olivLaw · US equity research
B.O.S Better Online Solutions Ltd. BOSC
Computer Communications Equipment · SIC 3576 · Vertical: Computer Communications Equipment (SIC 3576)
BOS Better Online Solutions is an Israel-based provider that combines distribution of electromechanical components, RFID inventory management services and industrial robotics. In 2025 the company grew revenues by 26.5% to 50.5 million USD, as demand in defense and geopolitical tension supported its distribution division.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, B.O.S Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) stock was 4.24 USD (−1.40% on the day), with market capitalisation 29.8 m USD, P/E 7.4 on diluted EPS of 0.57 USD over the last 12 months, beta 0.54, 52-week range 4.11–6.58 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 39.4
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 4.15 – 4.52
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.24 · band width 8.4%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 4.54 / 4.60
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.08 / -0.08
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −8.6% | −2.0% | −6.6 pp | — |
| 3 months | −5.8% | −2.2% | −3.6 pp | — |
| 6 months | −6.4% | +4.3% | −10.7 pp | — |
| Year to date | −7.0% | +10.6% | −17.6 pp | — |
| 1 year | −35.7% | +10.5% | −46.1 pp | +10.4% |
| 3 years | +63.1% | +73.7% | −10.6 pp | +63.6% |
| 5 years | +21.5% | +61.7% | −40.2 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 17 percentile of its own 6-quarter history (min 0.0, median 8.2, max 36.8; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 32.7 m | 33.8 m | 33.6 m | 33.6 m | 41.5 m | 44.2 m | 39.9 m | 50.6 m |
| Revenue YoY | +12.9% | +3.6% | −0.8% | +0.2% | +23.4% | +6.4% | −9.6% | +26.6% |
| Net income | 990.0 k | -913.0 k | -960.0 k | 451.0 k | 1.3 m | 2.0 m | 2.3 m | 3.6 m |
| Net income YoY | +28.1% | −192.2% | unavailable | unavailable | +182.9% | +57.1% | +14.7% | +57.0% |
| Diluted EPS | 3,500.00 | -0.23 | -0.22 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.57 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | −100.0% | unavailable | unavailable | +187.5% | +47.8% | +14.7% | +46.2% |
| net % | 3.0% | -2.7% | -2.9% | 1.3% | 3.1% | 4.5% | 5.8% | 7.1% |
| Free cash flow | 54.0 k | -1.3 m | 974.0 k | -370.0 k | -1.1 m | 1.5 m | 775.0 k | 4.6 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 11.8 m USD
- Financial debt
- 1.3 m USD
- Net debt
- -10.6 m USD
- Equity
- 28.7 m USD
- Total assets
- 44.6 m USD
- Debt / equity
- 0.04x
- Current ratio
- 2.70x
- ROE
- 14.4%
- ROA
- 9.1%
- FCF margin
- 9.1%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 33.6 m | 33.6 m | 41.5 m | 44.2 m | 39.9 m | 50.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 27.4 m | 27.0 m | 32.5 m | 35.0 m | 30.7 m | 38.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 6.1 m | 6.6 m | 9.1 m | 9.2 m | 9.3 m | 12.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Research & development | 112.0 k | 208.0 k | 166.0 k | 158.0 k | 175.0 k | 178.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | -612.0 k | 517.0 k | 1.9 m | 2.5 m | 1.4 m | 2.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 310.0 k | 258.0 k | 361.0 k | 510.0 k | 560.0 k | 481.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | -302.0 k ≈ | 775.0 k ≈ | 2.3 m ≈ | 3.0 m ≈ | 2.0 m ≈ | 3.4 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | — | 202.0 k | 306.0 k | 402.0 k | 197.0 k | 673.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -960.0 k | 412.0 k | 1.3 m | 2.0 m | 1.3 m | 3.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | — | -39.0 k | 6.0 k | 4.0 k | -1.0 m | -113.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -960.0 k | 451.0 k | 1.3 m | 2.0 m | 2.3 m | 3.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -0.22 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.57 | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 4.3 k | 5.4 m | 5.6 m | 5.9 m | 5.9 m | 6.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 1.0 m | 1.9 m | 1.8 m | 2.3 m | 3.4 m | 11.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | 9.2 m | 9.2 m | 10.8 m | 12.4 m | 11.8 m | 15.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | 4.9 m | 5.6 m | 6.4 m | 6.1 m | 7.9 m | 6.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 16.5 m | 17.9 m | 20.6 m | 22.0 m | 24.4 m | 35.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 956.0 k | — | 3.3 m | 3.3 m | 3.4 m | 3.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 4.7 m | 4.7 m | 4.9 m | 4.9 m | 4.2 m | 3.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 40.0 k | 20.0 k | 486.0 k | 1.1 m | 422.0 k | 361.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 23.0 m | 24.8 m | 30.6 m | 32.5 m | 34.3 m | 44.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 985.0 k | 996.0 k | 1.0 m | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 30 Mar 2023verified |
