olivLaw · US equity research
IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. IPST
Beverages · SIC 2080 · Vertical: Beverages (SIC 2080)
IP Strategy Holdings combines a digital asset treasury built around the native token of a blockchain network for intellectual property rights with a craft spirits business. Most recent revenue came from validator operations, which are now threatened by an announced migration of that network to another platform.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST) stock was 2.31 USD (−9.41% on the day), with market capitalisation 2.3 m USD, dividend yield 0.00%, beta 1.13, 52-week range 1.91–296.40 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 736.3 k USD (−44.3% YoY), net income of -15.4 m USD, diluted EPS -13.30 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 43.0
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 2.05 – 3.07
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.26 · band width 39.8%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 3.12 / 6.85
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.22 / -0.25
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −26.4% | −1.1% | −25.3 pp | — |
| 3 months | +3.1% | −0.5% | +3.6 pp | — |
| 6 months | −58.4% | +4.4% | −62.8 pp | — |
| Year to date | −92.6% | +12.3% | −104.9 pp | — |
| 1 year | −98.8% | +13.5% | −112.4 pp | +6.7% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +76.4% | unavailable | −30.5% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.8 m | 3.1 m | 1.1 m | 1.3 m | 3.0 m | 4.7 m | 1.7 m | 736.3 k |
| Cost of revenue | 1.1 m | 2.8 m | 820.1 k | 1.1 m | 1.2 m | 1.5 m | 543.1 k | 327.4 k |
| Gross profit | 629.7 k | 339.8 k | 271.9 k | 227.1 k | 1.8 m | 3.2 m | 1.2 m | 408.9 k |
| Operating income | -2.1 m | -8.3 m | -2.5 m | -6.6 m | -1.1 m | -123.7 m | -66.4 m | -14.8 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | — | 300.3 k | 296.5 k | 273.9 k | — | — | 30.8 k | 33.6 k |
| Interest expense | — | — | 523.2 k | 595.3 k | — | — | 12.5 k | 14.8 k |
| Pre-tax income | -3.4 m | -4.7 m | -3.0 m | -7.3 m | 245.7 m | -373.1 m | -66.7 m | -15.4 m |
| Income tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.1 k | 49.4 m | -49.4 m | 0 | 710 |
| Net income | -3.4 m | -4.7 m | -3.0 m | -7.3 m | 196.3 m | -323.7 m | -66.7 m | -15.4 m |
| Diluted EPS | -160.41 | -6.50 ≈ | -135.34 | -308.12 | 16.97 | -14.97 ≈ | -134.70 | -13.30 |
| Operating cash flow | -845.3 k ≈ | -5.0 m | -2.0 m | -697.7 k ≈ | -5.1 m ≈ | -7.5 m | -2.5 m | -1.6 m ≈ |
| Capex | -259.9 k ≈ | 74.3 k | 17.3 k | 11.3 k ≈ | 46.2 k ≈ | 0 | 0 | 0 ≈ |
| Share repurchases | 1.3 k ≈ | 0 | — | — | 0 ≈ | 2.0 k | — | — |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 8.0 m | 8.4 m | 10.1 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +5.4% | +20.4% |
| Net income | -36.8 m | 710.5 k | -137.7 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | −19,484.0% |
| Diluted EPS | -96.45 | -39.46 | -16.03 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | -461.6% | 8.5% | -1,360.9% |
| Free cash flow | -8.5 m | -11.3 m | -15.4 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 245.3 k USD
- Financial debt
- 2.6 m USD
- Net debt
- 2.3 m USD
- Equity
- 98.2 m USD
- Total assets
- 108.8 m USD
- Debt / equity
- 0.03x
- Current ratio
- 0.31x
- ROE
- -278.2%
- ROA
- -201.4%
- FCF margin
- -152.2%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 8.0 m | 8.4 m | 10.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 230.2 k | 6.3 m | 4.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 2.2 m | 2.1 m | 5.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Operating income | -11.3 m | -14.9 m | -133.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | — | 1.3 m | 1.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| EBITDA | — | -13.6 m ≈ | -132.9 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 2.5 m | 2.5 m | 1.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -36.8 m | 719.6 k | -137.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Income tax | 7.0 k | 9.2 k | -8.5 k | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Net income | -36.8 m | 710.5 k | -137.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -96.45 | -39.46 | -16.03 | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 381.5 k | 353.9 k | 8.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 76.9 k | 453.2 k | 245.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Oct 2026verified |
| Receivables | 721.9 k | 638.9 k | 347.8 k | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Inventories | 2.8 m | 2.5 m | 1.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Current assets | 5.3 m | 3.9 m | 2.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 6.4 m | 5.4 m | 1.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 0 | 589.9 k | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 0 | 421.2 k | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Total assets | 26.3 m | 28.0 m | 108.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 5.2 m | 5.0 m | 2.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | 14.3 m | 13.2 m | 2.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 62.8 m | 13.8 m | 8.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 69.7 m | 27.2 m | 10.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Equity | -43.4 m † | 791.8 k † | 98.2 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | — | 4.6 m | — | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Dec 2024verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -8.5 m | -11.2 m | -15.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Capex | 26.5 k | 106.4 k | 74.8 k | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -8.5 m ≈ | -11.3 m ≈ | -15.4 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -24.1 k | -101.3 k | -16.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 8.4 m | 11.7 m | 31.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
