olivLaw · US equity research
Viking Holdings Ltd VIK
Water Transportation · SIC 4400 · Vertical: Water Transportation (SIC 4400)
Viking Holdings Ltd is a luxury cruise operator active in three segments: river, ocean and expedition cruising, all under one brand. The company builds demand mainly through direct marketing, and its advance bookings for the 2026 season have grown considerably compared with the prior year, which makes its analysis relevant in the current industry context. The fleet has 103 ships, and its high market share in its segments places it among the leaders of the luxury category.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 05 Nov 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) stock was 86.16 USD (−5.50% on the day), with P/E 33.5 on diluted EPS of 2.57 USD over the last 12 months, beta 1.63, 52-week range 57.26–108.26 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q4 2024): net income of 103.5 m USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 51.4
- neutral
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 79.96 – 90.39
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.59 · band width 12.2%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 84.12 / 85.49
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- 1.08 / 0.65
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +5.5% | −1.1% | +6.6 pp | — |
| 3 months | −18.9% | −0.5% | −18.4 pp | — |
| 6 months | +2.6% | +4.4% | −1.8 pp | — |
| Year to date | +20.7% | +12.3% | +8.3 pp | — |
| 1 year | +50.7% | +13.5% | +37.1 pp | +15.2% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +76.4% | unavailable | +57.7% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q4 2024 · 31 Dec 2024
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q1 '24 | Q2 '24 | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income | -490.7 m | 159.8 m | 379.7 m | 103.5 m |
| Operating cash flow | 463.0 m | 419.8 m ≈ | 828.7 m ≈ | 370.5 m |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 50 percentile of its own 2-quarter history (min 27.8, median 75.1, max 122.4; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3.2 bn | 4.7 bn | 5.3 bn | 6.5 bn |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +48.3% | +13.2% | +21.9% |
| Net income | 414.7 m | -1.9 bn | 152.3 m | 1.1 bn |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | −546.2% | unavailable | +653.3% |
| Diluted EPS | -0.73 | -4.42 | 0.36 | 2.57 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | +613.9% |
| net % | 13.1% | -39.3% | 2.9% | 17.7% |
| Free cash flow | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 3.8 bn USD
- Financial debt
- 5.1 bn USD
- Net debt
- 1.3 bn USD
- Equity
- 1.1 bn USD
- Total assets
- 12.2 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- 4.57x
- Current ratio
- 0.79x
- ROE
- unavailable
- ROA
- 10.3%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3.2 bn | 4.7 bn | 5.3 bn | 6.5 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 2.2 bn | 2.9 bn | 3.1 bn | 3.7 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 1.0 bn ≈ | 1.9 bn ≈ | 2.2 bn ≈ | 2.8 bn ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026derived |
| Operating income | 62.7 m | 816.0 m | 1.1 bn | 1.5 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | 423.6 m | -1.8 bn | 169.8 m | 1.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 8.9 m | 6.6 m | 16.9 m | 19.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | 414.7 m | -1.9 bn | 152.3 m | 1.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -0.73 | -4.42 | 0.36 | 2.57 | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 406.2 m | 221.9 m | 366.7 m | 446.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Revenue − Cost of revenue.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 1.3 bn | 1.5 bn | 2.5 bn | 3.8 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | — | 344.8 m | 239.0 m | 142.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | — | 54.6 m | 91.5 m | 95.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | — | 2.4 bn | 3.2 bn | 4.5 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | — | 8.0 m | 8.0 m | 8.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | — | 8.6 bn | 10.1 bn | 12.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | — | 244.6 m | 236.4 m | 259.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | — | — | 4.9 bn | 5.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | — | 4.4 bn | 5.2 bn | 5.7 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | -3.4 bn | -5.3 bn | -219.0 m | 1.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 372.7 m | 1.4 bn | 2.1 bn | 2.6 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Investing cash flow | -841.5 m | -634.2 m | -853.7 m | -949.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -80.9 m | -479.7 m | -247.9 m | -306.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 46.5 m | 49.3 m | 18.2 m | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Mar 2026verified |
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 5 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 39.6% of at least 60%
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: unavailable
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
40% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 19.52 – 39.41 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · input data missing
- Peers: P/E19.52 – 39.41 (Mid 33.58)12 companies used · median multiple 13.1x · quartiles 7.6x – 15.3xCCL, DLNG, FLNG, INSW, KEX, KNOP, MATX, NCLH, RCL, RUBI, TDW, TNK
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · input data missing
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 39.6% of at least 60%
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | 64.2% | 100 (vs peers) | 26% |
| Net margin · Quality | 17.7% | 74 (vs peers) | 16% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 27.0% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 21% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.8x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 33.5x | 25 (vs peers) | 26% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality90/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial25/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 6.5 bn USD in 2025; YoY growth 21.9%; net margin 17.7%; ROE 263.5%.
