olivLaw · US equity research
Sow Good Inc. SOWG
Food and Kindred Products · SIC 2000 · Vertical: Food and Kindred Products (SIC 2000)
Sow Good Inc. pioneered the freeze dried candy category, but in December 2025 it sold its manufacturing assets and moved to a commission-based distribution model without factories. The company is now evaluating strategic alternatives, and its net loss from continuing operations was 6.8 million USD in fiscal 2025.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Sow Good Inc. (SOWG) stock was 2.21 USD (+4.74% on the day), with market capitalisation 44.4 m USD, beta 1.13, 52-week range 1.13–14.55 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): net income of -3.9 m USD, diluted EPS -0.19 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 49.6
- neutral
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 1.84 – 2.32
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.77 · band width 23.4%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 2.53 / 4.09
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.08 / -0.13
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −7.9% | −1.1% | −6.8 pp | — |
| 3 months | −34.6% | −0.5% | −34.2 pp | — |
| 6 months | +95.6% | +4.4% | +91.2 pp | — |
| Year to date | −56.7% | +12.3% | −69.0 pp | — |
| 1 year | −79.5% | +13.5% | −93.1 pp | −44.5% |
| 3 years | −97.6% | +76.4% | −174.0 pp | −65.9% |
| 5 years | −95.5% | +63.7% | −159.2 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3.6 m | -30.6 m | 2.5 m | 1.9 m | 1.6 m | -5.9 m | — | — |
| Cost of revenue | 3.0 m | 2.6 m | 1.4 m | 2.0 m | 10.5 m | — | — | — |
| Gross profit | 556.0 k | -1.2 m | 1.1 m | -129.7 k | -8.9 m | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 3.8 m | -553.5 k | 1.6 m | 1.1 m | 3.6 m | -4.5 m | 1.7 m | 3.8 m |
| Operating income | -3.3 m | -13.6 m | -1.6 m | -1.2 m | -12.6 m | 12.5 m | -1.7 m | -3.8 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 8.6 k | -551.0 k | 135.9 k | 8.6 k | 8.6 k | -745.7 k | 2.5 k | 0 ≈ |
| Interest expense | 225.1 k | -502.2 k | 365.2 k | 113.2 k | 93.3 k | -229.1 k | 243.6 k | 105.2 k |
| Pre-tax income | -3.4 m | -12.5 m | -2.0 m | -1.3 m | -10.9 m | 10.9 m | -1.9 m | -3.9 m |
| Income tax | -62.3 k | -195.6 k | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Net income | -3.4 m | -4.2 m | -2.8 m | -4.2 m | -10.9 m | -22.9 m | -2.5 m | -3.9 m |
| Diluted EPS | -0.33 | -0.51 ≈ | -3.40 | -5.43 | -0.90 | -1.88 ≈ | -0.13 | -0.19 |
| Operating cash flow | -5.2 m ≈ | -3.3 m | -2.0 m | -514.3 k ≈ | -820.2 k ≈ | -970.1 k | -1.7 m | -2.6 m ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | ⚠ 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 0 | 466.6 k | 0 | 88.4 k | 428.1 k | 16.1 m | 0 | 0 |
| Revenue YoY | −100.0% | unavailable | −100.0% | unavailable | +384.1% | +3,653.7% | — | unavailable |
| Net income | -344.0 k | 4.1 m | -5.3 m | -6.9 m | -12.1 m | -3.1 m | -3.7 m | -40.6 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | −228.8% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | — | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | -0.21 | 2.58 | -2.82 | -1.61 | -2.51 | -0.59 | -0.40 | -3.44 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | −209.3% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | — | unavailable |
| net % | unavailable | 885.2% | unavailable | -7,772.7% | -2,832.6% | -19.0% | unavailable | unavailable |
| Free cash flow | -187.9 k | -9.7 m | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
The series breaks before 2024: earlier years come from the original reports of the issuer of that time, later years from a subsequent filing that restated the perimeter (a separation, discontinued operations). The year-on-year change across the break is not shown.
