olivLaw · US equity research
GasLog Partners LP GLOP-PA
Water Transportation · SIC 4400 · Vertical: Water Transportation (SIC 4400)
GasLog Partners LP owns and operates vessels that carry liquefied natural gas, chartering its fleet on long-term contracts or in the spot market. The partnership faces a weak freight market at present, with spot rates falling sharply in 2025 and an 11-vessel fleet that must be re-employed as charters expire in 2026.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 05 Nov 2026, GasLog Partners LP (GLOP-PA) stock was 25.06 USD (+0.14% on the day), with market capitalisation 1.2 bn USD, dividend yield 5.84%, beta 0.10, 52-week range 24.91–26.00 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 41.8
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 25.03 – 25.41
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.08 · band width 1.5%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 25.31 / 25.58
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.06 / -0.04
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +0.6% | −1.1% | +1.7 pp | — |
| 3 months | −2.3% | −0.5% | −1.8 pp | — |
| 6 months | −2.1% | +4.4% | −6.5 pp | — |
| Year to date | −2.1% | +12.3% | −14.4 pp | — |
| 1 year | −2.1% | +13.5% | −15.6 pp | +21.5% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +76.4% | unavailable | +61.3% |
| 5 years | −3.7% | +63.7% | −67.4 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
EPS unavailable in the issuer's structured filings (e.g. a partnership reports per unit, not per share).
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 383.2 m | 378.7 m | 333.7 m | 326.1 m | 371.0 m | 397.8 m | 356.3 m | 278.2 m |
| Revenue YoY | −4.6% | −1.2% | −11.9% | −2.3% | +13.8% | +7.2% | −10.5% | −21.9% |
| Net income | 25.4 m | 2.7 m | 56.9 m | 5.7 m | 119.0 m | 138.7 m | 151.0 m | -20.2 m |
| Net income YoY | −52.9% | −89.6% | +2,045.6% | −89.9% | +1,978.0% | +16.6% | +8.8% | −113.4% |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | 6.6% | 0.7% | 17.0% | 1.8% | 32.1% | 34.9% | 42.4% | -7.2% |
| Free cash flow | 172.5 m | 289.9 m | 194.7 m | 213.9 m | 275.2 m | 247.2 m | 261.4 m | 175.6 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 5.2 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 1.1 bn USD
- Total assets
- 1.2 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 0.37x
- ROE
- -1.7%
- ROA
- -1.5%
- FCF margin
- 63.1%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 333.7 m | 326.1 m | 371.0 m | 397.8 m | 356.3 m | 278.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | 122.5 m | 40.5 m | 154.6 m | 196.6 m | 155.6 m | -15.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Interest expense | 51.0 m | 37.3 m | 47.6 m | 67.1 m | 4.8 m | 5.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | 56.9 m | 5.7 m | 119.0 m | 138.7 m | 151.0 m | -20.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | 1.46 | — | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2021derived |
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 103.7 m | 145.5 m | 198.1 m | 11.9 m | 7.8 m | 5.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | 16.3 m | 11.2 m | 11.2 m | 24.4 m | 13.4 m | 17.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | 3.0 m | 3.0 m | 2.9 m | 2.9 m | 2.7 m | 4.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 125.7 m | 161.1 m | 243.0 m | 60.2 m | 38.3 m | 29.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 2.2 bn | 1.9 bn | 1.7 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 2.3 bn | 2.1 bn | 2.0 bn | 1.7 bn | 1.4 bn | 1.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | 1.2 bn | 986.5 m | 831.6 m | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 06 Mar 2023verified |
| Current liabilities | 185.2 m | 175.5 m | 177.2 m | 80.3 m | 84.3 m | 81.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 953.8 m | 919.5 m | 960.9 m | 1.5 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | 47.5 m | — | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2021verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 218.4 m | 233.4 m | 277.7 m | 262.4 m | 269.9 m | 191.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 23.6 m | 19.4 m | 2.5 m | 15.2 m | 8.5 m | 16.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | 194.7 m ≈ | 213.9 m ≈ | 275.2 m ≈ | 247.2 m ≈ | 261.4 m ≈ | 175.6 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -23.3 m | 98.2 m | 76.4 m | 149.4 m | 139.4 m | 35.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -188.2 m | -289.8 m | -302.3 m | -598.4 m | -413.4 m | -229.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 69.6 m | 31.9 m | 29.1 m | 292.3 m | 226.4 m | 130.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Share repurchases | 996.0 k | 18.4 m | 49.2 m | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 06 Mar 2023verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- score weight coverage: 43.8% of at least 60%
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 1.2 bn USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
44% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 19.24 – 25.87 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)19.24 – 25.87 (Mid 22.06)
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: score weight coverage: 43.8% of at least 60%
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -7.2% | 11 (vs peers) | 14% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -9.2% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 19% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -3.0x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 14% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.4x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | 14.7% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 19% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 10.9% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 14% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | 74.2% | 65 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet0/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial0/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial11/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns86/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial100/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
GasLog Partners LP (GLOP-PA). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 278.2 m USD in 2025; YoY growth -21.9%; net margin -7.2%; ROE -1.7%.
