olivLaw · US equity research
Intuitive Machines, Inc. LUNR
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical Sys · SIC 3812 · Vertical: Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical Sys (SIC 3812)
Intuitive Machines builds, connects and operates space infrastructure, from spacecraft and satellites to communication networks and lunar and orbital services. In the second quarter of 2026 the company reported record revenue of 206 million USD and a backlog of 1.8 billion USD, which may show a shift from one-off missions toward recurring services.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) stock was 9.93 USD (−5.25% on the day), with market capitalisation 835.8 m USD, beta 3.09, 52-week range 8.05–45.70 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 206.2 m USD (+309.8% YoY), net income of -46.4 m USD, diluted EPS -0.29 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 35.6
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 9.17 – 13.30
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.18 · band width 36.7%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 13.44 / 19.61
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.96 / -0.98
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −30.5% | −1.1% | −29.4 pp | — |
| 3 months | −29.0% | −0.5% | −28.6 pp | — |
| 6 months | −62.3% | +4.4% | −66.7 pp | — |
| Year to date | −38.8% | +12.3% | −51.1 pp | — |
| 1 year | −4.5% | +13.5% | −18.1 pp | −2.2% |
| 3 years | +191.2% | +76.4% | +114.8 pp | +54.2% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 58.5 m | 54.7 m | 62.5 m | 50.3 m | 52.4 m | 44.8 m | 186.7 m | 206.2 m |
| Research & development | — | — | 911.0 k | 461.0 k | — | — | 5.6 m | 7.7 m |
| Operating income | -13.7 m | -13.4 m | -10.1 m | -28.6 m | -15.4 m | -33.1 m | -39.2 m | -47.1 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 482.0 k ≈ | 540.0 k | 623.0 k | 752.0 k | 815.0 k ≈ | 1.4 m | 13.0 m | 14.9 m |
| Interest expense | 13.0 k | 5.0 k | 26.0 k | 72.0 k | 1.3 m | 2.7 m | 4.9 m | 4.5 m |
| Pre-tax income | -80.4 m | -165.1 m | 975.0 k | -38.2 m | -10.0 m | -55.7 m | -52.5 m | -62.8 m |
| Income tax | 50.0 k | -13.0 k | 0 | 0 | 5.0 k | 4.0 m | 2.0 k | 8.0 k |
| Net income | -55.4 m | -149.2 m | -11.4 m | -25.2 m | -6.8 m | -39.9 m | -37.4 m | -46.4 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.83 | -1.72 ≈ | -0.11 | -0.22 | -0.06 | -0.33 ≈ | -0.25 | -0.29 |
| Operating cash flow | -17.9 m ≈ | -2.0 m | 19.4 m | -19.3 m ≈ | -7.2 m ≈ | -7.3 m | -54.8 m | -57.1 m ≈ |
| Capex | 1.4 m ≈ | 4.9 m | 6.1 m | 8.1 m ≈ | 11.8 m ≈ | 15.6 m | 9.9 m | 24.1 m ≈ |
| Dividends paid | 0 ≈ | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Share repurchases | 0 ≈ | 0 | 20.7 m | 0 ≈ | 0 ≈ | 0 | 0 | 0 ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 85.9 m | 79.6 m | 228.0 m | 210.1 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | −7.4% | +186.6% | −7.9% |
| Net income | -190.4 k | 61.8 m | -283.4 m | -83.3 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | −558.9% | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | 2.42 | -4.63 | -0.73 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | −291.3% | unavailable |
| net % | -0.2% | 77.6% | -124.3% | -39.7% |
| Free cash flow | -15.6 m | -75.2 m | -67.7 m | -56.0 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 582.6 m USD
- Financial debt
- 335.3 m USD
- Net debt
- -247.3 m USD
- Equity
- -754.4 m USD
- Total assets
- 757.2 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 4.96x
- ROE
- unavailable
- ROA
- -15.0%
- FCF margin
- -26.6%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 85.9 m | 79.6 m | 228.0 m | 210.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 75.5 m | 100.5 m | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2024verified |
| Gross profit | 10.4 m ≈ | -20.9 m ≈ | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2025derived |
| Operating income | -5.5 m | -61.1 m | -57.4 m | -87.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 1.1 m | 1.4 m | 1.9 m | 3.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | -4.4 m ≈ | -59.7 m ≈ | -55.5 m ≈ | -83.6 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | — | — | 92.0 k | 4.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -6.4 m | 10.2 m | -346.9 m | -102.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | -23.0 k | 40.0 k | 37.0 k | 4.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -190.4 k | 61.8 m | -283.4 m | -83.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | — | 2.42 | -4.63 | -0.73 | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | — | 25.6 m | 61.4 m | 115.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Revenue − Cost of revenue; Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 25.8 m | 4.5 m | 207.6 m | 582.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | 1.3 m | 16.9 m | 44.8 m | 12.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | — | — | — | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 15 May 2026verified |