The estimated value range is 19.52–39.41 USD per share (median of 1 methods, agreement: single method); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 33.58 USD, the price of 86.16 USD leaves a potential of -61.0% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of -156.6% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 39.6% of at least 60%).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- ROIC: 64.2%
- Net margin: 17.7%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 27.0%
What contradicts it
- Current ratio: 0.8x
- P/E (TTM): 33.5x
- The price is above the estimated value range
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Water Transportation (SIC 4400) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 21 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCLRoyal Caribbean Cruises Ltd | 89.1 bn | 19.7 | 41.7% | 23.8% | +8.8% | +25% / +210% |
| CCLCarnival Corp Ltd. | 42.1 bn | 13.7 | 24.0% | 11.4% | +6.4% | +21% / +108% |
| BIPBrookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. | 11.2 bn | 42.0 | 7.7% | 11.0% | +9.8% | +5% / +44% |
| NCLHNorwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. | 8.2 bn | 9.8 | 31.2% | 8.2% | +3.7% | −4% / +16% |
| MATXMatson, Inc. | 6.4 bn | 14.3 | 17.2% | 13.4% | −2.3% | +96% / +123% |
| KEXKirby Corporation | 6.3 bn | 18.4 | 10.4% | 10.2% | +3.0% | +5% / +56% |
| INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. | 4.7 bn | 6.0 | 37.4% | 62.0% | −11.4% | +78% / +107% |
| GLNGGolar Lng Limited | 4.3 bn | 65.7 | 3.4% | 16.7% | +51.1% | +15% / +98% |
| TDWTidewater Inc | 3.4 bn | 14.0 | 19.5% | 18.3% | +0.5% | +28% / +15% |
| SEAL-PASeapeak LLC | 2.0 bn | 76.8 | — | 4.1% | −10.4% | −2% / −2% |
| FLNGFLEX LNG Ltd. | 1.4 bn | 18.8 | 9.8% | 21.5% | −2.4% | +2% / −11% |
| NATNORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS Ltd | 1.4 bn | 108.8 | 2.6% | 4.2% | −16.6% | +79% / +68% |
| GLOP-PAGasLog Partners LP | 1.2 bn | — | -1.7% | -7.2% | −21.9% | −2% / +5% |
| CMDBCostamare Bulkers Holdings Limited | 430.2 m | — | -11.2% | -6.3% | unavailable | +8% / unavailable |
| KNOPKNOT Offshore Partners LP | 288.4 m | 12.4 | — | 6.4% | +14.4% | −15% / +58% |
| EDRYEurodry Ltd. | 102.6 m | — | -4.0% | — | +8.9% | +173% / +79% |
| OMEXOdyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. | 26.0 m | — | — | -13,366.3% | −54.0% | +437% / +200% |
| USEAUnited Maritime Corp | 22.2 m | — | -11.0% | -16.4% | −16.8% | +40% / −4% |
| RUBIRubico Inc. | 682.3 k | 0.0 | 6.6% | 11.2% | −2.8% | −100% / unavailable |
| VIKViking Holdings Ltd | — | 33.5 | 263.5% | 17.7% | +21.9% | +51% / unavailable |
| DLNGDynagas Lng Partners LP | — | 2.2 | 12.9% | — | −100.0% | −16% / +16% |
| TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd. | — | 8.1 | 18.5% | 36.9% | −22.6% | +42% / +65% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for VIK from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 03 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (11 Sept 2026), 6-K (19 Aug 2026), 6-K (15 May 2026), 6-K (14 May 2026).
In brief
Viking Holdings Ltd is a luxury cruise operator active in three segments: river, ocean and expedition cruising, all under one brand. The company builds demand mainly through direct marketing, and its advance bookings for the 2026 season have grown considerably compared with the prior year, which makes its analysis relevant in the current industry context 1. The fleet has 103 ships, and its high market share in its segments places it among the leaders of the luxury category 1.