The estimated value range is 19.24–25.87 USD per share (median of 1 methods, agreement: single method); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 22.06 USD, the price of 25.06 USD leaves a potential of -12.0% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of -13.6% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
Insufficient data for a verdict (score weight coverage: 43.8% of at least 60%).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- FCF yield: 14.7%
- Shareholder yield (distributions): 10.9%
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -7.2%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -9.2%
- Interest coverage: -3.0x
- Current ratio: 0.4x
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA.
Versus the vertical median
Water Transportation (SIC 4400) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 21 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCLRoyal Caribbean Cruises Ltd | 89.1 bn | 19.7 | 41.7% | 23.8% | +8.8% | +25% / +210% |
| CCLCarnival Corp Ltd. | 42.1 bn | 13.7 | 24.0% | 11.4% | +6.4% | +21% / +108% |
| BIPBrookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. | 11.2 bn | 42.0 | 7.7% | 11.0% | +9.8% | +5% / +44% |
| NCLHNorwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. | 8.2 bn | 9.8 | 31.2% | 8.2% | +3.7% | −4% / +16% |
| MATXMatson, Inc. | 6.4 bn | 14.3 | 17.2% | 13.4% | −2.3% | +96% / +123% |
| KEXKirby Corporation | 6.3 bn | 18.4 | 10.4% | 10.2% | +3.0% | +5% / +56% |
| INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. | 4.7 bn | 6.0 | 37.4% | 62.0% | −11.4% | +78% / +107% |
| GLNGGolar Lng Limited | 4.3 bn | 65.7 | 3.4% | 16.7% | +51.1% | +15% / +98% |
| TDWTidewater Inc | 3.4 bn | 14.0 | 19.5% | 18.3% | +0.5% | +28% / +15% |
| SEAL-PASeapeak LLC | 2.0 bn | 76.8 | — | 4.1% | −10.4% | −2% / −2% |
| FLNGFLEX LNG Ltd. | 1.4 bn | 18.8 | 9.8% | 21.5% | −2.4% | +2% / −11% |
| NATNORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS Ltd | 1.4 bn | 108.8 | 2.6% | 4.2% | −16.6% | +79% / +68% |
| GLOP-PAGasLog Partners LP | 1.2 bn | — | -1.7% | -7.2% | −21.9% | −2% / unavailable |
| CMDBCostamare Bulkers Holdings Limited | 430.2 m | — | -11.2% | -6.3% | unavailable | +8% / unavailable |
| KNOPKNOT Offshore Partners LP | 288.4 m | 12.4 | — | 6.4% | +14.4% | −15% / +58% |
| EDRYEurodry Ltd. | 102.6 m | — | -4.0% | — | +8.9% | +173% / +79% |
| OMEXOdyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. | 26.0 m | — | — | -13,366.3% | −54.0% | +437% / +200% |
| USEAUnited Maritime Corp | 22.2 m | — | -11.0% | -16.4% | −16.8% | +40% / −4% |
| RUBIRubico Inc. | 682.3 k | 0.0 | 6.6% | 11.2% | −2.8% | −100% / unavailable |
| VIKViking Holdings Ltd | — | 33.5 | 263.5% | 17.7% | +21.9% | +29% / unavailable |
| DLNGDynagas Lng Partners LP | — | 2.2 | 12.9% | — | −100.0% | −16% / +16% |
| TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd. | — | 8.1 | 18.5% | 36.9% | −22.6% | +42% / +65% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for GLOP-PA from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 19 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (23 Oct 2026), 6-K (24 Jul 2026), 6-K (28 May 2026), 6-K (24 Apr 2026).
