olivLaw · US equity research
Intrusion Inc. INTZ
Computer Communications Equipment · SIC 3576 · Vertical: Computer Communications Equipment (SIC 3576)
Intrusion Inc. is a cybersecurity company in Plano, Texas, selling threat intelligence built on its own database of IP addresses and the Shield product, and is shifting from government customers toward commercial ones. The company remains loss-making and has raised going concern doubts, so its ability to reach profitability in 2027, especially after the VigilAigent acquisition, is the key point to follow.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) stock was 0.48 USD (−15.09% on the day), with market capitalisation 11.9 m USD, beta 0.55, 52-week range 0.48–1.79 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 1.5 m USD (−22.4% YoY), net income of -2.6 m USD, diluted EPS -0.13 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 32.9
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 0.50 – 0.70
- below the lower band · %B -0.10 · band width 32.5%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 0.70 / 0.85
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.04 / -0.04
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −29.9% | −2.0% | −27.9 pp | — |
| 3 months | −37.1% | −2.2% | −35.0 pp | — |
| 6 months | −38.7% | +4.3% | −43.0 pp | — |
| Year to date | −57.9% | +10.6% | −68.5 pp | — |
| 1 year | −72.8% | +10.5% | −83.3 pp | +10.4% |
| 3 years | −92.7% | +73.7% | −166.3 pp | +63.6% |
| 5 years | −99.4% | +61.7% | −161.1 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.5 m | 1.7 m | 1.8 m | 1.9 m | 2.0 m | 1.4 m | 888.0 k | 1.5 m |
| Cost of revenue | 344.0 k | 421.0 k | 432.0 k | 442.0 k | 461.0 k | 380.0 k | 229.0 k | 488.0 k |
| Gross profit | 1.2 m | 1.3 m | 1.3 m | 1.4 m | 1.5 m | 1.1 m | 659.0 k | 965.0 k |
| Research & development | 1.2 m | 1.2 m | 1.2 m | 1.3 m | 1.3 m | 1.3 m | 1.5 m | 1.1 m |
| Operating income | -2.0 m | -1.9 m | -2.1 m | -2.1 m | -2.1 m | -2.8 m | -3.6 m | -2.5 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 357.0 k ≈ | 465.0 k | 540.0 k | 391.0 k ≈ | 425.0 k ≈ | 406.0 k | 405.0 k | 414.0 k ≈ |
| Interest expense | -242.0 k ≈ | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net income | -2.1 m | -2.0 m | -2.1 m | -2.0 m | -2.1 m | -2.8 m | -3.6 m | -2.6 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.35 | -0.24 ≈ | -0.11 | -0.10 | -0.10 | -0.14 ≈ | -0.18 | -0.13 |
| Operating cash flow | -2.1 m ≈ | -178.0 k | -1.7 m | -1.6 m ≈ | -3.0 m ≈ | -531.0 k | -1.8 m | -3.6 m ≈ |
| Capex | 33.0 k ≈ | 467.0 k | 392.0 k | 333.0 k ≈ | 34.0 k ≈ | 18.0 k | 54.0 k | 1.0 k ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 10.3 m | 13.6 m | 6.6 m | 7.3 m | 7.5 m | 5.6 m | 5.8 m | 7.0 m |
| Revenue YoY | +49.8% | +32.8% | −51.5% | +9.9% | +3.5% | −25.5% | +2.9% | +21.6% |
| Net income | 2.3 m | 4.5 m | -6.5 m | -18.8 m | -16.2 m | -13.9 m | -7.8 m | -9.1 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | +95.2% | −246.0% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | 0.14 | 0.28 | -0.45 | -1.05 | -16.39 | -11.46 | -1.63 | -0.46 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | +100.0% | −260.7% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | 22.3% | 32.7% | -98.5% | -258.4% | -215.6% | -247.6% | -135.0% | -129.1% |
| Free cash flow | 2.4 m | 4.0 m | -5.5 m | -17.6 m | -13.5 m | -7.9 m | -6.8 m | -7.5 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 3.6 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 7.3 m USD
- Total assets
- 10.4 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 2.37x
- ROE
- -133.9%
- ROA
- -82.7%
- FCF margin
- -107.4%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 6.6 m | 7.3 m | 7.5 m | 5.6 m | 5.8 m | 7.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 2.7 m | 3.6 m | 3.4 m | 1.3 m | 1.3 m | 1.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 3.9 m | 3.7 m | 4.2 m | 4.4 m | 4.4 m | 5.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Research & development | 3.8 m | 6.3 m | 6.5 m | 5.6 m | 4.4 m | 5.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | -6.5 m | -19.5 m | -16.3 m | -12.0 m | -8.4 m | -9.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 231.0 k | 780.0 k | 1.3 m | 1.7 m | 1.6 m | 1.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | -6.3 m ≈ | -18.7 m ≈ | -15.0 m ≈ | -10.4 m ≈ | -6.8 m ≈ | -7.4 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 6.0 k | 21.0 k | 2.4 m | 1.9 m | 20.0 k | — | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2025verified |
| Pre-tax income | -6.5 m | -18.8 m | -16.2 m | -13.9 m | -7.8 m | -9.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -6.5 m | -18.8 m | -16.2 m | -13.9 m | -7.8 m | -9.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -0.45 | -1.05 | -16.39 | -11.46 | -1.63 | -0.46 | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 14.7 m | 18.0 m | 990.0 k | 1.2 m | 5.3 m | 19.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 16.7 m | 4.1 m | 3.0 m | 139.0 k | 4.9 m | 3.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | 1.2 m | 1.0 m | 530.0 k | 364.0 k | 169.0 k | 131.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 18.3 m | 5.5 m | 5.4 m | 1.1 m | 5.5 m | 4.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 466.0 k | 1.1 m | 2.2 m | 2.9 m | 3.8 m | 4.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 11 Aug 2026verified |