SWOT
Strengths
Weaknesses
- Revenue is seasonal, concentrated in the middle quarters, while the first and fourth quarters are close to break even or loss 1.
- The company depends on a narrow demographic segment, which limits diversification of demand 1.
- Fuel and operating costs are sensitive to inflation, and prices for existing bookings cannot be adjusted immediately 1.
Opportunities
Risks
- Demand and macroeconomic conditionshigh
Cruises are discretionary purchases, and a drop in consumer confidence or a rise in interest rates could reduce demand and force price discounting 1.
- Incidents and reputationmedium
Accidents or onboard incidents could generate negative publicity and cancellations, even when not directly linked to the company's operations 1.
- Pandemics and diseasemedium
An outbreak could lead to port restrictions, cancellations and added costs, and the impact depends on duration and severity 1.
- Weather and natural eventslow
Low river water levels or storms can alter itineraries and lead to cancelled cruises, with associated costs and refunds 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If advance bookings keep rising, the company could sustain high occupancy and good pricing in coming seasons 1.
- Guest loyalty and launches to existing guests could reduce acquisition costs and support growth 1.
- Leadership in North American river cruising and luxury ocean gives a solid base for expansion into new segments 1.
What would break the thesis
- If demand from source markets falls, prices could be cut and margins could suffer, especially in seasons with new capacity 1.
- Seasonal revenue and reliance on a narrow demographic could make quarterly results volatile 1.
- Conflicts, incidents and fuel costs could simultaneously affect demand and costs, reducing financial flexibility 1.
What to watch
- Evolution of advance bookings for the 2026 season2026
- Growth pace of the ocean and expedition segments2026
- Trend in the share of repeat guests and direct bookingsQ1 2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 03 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (11 Sept 2026), 6-K (19 Aug 2026), 6-K (15 May 2026), 6-K (14 May 2026).
The business
Revenue comes from cruise and land products and from onboard and other services, and advance bookings are an important indicator of future demand 1. Operating costs include commissions, transportation, direct costs of excursions and vessel operating costs, among them fuel 1. Revenue is recognized over the duration of each cruise, so results for one period depend partly on strategies applied in earlier periods 1.
Segments
Viking River
The river segment is the largest and oldest, with 89 river vessels at the end of 2025 1. Viking holds more than half of the North American outbound river market, with advantages from its brand, the Longship design and access to premium docking locations 1.
Expedition and Mississippi
Viking Expedition operates two expedition ships in the Arctic, Antarctica and the Great Lakes, while Viking Mississippi offers an option for North American guests who prefer not to take long-haul flights 1. Both products attracted bookings from past guests at launch, which reduces the commercial risk of expansion 1.
Market context
The luxury cruise market is served by a financially prepared public willing to pay for cultural travel, and the company positions itself as the only pure-play public luxury operator in the category 1. Demand depends on economic and political conditions, interest rates, inflation and travel safety, factors that can change consumer budgets in source countries 1. The company notes that demand for Russia, Ukraine and other Eastern European regions has declined because of conflicts 1.
The pace of advance bookings for the 2026 season indicates solid demand, but future demand could be affected if macroeconomic conditions deteriorate 1. Seasonality remains important, with revenue concentrated in the second and third quarters 1.
Trends
- Guest loyaltytailwind
The share of repeat guests has risen steadily, which reduces reliance on acquiring new customers and supports product launches 1. If this trend continues, marketing costs per booking could decline over time 1.
- Rising advance bookingstailwind
Bookings for the 2026 season are above the prior season, and the average advance booking per capacity unit has risen, which indicates pricing power 1. The increase could, however, be temporary if demand slows 1.
- Geopolitical uncertaintyheadwind
Conflicts in Eastern Europe, the Middle East and the Red Sea can reduce demand for some destinations and may raise costs or disrupt the supply chain 1.
- Fleet expansionmixed
Operating capacity grows for the 2026 season, and added ships increase revenue potential but also the risk of underoccupancy if demand does not keep pace 1. Reduced seasonality through year-round products could help 1.
Competitive position
Viking competes with large cruise operators that own several brands covering all categories, though luxury represents a small share of their capacity 1. In the river segment the company says its share is about three times that of its nearest competitor 1.
Viking's competitive edge rests on brand recognition, repeat bookings from past guests and the cost structure of small ships 1. Larger competitors may benefit from economies of scale and broader reach 1.