In brief
GasLog Partners LP owns and operates vessels that carry liquefied natural gas, chartering its fleet on long-term contracts or in the spot market. The partnership faces a weak freight market at present, with spot rates falling sharply in 2025 and an 11-vessel fleet that must be re-employed as charters expire in 2026.
SWOT
Strengths
- The partnership owns its fleet and has charters in force with clear terms running to 2030, providing a predictable revenue base for part of the vessels 1.
- The link with GasLog gives access to commercial capabilities and operating experience of the parent, which manages customer relationships 1.
- The fleet includes modern TFDE vessels, which are more efficient than older ships and may help attract customers in a competitive market 1.
Weaknesses
- Revenues depend on a small number of customers, and losing a single customer or vessel could significantly reduce income 1.
- The Steam vessel is less efficient with higher emissions, which could make re-employment at attractive rates difficult 1.
- The partnership depends on GasLog for staff and commercial development, which may create conflicts of interest and dependence risks 1.
Opportunities
- Rising LNG demand in Asia and Europe could support a recovery in rates and open new contracts for vessels coming off charter 1.
- Renewing long-term charters for vessels leaving charter in 2026 could stabilize the partnership's revenues 1.
- Growth of LNG marine bunkering, as projected in the cited forecasts, could create additional demand for modern vessels 1.
Threats
- Oversupply of newbuild vessels could keep rates low and reduce earnings from vessels trading in the spot market 1.
- Conflicts in the Middle East and other regions could disrupt routes and adversely affect operations and cash flows 1.
- Trade policies and possible port fees imposed by the United States and China could affect vessel costs and traffic 1.
Risks
- Charter rate volatilityhigh
Revenues and cash flows could decline significantly if vessels cannot be re-chartered over the long term at similar or better rates 1.
- Customer concentrationhigh
Most revenues come from a limited number of customers, and losing a customer, charter or vessel could have a severe effect on results 1.
- Vessel value impairmentmedium
Ship values have fluctuated substantially and led to non-cash impairment charges in prior years, including 2025; a further decline could cause additional losses 1.
- Geopolitical and regulatory risksmedium
Political instability, port fees and climate regulation could raise costs and affect operations and distributions to holders of the preference units 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If LNG demand grows as expected and newbuild supply stabilizes, charter rates could recover and support fleet revenues 1.
- Modern TFDE vessels could secure long-term charters at acceptable rates, which could provide stability to cash flows 1.
- The link with a parent that has commercial experience could help the partnership re-employ its vessels and maintain customer relationships 1.
What would break the thesis
- Spot rates fell sharply in 2025, and if these levels persist, the partnership's revenues could remain under pressure 1.
- Large oversupply of new vessels could prevent a rapid recovery in rates, particularly for less efficient ships 1.
- Concentration of revenues on few customers and dependence on a parent could amplify the impact of any adverse event on the company 1.
What to watch
- Re-employment of vessels leaving charter, including the Steam vessel and five TFDE vessels on the spot market2026
- Trend in spot rates for modern vessels and the mix between long-term and short-term chartersQ1 2027
- Evolution of the Middle East conflict and its effect on Strait of Hormuz traffic2026
- Clarification of the US-China port fee regime after the temporary suspensionnext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 19 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (23 Oct 2026), 6-K (24 Jul 2026), 6-K (28 May 2026), 6-K (24 Apr 2026).