| Share repurchases | 11.3 k | 3.7 k | 2.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- score weight coverage: 41.7% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 2.3 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
42% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: score weight coverage: 41.7% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | -1,156.0% | 0 (vs peers) | 25% |
| Net margin · Quality | -2,064.0% | 6 (vs peers) | 15% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -374.0x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 15% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.3x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -727.8% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 20% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 0.1% | 2 (on a fixed band) | 15% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet0/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality2/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partial2/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
IP STRATEGY HOLDINGS, INC. (IPST). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 10.1 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 20.4%; net margin -2,064.0%; ROE -2,713.2%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (score weight coverage: 41.7% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
What contradicts it
- ROIC: -1,156.0%
- Net margin: -2,064.0%
- Interest coverage: -374.0x
- Current ratio: 0.3x
- FCF yield: -727.8%
- Shareholder yield (distributions): 0.1%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Beverages (SIC 2080) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 17 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOCoca Cola Co | 412.1 bn | 28.2 | 42.6% | 28.7% | +1.9% | +31% / +64% |
| DEODIAGEO plc | 237.6 bn | 92.4 | 24.0% | 9.1% | +0.3% | +7% / −30% |
| PEPPepsico Inc | 194.1 bn | 18.7 | 50.1% | 10.8% | +2.3% | −4% / −15% |
| KDPKeurig Dr Pepper Inc. | 50.1 bn | 37.2 | 5.7% | 7.1% | +8.2% | +32% / +17% |
| BF-ABrown Forman Corp | 14.9 bn | 20.3 | 18.1% | 18.4% | −1.2% | +10% / −48% |
| PRMBPrimo Brands Corp | 7.6 bn | 79.4 | 3.2% | 1.5% | +29.3% | +34% / +46% |
| COCOThe Vita Coco Company, Inc. | 3.7 bn | 32.9 | 32.0% | 15.7% | +18.2% | +23% / +133% |
| WESTWestrock Coffee Company | 1.0 bn | — | — | -4.9% | +39.8% | +138% / +13% |
| BUDABuda Juice, Inc. | 83.2 m | 34.5 | 19.3% | 17.1% | +11.8% | unavailable / unavailable |
| SRXHSRX Global Inc. | 18.0 m | — | -70.8% | -254.8% | −81.3% | −96% / −100% |
| WVVIWillamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. | 8.3 m | — | -3.3% | -5.9% | −6.5% | −37% / −68% |
| YHCLQR House Inc. | 2.9 m | 0.2 | -88.2% | -1,589.2% | −37.4% | −98% / −100% |
| IPSTIp Strategy Holdings, Inc. | 2.3 m | — | -2,713.2% | -2,064.0% | +20.4% | −99% / unavailable |
| EDVAEndovia Health Sciences, Inc. | 1.2 m | — | — | -53,856.5% | −90.9% | −96% / −100% |
| BRCCBRC Inc. | 903.4 k | — | -14.2% | -1.5% | +1.7% | −23% / −77% |
| IBGInnovation Beverage Group Limited | 593.4 k | — | — | -223.4% | −5.1% | −94% / unavailable |
| STZConstellation Brands, Inc. | — | — | 23.9% | 20.9% | −10.5% | +7% / −40% |
| ABEVAmbev S.A. | — | — | 16.6% | 17.6% | −1.4% | +9% / +1% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for IPST from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
IP Strategy Holdings combines a digital asset treasury built around the native token of a blockchain network for intellectual property rights with a craft spirits business. Most recent revenue came from validator operations, which are now threatened by an announced migration of that network to another platform 2.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company holds a significant token position and has built its own validator infrastructure, with high margins in the digital segment.
- The treasury policy sets a clear commitment to long-term accumulation of its core asset.
- The spirits segment has broad reach through direct sales and diversified distribution channels.
Weaknesses
- Financial results depend heavily on token prices, producing large swings in gains and losses.
- The company reported operating losses in fiscal 2025 and has historically posted net losses in most years.
- The spirits segment remains under cost pressure and is in the middle of restructuring.
Opportunities
- Diversifying into other token-based income sources, such as options, lending or new services, could offset validator revenue.
- Expanding brand licensing through the TBN model could bring royalty revenue with low costs.
- Direct-to-consumer sales could lift margins in the premium spirits segment.
Threats
- The network migration could stop the validator rewards that are the main revenue source.
- Regulation could classify tokens as securities, affecting the treasury strategy.
- Successive token unlocks could create selling pressure and lower prices.