| Current assets | 41.0 m | 31.6 m | 293.2 m | 618.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 21.2 m | 18.3 m | 23.4 m | 68.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | — | — | 0 | 18.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | — | — | 0 | 13.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 67.0 m | 85.9 m | 355.4 m | 757.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | 16.1 m | 8.0 m | 0 | — | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2025verified |
| Long-term debt | 3.9 m | 0 | 0 | 335.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 86.1 m | 81.5 m | 98.8 m | 124.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 117.9 m | 137.5 m | 351.5 m | 553.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | -50.9 m | -261.4 m | -1.0 bn | -754.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 784.0 k | -45.3 m | -57.6 m | -14.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 16.4 m | 29.9 m | 10.1 m | 41.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -15.6 m ≈ | -75.2 m ≈ | -67.7 m ≈ | -56.0 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -16.4 m | -29.9 m | -10.1 m | -56.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 12.1 m | 53.9 m | 272.8 m | 446.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 8.0 m | 0 | — | SEC (XBRL)· 25 Mar 2025verified |
| Share repurchases | — | — | 0 | 20.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- score weight coverage: 39.6% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 835.8 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
40% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · input data missing
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: score weight coverage: 39.6% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -26.6% | 13 (vs peers) | 16% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 34.7% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 21% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -10.0x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 16% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.7x | 71 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | -22.5% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 21% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 0.0% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 16% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet29/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial13/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partial0/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
INTUITIVE MACHINES, INC. (LUNR). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 210.1 m USD in 2025; YoY growth -7.9%; net margin -26.6%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (score weight coverage: 39.6% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 34.7%
- Current ratio: 1.7x
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -26.6%
- Interest coverage: -10.0x
- FCF yield: -22.5%
- Shareholder yield (distributions): 0.0%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical Sys (SIC 3812) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 8 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp | 74.6 bn | 16.6 | 26.1% | 10.4% | +2.2% | −8% / +11% |
| GRMNGarmin Ltd | 55.7 bn | 27.8 | 22.4% | 25.6% | +15.1% | +48% / +137% |
| LHXL3harris Technologies, Inc. | 48.4 bn | 24.2 | 10.3% | 5.2% | unavailable | −7% / +36% |
| TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc | 29.1 bn | 28.9 | 9.5% | 15.8% | +7.9% | +27% / +57% |
| DRSLeonardo DRS, Inc. | 9.5 bn | 26.1 | 13.2% | 9.4% | +12.8% | +4% / +93% |
| NNNextNav Inc. | 1.5 bn | — | -77.9% | -2,812.5% | −19.3% | −38% / +121% |
| LUNRIntuitive Machines, Inc. | 835.8 m | — | — | -26.6% | −7.9% | −5% / +191% |
| CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc. | 101.4 m | 20.3 | 8.4% | 17.6% | +30.7% | +2% / +52% |
| MINDMind Technology, Inc | 33.6 m | — | -6.8% | -6.8% | −12.6% | −61% / −29% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for LUNR from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Intuitive Machines builds, connects and operates space infrastructure, from spacecraft and satellites to communication networks and lunar and orbital services. In the second quarter of 2026 the company reported record revenue of 206 million USD and a backlog of 1.8 billion USD, which may show a shift from one-off missions toward recurring services.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company has strong demand visible in its backlog, record quarterly revenue and a vertically integrated structure covering building, connecting and operating space assets 123.
