olivLaw · US equity research
Zone Frontier Inc. ZONE
Specialty Cleaning, Polishing and Sanitation Preparations · SIC 2842 · Vertical: Chemicals and allied products (SIC 284x)
Zone Frontier, formerly CleanCore Solutions, reoriented in 2026 from aqueous ozone cleaning products and a Dogecoin treasury strategy toward building data center infrastructure for AI companies. It aims to support over one gigawatt of computing power by 2030, yet it remains small, loss-making and carries an audit opinion with substantial doubt about going concern, while its annual revenue of 3.4 million USD still comes almost entirely from cleaning products.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Zone Frontier Inc. (ZONE) stock was 3.76 USD (−24.50% on the day), with market capitalisation 1.9 bn USD, beta 8.45, 52-week range 0.10–5.70 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q4 2026): revenue of 885.9 k USD (−0.8% YoY), net income of -19.2 m USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 61.5
- strong (55–70)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- -2.81 – 6.88
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.68 · band width 475.6%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 0.90 / 0.57
- uptrend (price > SMA50 > SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- 1.20 / 0.95
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +2,814.7% | −1.1% | +2,815.8 pp | — |
| 3 months | +1,128.8% | −0.5% | +1,129.2 pp | — |
| 6 months | +1,019.0% | +4.4% | +1,014.7 pp | — |
| Year to date | +1,346.2% | +12.3% | +1,333.8 pp | — |
| 1 year | +248.1% | +13.5% | +234.6 pp | +7.1% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +76.4% | unavailable | −12.3% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q4 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 | Q3 '26 | Q4 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 364.9 k | 257.3 k | 557.9 k | 892.8 k | 904.7 k | 1.1 m | 543.7 k | 885.9 k |
| Cost of revenue | 179.4 k | 195.3 k | 246.8 k | 464.9 k | 368.2 k | 341.5 k | 963.0 k | 444.4 k |
| Gross profit | 185.5 k | 62.0 k | 311.1 k | 427.8 k | 536.5 k | 727.4 k | -419.3 k | 441.5 k |
| Operating income | -816.7 k | -964.0 k | -716.8 k | -3.9 m | -8.2 m | -20.7 m | -19.0 m | -10.1 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 39.8 k | 39.9 k | 39.9 k | 84.1 k | 89.9 k | 63.1 k | 61.6 k | 63.6 k |
| Interest expense | 39.3 k | 41.0 k | 92.6 k | 183.1 k | 133.1 k | -62.7 k | -72.5 k | -161.7 k |
| Net income | -856.1 k | -1.0 m | -809.4 k | -4.1 m | -13.4 m | -104.4 m | -37.3 m | -19.2 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.10 | -0.12 | -0.10 | — | -0.49 | -0.51 | -0.17 | — |
| Operating cash flow | -799.8 k | -862.6 k ≈ | -571.9 k ≈ | -103.5 k | -3.8 m | -3.4 m ≈ | -7.6 m ≈ | -3.3 m |
| Capex | 6.5 k | 2.6 k ≈ | 9.8 k ≈ | 13.5 k | 11.7 k | 5.3 k ≈ | 23.6 k ≈ | -3.1 k |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
EPS unavailable in the issuer's structured filings (e.g. a partnership reports per unit, not per share).
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.6 m | 2.1 m | 3.4 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +29.2% | +64.3% |
| Net income | -2.3 m | -6.7 m | -174.2 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | -142.2% | -325.3% | -5,112.7% |
| Free cash flow | -1.6 m | -2.4 m | -18.2 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
- Cash
- 15.4 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 51.5 m USD
- Total assets
- 52.5 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 21.24x
- ROE
- -657.5%
- ROA
- -571.3%
- FCF margin
- -534.1%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.6 m | 2.1 m | 3.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 809.2 k | 1.1 m | 2.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 795.8 k | 986.5 k | 1.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Operating income | -1.9 m | -6.4 m | -58.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 155.1 k | 203.8 k | 265.9 k | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| EBITDA | -1.8 m ≈ | -6.2 m ≈ | -57.7 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 335.0 k | 356.1 k | -140.4 k | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Net income | -2.3 m | -6.7 m | -174.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 2.0 m | 1.5 m | 15.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Receivables | 467.3 k | 657.7 k | 458.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Inventories | 672.3 k | 1.3 m | 909.2 k | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Current assets | 3.2 m | 3.8 m | 18.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 10.6 k | 32.5 k | 53.8 k | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 2.2 m | 2.2 m | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 1.5 m | 2.0 m | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Total assets | 7.5 m | 8.5 m | 52.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 176.1 k | 909.3 k | 466.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 1.5 m | 2.8 m | 880.8 k | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 3.7 m | 7.0 m | 994.8 k | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Equity | 3.7 m † | 1.5 m † | 51.5 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -1.5 m | -2.3 m | -18.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Capex | 10.4 k | 32.4 k | 37.6 k | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -1.6 m ≈ | -2.4 m ≈ | -18.2 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -10.4 k | -614.2 k | -130.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 3.2 m | 2.4 m | 162.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 28 Sept 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 4 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 1.9 bn USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
25% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -5,112.7% | 4 (vs peers) | 25% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -413.1x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 25% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 21.2x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 17% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -0.9% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 33% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet40/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial4/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Zone Frontier Inc (ZONE). Latest full fiscal year: 2026; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 3.4 m USD in 2026; YoY growth 64.3%; net margin -5,112.7%; ROE -657.5%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Current ratio: 21.2x
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -5,112.7%
- Interest coverage: -413.1x
- FCF yield: -0.9%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Chemicals and allied products (SIC 284x) · same industry group (3-digit SIC) · compared with 24 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGPROCTER & GAMBLE Co | 387.8 bn | 25.2 | 29.4% | 18.2% | +3.3% | +13% / +9% |
| ECLEcolab Inc. | 88.4 bn | 42.9 | 20.7% | 12.0% | +2.2% | +14% / +64% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Company | 78.5 bn | 38.7 | 358.9% | 9.6% | +1.4% | +23% / +25% |
| KVUEKenvue Inc. | 37.1 bn | 21.9 | 16.3% | 10.9% | −2.1% | +34% / +4% |
| CHDChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. | 26.4 bn | 34.5 | 17.8% | 12.4% | +1.6% | +32% / +16% |
| CLXThe Clorox Company | 12.0 bn | 15.9 | — | 11.2% | +0.2% | −8% / −31% |
| ELFe.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 6.7 bn | 113.6 | 6.0% | 3.4% | +24.6% | +49% / −4% |
| IPARInterparfums, Inc. | 4.0 bn | 23.3 | 19.5% | 11.3% | +2.5% | +52% / −1% |
| COTYCoty Inc. | 3.1 bn | — | -18.5% | -10.4% | −1.5% | +5% / −70% |
| ZONEZone Frontier Inc | 1.9 bn | — | -657.5% | -5,112.7% | +64.3% | +248% / unavailable |
| SCLStepan Company | 1.6 bn | 374.7 | 0.4% | 0.2% | +7.0% | +56% / −14% |
| EPCEdgewell Personal Care Company | 1.4 bn | — | -6.2% | -4.2% | −1.3% | +66% / −15% |
| SLSNSolesence, Inc. | 64.6 m | — | -15.1% | -3.8% | +18.6% | −60% / +22% |
| BYAHPark Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. | 56.5 m | — | -885.8% | -965.0% | +6.0% | −98% / unavailable |
| AXILAxil Brands, Inc. | 38.2 m | 16.7 | 23.3% | 9.3% | +17.5% | +10% / unavailable |
| UGUnited-Guardian, Inc. | 31.5 m | 12.8 | 21.4% | 22.0% | −13.4% | +18% / −16% |
| WNWMeiwu Technology Company Limited | 30.8 m | — | -34.2% | -262.5% | +4,368.0% | −98% / −100% |
| CABRCaring Brands, Inc. | 9.3 m | — | -3,889.1% | -183,298.7% | unavailable | −13% / unavailable |
| BNKKBonk, Inc. | 9.3 m | — | -332.4% | -2,330.4% | +201.6% | −82% / −99% |
| YCBDcbdMD, Inc. | 4.5 m | — | -40.3% | -13.8% | −1.5% | −34% / −93% |
| ODDOddity Tech Ltd | — | 12.0 | 32.6% | 13.7% | +25.2% | −50% / −37% |
| ELEstee Lauder Companies Inc | — | 111.7 | 9.3% | 2.4% | +5.0% | +19% / −12% |
| YSGYatsen Holding Limited | — | — | -2.7% | -1.9% | +32.2% | −67% / −49% |
| ULUnilever PLC | — | — | 53.3% | 18.7% | −3.8% | −2% / +25% |
| HLNHaleon plc | — | — | 10.2% | 15.1% | −1.8% | −6% / +8% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for ZONE from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 28 Sept 2026; since then the company filed 10-K/A (28 Oct 2026).
In brief
Zone Frontier, formerly CleanCore Solutions, reoriented in 2026 from aqueous ozone cleaning products and a Dogecoin treasury strategy toward building data center infrastructure for AI companies. It aims to support over one gigawatt of computing power by 2030, yet it remains small, loss-making and carries an audit opinion with substantial doubt about going concern, while its annual revenue of 3.4 million USD still comes almost entirely from cleaning products 1.
SWOT
Strengths
- A contracted anchor tenant for the Minnesota project reduces speculative development risk, and the company has raised public equity to fund its share of that project 1.
- A site strategy built on available power in rural and industrial markets could speed delivery compared with competitors in established data center hubs 1.
- Its NYSE American listing gives access to public equity and debt markets and allows its shares to be used as currency for future acquisitions 1.
Weaknesses
- The company has a very short operating history, large losses, and an audit opinion with substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern 1.
- Dependence on a single major tenant for the data center projects, and revenue concentration in a few cleaning customers, are clear vulnerabilities 1.
- The company will need additional financing through equity or debt, which could dilute existing shareholders 1.
