olivLaw · US equity research
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. HPP
Real Estate · SIC 6500 · Vertical: Real Estate (SIC 6500)
Hudson Pacific Properties is a vertically integrated REIT that owns and operates Class-A offices in West Coast tech hubs and studio properties for film and television. In 2026 the company shows a recovery, with occupancy up for a fourth consecutive quarter to 82.5% in in-service offices and a raised Core FFO outlook of $1.12 to $1.20 per diluted share.
At the close of 05 Nov 2026, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) stock was 8.76 USD (−17.05% on the day), with market capitalisation 475.2 m USD, dividend yield 0.00%, beta 1.41, 52-week range 5.51–16.91 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q1 2026): revenue of 181.9 m USD (−8.4% YoY), net income of -50.9 m USD, diluted EPS -0.82 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 34.1
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 8.71 – 12.53
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.01 · band width 35.9%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 11.50 / 10.89
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.49 / -0.42
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −24.4% | −1.1% | −23.3 pp | — |
| 3 months | −34.8% | −0.5% | −34.4 pp | — |
| 6 months | −25.6% | +4.4% | −30.0 pp | — |
| Year to date | −19.1% | +12.3% | −31.4 pp | — |
| 1 year | −48.1% | +13.5% | −61.6 pp | −12.9% |
| 3 years | −76.4% | +76.4% | −152.8 pp | −3.3% |
| 5 years | −95.3% | +63.7% | −159.0 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q1 2026 · 31 Mar 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q2 '24 | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 218.0 m | 200.4 m | 209.7 m | 198.5 m | 190.0 m | 186.6 m | 256.0 m | 181.9 m |
| Gross profit | 104.7 m | 85.6 m | 93.7 m | 85.2 m | 81.9 m | 82.7 m | 153.6 m | 80.3 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 86.8 m | 86.7 m | 89.1 m | 93.1 m | 94.8 m | 94.1 m | 93.0 m | 80.7 m |
| Interest expense | 44.2 m | 45.0 m | 44.1 m | 43.5 m | 48.1 m | 41.7 m | 38.9 m | 38.0 m |
| Pre-tax income | -47.0 m | -104.8 m | -174.5 m | -80.1 m | -87.3 m | -144.1 m | -281.1 m | -50.6 m |
| Income tax | 510.0 k | 2.2 m | -1.1 m | 194.0 k | 454.0 k | 24.0 k | -945.0 k | 348.0 k |
| Net income | -47.6 m | -107.0 m | -173.5 m | -80.3 m | -87.8 m | -144.1 m | -280.2 m | -50.9 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.33 | -0.69 | — | -3.70 | -0.41 | -0.30 | — | -0.82 |
| Operating cash flow | 35.6 m ≈ | 63.7 m ≈ | 162.0 k | 30.5 m | -2.0 m ≈ | 33.2 m ≈ | 59.3 m | 44.3 m |
| Dividends paid | 7.5 m ≈ | 0 ≈ | 0 | 353.0 k | 0 | 0 | -2.0 k | 557.0 k |
| Share repurchases | 0 ≈ | 0 ≈ | 0 | — | — | — | — | — |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 728.4 m | 818.2 m | 805.0 m | 896.8 m | 1.0 bn | 952.3 m | 842.1 m | 831.1 m |
| Revenue YoY | +0.0% | +12.3% | −1.6% | +11.4% | +14.4% | −7.2% | −11.6% | −1.3% |
| Net income | 111.8 m | 55.8 m | 16.4 m | 29.0 m | -16.5 m | -170.7 m | -381.4 m | -592.3 m |
| Net income YoY | +18.2% | −50.0% | −70.6% | +76.6% | −156.9% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | 0.63 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.04 | -0.39 | -9.54 | -18.05 | -12.81 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | +43.2% | −55.6% | −100.0% | unavailable | −1,075.0% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | 15.3% | 6.8% | 2.0% | 3.2% | -1.6% | -17.9% | -45.3% | -71.3% |
| Free cash flow | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 138.4 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 3.2 bn USD
- Total assets
- 7.3 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- unavailable
- ROE
- -18.9%
- ROA