| Total assets | 19.9 m | 9.2 m | 9.3 m | 6.2 m | 11.5 m | 10.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 408.0 k | — | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2021verified |
| Current liabilities | 2.1 m | 3.4 m | 13.2 m | 14.3 m | 3.7 m | 1.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 15.7 m † | 3.9 m † | -4.2 m † | -9.6 m † | 6.3 m | 7.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 11 Aug 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -5.2 m | -16.6 m | -13.2 m | -7.8 m | -6.3 m | -6.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 320.0 k | 1.1 m | 307.0 k | 157.0 k | 533.0 k | 777.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -5.5 m ≈ | -17.6 m ≈ | -13.5 m ≈ | -7.9 m ≈ | -6.8 m ≈ | -7.5 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -320.0 k | -1.1 m | -1.5 m | -1.4 m | -1.8 m | -2.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 18.9 m | 5.1 m | 13.6 m | 6.3 m | 12.8 m | 8.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 99.0 k | 0 | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 18 Mar 2022verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
4 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 11.9 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
72% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the reported interest expense is far older than the latest period (the filer changed its XBRL tag): a stale figure is not used
- Peers: EV/Salesunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin · Quality | 74.1% | 85 (on a fixed band) | 15% |
| EBIT margin · Quality | -193.6% | 7 (vs peers) | 12% |
| FCF margin · Quality | -158.1% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 12% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -2.3% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 24% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) · Growth | 21.6% | 80 (vs peers) | 12% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.4x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| EV/Sales · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -76.1% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 18% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial0/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Growth27/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Quality35/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/1 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
INTRUSION INC. (INTZ). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 7.0 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 21.6%; net margin -194.0%; ROE -140.9%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Gross margin: 74.1%
- Revenue growth (YoY): 21.6%
What contradicts it
- EBIT margin: -193.6%
- FCF margin: -158.1%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -2.3%
- Current ratio: 0.4x
- FCF yield: -76.1%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): Net debt / EBITDA, EV/Sales, Shareholder yield (distributions).
Versus the vertical median
Computer Communications Equipment (SIC 3576) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 15 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. | 406.0 bn | 30.9 | 27.3% | 21.0% | +11.8% | +34% / +113% |
| ANETArista Networks, Inc. | 214.3 bn | 53.6 | 31.5% | 38.4% | +28.6% | +30% / +209% |
| FFIVF5, Inc. | 18.8 bn | 26.4 | 19.8% | 22.0% | +9.7% | +38% / +93% |
| EXTRExtreme Networks, Inc. | 3.0 bn | 58.0 | 67.1% | 4.0% | +12.6% | +31% / +42% |
| DGIIDigi International Inc. | 2.8 bn | 57.5 | 7.5% | 9.6% | +1.5% | +74% / +208% |
| ATENA10 Networks, Inc. | 1.7 bn | 40.0 | 19.4% | 13.9% | +11.0% | +38% / +91% |
| NTGRNETGEAR, Inc. | 606.6 m | — | -5.3% | -3.7% | +3.8% | −16% / +64% |
| ALLTAllot Ltd. | 421.3 m | 108.3 | 4.5% | 3.6% | +10.6% | −10% / +541% |
| LTRXLantronix, Inc. | 263.9 m | — | -4.3% | -3.5% | −1.6% | +10% / 0% |
| SILCSilicom Ltd. | 181.2 m | — | -9.4% | -18.5% | +6.6% | +112% / +95% |
| BOSCBos Better Online Solutions Ltd | 29.8 m | 7.4 | 14.4% | 7.1% | +26.6% | −9% / +48% |
| CIITTianci International, Inc. | 16.5 m | — | -59.1% | -14.7% | +7.7% | −93% / −96% |
| FOXXFoxx Development Holdings Inc. | 13.3 m | — | — | -100.2% | −20.2% | −58% / −83% |
| INTZIntrusion Inc. | 11.9 m | — | -140.9% | -194.0% | +21.6% | −73% / −93% |
| WLDSWearable Devices Ltd. | 4.2 m | — | -72.3% | -1,253.0% | +23.9% | −92% / −100% |
| HUBCHUB Cyber Security Ltd. | 3.4 m | — | — | -134.5% | −30.7% | −100% / −100% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for INTZ from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Intrusion Inc. is a cybersecurity company in Plano, Texas, selling threat intelligence built on its own database of IP addresses and the Shield product, and is shifting from government customers toward commercial ones. The company remains loss-making and has raised going concern doubts, so its ability to reach profitability in 2027, especially after the VigilAigent acquisition, is the key point to follow.
