olivLaw · US equity research
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. CDNL
Heavy Construction Other Than Bldg Const - Contractors · SIC 1600 · Vertical: Heavy Construction Other Than Bldg Const - Contractors (SIC 1600)
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. is a full-service infrastructure contractor performing wet utility installation, grading, paving and site preparation for residential, commercial, industrial and public clients across the Southeastern United States. The company is expanding quickly, with revenue of 456.0 million USD in fiscal 2025 and 2026 guidance of 880 to 900 million USD.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (CDNL) stock was 14.93 USD (−4.96% on the day), with beta 1.87, 52-week range 13.69–94.31 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 226.9 m USD (+113.9% YoY), net income of 4.7 m USD (−34.8% YoY), diluted EPS 0.26 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 29.7
- oversold (≤ 30)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 10.83 – 22.00
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.37 · band width 68.1%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 26.19 / 43.49
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -3.49 / -4.22
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −48.0% | −1.1% | −46.9 pp | — |
| 3 months | −76.4% | −0.5% | −75.9 pp | — |
| 6 months | −72.5% | +4.4% | −76.9 pp | — |
| Year to date | −38.3% | +12.3% | −50.6 pp | — |
| 1 year | unavailable | +13.5% | unavailable | −9.2% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +76.4% | unavailable | +57.8% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 81.8 m | 106.1 m | 167.5 m | 226.9 m |
| Cost of revenue | 65.3 m | 83.5 m | 133.3 m | 190.9 m |
| Operating income | 7.9 m | 11.7 m | 14.8 m | 15.5 m |
| Interest expense | 1.0 m | 1.6 m | 2.2 m | 3.5 m |
| Pre-tax income | 6.6 m | 10.2 m | 12.5 m | 10.1 m |
| Income tax | 0 | 714.3 k | 1.1 m | -1.0 m |
| Net income | 5.5 m | 7.2 m | 3.4 m | 4.7 m |
| Diluted EPS | — | — | 0.23 | 0.26 |
| Operating cash flow | 12.1 m | 4.2 m ≈ | 9.3 m | 12.7 m ≈ |
| Capex | 10.4 m | 12.2 m ≈ | 9.3 m | 24.7 m ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
EPS unavailable in the issuer's structured filings (e.g. a partnership reports per unit, not per share).
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 247.9 m | 315.2 m | 456.0 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +27.1% | +44.7% |
| Net income | 20.6 m | 21.4 m | 22.7 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | +3.8% | +6.2% |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | 8.3% | 6.8% | 5.0% |
| Free cash flow | 18.6 m | 21.9 m | -5.9 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- unavailable USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 139.5 m USD
- Total assets
- 394.6 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 2.35x
- ROE
- 27.9%
- ROA
- 8.5%
- FCF margin
- -1.3%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 247.9 m | 315.2 m | 456.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 199.1 m | 249.9 m | 359.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 48.8 m ≈ | 65.3 m ≈ | 96.1 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026derived |
| Operating income | 29.5 m | 35.9 m | 40.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Interest expense | 4.0 m | 4.8 m | 6.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | 24.3 m | 29.6 m | 33.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 0 | 1.4 m | 2.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | 20.6 m | 21.4 m | 22.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Revenue − Cost of revenue.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receivables | 34.1 m | 38.3 m | 61.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | — | 77.4 m | 215.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | — | 49.8 m | 84.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 7.1 m | 7.1 m | 23.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | — | 0 | 15.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | — | 140.3 m | 394.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | — | 38.3 m | 60.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | — | 70.5 m | 91.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | — | 117.0 m | 255.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 7.5 m | 23.4 m | 139.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 30.9 m | 42.6 m | 37.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 12.3 m | 20.8 m | 43.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | 18.6 m ≈ | 21.9 m ≈ | -5.9 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -22.4 m | -21.0 m | -101.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -2.7 m | -8.0 m | 139.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 4 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 22.9% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: unavailable