- -7.7%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 805.0 m | 896.8 m | 1.0 bn | 952.3 m | 842.1 m | 831.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 505.2 m | 561.0 m | 612.4 m | 501.8 m | 388.0 m | 403.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 299.7 m | 343.6 m | 373.2 m | 397.8 m | 354.4 m | 375.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Interest expense | 113.8 m | 121.9 m | 149.9 m | 214.4 m | 177.4 m | 172.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | — | 29.0 m | -16.5 m | -163.9 m | -379.8 m | -592.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Income tax | -1.0 m | 0 | 0 | 6.8 m | 1.6 m | -273.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Net income | 16.4 m | 29.0 m | -16.5 m | -170.7 m | -381.4 m | -592.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 0.00 | 0.04 | -0.39 | -9.54 | -18.05 | -12.81 | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 153.2 m | 151.9 m | 143.7 m | 20.1 m | 20.2 m | 44.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.63 | 0.70 | 0.00 | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 113.7 m | 96.6 m | 255.8 m | 100.4 m | 63.3 m | 138.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Inventories | 0 | 1.6 m | 4.9 m | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 10 Feb 2023verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 8.4 m | 58.5 m | 130.3 m | 118.8 m | 127.1 m | 72.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 8.8 m | 109.4 m | 263.5 m | 264.1 m | 156.5 m | 8.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 285.8 m | 341.4 m | 393.8 m | 327.0 m | 327.5 m | 307.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Total assets | 8.4 bn | 9.0 bn | 9.3 bn | 8.3 bn | 8.1 bn | 7.3 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 4.2 bn | 4.7 bn | 5.4 bn | 4.7 bn | 5.0 bn | 4.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Equity | 4.0 bn | 4.2 bn | 3.7 bn | 3.5 bn | 3.1 bn | 3.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 302.0 m | 314.9 m | 369.5 m | 232.3 m | 164.7 m | 121.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Investing cash flow | -1.0 bn | -754.2 m | -378.1 m | 467.8 m | -250.5 m | 42.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 796.1 m | 486.7 m | 97.4 m | -866.7 m | 65.9 m | -100.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 155.0 m | 154.6 m | 145.4 m | 55.0 m | 15.4 m | 351.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
| Share repurchases | 80.2 m | 46.1 m | 37.2 m | 1.4 m | 0 | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Feb 2026verified |
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Market and valuation
9 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 4 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 50.0% of at least 60%
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 475.2 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
50% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 31.35 – 85.26 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- Net asset value (NAV)unavailable · input data missing
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Peers: P/B31.35 – 85.26 (Mid 47.72)18 companies used · median multiple 0.9x · quartiles 0.6x – 1.6xAEI, AHRT, AIRE, BEEP, CHCI, CIGI, CMTG, CURB, CWK, FOR, FRPH, GTY, IIPR, LPA, OPI, TRC, TRNO, UE
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 50.0% of at least 60%
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE · Quality | -19.8% | 14 (vs peers) | 13% |
| EBITDA margin · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -6.8% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 17% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| P/B · Valuation | 0.2x | 92 (vs peers) | 39% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Dividend yield · Returns | 0.0% | 0 (vs peers) | 30% |
| Payout ratio (EPS) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Growth0/100 · 1/1 factors with a value
- Quality· partial14/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Returns· partial0/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial92/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-03-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 831.1 m USD in 2025; YoY growth -1.3%; net margin -69.1%; ROE -19.8%.
The estimated value range is 31.35–85.26 USD per share (median of 1 methods, agreement: single method); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 47.72 USD, the price of 8.76 USD leaves a potential of 444.7% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of 81.6% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 50.0% of at least 60%).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- P/B: 0.2x
- The price is below the estimated value range
What contradicts it
- ROE: -19.8%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -6.8%
- Dividend yield: 0.0%
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): EBITDA margin, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), Payout ratio (EPS).
