olivLaw · US equity research
Westwater Resources, Inc. WWR
Metal Mining · SIC 1000 · Vertical: Metal Mining (SIC 1000)
Westwater Resources is building an integrated battery-grade natural graphite business, from mine to market, in Coosa County, Alabama, with a planned capacity of 12,500 mt of CSPG per year in Phase I. As China dominates the global graphite supply chain, the company could become an important domestic source if the remaining Phase I funding, about 115 million USD, is secured.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) stock was 0.41 USD (+2.00% on the day), with market capitalisation 52.5 m USD, beta 1.23, 52-week range 0.39–1.24 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): net income of -4.3 m USD, diluted EPS -0.03 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 38.3
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 0.38 – 0.45
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.35 · band width 16.4%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 0.50 / 0.64
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.03 / -0.03
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −15.0% | −1.1% | −13.9 pp | — |
| 3 months | −5.1% | −0.5% | −4.7 pp | — |
| 6 months | −39.1% | +4.4% | −43.5 pp | — |
| Year to date | −45.6% | +12.3% | −57.9 pp | — |
| 1 year | −65.1% | +13.5% | −78.7 pp | −9.4% |
| 3 years | −33.1% | +76.4% | −109.5 pp | +102.6% |
| 5 years | −88.0% | +63.7% | −151.6 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research & development | 254.0 k | 327.0 k | 182.0 k | 275.0 k | 370.0 k | 312.0 k | 550.0 k | 355.0 k |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 63.0 k | 62.0 k | 152.0 k | 154.0 k | 244.0 k | 195.0 k | 190.0 k | 192.0 k |
| Net income | -3.1 m | -2.8 m | -2.7 m | -3.9 m | -9.8 m | -10.9 m | -4.7 m | -4.3 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.05 | -0.05 ≈ | -0.04 | -0.05 | -0.12 | -0.10 ≈ | -0.04 | -0.03 |
| Operating cash flow | 1.4 m ≈ | -2.1 m | -2.3 m | -2.4 m ≈ | -3.3 m ≈ | -2.0 m | -4.0 m | -2.5 m ≈ |
| Capex | 1.1 m ≈ | 1.1 m | 2.9 m | 2.1 m ≈ | 1.2 m ≈ | 5.4 m | 1.6 m | 729.0 k ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Net income | -35.7 m | -10.6 m | -23.6 m | -16.1 m | -11.1 m | -7.8 m | -12.7 m | -27.3 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | unavailable | -1.58 | -0.49 | -0.25 | -0.15 | -0.22 | -0.32 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Free cash flow | unavailable | unavailable | -15.3 m | -20.3 m | -66.0 m | -69.7 m | -12.0 m | -21.6 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 48.6 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 181.5 m USD
- Total assets
- 194.5 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 4.20x
- ROE
- -17.4%
- ROA
- -16.0%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research & development | — | — | 1.1 m | 2.9 m | 1.2 m | 1.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | -11.2 m | — | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 16 Feb 2021verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | — | 20.0 k | 146.0 k | 221.0 k | 249.0 k | 745.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -13.9 m | -16.1 m | -11.1 m | -7.8 m | -12.7 m | -27.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -23.6 m | -16.1 m | -11.1 m | -7.8 m | -12.7 m | -27.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -1.58 | -0.49 | -0.25 | -0.15 | -0.22 | -0.32 | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 8.8 m | 32.7 m | 44.9 m | 52.0 m | 58.5 m | 86.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 50.3 m | 115.3 m | 75.2 m | 10.9 m | 4.3 m | 48.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 52.6 m | 115.6 m | 76.1 m | 11.6 m | 4.9 m | 48.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 9.0 m | 14.5 m | 90.1 m | 132.4 m | 137.9 m | 143.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 61.9 m | 133.0 m | 168.4 m | 149.8 m | 146.4 m | 194.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 1.7 m | 3.0 m | 23.0 m | 6.0 m | 9.5 m | 4.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 4.3 m | 5.3 m | 25.1 m | 7.8 m | 11.8 m | 11.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 4.5 m | 6.8 m | 26.4 m | 9.4 m | 13.2 m | 13.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 57.5 m † | 126.2 m † | 142.0 m † | 140.4 m † | 133.1 m † | 181.5 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -15.2 m | -16.9 m | -13.2 m | -11.4 m | -5.8 m | -9.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 81.0 k | 3.4 m | 52.8 m | 58.3 m | 6.1 m | 11.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -15.3 m ≈ | -20.3 m ≈ | -66.0 m ≈ | -69.7 m ≈ | -12.0 m ≈ | -21.6 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -4.1 m | -2.1 m | -52.8 m | -58.3 m | -4.6 m | -11.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 63.9 m | 84.0 m | 25.9 m | 5.4 m | 3.9 m | 65.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 2 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 12.5% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 52.5 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
13% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the reported interest expense is far older than the latest period (the filer changed its XBRL tag): a stale figure is not used