The business
GasLog Partners LP owns, operates and acquires LNG carriers since its May 2014 IPO. According to the annual report, as of March 12, 2026 the partnership's fleet comprised eight wholly-owned vessels, seven with TFDE propulsion and one Steam vessel, plus three TFDE vessels leased under sale-and-leaseback arrangements without a purchase option. All vessels were contributed or acquired from GasLog, which holds 100% of the common units 1. The company reports its results in a single segment 1.
The partnership's revenues depend on charter contracts, as vessels are employed either on long-term charters or in the spot market. The report states that five vessels currently operate under long-term time charters, while six trade in the spot market, with fixed charter terms expiring between March 2026 and April 2030 1. The partnership relies on GasLog's commercial capabilities to develop and maintain customer relationships 1.
The company's structure is closely tied to GasLog, which employs the partnership's officers. This relationship brings both commercial benefits and risks of conflicts of interest and financial dependence on the parent 1.
Segments
LNG carrier fleet owned and bareboat-chartered
This segment combines wholly-owned and bareboat-chartered vessels employed under long-term charters or in the spot market. Of the 11 vessels, five are on long-term charters and six on the spot market, and expirations in 2026 will largely shape future revenues 1.
Spot and short-term charter vessels
Vessels moving to the spot market or to charters under three years are exposed to large rate swings. The report notes the Steam vessel is less efficient and has higher CO2 emissions than modern ships, which could make re-employment more difficult 1.
Market context
The LNG freight market remained weak in 2025: spot rates for 160,000 cbm vessels averaged 24,245 USD per day, down 42.6% year on year 1. The global fleet of conventional LNG carriers stood at 705 vessels at December 31, 2025, with another 271 on order, keeping pressure on rates 1. Demand is nevertheless expected to grow by around 60% by 2035, according to Wood Mackenzie, which could support a recovery in freight markets 1.
Gas price outlook points to a structural decline from 2026 as new liquefaction capacity comes online in the United States, Qatar and Canada, though the report warns of a soft period between 2030 and 2033 and oversupply risks 1. The Middle East conflict that began on February 28, 2026 has disrupted Strait of Hormuz traffic, which could alter routes and vessel demand, but freight effects have been uneven 1.
Trends
- Oversupply of vesselsheadwind
Heavy newbuild ordering in past years and ongoing deliveries could keep charter rates low and reduce utilization, especially for less efficient vessels such as the Steam ship 1.
- Growth of the spot marketheadwind
If more vessels move to the spot market and long-term charters become scarcer, revenues could become more volatile and re-employment could occur at lower rates 1.
- Rising LNG demandtailwind
LNG demand is expected to grow, particularly in Asia and Europe as domestic supply declines and power demand expands, which could support long-term charter rates 1.
- Geopolitical tensions and routingmixed
The Middle East conflict and disruptions in the Suez and Panama canal regions could lengthen voyages, creating both opportunities and delay risks depending on how long the conflict lasts 1.
Competitive position
The partnership competes with established LNG carrier operators with greater financial resources, as well as with new entrants, which could reduce its chances of winning new charters at good rates 1. Newer vessels add further pressure on older ships, including the Steam vessel 1.
Competition is also intense in the spot market, where available vessels make long-term contracts harder to secure. Because the partnership depends on GasLog's commercial capacity, its performance partly reflects GasLog's success in negotiating with customers in the global market 1.
- Established LNG carrier operators
Companies with larger fleets and stronger financial resources, cited in the report as competitors for new charter contracts 1.
- New entrants to LNG shipping
Recent or potential entrants that could reduce the availability of long-term charters for the partnership's fleet 1.
- Owners of modern TFDE-propelled vessels
Operators with more efficient ships that can offer better rates, making re-employment of the partnership's Steam vessel harder according to the report 1.
- Operators with newbuild orders
Companies that have placed newbuild orders whose deliveries could increase supply and pressure rates for all participants 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)23 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)24 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)28 May 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)24 Apr 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)19 Mar 2026
- Annual report (foreign issuer)19 Mar 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)12 Feb 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)29 Dec 2025
- Current report (foreign issuer)26 Nov 2025
- Current report (foreign issuer)24 Oct 2025
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / GasLog Partners LP · 19 Mar 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.