- The Lanteris acquisition adds satellite manufacturing capacity and experience on well-tested GEO platforms, which could support new contracts 1.
- Its position in defense space programs, including missile-tracking contracts and AMDT3, offers revenue tied to public policy priorities 23.
Weaknesses
- Customer concentration is very high, with one customer generating most revenue in 2025 1. A problem with that customer would directly affect results.
- The company has a history of operating losses and has relied on outside capital, so its investment plans could require new funding 1.
- Integrating several acquisitions in one year adds operational complexity and the risk of delivery delays 1.
Opportunities
- If NASA network and data relay services expand, the company could turn Goonhilly and KinetX assets into recurring revenue 12.
- Commercial GEO satellite contracts and defense programs could raise backlog if new customers confirm orders 23.
- Lunar infrastructure programs, including data relay constellations, could open a new market if missions succeed 1.
Threats
- Government shutdowns and budget shifts can delay federal contracts and payments 12.
- Insolvency proceedings at customers in the EchoStar group could reduce collections and affect active contracts 2.
- Large competitors and new entrants in the space industry could push down prices and reduce the company's market share 1.
Risks
- Customer concentrationhigh
One customer accounted for most revenue in 2025, and a delay or non-payment could affect results 1.
- EchoStar customer insolvencyhigh
Bankruptcy proceedings at EchoStar entities affect Lanteris collections and contracts, and the final outcome is still uncertain 2.
- Acquisition integrationmedium
Integrating Lanteris, KinetX and the Goonhilly operations could distract management and create unforeseen costs 12.
- Funding and lossesmedium
The company has a history of operating losses and could need additional capital if investment plans expand 1.
- Government shutdownslow
Federal funding interruptions can delay new contracts and payments for work already performed 12.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- The record backlog and rising quarterly revenue suggest that demand for integrated space services could continue if execution stays reliable 23.
- Expansion into defense space and network services could diversify revenue sources and reduce reliance on one type of mission 23.
- If the recurring service model works, margins could improve over time, as management argues 13.
What would break the thesis
- Customer concentration and exposure to federal budgets make revenue vulnerable to political decisions the company does not control 1.
- Insolvency proceedings in the EchoStar group could reduce collections and could force provisions if recoveries fall short of estimates 2.
- A history of losses and the need for outside funding could limit flexibility if execution is delayed 1.
What to watch
- Delivery against 2026 revenue guidance of 900 million to 1 billion USDnext 10-K
- Development of backlog and new defense contracts, including AMDT3Q3 2026
- Status of EchoStar insolvency proceedings and Lanteris collectionsQ3 2026
- Integration of Goonhilly and COMSAT and their contribution to revenue and network services2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
Founded in 2013, the company organizes its work into three integrated capabilities: Build (designing and delivering spacecraft, landers and satellites), Connect (integrating assets into communication, navigation and data relay networks) and Operate (mission operations and infrastructure services). According to the annual report 1, the company aims to extend its activity from single missions to infrastructure operated over long periods.
The Lanteris acquisition, completed on January 13, 2026, added commercial GEO satellite and defense satellite manufacturing, and the KinetX acquisition strengthened deep-space navigation 1. The company also completed the acquisition of the Goonhilly UK and US operations on August 3, 2026 2.
Main customers are US civil and defense agencies, especially NASA, the Space Development Agency and the Missile Defense Agency, plus commercial customers in GEO and lunar delivery 1. Customer concentration is high, and the 2025 concentration on one major customer is treated as a major risk in the annual report 1.
Segments
Build (spacecraft and satellites)
The Build segment includes lunar landers, defense satellites and GEO platforms and is the main source of near-term revenue according to the annual report 1. Contracts for missile-tracking satellites for the Space Development Agency, delivered through Lanteris, belong to this segment 1.
Market context
The company describes an addressable market including ground stations, satellites in LEO, GEO and cislunar space, lunar landers and robotic surface systems, with growing US government interest in a persistent presence in space 1. Demand for commercial GEO satellites is cyclical, however, and orders depend on operators deferring contracts 1.