- Large multi-brand cruise operators
Companies named in the source operate several brands across all three categories, with luxury a small part of capacity 1.
- Nearest competitor in river cruising
The source indicates one competitor in North American outbound river cruising with a market share well below Viking's 1.
- Luxury ocean operators
The source mentions other luxury ocean operators whose brand awareness is lower than Viking's 1.
- Polar expedition operators
The source indicates an Antarctic expedition market share in which Viking holds a smaller position than in its other segments 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Acum peste 1.000 de ani, un viking a scrijelit „Halvdan a fost aici” pe un perete de marmură din Hagia Sofia. Un mileniu mai târziu, graffiti-ul nordic încă poate fi cititLibertatea.ro · 05 Nov 2026 · RO
- Galata - Barcelona 1-4, Inter - Brugge 3-4, Atletico - United 2-0 și Viking - Bayern 3-3, în a doua etapă din UCL. Seară plină de surprize: toate rezultatele, AICI! - iAM SPORTSurge — Google News · 04 Nov 2026 · RO
- Coaches see red as Bodo/Glimt edge Viking in fiery Norwegian thrillerCNA (Channel NewsAsia) · 30 Oct 2026 · EN
- Viking Kids Training Camp la Mall Moldova – 23 octombrie – 1 noiembrie 2026 - Zile și NopțiSurge — Google News · 23 Oct 2026 · RO
- Reexamined Viking 2 signal reveals possible marsquake from region active decades laterPhys.org · 21 Oct 2026 · EN
- Fast-growing Viking adds 7 more new ships from Europe to EgyptThe Points Guy · 16 Oct 2026 · EN
- Galatasaray - Barcelona 1-1, Atletico - United 1-0, Inter - Brugge 1-1, Viking - Bayern 2-0, ACUM, DGS 1, 2, 3, 4. Programul - Digi SportSurge — Google News · 13 Oct 2026 · RO
- Galatasaray - Barcelona 1-1, Atletico - United 1-0, Inter - Brugge 1-1, Viking - Bayern 2-0, ACUM, DGS 1, 2, 3, 4. Programul - Digi SportSurge — Google News · 13 Oct 2026 · RO
- Here are Tuesday's biggest analyst calls: Nvidia, Apple, Netflix, Meta, Galaxy, SoFi, Viking, AT&T & moreCNBC — Top News · 13 Oct 2026 · EN
- Fotbal: Neuer nu a fost inclus în lotul lui Bayern pentru meciul din Liga Campionilor cu VikingAgerpres · 13 Oct 2026 · RO
- Broken bones in ancient homes shed new light on Viking violencePhys.org · 09 Oct 2026 · EN
- „Războinicii secolului”, adevărate tancuri ale lumii medievale. Cum au reinventat fancezii cu sânge viking arta războiului călareAdevărul · 30 Sept 2026 · RO
- Why Viking museums still can’t escape the warrior mythScienceDaily · 23 Sept 2026 · EN
- Viking Therapeutics (VKTX) Rockets 35.7% After Weight Loss Drug Trial — What’s The Selling Point?Yahoo Finance — News · 22 Sept 2026 · EN
- Sandisk, Lennar, Viking Therapeutics, Shopify, GameStop, and More Stocks That Explain Today’s MarketYahoo Finance — News · 22 Sept 2026 · EN
- VKTX Stock Soars as Viking Therapeutics Announces Positive GLP-1 Trial ResultsYahoo Finance — News · 22 Sept 2026 · EN
- Viking Therapeutics Skyrockets On Obesity Drug Data. Eli Lilly, Novo Fall.Yahoo Finance — News · 22 Sept 2026 · EN
- Novo Nordisk Falls 7% as Post-Wegovy Growth Plan Fails to Ease Competition Fears; Eli Lilly Slips, Viking Therapeutics Edges HigherYahoo Finance — News · 21 Sept 2026 · EN
- Viking Village applies for premise licence after closingSurge — GDELT DOC · 13 Sept 2026 · RO
- Northern Viking 26: SUA și aliații din NATO au exersat apărarea IslandeiDefenseRomania.ro · 07 Sept 2026 · RO
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)11 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)19 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)19 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)15 May 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)14 May 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)14 May 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)31 Mar 2026
- Annual report (foreign issuer)03 Mar 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)03 Mar 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)19 Nov 2025
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Viking Holdings Ltd · 03 Mar 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.