| Short-term debt | 815.0 k | 740.0 k | 54.0 m | 170.0 k | 439.0 k | 286.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | 1.2 m | 681.0 k | 1.3 m | 1.2 m | 980.0 k | 972.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 8.9 m | 8.8 m | 11.2 m | 10.9 m | 10.7 m | 13.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 11.9 m † | 14.3 m † | 16.6 m † | 18.8 m † | 21.3 m † | 28.7 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | 4.4 m | 0 | — | — | 5.8 m | 7.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 1.1 m | 9.0 k | 1.3 m | 1.8 m | 1.3 m | 5.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 84.0 k | 379.0 k | 2.4 m | 341.0 k | 519.0 k | 452.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | 974.0 k ≈ | -370.0 k ≈ | -1.1 m ≈ | 1.5 m ≈ | 775.0 k ≈ | 4.6 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | 71.0 k | -379.0 k | -3.1 m | -772.0 k | -519.0 k | -452.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -532.0 k | 1.3 m | 1.6 m | -389.0 k | 217.0 k | 3.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
4 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
Score: 64 / 100
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 29.8 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
- Balance sheet100
- Growth49
- Valuation92
- Quality32
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 9.25 – 43.61 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)11.86 – 17.42 (Mid 14.02)WACC 9.1% · starting FCFF 5.2 m USD · terminal value share of EV 74%The WACC × g sensitivity gives the method's bounds; these are not probabilities.Reverse DCF: no growth between −30% and +40% justifies the price
- Peers: EV/Sales9.25 – 43.61 (Mid 17.66)7 companies used · median multiple 2.2x · quartiles 1.1x – 5.9xATEN, CSCO, DGII, EXTR, FOXX, HUBC, LTRX
- Peers: EV/EBITDA14.46 – 14.93 (Mid 14.57)3 companies used · median multiple 27.1x · quartiles 26.9x – 27.8xATEN, CSCO, DGII
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Neutral profile · Score 64/100
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin · Quality | 23.9% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| EBIT margin · Quality | 5.8% | 67 (vs peers) | 9% |
| FCF margin · Quality | 9.1% | 36 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 6.8% | 27 (on a fixed band) | 18% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) · Growth | 26.6% | 93 (vs peers) | 9% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | -3.1x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 2.7x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
| EV/Sales · Valuation | 0.4x | 86 (vs peers) | 18% |
| FCF yield · Valuation | 15.4% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 13% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet100/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Growth49/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Quality32/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/1 factors with a value
- Valuation92/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD (BOSC). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 50.6 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 26.6%; net margin 7.1%; ROE 14.4%; net debt/EBITDA -3.1x.
The estimated value range is 11.86–17.42 USD per share (median of 3 methods, agreement: high); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 14.57 USD, the price of 4.24 USD leaves a potential of 243.7% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of 70.9% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
olivLaw score 64/100, methodological classification: neutral profile (score, margin of safety and method agreement together; not a judgement of the right price). Groups assessed only in part: returns. Not investment advice.
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Revenue growth (YoY): 26.6%
- Net debt / EBITDA: -3.1x
- Current ratio: 2.7x
- EV/Sales: 0.4x
- FCF yield: 15.4%
- The price is below the estimated value range
What contradicts it
- Gross margin: 23.9%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 6.8%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): Shareholder yield (distributions).