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 2 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 12.5% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 5.1x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 33% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -39.4% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 67% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial100/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
WESTWATER RESOURCES, INC. (WWR). Latest full fiscal year: 2019; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: ROE -19.1%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 2 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 12.5% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Current ratio: 5.1x
What contradicts it
- FCF yield: -39.4%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, Net margin, FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Metal Mining (SIC 1000) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 26 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHPBhp Group Limited | 406.8 bn | 45.2 | 19.5% | 17.6% | −7.9% | +46% / +31% |
| SCCOSouthern Copper Corp | 149.3 bn | 23.0 | 53.2% | 37.3% | +17.4% | +35% / +163% |
| RIORio Tinto PLC | 106.2 bn | 13.9 | 17.0% | 17.3% | +7.4% | +18% / +22% |
| FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc. | 89.9 bn | 29.2 | 21.8% | 16.2% | +1.8% | +46% / +68% |
| HBMHudbay Minerals Inc. | 8.8 bn | 15.4 | 19.7% | 25.7% | +9.4% | +31% / +388% |
| CLFCleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 7.3 bn | — | -8.5% | -2.4% | −3.0% | −2% / −25% |
| BVNBuenaventura Mining Co Inc | 7.3 bn | 18.1 | 12.6% | 34.9% | +40.1% | +16% / +202% |
| MPMP Materials Corp. | 6.4 bn | — | -4.1% | -19.9% | +10.1% | −42% / +126% |
| EROEro Copper Corp | 3.2 bn | 12.2 | 34.6% | 33.6% | +67.1% | +21% / +150% |
| NEXANexa Resources S.A. | 1.6 bn | 11.9 | 14.6% | 4.4% | +8.5% | +70% / +103% |
| IEIvanhoe Electric Inc. | 1.2 bn | — | -8.4% | -1,138.7% | +11.8% | −46% / −32% |
| USARUSA Rare Earth, Inc. | 1.1 bn | — | -23.6% | -2,159.3% | unavailable | −39% / −20% |
| TMCTMC the metals Co Inc. | 1.0 bn | 4.2 | -1,123.2% | — | unavailable | −67% / +103% |
| USASAmericas Gold And Silver Corporation | 986.9 m | — | -61.6% | -74.1% | +17.7% | −31% / +413% |
| ASMAvino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 769.3 m | 79.0 | 7.0% | 12.2% | +50.8% | −15% / +746% |
| LARLithium Argentina AG | 682.1 m | — | -9.5% | — | +12.9% | −24% / −21% |
| SGMLSigma Lithium Corporation | 626.1 m | — | -67.4% | -45.6% | −27.3% | −50% / −81% |
| GSMFerroglobe PLC | 547.5 m | — | -25.9% | -12.8% | −18.8% | −34% / −49% |
| ALOYRealloys Inc. | 459.5 m | — | -155.8% | -5,144.4% | −5.3% | −5% / +68% |
| THMInternational Tower Hill Mines Ltd | 455.2 m | — | -2.8% | — | unavailable | −10% / +222% |
| LZMLifezone Metals Limited | 336.9 m | — | -16.7% | -1,289.2% | +652.2% | +1% / −60% |
| USAUU.s. Gold Corp. | 186.4 m | — | -55.2% | — | −30.9% | −35% / +239% |
| PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp. | 83.9 m | — | -46.1% | — | −54.7% | −20% / +146% |
| WWRWestwater Resources, Inc. | 52.5 m | — | -19.1% | — | unavailable | −65% / −33% |
| COPRIdaho Copper Corporation | 25.7 m | — | -187.5% | — | −63.5% | unavailable / unavailable |
1- and 3-year price returns: for WWR from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Westwater Resources is building an integrated battery-grade natural graphite business, from mine to market, in Coosa County, Alabama, with a planned capacity of 12,500 mt of CSPG per year in Phase I 1. As China dominates the global graphite supply chain, the company could become an important domestic source if the remaining Phase I funding, about 115 million USD 2, is secured.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company holds an integrated resource-to-processing project in the United States and a US patent for its graphite purification method 1.
- The R&D lab and qualification line let the company produce samples for customers and offer in-house quality control testing 2.
- Offtake agreements with SK On and Hiller Carbon remain in effect, providing a core commercial underpinning for the project 1.
Weaknesses
- The company has no operating revenue and depends entirely on financing to cover its spending 1.
- The plant has not yet operated at commercial scale, and the company has never run a full-scale graphite processing facility 1.
- Financing for the rest of Phase I is not fully secured, and several capital sources have been paused or have caused dilution for shareholders 2.
Opportunities
- If the EXIM loan closes and other government funders get involved, the project could reduce its reliance on dilutive capital 2.
- Policies favouring domestic production of critical materials could support new contracts with battery makers and defence suppliers 1.
- The largely unexplored Coosa deposit could later provide additional feedstock or sales to third parties 1.
Threats
- Competition from subsidised or low-cost Chinese producers could limit the prices the company can charge 1.
- Losing a key customer or delays in contracts could weaken lender confidence and the project timeline 1.