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
23% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · input data missing
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 22.9% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | 2.7% | 60 (vs peers) | 27% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | -64.0% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 27% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | 5.1x | 56 (on a fixed band) | 27% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 3.6x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 18% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet74/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality30/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc (CDNL). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 456.0 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 44.7%; net margin 2.7%; ROE 7.4%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 22.9% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Current ratio: 3.6x
What contradicts it
- FCF conversion: -64.0%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Heavy Construction Other Than Bldg Const - Contractors (SIC 1600) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 10 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JJacobs Solutions Inc. | 18.7 bn | 54.3 | 9.6% | 2.4% | +4.6% | +19% / +52% |
| STRLSterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 8.7 bn | 15.9 | 43.3% | 12.9% | +17.7% | −18% / +347% |
| FLRFluor Corporation | 6.4 bn | — | -46.2% | -12.8% | −5.0% | +11% / +25% |
| GVAGranite Construction Inc | 5.8 bn | — | -25.2% | -5.0% | +10.4% | +23% / +188% |
| KBRKBR, Inc. | 5.0 bn | 11.4 | 27.4% | 5.7% | +1.0% | −4% / −23% |
| ROADConstruction Partners, Inc. | 1.9 bn | 38.9 | 15.0% | 4.1% | +54.2% | −9% / +137% |
| ORNOrion Group Holdings, Inc. | 318.8 m | 50.9 | 3.5% | 0.6% | +7.0% | −22% / +63% |
| SHIMShimmick Corporation | 98.8 m | — | — | -3.8% | +2.6% | −9% / −61% |
| SLNDSouthland Holdings, Inc. | 40.8 m | — | — | -67.0% | −21.2% | −76% / −86% |
| FERFerrovial N.V. | — | — | 14.8% | 9.2% | +5.2% | −10% / +79% |
| CDNLCardinal Infrastructure Group Inc | — | — | 7.4% | 2.7% | +44.7% | unavailable / unavailable |
1- and 3-year price returns: for CDNL from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. is a full-service infrastructure contractor performing wet utility installation, grading, paving and site preparation for residential, commercial, industrial and public clients across the Southeastern United States. The company is expanding quickly, with revenue of 456.0 million USD in fiscal 2025 and 2026 guidance of 880 to 900 million USD 13.
SWOT
Strengths
- The integrated model, with in-house crews and equipment, gives control over schedules and quality, which supports the company's reputation with clients 1.
- A large backlog and long-standing homebuilder relationships provide revenue visibility and the ability to negotiate contracts 13.
- Strong organic growth and a track record of integrating acquisitions show management's ability to expand into new markets 3.
Weaknesses
- Margins compressed in the second quarter of 2026 due to higher subcontracting and equipment rental costs in developing markets 3.
- Geographic concentration in North Carolina and reliance on fixed-price contracts expose the company to estimating risk and regional demand declines 1.
- The Up-C structure and the payment obligations under the tax receivable agreement complicate the financial structure and may reduce cash available to shareholders 1.
Opportunities
- The fragmented Southeastern market offers acquisition opportunities, and expansion into Georgia and South Carolina could open new client segments 13.
- Diversifying toward commercial, industrial and public clients could reduce dependence on the residential cycle and improve margins over the long term 13.
- Bringing paving in-house in Atlanta through the Allied Paving acquisition could shorten timelines and raise margins if integration goes to plan 3.
Threats
- An economic downturn or lower public funding could reduce demand for new projects and delay work in the backlog 1.
- Rising costs of materials, fuel and labor could weigh on the profitability of fixed-price contracts 13.
- Severe weather and penalties for delays could affect results and the company's reputation 13.
Risks
- Geographic concentrationhigh
Operations are concentrated in North Carolina, and a decline in construction there could materially affect results 1.
- Cost estimation on fixed-price contractshigh
If cost estimates prove wrong or overruns occur, contract profitability could fall or losses could arise 1.
- Acquisition integrationmedium
Several acquisitions in a short period can strain administrative and operational resources and delay the synergies announced 13.
- Margin pressuremedium
Higher subcontracting and equipment rental costs, combined with corporate investment, reduced adjusted margins in the second quarter of 2026 3.