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 1.5 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- -2.6 m USD
- Total assets
- 3.8 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 0.55x
- ROE
- unavailable
- ROA
- -139.0%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 0 | 88.4 k | 428.1 k | 16.1 m | 0 | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 0 | 81.3 k | 308.3 k | 12.8 m | 19.0 m | — | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2025verified |
| Gross profit | 0 | 7.1 k | 119.8 k | 3.3 m | 13.0 m | — | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2025verified |
| SG&A | 3.0 m | 6.9 m | 10.7 m | 4.4 m | 11.1 m | 6.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | -3.0 m | -7.1 m | -10.9 m | -1.2 m | -11.1 m | -6.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 3.6 k | 208.4 k | 299.6 k | 459.3 k | 31.6 k | 33.1 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | -3.0 m ≈ | -6.9 m ≈ | -10.6 m ≈ | -761.3 k ≈ | -11.1 m ≈ | -6.6 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 386.2 k | 5.9 k | 1.3 m | 1.8 m | 741.2 k | 160.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | -5.3 m | — | -12.1 m | -3.1 m | -11.8 m | -6.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | -5.3 m | -6.9 m | -12.1 m | -3.1 m | -3.7 m | -40.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -2.82 | -1.61 | -2.51 | -0.59 | -0.40 | -3.44 | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 1.9 m | 4.3 m | 4.8 m | 5.2 m | 9.2 m | 11.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 1.9 m | 3.3 m | 276.5 k | 2.4 m | 3.7 m | 1.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | 0 | 12.4 k | 191.0 k | 2.6 m | 460.1 k | — | SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2025verified |
| Inventories | 141.4 k | 1.5 m | 1.9 m | 4.1 m | 0 | 22.9 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 2.4 m | 4.9 m | 2.6 m | 10.4 m | 25.1 m | 3.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 1.9 m | 2.7 m | 5.0 m | 6.7 m | 128.9 k | 21.7 k | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 6.4 m | 4.9 m | 0 | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2023verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 219.7 k | 304.2 k | 0 | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Apr 2023verified |
| Total assets | 12.3 m | 14.1 m | 8.9 m | 21.5 m | 54.7 m | 3.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 273.9 k | 279.3 k | 392.7 k | 853.5 k | 1.4 m | 1.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | — | 699.2 k | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Mar 2022verified |
| Current liabilities | 622.8 k | 403.1 k | 890.2 k | 5.8 m | 7.4 m | 6.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 2.3 m | 3.3 m | 6.1 m | 14.2 m | 22.7 m | 6.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 10.1 m † | 10.8 m † | 2.8 m † | 7.3 m † | 32.0 m † | -2.6 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -1.7 m | -5.6 m | -5.1 m | -4.8 m | -9.4 m | -4.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Investing cash flow | 3.3 m | -653.1 k | -2.6 m | -2.3 m | -5.9 m | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 262.9 k | 7.6 m | 4.7 m | 9.2 m | 16.7 m | 2.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2026verified |
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 2 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 10.4% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 44.4 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
10% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the input exists, but its latest figure is far older than the latest reported period: not used
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 2 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 10.4% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -26.2x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 60% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.1x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 40% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet0/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
SOW GOOD INC. (SOWG). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 0 USD in 2025; ROE -346.4%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 2 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 10.4% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
What contradicts it
- Interest coverage: -26.2x
- Current ratio: 0.1x
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, Net margin, FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Food and Kindred Products (SIC 2000) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 20 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZMondelez International, Inc. | 85.3 bn | 21.2 | 15.5% | 10.2% | +5.8% | +17% / −5% |
| CAGConagra Brands, Inc. | 7.3 bn | — | -24.9% | -17.0% | −2.9% | −14% / −46% |
| CPBThe Campbell’s Company | 6.9 bn | 17.8 | 10.4% | 4.1% | −5.0% | −24% / −42% |
| OTLYOatly Group AB | 5.1 bn | — | -247.9% | -17.7% | +4.7% | −34% / −55% |
| BYNDBeyond Meat, Inc. | 3.7 bn | — | — | 111.7% | −15.6% | −76% / −97% |
| STKHSteakholder Foods Ltd. | 2.3 bn | — | -266.3% | -112,470.0% | unavailable | −95% / −100% |
| FLOFlowers Foods Inc | 1.5 bn | 27.3 | 4.0% | 1.1% | unavailable | −34% / −66% |
| BRBRBellRing Brands, Inc. | 1.2 bn | 7.2 | — | 7.3% | +16.1% | −67% / −81% |
| SMPLThe Simply Good Foods Company | 1.2 bn | — | -9.6% | -11.5% | −6.5% | −32% / −66% |
| VITLVital Farms, Inc. | 450.8 m | — | -7.4% | -3.0% | +25.3% | −68% / −21% |
| UCFICN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp. | 287.8 m | 36.7 | 39.2% | 24.6% | +144.6% | −46% / unavailable |
| BGSB&G Foods, Inc. | 208.9 m | — | -15.8% | -4.0% | unavailable | −44% / −72% |
| CHSNChanson International Holding | 131.0 m | 112.0 | 0.5% | 1.0% | +0.2% | −99% / −100% |
| SOWGSow Good Inc. | 44.4 m | — | -346.4% | — | unavailable | −80% / −98% |
| MLECMoolec Science SA | 32.7 m | — | -86.4% | -130.0% | +521.5% | −86% / −100% |
| LSFLaird Superfood, Inc. | 26.9 m | — | -22.9% | -3.4% | +15.2% | −12% / +129% |
| BOFBranchOut Food Inc. | 25.9 m | — | -202.6% | -56.8% | +113.3% | −45% / +8% |
| BRLSBorealis Foods Inc. | 24.7 m | — | — | -56.5% | +8.2% | −38% / −90% |
| HAINThe Hain Celestial Group, Inc. | 13.7 m | — | -96.8% | -22.5% | −13.2% | −86% / −99% |
| DDCDDC Enterprise Limited | — | — | -124.4% | -123.3% | +4.6% | −96% / −100% |
| NOMDNomad Foods Limited | — | — | 5.3% | 4.5% | −2.2% | +2% / −22% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for SOWG from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Sow Good Inc. pioneered the freeze dried candy category, but in December 2025 it sold its manufacturing assets and moved to a commission-based distribution model without factories. The company is now evaluating strategic alternatives, and its net loss from continuing operations was 6.8 million USD in fiscal 2025 1.