- Changes in tariff policy and court challenges could alter market conditions in ways that are hard to predict 1.
Risks
- Uncertain financing for Phase Ihigh
The company has no committed source for the rest of Phase I, and if it cannot be raised, construction could be slowed or halted 12.
- No commercial production yethigh
The company is not producing at commercial scale and has no reliable operating cash source, which could create further capital needs 1.
- Cost overruns and delaysmedium
Pressures from tariffs, energy and inflation could raise the budget or push back schedules, given the complexity of permitting 12.
- Loss of offtake commitmentsmedium
FCA's withdrawal from its offtake agreement shows customer commitments can be revoked, which could weaken support for debt financing 1.
- Graphite price volatilitylow
If graphite prices fall or alternative anode technologies develop, the return on invested capital could be limited 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- The company could benefit from strong political support for domestic graphite production if it obtains further government funding after the EXIM approval 2.
- If the Kellyton plant qualifies customers, its position as a non-FEOC supplier could become a real competitive advantage 1.
- The Coosa deposit, largely unexplored, could reduce reliance on third parties for raw material over the long term 1.
What would break the thesis
- The company has no revenue and depends on external funding, and if capital becomes unavailable the project could be postponed 1.
- The loss of the FCA contract and the pause in debt syndication suggest the commercial support could be fragile 1.
- If China keeps its cost advantage, demand for US-made supply could remain limited even with higher tariffs 1.
What to watch
- Signing of definitive EXIM loan documentation and any other government financing sourcesQ3 2026
- Progress of Coosa deposit permitting, including the ADEM decision and USACE review2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
Westwater Resources, Inc. is an energy technology company developing battery-grade natural graphite materials through a mine-to-market strategy anchored in two projects in Coosa County, Alabama: the Kellyton Graphite Plant and the Coosa Graphite Deposit 1. The company shifted its focus to graphite in 2017, though it was originally incorporated in 1977 1.
In 2025 and the first half of 2026, activity centred on plant construction, permitting for the mine and financing. FCA terminated its offtake agreement, but agreements with SK On and Hiller Carbon remain in effect 1. In August 2026 EXIM approved an approximately 25 million USD direct loan for the plant, subject to definitive documentation 2.
Segments
Kellyton Graphite Plant (CSPG processing)
The Kellyton plant aims to produce CSPG for lithium-ion battery anodes, with a planned capacity of 12,500 mt per year in Phase I 1. The current estimated cost of Phase I is 245 million USD, of which about 130 million USD had been incurred through June 30, 2026 2.
Market context
The graphite market is highly concentrated: China produces about 76% of global flake graphite output and around 90% of graphite anodes 1. Demand is supported by electric vehicles and by storage systems for grids and data centres, and the company cites the IEA on rapidly growing battery demand 1.
Antidumping and countervailing duties on Chinese AAM imports, along with policies supporting domestic production, could improve the competitive position of US producers, but the tariff framework has changed frequently and is subject to judicial review 1.
Trends
- Supply chain concentration and geopolitical risktailwind
US dependence on imported battery graphite and Chinese export restrictions could sustain interest in domestic sources if these trends persist 1.
- Growth of energy storage for grids and data centrestailwind
Battery storage is increasingly seen as part of energy security, which could raise long-term graphite demand 1.
- Shifts in electric vehicle policymixed
In North America, reduced incentives slowed demand, while Europe accelerated, making the demand picture uneven 1.
- Tariff uncertainty and construction costsheadwind
Tariffs and energy costs have put pressure on the construction budget, which could extend timelines or raise project costs 12.
Competitive position
Competition comes from large global producers, many government-controlled or well capitalised, particularly in China, which processes over 90% of the world's graphite for battery anodes 1. Westwater says a domestic, non-FEOC supplier could be a differentiator for customers assessing supply chain resilience 1.
The company intends to compete on quality, consistency, price, qualification timelines and supply reliability, and an advantage could be its purification patent, which avoids hydrofluoric acid 1. Exploration and development companies seeking new graphite sources or processing capacity also compete for capital and customers 1.
- Chinese graphite and anode producers
These producers dominate global flake graphite output and anode production, benefiting from a low-cost base and scale 1.
- Synthetic graphite producers
Synthetic graphite is a direct substitute in anodes, and the company cites competition from better-funded producers of it 1.
- Foreign companies not subject to the same environmental rules
The company notes that some foreign competitors may operate without the same environmental and regulatory requirements as a US producer 1.
- Graphite exploration and development companies
Companies seeking new natural graphite sources or downstream processing capacity compete for financing and customers 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report14 Sept 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report10 Aug 2026
- Current report22 May 2026Amendments to articles or bylaws · Shareholder vote · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report12 May 2026
- Current report09 Apr 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report01 Apr 2026Termination of a material agreement · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement31 Mar 2026
- Annual report19 Mar 2026
- Current report29 Jan 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report12 Nov 2025
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Westwater Resources, Inc. · 19 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Westwater Resources, Inc. · 10 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Westwater Resources, Inc. · 07 Aug 2025
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.