Risks
- Network migrationhigh
The announced migration to another platform could eliminate the validator infrastructure and its associated revenue, with no certain completion date 2.
- Token price volatilityhigh
The value of held tokens has fluctuated greatly, and value changes are recorded directly in results, producing large gains and losses 1.
- Unlocks and selling pressuremedium
The release of locked tokens could increase supply and reduce price, affecting validator revenue 1.
- Regulatory uncertaintymedium
Classifying tokens as securities could impose extra requirements and affect treasury operations 1.
- Liquidity and deactivation periodsmedium
Staked tokens can be unavailable for a period, which may limit the ability to meet short-term obligations 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the network migration ends with alternative token income, the company could keep its asset exposure and return to recurring revenue.
- A rise in token value could generate significant accounting gains given the large treasury position.
- If the spirits segment meets its licensing and direct sales targets, margins could improve and reduce dependence on digital assets.
What would break the thesis
- If the network migration removes the validator without alternatives, main revenue could disappear quickly.
- A fall in token price could generate large accounting losses and weaken investor confidence.
- The spirits segment is small relative to its market and could remain unprofitable if restructuring fails.
What to watch
- Timing and terms of the Sui migration and its effect on the validator2027
- Whether alternative token income arrangements replace validator revenueQ1 2027
- Margin and volume trends in the spirits segment after restructuringnext 10-Q
- Regulatory clarifications on the classification of tokensnext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
The company runs two segments: digital asset management built on validator infrastructure and intellectual property management, and a traditional craft spirits segment through its subsidiary Heritage Distilling. After the August 2025 private placement of about 220 million dollars, the company held 53.2 million tokens, of which 43.5 million were staked through its own validator 12. The spirits segment is becoming lighter, with third-party production, direct-to-consumer sales, wholesale distribution and licensing through the TBN tribal network 1.
Treasury and capital allocation are governed by a policy that keeps tokens at no less than 95 percent of treasury reserves and treats them mainly as a long-term accumulation asset 1. The company used limited covered call options to generate premium income, but this adds further exposure 12.
Segments
Digital asset management and validator
This segment covers token holdings and validator operations, with revenue from staking rewards. The company staked most of its treasury, and part was moved to third-party custodians for longer-term contracts 1. The announced migration to Sui could halt current validator revenue, with no defined alternative yet 2.
Market context
The craft spirits segment operates in a global market of about 288 billion dollars, where the company pursues niche share through direct sales reaching 96.8 percent of the US population 2. The market for digital assets tied to intellectual property rights is early-stage, and token values fluctuate sharply, directly influencing reported results 1.
In validation, revenue depends on the number of tokens staked, network yield and token price, all external to the company 1. Selling pressure from successive token unlocks could reduce price and therefore the value of revenue 1.
Trends
- Migration of the network to Suiheadwind
The October 2026 announcement of a network migration could eliminate the validator infrastructure that generates revenue, if no alternatives emerge 2.
- Interest in digital assets held as treasury reservestailwind
Companies holding digital assets as treasury reserves may attract investors seeking crypto exposure, which could support future financing 1.
- Regulatory uncertainty for tokensheadwind
Tokens could be classified as securities, which would impose additional rules and could affect the treasury strategy 1.
- Premium spirits demand and direct channelsmixed
Direct-to-consumer sales and licensing could support better margins for premium brands, but consumption remains sensitive to macroeconomic conditions 12.
Competitive position
The company faces well-funded competitors both in network validation and in craft spirits, and loss of market share is a stated risk 1. In validation, competition comes from operators that can accept token delegations and offer similar staking services 1.
In spirits, competition comes from established craft brands and from operators that already have distribution networks and licensing programs, which could limit volume growth 12.
- Independent validator operators
Competitors in network validation that can attract token delegations and offer comparable staking services.
- Established craft whiskey brands
Competitors on distributor shelves and in direct channels, with brands already known to consumers.
- Custody service providers
Competitors for safekeeping and staking of tokens, which the company already uses through third-party contracts.
- Other digital asset treasury companies
Companies holding digital assets as treasury reserves that compete for capital and investor attention.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- How founders are using AI to own their IP strategySifted (EU startups) · 24 Aug 2026 · EN
The latest news item in our archive is from 24 Aug 2026; the newest SEC filing is from 27 Oct 2026. The press archive comes from the RSS feeds we follow and does not necessarily cover the latest event — the filings alongside do.
SEC filings
- Current report27 Oct 2026Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report23 Oct 2026
- Current report01 Sept 2026Delisting notice · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report25 Jun 2026Departure or appointment of officers · Shareholder vote · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report20 May 2026
- Current report14 May 2026Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement29 Apr 2026
- Current report21 Apr 2026Item 3.03 · Amendments to articles or bylaws · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report16 Apr 2026Departure or appointment of officers · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report14 Apr 2026Shareholder vote · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. · 14 Apr 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. · 23 Oct 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.