- Up-C structure and tax obligationslow
Payments to the continuing equity holders may absorb a significant part of the tax savings, reducing available cash flow 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If demand stays strong and acquisitions integrate well, revenue growth could continue and margins could return toward planned levels over the medium term 3.
- A position in the Southeastern United States, in a fragmented market with population growth, could allow further consolidation and expansion into new cities 13.
What would break the thesis
- If subcontracting and labor costs stay high, margins could remain below expected levels, especially in new markets 3.
- Dependence on North Carolina and residential demand could expose the company to a regional slowdown or to cuts in public investment 1.
- Repeated acquisitions could create integration difficulties and could dilute shareholders if partly funded with shares 13.
What to watch
- Adjusted EBITDA margin against the 16% to 18% guidanceQ3 2026
- Completion of the Allied Paving acquisition and its integrationQ4 2026
- Subcontracting and equipment rental costs in new markets2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
Backlog was 682.0 million USD at December 31, 2025 1 and reached 866 million USD at June 30, 2026 3, providing revenue visibility, although customers may cancel contracts in the backlog 1. Most revenue comes from fixed-unit price and lump sum contracts, which makes profitability sensitive to cost estimates 1.
In August 2026 the company announced the acquisition of Allied Paving, an Atlanta paving and heavy site contractor, for about 120 million USD, its third acquisition in 2026 after ALGC and Piedmont Pipe 3. Completion is expected in early October 2026 and it brings paving capabilities in-house in Atlanta 3.
Segments
Wet utilities and residential site work
The residential segment, the core of the business, covers water, sewer and stormwater installations for regional and national homebuilders, with long-standing customer relationships 12. It remained strong in the second quarter of 2026, while the company diversified toward commercial and industrial work 3.
Paving and commercial, industrial and public work
The commercial, industrial, municipal and state segment includes paving, concrete work and site services for larger projects, and acquisitions such as Allied Paving add paving capabilities 13. The company said expanding this segment raised subcontracting and equipment rental costs in developing markets, which weighed on second quarter 2026 margins 3.
Market context
Cardinal's North Carolina markets have seen strong population growth: the state grew 15.8% between 2010 and 2024 and is expected to grow 6.3% between 2024 and 2030 according to the state budget office 1. Demand for water and transport infrastructure is supported by this growth, and the company is expanding into South Carolina and Georgia 12.
The company describes its market as very fragmented and attractive, with many small providers, which leaves room for consolidation through acquisitions 1. Demand remains sensitive to economic cycles, public project funding and the cost of materials and labor 1.
Trends
- Population growth in the Southeasttailwind
Rapid population growth in North Carolina and neighboring states supports demand for water, sewer and road work, which could sustain project volume over the medium term 1.
- Consolidation through acquisitionsmixed
The company has integrated several regional firms and seeks small acquisitions to add capabilities and geography, which can speed growth but also complicates integration 13.
- Material and labor costsheadwind
Volatile prices for fuel, asphalt, cement and steel, along with scarce skilled labor, could compress margins if they cannot be passed on to clients 13.
- Strong residential demand and diversificationmixed
Residential demand remains strong, and extending toward commercial, industrial and public clients could reduce reliance on homebuilders but carries higher upfront costs 3.
Competitive position
The site services market in the Southeastern United States is fragmented, with local and regional contractors of varying size, as well as larger general contractors that subcontract much of the work 1. Cardinal differentiates itself through self-performed work with its own crews and equipment, which lets it offer shorter timelines 1.
Competition also plays out in bidding, where price can be decisive, but the company says its homebuilder relationships allow it to negotiate contracts rather than compete only on price 1. This position depends on keeping quality and schedule performance high 1.
- Regional and national general contractors
Larger general contractors compete for the same commercial and public projects but subcontract most site work, unlike Cardinal's integrated model 1.
- Local utility and site work providers
Small and mid-sized firms in North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia offer similar services in local niches and form part of the fragmented market Cardinal targets through acquisitions 1.
