatives, while Innate-Essence brings functional hydration brands such as The Turmeric Co 1. The company says it is expanding distribution of these brands through its cross-channel approach 1. These segments are described as a growth direction rather than already dominant sources of revenue 1.
Operations and manufacturing
The company manufactures mainly at Cumbernauld and Milton Keynes and produces over 80% of its soft drinks in-house 1. Capacity and efficiency investments are described as part of a multi-year manufacturing programme 1. The company plans to insource the Boost Sport range in 2026 and complete the Boost insourcing by the end of 2027 1.
Market context
The company describes the UK soft drinks market as stable and resilient, a large and growing category with defensive characteristics as a low-cost everyday purchase 1. Changing dynamics include demand for functional drinks, premium non-alcoholic alternatives, sugar regulation (HFSS) and pressure from energy, ingredient and logistics costs 1.
Management states that in fiscal 2025/26 the market remained resilient and that demand for trusted brands rose in periods of high cost of living 1. The company says its portfolio is already largely HFSS compliant, which could be an advantage if legislation tightens 1.
Trends
- Demand for functional drinkstailwind
Consumers increasingly seek functional benefits such as energy and immunity, which could support the expansion of Rubicon and the functional acquisitions 1.
- Premium non-alcoholic alternativestailwind
Many adults are moderating alcohol intake, and demand for premium alternatives with a similar social experience is rising, which favours Bundaberg, Fentimans and Frobishers 1.
- HFSS regulationmixed
Tighter legislation on sugar and advertising is reshaping retail, and the company says its portfolio is already largely compliant, which could turn regulation into a driver of innovation 1.
- Cost pressureheadwind
Energy costs are volatile and ingredient and logistics costs remain high, pressuring industry margins; vertical integration and manufacturing investment are meant to mitigate this 1.
Competitive position
The sources analysed do not explicitly name the company's competitors; the report, however, describes a highly competitive market in which the company competes with other soft drinks and premium non-alcoholic brands 1. Pricing is adjusted to protect consumer trust and margins 1.
The company's stated advantage rests on brands with UK recognition, in-house production and an integrated distribution model combining own channels and external logistics partners 1. The company says this model sets it apart from competitors, but it gives no quantitative comparison 1.
- Other UK soft drinks producers
The sources do not name specific competitors; the company refers only to highly competitive markets without details on rivals.
- Premium non-alcoholic drinks producers
The premium non-alcoholic segment is mentioned as an area of rising demand, without naming specific competitors.
- Functional and hydration drinks brands
The company extends its portfolio in this segment through acquisitions, but the sources do not identify specific competitors.
- Food retailers and wholesale distributors
Large retail and wholesale customers are described as key partners with price pressure, without names.
News & filings
In the press
- Trump can't pack the Fed board with allies nowAxios · 04 Nov 2026 · EN
- Valul albastru i-a lovit pe republicani. Democrații câștigă Camera Reprezentanților și Senatul - Revista 22Surge — Google News · 04 Nov 2026 · RO
- LIVE Alegeri SUA: Democrații preiau Camera Reprezentanților, potrivit proiecției NBC. Victorii importante și în lupta pentru Senat. Prima reacție a lui TrumpSpotMedia.ro · 04 Nov 2026 · RO
- BREAKING - Republican Andy Barr defeats Democrat Charles Booker in Kentucky’s Se…Telegram — Insider Paper (EN, defense leaks) · 04 Nov 2026 · EN
- Media Monitor : united states TODAY Reports First Polls Close in Midterms as Key House Races Draw ScrutinySurge — GDELT DOC · 04 Nov 2026 · RO
- Barr wins McConnell’s open Senate seat in KentuckyThe Hill · 04 Nov 2026 · EN
- How Do You Take a Picture of a Black Hole?Quanta Magazine · 29 Oct 2026 · EN
- A treia încercare de acuzare a lui James Comey - Saptamana FinanciaraSurge — Google News · 27 Oct 2026 · RO
- Persistent and compartmentalized T cell immunity in ALSNature Medicine · 27 Oct 2026 · EN
- Medical education: How are residents using AI?Medical Xpress · 26 Oct 2026 · EN
- Lymph node-targeted, mKRAS-specific amphiphile vaccine in pancreatic cancer: the randomized phase 2 AMPLIFY-7P trialNature Medicine · 23 Oct 2026 · EN
- 95% of MAGA Republicans approve of Trump. For non-MAGA Republicans, it's 47%.Axios · 18 Oct 2026 · EN
- How Do Fungi Keep the Planet Healthy?Quanta Magazine · 15 Oct 2026 · EN
- Unexpected House battles pop up deep in Trump countryAxios · 14 Oct 2026 · EN
- Personalized neoantigen-targeting cancer vaccines in ovarian cancer: a phase 1 trialNature Medicine · 14 Oct 2026 · EN
- How a common virus's hijack of cell repair processes may promote cancerMedical Xpress · 13 Oct 2026 · EN
- Delta Air Lines Passenger Arrested After Stealing California Airport TugSimple Flying · 08 Oct 2026 · EN
- 'Real opportunity' to boost low-carbon European holidaysPhys.org · 07 Oct 2026 · EN
- SF Fed president: AI demand could extend energy shockAxios · 06 Oct 2026 · EN
- Which Workers Left the Labor Force Post-COVID Recession and Why?: Filing, Tax Credit Take-Up, and Labor Force Engagement by Occupation -- by Andrew C. Barr, Laura Kawano, Bruce Sacerdote, Michael StevensNBER — New Working Papers · 05 Oct 2026 · EN
Annual reports (ESEF)
- Annual report 202622 Apr 2026
- Annual report 202523 Apr 2025
Sources
- [1] Annual report, fiscal year ended 2026-01-31 (ESEF) · SEC / A.G. BARR p.l.c. · 31 Jan 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from ESEF annual reports and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.