Versus the vertical median
Real Estate (SIC 6500) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 31 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRECbre Group, Inc. | 40.7 bn | 30.2 | 16.1% | 3.1% | +13.4% | −13% / +79% |
| VTMXVesta Real Estate Corporation, S.A.B. de C.V. | 32.6 bn | 131.1 | 9.1% | 85.4% | +12.2% | +18% / −3% |
| TRNOTerreno Realty Corporation | 7.4 bn | 20.0 | 8.3% | 68.1% | +24.5% | +7% / +17% |
| FSVFirstService Corporation | 7.0 bn | 48.5 | 14.9% | 3.5% | +5.4% | −2% / −2% |
| CIGIColliers International Group Inc. | 3.9 bn | 47.5 | 15.7% | 4.0% | +15.3% | −33% / −8% |
| CURBCurbline Properties Corp. | 3.6 bn | 122.8 | 1.3% | 11.2% | +51.3% | +23% / unavailable |
| CWKCushman & Wakefield Ltd. | 3.3 bn | 48.0 | 3.4% | 0.6% | +8.9% | −15% / +73% |
| UEUrban Edge Properties | 2.6 bn | 24.3 | 7.9% | 22.2% | +6.1% | +8% / +24% |
| GTYGetty Realty Corp. | 1.9 bn | 17.4 | 8.9% | 42.4% | +9.0% | +1% / −2% |
| IIPRInnovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 1.5 bn | 12.3 | 7.6% | 53.2% | −13.8% | +12% / −32% |
| FORForestar Group Inc. | 1.2 bn | 7.3 | 9.6% | 9.9% | +10.1% | −4% / −20% |
| DUOFangdd Network Group Ltd. | 516.4 m | — | -17.9% | -23.9% | +9.2% | −70% / −96% |
| AHRTAh Realty Trust, Inc. | 482.1 m | — | -6.7% | -18.2% | +4.1% | −1% / −41% |
| HPPHudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | 475.2 m | — | -19.8% | -69.1% | −1.3% | −48% / −76% |
| TRCTejon Ranch Co. | 453.7 m | 73.6 | 1.3% | 10.6% | +18.4% | +3% / +6% |
| FRPHFrp Holdings, Inc. | 351.3 m | 1,988,413.4 | 0.0% | 0.2% | +2.6% | −21% / −34% |
| MLPMaui Land & Pineapple Co Inc | 287.0 m | — | -16.1% | -28.6% | +68.2% | −9% / −3% |
| OPIOffice Properties Income Trust | 283.0 m | — | -40.5% | -73.0% | −11.8% | unavailable / unavailable |
| CMTGClaros Mortgage Trust, Inc. | 241.3 m | — | -36.5% | -391.9% | −24.4% | −49% / −86% |
| CHCIComstock Holding Companies, Inc. | 154.4 m | 6.2 | 36.4% | 32.2% | +22.6% | +36% / +321% |
| BEEPMobile Infrastructure Corporation | 94.6 m | — | -16.1% | -67.2% | −5.2% | −27% / −57% |
| LPALogistic Properties of the Americas | 72.1 m | 6.9 | 4.3% | 20.9% | +14.3% | −33% / unavailable |
| OZBelpointe PREP, LLC | 45.1 m | — | — | -212.1% | +243.4% | −44% / −53% |
| AEIAlset Inc. | 19.4 m | — | -43.4% | -951.4% | −78.8% | −82% / −57% |
| CWDCalibercos Inc. | 4.3 m | — | — | -117.3% | −60.7% | −82% / −99% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for HPP from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 3 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
| 5 years | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable | insufficient data Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable |
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Hudson Pacific Properties is a vertically integrated REIT that owns and operates Class-A offices in West Coast tech hubs and studio properties for film and television. In 2026 the company shows a recovery, with occupancy up for a fourth consecutive quarter to 82.5% in in-service offices and a raised Core FFO outlook of $1.12 to $1.20 per diluted share.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company describes itself as the only publicly traded owner and operator of both premier office and studio properties, giving differentiated exposure.
- Office occupancy has risen over recent quarters, and large contracts with the local government provide long-term visibility on cash flows.
- The company has experienced management, long-standing lender relationships and recognition for its sustainability program.
Weaknesses
- Leverage is high relative to total market capitalization, and credit ratings have been lowered several times.
- The portfolio is geographically concentrated in a few markets in California, Seattle, New York and Vancouver, increasing exposure to local events.
- High exposure to the technology and media industries makes revenue depend on those sectors and creates tenant concentration risk.
Opportunities
- Re-leasing vacant space and studios could add revenue without major capital outlays.
- Developing land with density rights and studio projects could open new long-term growth sources.
- Selective sales of non-core assets could reduce debt and fund projects with better returns.
Threats
- A new wave of layoffs or lower demand from tech and media could weigh on occupancy and rents.
- Higher financing costs or another rating downgrade could make refinancing debt more difficult.
- Changes to property taxation, including possible changes to California's Proposition 13 regime, could raise operating costs.
Risks
- High leveragehigh
The ratio of debt to total market capitalization is very high, and a further downgrade could raise costs and reduce access to financing.
- Concentration in tech and mediahigh
Revenue depends on demand from the tech and media sectors, which can be hit by layoffs, strikes or changes in tenant strategies.