- Atlanta paving and site construction firms
Competitors in the Atlanta area are addressed through the Allied Paving acquisition, which signals a competitive regional market in which Cardinal seeks to consolidate 3.
- Subcontractors and equipment rental providers
Subcontractors and equipment rental firms are both suppliers and indirect competitors, since reliance on them raises costs when internal capacity is stretched 13.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Papa Leon pune bazele viitorului conclav și numește un cardinal filipinez decan al ColegiuluiG4Media · 09 Oct 2026 · RO
- Papa Leon pune bazele viitorului conclav și a numit un cardinal filipinez decan al ColegiuluiMediafax · 09 Oct 2026 · RO
- Papa Leon pune bazele viitorului conclav numindu-l pe un cardinal filipinez decan al cardinalilorMediafax · 09 Oct 2026 · RO
- Cardinal Visits SMU FridaySurge — GDELT DOC · 23 Sept 2026 · RO
- Cardinal Infrastructure Group’s (CDNL) Long-Term Growth Opportunity Remains IntactYahoo Finance — News · 23 Sept 2026 · EN
- Cardinal Health Targets 13%-15% EPS Growth as Specialty Momentum BuildsYahoo Finance — News · 19 Sept 2026 · EN
- Cardinal Health Sees Growth Normalize as Specialty, At-Home Investments ExpandYahoo Finance — News · 19 Sept 2026 · EN
- Cardinal Health (NYSE:CAH) Vs Danaher Corporation (NYSE:DHR) – Here’s The One Jim Cramer Said Did BetterYahoo Finance — News · 18 Sept 2026 · EN
- Cardinal Zuppi reports preparations for visit to Moscow in late SeptemberTASS (RU, EN) · 17 Sept 2026 · EN
- How Is Cardinal Health's Stock Performance Compared to Other Health Care Services Stocks?Yahoo Finance — News · 16 Sept 2026 · EN
- Papa abrogă scăderea salariilor cardinalilor din timpul pandemiei. Un cardinal câștigă între 4.500 și 5.000 euro lunarProfit.ro · 15 Sept 2026 · RO
- Will Alphabet Break Warren Buffett's Cardinal Rule of Investing?Yahoo Finance — News · 06 Sept 2026 · EN
- Jim Cramer Notes Cardinal Health (CAH) is “Too Attractive to Ignore”Yahoo Finance — News · 03 Sept 2026 · EN
- Hong Kong's Cardinal Zen loses appeal over protest fundNikkei Asia · 03 Sept 2026 · EN
- What to Know About the Latest Sale From Cardinal Health's Chief Accounting OfficerYahoo Finance — News · 23 Aug 2026 · EN
- Cardinal Health's CFO Moved $9.9 Million of Stock. Here's What Long-Term Investors Should KnowYahoo Finance — News · 23 Aug 2026 · EN
- Cardinal Health's Medical Segment Boss Sold $8 Million in Stock. Here's What to KnowYahoo Finance — News · 23 Aug 2026 · EN
- Cardinal Health's Pharma Chief Sold 7,354 Shares and Still Grew Her Stake by 47%. Here's How That HappenedYahoo Finance — News · 23 Aug 2026 · EN
- The CIO of Cardinal Health Parted With 11,650 Shares. Here's Whether It Matters for Long-Term InvestorsYahoo Finance — News · 23 Aug 2026 · EN
- Cardinal Health's Legal Chief Just Filed an Insider Transaction. Here's What to KnowYahoo Finance — News · 23 Aug 2026 · EN
The latest news item in our archive is from 09 Oct 2026; the newest SEC filing is from 19 Oct 2026. The press archive comes from the RSS feeds we follow and does not necessarily cover the latest event — the filings alongside do.
SEC filings
- Current report19 Oct 2026Material agreement · Item 3.02 · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report01 Oct 2026Item 3.02 · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report11 Sept 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report12 Aug 2026
- Current report11 Aug 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report05 Jun 2026Shareholder vote
- Quarterly report13 May 2026
- Current report12 May 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report (amendment)06 May 2026Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement24 Apr 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. · 23 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. · 12 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. · 11 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.