SWOT
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Risks
- Going concernhigh
The auditor flagged substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern, and if funding is not secured, operations could be constrained 1.
- Government dependencehigh
Sales to U.S. government customers make up nearly all revenue, and cancelled or delayed orders could sharply affect results 12.
- Customer concentrationmedium
A small number of customers generate most revenue, and losing one could quickly reduce sales 12.
- Acquisition integrationmedium
Integrating VigilAigent may face technical and cultural difficulties, and cost-saving targets could be delayed 3.
- Shareholder dilutionmedium
Equity financing could reduce the value of existing shares for current shareholders 12.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the delayed government contract is restored and sequential growth continues, revenue could return to levels seen before the funding delay 3.
- The VigilAigent acquisition could add recurring revenue and open access to larger enterprise customers 3.
- The proprietary database, built over more than 20 years, could remain a barrier that competitors find hard to overcome 1.
What would break the thesis
- The company could keep large net losses and low liquidity, which may force further share issuances 12.
- Reliance on government budgets could repeat the delays that reduced revenue in 2026 23.
- If the VigilAigent integration does not deliver the expected synergies, the company could stay loss-making for longer than planned 3.
What to watch
- Completion of the second VigilAigent closing and its closing conditionsby August 30, 2026
- Resumption of revenue from the delayed government contractQ3 2026
- Realization of cost synergies after integration2027
- Stated profitability target for fiscal year 20272027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
In 2026 the company agreed to acquire VigilAigent in two closings, with the first 60% stake completed on June 29, 2026 for 2.0 million USD 2. Management estimates VigilAigent will add about 3.5 million USD of annual recurring revenue from multi-year contracts 3.
The company was organized in Texas in 1983 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1995 1. It had 52 employees at the end of 2025 1. In the near term the model depends on raising capital, since the company has disclosed substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern 1.
Segments
Market context
The network security market is intensely competitive and changes quickly, with new products and pressure on price and performance 1. The company competes in threat intelligence and advanced persistent threat detection against firms and open-source technologies in firewall, antivirus and endpoint protection 1. Government customers dominate current demand, so federal budgets directly shape sales 1.
In the first half of 2026 revenue fell to 2.3 million USD from 3.6 million USD a year earlier, due to delays in a major Department of Defense contract 2. The company says a meaningful part of the delayed revenue could be realized in future periods if the contract is awarded and funded 3.
Trends
- Government fundingheadwind
Most revenue comes from U.S. public sector customers, and delays in funding and contract awards affected the fourth quarter of 2025 and the second quarter of 2026 13. If federal budgets stay unstable, revenue could be postponed again.
- Diversification toward commercialtailwind
Management is trying to extend Shield to commercial and civilian government customers, and the Port Nexus partnership and the VigilAigent acquisition could reduce dependence on government 12.
- Margin pressuremixed
Gross margin fell in 2026 as Shield's share of revenue declined and consulting work carries lower margins 2. If Shield's share rises again, margins could recover.
- Access to capitalheadwind
The company has relied on share issuances and at-the-market sales, and its going concern disclosure shows future financing is uncertain 1. If financing is not secured, the profitability plan could be affected.
Competitive position
Principal named competitors in data mining and advanced persistent threat detection are Darktrace, Trellix and Recorded Future 1. The company believes competition for TraceCop is limited, because its historical data, collected over more than 20 years, is hard to replicate 1.
Competition is higher for Shield, where the company acknowledges other vendors could offer similar solutions if the product gains market acceptance 1. The proprietary database could remain a barrier to entry if competitors cannot replicate it 1.
- Darktrace
Principal competitor in data mining and advanced persistent threat detection, named in the annual report 1.
- Trellix
Competitor in firewall, intrusion detection and endpoint protection areas, named by the company 1.
- Recorded Future
Competitor in threat intelligence, named as a principal competitor by the company 1.
- Open-source and antivirus providers
Open-source technologies and antivirus, network analysis and endpoint vendors that compete indirectly with Intrusion products 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report02 Nov 2026Material agreement · Item 3.02 · Amendments to articles or bylaws · Regulation FD disclosure · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report15 Sept 2026Departure or appointment of officers
- Current report03 Sept 2026Item 3.02 · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report28 Aug 2026Material agreement · Acquisition or disposition of assets · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Shareholder vote · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report18 Aug 2026Material agreement · Item 3.02 · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report11 Aug 2026
- Current report11 Aug 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report22 Jul 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement20 Jul 2026
- Current report30 Jun 2026Material agreement · Item 3.02 · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Intrusion Inc. · 25 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Intrusion Inc. · 11 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Intrusion Inc. · 11 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.