Defense and US civil customers are the main growth drivers but also the most exposed to federal budgets and government shutdowns 12. The quarterly report mentions a contract of over 600 million USD for three commercial GEO satellites 2.
Trends
- Shift from missions to infrastructuretailwind
The company argues that moving from single missions to operated infrastructure could bring recurring revenue and better margins 1. The effect depends on customers adopting services, which is not yet proven at scale.
- Defense space demandtailwind
Growth in defense contracts, including AMDT3 and missile-tracking programs, has raised the share of national security revenue 23. If defense budgets change, new orders could be delayed.
- Federal budget uncertaintyheadwind
Government shutdowns and shifts in priorities can delay contracts and federal payments 12. The company describes these risks as outside its control.
- Exposure to satellite industry customersmixed
Insolvency proceedings at some EchoStar entities could affect Lanteris collections and active contracts, although the company has not so far recorded an additional provision 2. The final effect depends on the outcome of the proceedings.
Competitive position
Competitors include incumbents such as Lockheed Martin and Blue Origin, plus newer players such as Astrobotic and Firefly Aerospace in lunar mission contests 1. In GEO satellite and defense work, Lanteris competes with Airbus, Northrop Grumman, Rocket Lab and others 1.
In ground station and data relay services, competitors named in the annual report are Kongsberg Satellite Services, Swedish Space Corporation and Telespazio 1. The company's position depends on proving reliable lunar operations and winning new contracts.
- Lockheed MartinLMT
Incumbent in complex lunar missions and defense space programs, named as a competitor in the annual report 1.
- Blue Origin
Competitor in crewed lunar missions and the civil segment, named in the annual report 1.
- Astrobotic
Competitor on CLPS contracts, the same category of lunar deliveries 1.
- Airbus
Competitor for commercial GEO satellite construction, named for Lanteris 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Intuitive Machines (LUNR) Just Opened a New Market for Its IM 300 Platform. How Big Is the Opportunity?Yahoo Finance — News · 22 Sept 2026 · EN
- Intuitive Machines (LUNR) Rockets Higher as Analyst Bets on 100% UpsideYahoo Finance — News · 22 Sept 2026 · EN
- Why Intuitive Machines Stock Just PoppedYahoo Finance — News · 21 Sept 2026 · EN
- Rocket Lab Climbs 7% as Cantor Reiterates $122 Target on Launch Record; Intuitive Machines Jumps 10%, AST SpaceMobile Rises 6%Yahoo Finance — News · 21 Sept 2026 · EN
- Advance Auto Parts vs. Intuitive Machines: Which Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?Yahoo Finance — News · 16 Sept 2026 · EN
- Intuitive Machines vs. Vertiv: Which Industrials Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?Yahoo Finance — News · 15 Sept 2026 · EN
- Management Reiterates Optimistic FY26 Guidance for Intuitive Machines (LUNR)Yahoo Finance — News · 05 Sept 2026 · EN
- Planet Labs Sinks 8% Despite New Defense Contract, Intuitive Machines Pulls Back, AST SpaceMobile Sits Out Broad-Market RallyYahoo Finance — News · 03 Sept 2026 · EN
- Intuitive Machines Has 7 NASA Missions on the Manifest. Is the Stock Finally Worth Owning?Yahoo Finance — News · 03 Sept 2026 · EN
- Extreme Speculators Should Keep Close Tabs on Intuitive Machines (LUNR) StockYahoo Finance — News · 26 Aug 2026 · EN
The latest news item in our archive is from 22 Sept 2026; the newest SEC filing is from 22 Oct 2026. The press archive comes from the RSS feeds we follow and does not necessarily cover the latest event — the filings alongside do.
SEC filings
- Current report22 Oct 2026Departure or appointment of officers · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report13 Aug 2026
- Current report13 Aug 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report03 Aug 2026Material agreement · Regulation FD disclosure · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report08 Jun 2026Shareholder vote
- Current report03 Jun 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report15 May 2026
- Current report14 May 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement24 Apr 2026
- Current report (amendment)01 Apr 2026Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Intuitive Machines, Inc. · 19 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Intuitive Machines, Inc. · 13 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Intuitive Machines, Inc. · 13 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.