Opportunities
- If the Texas and Minnesota projects are delivered on time, they could create long-term recurring revenue from leasing space and power 1.
- Expanding to more sites and attracting other tenants could diversify its customer and developer base 1.
- Selling the cleaning business could release capital for the infrastructure strategy if the transaction is completed 1.
Risks
- Going concern doubthigh
The auditor expressed substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern, and current resources could prove insufficient for the next twelve months 1.
- Dependence on one tenanthigh
The entire Minnesota campus is leased to a single customer, so a payment failure would seriously affect revenue and debt service 1.
- Financing and dilutionmedium
If financing cannot be obtained on acceptable terms, the company could have to cut spending, and new shares would dilute shareholders 1.
- Construction and delivery delaysmedium
Reliance on a few equipment vendors and on labor could delay delivery and raise costs 1.
- Power outages and cyber securitymedium
Data centers are vulnerable to power loss, disasters and cyber attacks, and the company does not presently have a formal disaster recovery plan 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the projects are delivered on schedule, the company could move from very small revenue to long-term infrastructure income backed by multi-year contracts with a major tenant 1.
- An anchor tenant and a public equity commitment partly reduce speculative risk for the first project, which could help attract other tenants 1.
- Access to public capital markets could allow funding of later sites without relying only on lenders 1.
What would break the thesis
- The company has large losses, an audit opinion with substantial doubt, and resources that could prove insufficient for a year, making additional financing necessary 1.
- Dependence on a single customer for the main project means that any problem with that customer would directly hit the whole new segment 1.
- The data center market is dominated by large, well-funded operators, and a newcomer with a short history could struggle to win contracts 1.
What to watch
- Delivery of the first phase of the Minnesota campus and the start of lease revenueQ1 2027
- Progress of the West Texas project and securing power for its first phase2028
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 28 Sept 2026; since then the company filed 10-K/A (28 Oct 2026).
The business
On June 8, 2026 the company announced its new direction, led by a new chief executive, and its intention to move away from the cleaning products business and the Dogecoin treasury strategy 1. The main project is a Minnesota campus with a ten-year tenancy agreement with Cerebras Systems, which could generate revenue in the first quarter of 2027 1. A second project in West Texas, with HST Technologies, Inc., is planned to supply an initial phase of 200 megawatts by 2029 1.
Segments
Critical AI Infrastructure
The segment focuses on building data centers on powered land in rural and industrial areas of Texas and Minnesota. It had generated no revenue through June 30, 2026, and the Cerebras contract for the Minnesota campus is the main expected source of future income 1.
CleanCore cleaning products
This segment generated all of the company's revenue in fiscal 2026, from selling aqueous ozone nanobubble products through distributors and directly to customers. The company intends to sell the business but had no binding contract with a buyer as of September 28, 2026 1.
Market context
Demand for computing capacity and power tied to artificial intelligence is growing quickly, and data center developers are seeking land with available power. The company's revenue is small, and demand for its cleaning products has remained uncertain, according to its own description of the market 1.
Trends
- Strong demand for AI data centerstailwind
AI companies are competing hard for power and space, which could favor fast projects on land with existing power, such as the Minnesota campus 1.
- Rising competition in data center developmentheadwind
New competitors are entering the market, and Bitcoin mining operators are converting their power capacity into AI data centers, which could slow the company's access to new sites 1.
- Cryptocurrency volatilityheadwind
The value of Dogecoin produced large fair value losses, which led the company to exit its treasury strategy 1.
- Trade policy and tariffsmixed
New US tariffs and retaliatory measures could raise costs for imported equipment and cleaning products, although the suppliers for the data center business are described as domestic 1.
Competitive position
AI infrastructure faces many well-capitalized data center operators and new entrants, as well as converted Bitcoin mining operations. In cleaning products the market is highly competitive, with larger and smaller companies that often have greater brand recognition and scale 1.
- Established data center operators
Large, well-capitalized companies already building compute capacity for AI, cited in the annual report as competition 1.
- Bitcoin mining operators converting to AI
Companies turning their power footprint into AI data centers, a direct rival for land and tenants 1.
- Cleaning and sanitation companies
Large and small firms in the cleaning industry, some with greater scale, brand recognition and market share than the company 1.
- Alternative green cleaning providers
Newer producers of eco-friendly cleaning products that may react faster to market changes 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report29 Oct 2026Item 3.03 · Departure or appointment of officers · Amendments to articles or bylaws · Financial statements and exhibits
- Annual report (amendment)28 Oct 2026
- Current report14 Oct 2026Material agreement · Termination of a material agreement · Acquisition or disposition of assets · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report30 Sept 2026Material agreement · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Annual report28 Sept 2026
- Current report11 Sept 2026Departure or appointment of officers
- Current report20 Aug 2026Other events
- Current report19 Aug 2026Amendments to articles or bylaws · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report12 Aug 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report29 Jul 2026Material agreement · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Zone Frontier Inc. · 28 Sept 2026
- [2] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Zone Frontier Inc. · 13 Nov 2025
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.