- Geographic exposuremedium
Properties are concentrated in a few urban areas, exposing the company to local economic, regulatory and natural hazard risks.
- Property taxesmedium
Tax reassessments or legislative changes could raise property taxes paid, particularly in California.
- Acquisition and integration risklow
Acquisitions and integration of new assets may exceed budget or underperform expectations, which could affect financial results.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If office occupancy keeps rising, revenue and Core FFO could move above the current outlook.
- Long-term contracts with the San Francisco city and county government could provide a stable revenue base for years.
- If financing costs ease and ratings stabilize, the company could reduce pressure on its cash flow.
What would break the thesis
- If tech demand cools, occupancy and rents could fall again, weighing on office revenue.
- Large debt and lower credit ratings could make refinancing harder and raise financing costs.
- If the restructuring of production services does not succeed, studio revenue could stay under pressure.
What to watch
- Delivery of the Core FFO outlook and office occupancyQ3 2026
- Credit rating developments and refinancing costs2026
- Pace of studio leasing and development projectsnext 10-K
- Effect of asset sales and the production services restructuring2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
The company describes itself as a vertically integrated REIT offering end-to-end real estate solutions for tenants in technology and media. Its portfolio includes office properties of approximately 14.0 million square feet as of June 30, 2026, studios with 45 sound stages and production services assets, plus land with undeveloped density rights. Primary markets are Los Angeles, the San Francisco Bay Area, Seattle, New York and Vancouver.
Segments
Offices
The office segment consists of Class-A buildings in West Coast tech hubs, with approximately 13.9 million square feet at the end of 2025. Occupancy rose in 2026, and the company signed large leases, including with the City and County of San Francisco.
Studios
The studio segment includes sound stages and related services, with 74.6% of in-service stages leased on a trailing three-month basis in Q2 2026. Hollywood studios are almost fully leased, while the company restructures its production services assets.
Market context
The West Coast office market is affected by demand from the technology and AI sectors, while rents face downward pressure in some submarkets. Activity in the Los Angeles media industry and strike sensitivity influence demand for studios. If tech demand firms up, portfolio occupancy could keep rising.
Debt remains a central factor, with consolidated debt of approximately $3.4 billion in early 2026. Financing costs and access to capital markets can influence results, especially if credit ratings decline further.
Trends
- Recovery in tech office demandtailwind
Occupancy of in-service offices has risen over several consecutive quarters, and the company points to demand from AI and other tech services. If the trend persists, it could support rental revenue.
- Pressure on rents and renewalsheadwind
Many new and renewed leases carry lower effective cash rents, linked to re-leasing space signed at pre-pandemic peak rents. This could limit revenue growth per square foot.
- Debt costs and refinancingmixed
The company carries significant debt and has been downgraded by rating agencies, which could raise refinancing costs. On the other hand, much of its debt is now fixed or capped, reducing interest rate exposure.
- Restructuring of production servicesmixed
The company is closing certain production services lines and focusing on its vehicle fleet and core assets. If the restructuring succeeds it could simplify operations, but it may reduce revenue from these lines in the short term.
Competitive position
The company competes with other developers, owners and operators of offices and studios, many with greater financial resources. In transactions, competition can raise acquisition prices and lower sale proceeds. In leasing, competition could force concessions or higher tenant improvement spending.
- Other West Coast office developers and owners
Compete for the same tech tenants in Los Angeles, the Bay Area and Seattle.
- Los Angeles film studio owners
Compete for productions and stage rentals in the same media markets.
- Other REITs and real estate investment funds
May have access to cheaper capital and bid for the same properties.
- Private investors and private equity funds
May accept more risk and pay higher acquisition prices.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Hudson Pacific (HPP) Extends $1.1B Hollywood Loan. Can Leasing Improve?Yahoo Finance — News · 17 Sept 2026 · EN
The latest news item in our archive is from 17 Sept 2026; the newest SEC filing is from 05 Oct 2026. The press archive comes from the RSS feeds we follow and does not necessarily cover the latest event — the filings alongside do.
SEC filings
- Current report05 Oct 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report11 Sept 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report10 Aug 2026
- Current report05 Aug 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report22 Jun 2026Departure or appointment of officers
- Current report01 Jun 2026Shareholder vote
- Quarterly report08 May 2026
- Current report07 May 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement23 Apr 2026
- Annual report27 Feb 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. · 27 Feb 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. · 10 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. · 05 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.