Versus the vertical median
Computer Communications Equipment (SIC 3576) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 15 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. | 406.0 bn | 30.9 | 27.3% | 21.0% | +11.8% | +34% / +113% |
| ANETArista Networks, Inc. | 214.3 bn | 53.6 | 31.5% | 38.4% | +28.6% | +30% / +209% |
| FFIVF5, Inc. | 18.8 bn | 26.4 | 19.8% | 22.0% | +9.7% | +38% / +93% |
| EXTRExtreme Networks, Inc. | 3.0 bn | 58.0 | 67.1% | 4.0% | +12.6% | +31% / +42% |
| DGIIDigi International Inc. | 2.8 bn | 57.5 | 7.5% | 9.6% | +1.5% | +74% / +208% |
| ATENA10 Networks, Inc. | 1.7 bn | 40.0 | 19.4% | 13.9% | +11.0% | +38% / +91% |
| NTGRNETGEAR, Inc. | 606.6 m | — | -5.3% | -3.7% | +3.8% | −16% / +64% |
| ALLTAllot Ltd. | 421.3 m | 108.3 | 4.5% | 3.6% | +10.6% | −10% / +541% |
| LTRXLantronix, Inc. | 263.9 m | — | -4.3% | -3.5% | −1.6% | +10% / 0% |
| SILCSilicom Ltd. | 181.2 m | — | -9.4% | -18.5% | +6.6% | +112% / +95% |
| BOSCBos Better Online Solutions Ltd | 29.8 m | 7.4 | 14.4% | 7.1% | +26.6% | −36% / +63% |
| CIITTianci International, Inc. | 16.5 m | — | -59.1% | -14.7% | +7.7% | −93% / −96% |
| FOXXFoxx Development Holdings Inc. | 13.3 m | — | — | -100.2% | −20.2% | −58% / −83% |
| INTZIntrusion Inc. | 11.9 m | — | -140.9% | -194.0% | +21.6% | −66% / −93% |
| WLDSWearable Devices Ltd. | 4.2 m | — | -72.3% | -1,253.0% | +23.9% | −92% / −100% |
| HUBCHUB Cyber Security Ltd. | 3.4 m | — | — | -134.5% | −30.7% | −100% / −100% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for BOSC from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 2.31 Total return -45% · Per year -45% | 4.08 Total return -4% · Per year -4% | 6.14 Total return 45% · Per year 45% |
| 3 years | 2.35 Total return -45% · Per year -18% | 4.66 Total return 10% · Per year 3% | 7.68 Total return 81% · Per year 22% |
| 5 years | 2.39 Total return -44% · Per year -11% | 5.31 Total return 25% · Per year 5% | 9.60 Total return 126% · Per year 18% |
- Exit P/E± 1.16
- Net margin± 0.81
- Annual revenue growth± 0.65
- Annual dilution± 0.07
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 31 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (20 Oct 2026), 6-K (30 Sept 2026), 6-K (20 Aug 2026), 6-K (17 Jul 2026), 6-K (28 May 2026).
In brief
BOS Better Online Solutions is an Israel-based provider that combines distribution of electromechanical components, RFID inventory management services and industrial robotics. In 2025 the company grew revenues by 26.5% to 50.5 million USD 1, as demand in defense and geopolitical tension supported its distribution division.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company has long-standing relationships with global manufacturers and defense customers, which generate recurring orders once products move into production 1.
- Revenue growth in 2025 and positive operating cash flow point to a firmer financial base than in earlier years 1.
- The portfolio spans three complementary divisions, from components to automation, allowing integrated solutions for clients 1.
Weaknesses
- Reliance on a small number of suppliers and on a single manufacturer for a significant share of purchases exposes the company to supply risks 1.
- The RFID division has declined in recent years and required impairments of intangible assets and goodwill, pointing to performance weaknesses 1.
- The geographic concentration in Israel makes results sensitive to political and economic developments in that country 1.
Opportunities
- Defense demand and industrial automation could open new contracts for the robotics and distribution divisions 1.
- Expanding inventory management systems in retail and logistics could renew demand for the RFID division if the market stabilizes 1.
- Access to capital markets through the at-the-market share sales program could fund growth if the company uses it 1.
Threats
- Military conflict and political instability in the region can directly affect commercial activity and delivery chains 1.
- Fluctuations in the exchange rate can affect reported results, since part of costs and revenues is linked to the dollar and the shekel 1.
- Larger competitors with superior financial and technological resources could reduce margins through more aggressive pricing 1.
Risks
- Geographic concentrationhigh
A very large majority of sales come from Israel, so a deterioration in the local political or economic situation could quickly affect results 1.
- Supplier dependencehigh
A small group of suppliers accounts for most purchases of the Supply Chain division, and an interruption of a representation agreement could affect revenues 1.
- Decline of the RFID divisionmedium
The RFID division recorded a cumulative decline and asset impairments, which raises questions about its medium-term recovery 1.
- Currency riskmedium
Exposure to the shekel-dollar rate can produce currency gains or losses that materially change net results from one year to the next 1.
- Dilution from share saleslow
The at-the-market share sales program could dilute existing shareholders if the company uses it extensively 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If defense demand and industrial automation remain strong, the revenue growth of 2025 could continue, and margins in the Supply Chain division could stay high 1.
- The balance sheet has improved, with positive operating cash flow and higher working capital, giving the company more flexibility for investment 1.
- A portfolio spread across three divisions could reduce dependence on a single business line if demand in each segment develops differently 1.
What would break the thesis
- If regional conflicts widen, commercial activity in Israel could decline and revenues could return to the weaker levels of earlier years 1.
- The gross margin of the RFID division fell in 2025, and without operational correction the pressure on profitability could persist 1.
- Dependence on a few suppliers and competition from much larger distributors could limit the company's bargaining power 1.
What to watch
- Revenue trend of the RFID division and its gross margin after operational measuresQ1 2027
- Share of sales from Israel and the impact of regional conflicts on demand2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 31 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (20 Oct 2026), 6-K (30 Sept 2026), 6-K (20 Aug 2026), 6-K (17 Jul 2026), 6-K (28 May 2026).
The business
BOS integrates technologies to optimize supply chain operations through three divisions: Supply Chain Solutions, RFID and Intelligent Robotics 1. The company acts as a distributor for global manufacturers and sells its solutions directly to clients in industry, defense and retail, with a strong focus on the Israeli market. Its shares are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol BOSC 1.
Segments
Supply Chain Solutions
The division represents and distributes electromechanical components of global manufacturers, mainly for the defense and Hi-Tech industries, and generates most of the revenue, at 70% of the total in 2025 1.
RFID
The division optimizes inventory management through RFID tags, AIDC equipment, proprietary software and inventory counting services, with clients in retail and logistics; it contributed 27% of revenues in 2025 1.
Market context
The company operates mainly in the Israeli market, which accounted for 91% of 2025 sales 1. Demand from defense and the electronics industry has grown in recent years, but the RFID market is competitive, with rapidly changing technologies and standards 1.
Suppliers of supply chain equipment and services compete on price, delivery time and the ability to integrate solutions. BOS revenues depend on the capital expenditure budgets of its customers, which can be influenced by macroeconomic conditions 1.
Trends
- Higher defense-related demandtailwind
Geopolitical tension in Israel and Europe raised demand for the distribution division's products, whose revenues grew by 37.6% 1. If these tensions persist, defense demand could continue to support revenues.
- Regional conflict pressure on RFIDheadwind
Political and military conflict in Israel affected the commercial market, the main revenue base of the RFID division, which recorded a cumulative revenue decline of 12% between 2022 and 2025 1.
- Inflation and component costsmixed
Increases in component prices and wages raised costs, which the company partly passes on in its price list. Delays in the global component supply chain may lengthen delivery times 1.
- Currency effectmixed
The appreciation of the shekel against the dollar produced currency gains in 2025, but it also increased operating expenses measured in dollars, so results can be affected by exchange rate swings 1.
Competitive position
In component distribution, BOS competes with Israeli distributors such as Telsys and STG International, as well as large international distributors such as Arrow Electronics, Avnet and Future Electronics 1. Competition is intense, and these firms have greater financial resources.
In RFID and robotics, the main competitors are smaller Israeli firms such as eWave mobile, Dangot, Dannet, GBM Automation and Automatica 1. The RFID market is expanding, and the number of competitors grows with it 1.
- Telsys Ltd.
Israeli electronic components distributor, cited as a competitor in the Supply Chain division.
- Arrow Electronics International
International component distributor, cited as a competitor in international markets.
- Avnet Electronics Marketing
Global electronic components distributor, cited as a competitor in international markets.
- eWave mobile Ltd.
Israeli RFID firm, cited as a main competitor of the RFID division.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)20 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)30 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)20 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)17 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)28 May 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)31 Mar 2026
- Annual report (foreign issuer)31 Mar 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)31 Mar 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)17 Feb 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)25 Nov 2025
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / B.O.S Better Online Solutions Ltd. · 31 Mar 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.