SWOT
Strengths
Weaknesses
- The company has no continuing revenue and a very short operating history in its current form 1.
- Dependence on an affiliated distributor run by the founders creates conflict-of-interest and dependency risks 1.
- Persistent operating losses and limited cash require further financing, which may be dilutive 1.
Opportunities
Threats
Risks
- No revenue from continuing operationshigh
The company reported no revenue from continuing operations in fiscal 2025 and depends on distributor commission, which makes forecasting difficult 1.
- Dependence on related partieshigh
The exclusive distributor and the asset buyer are entities linked to the founders, and related-party dealings can raise governance questions 1.
- Need for additional fundingmedium
Losses and cash needs may force the company to issue new securities, diluting shareholders, if alternative financing is not obtained 1.
- Expiry of the distribution agreementhigh
If the agreement is not extended or replaced after July 2026, the company could lose its main source of income 1.
- Risk of the mining acquisitionmedium
The graphite deal depends on due diligence, approvals and financing, and its failure could weigh on investor confidence 2.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the distributor succeeds in growing sales of new clean-label products, the company's commission could rise without production costs 13.
- Removing factories and cutting staff has substantially reduced fixed costs, which could speed a return to profitability 13.
- If the graphite acquisition closes, the company could enter a sector with structural demand, giving it a new growth direction 2.
What would break the thesis
- If the freeze dried category does not recover, the distributor's commission could stay low and the company could keep losing money 1.
- The related-party relationship and the lack of a long operating history make future results hard to assess 1.
- Moving into a mining project carries financing, development and regulatory risks, and the deal has not yet closed 2.
What to watch
- Quarterly results and the commission received from the distributorQ3 2026
- Extension or replacement of the distribution agreement with Trea GroveJuly 2026
- Closing of the Nachu graphite acquisition and its financing terms2026
- Outcome of the strategic alternatives review announced by managementnext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
Sow Good Inc. is a U.S. consumer packaged goods company that built the freeze dried candy category, with products sold under the Sow Good brand 1. Until December 2025 it operated its own freeze drying plant in Irving, Texas; on 30 December 2025 it sold the manufacturing assets to Trea Grove, LLC, a related party, for 1.5 million USD, and the same entity became the exclusive worldwide distributor of remaining inventory, with the company receiving 10% of gross receipts 1. The company therefore no longer manufactures or holds inventory and earns a fixed commission on distributor sales 1. The board and management are evaluating strategic alternatives, and the distribution agreement runs through 31 July 2026 1. The quarter ended 30 June 2026 brought a new direction: the acquisition of the Nachu graphite project in Tanzania, still subject to closing conditions 2. With a short operating history in its current form, future results are hard to forecast 1.
After the December 2025 transactions, cash flow depends on distributor receipts and on capital from a private placement of convertible preferred stock, with 3 million USD raised in the first tranche 1. The company has said it will likely keep incurring operating losses in the near term while it pursues alternatives 1.
Trends
- Decline of the freeze dried candy categoryheadwind
Category sales fell sharply toward the end of 2025, and the company responded by moving to a capital-light model 1. If the decline deepens, demand for the exclusive distributor could fall and the company's commission could shrink 1.
- Shift toward clean-label and new productstailwind
Management sees retailer demand moving toward clean-label products, such as the Caramel Crunch SKU made without artificial dyes, launched for a national private-label partner 3. This could support distributor sales if consumers accept the new products 3.
- Ingredient prices and supply chainheadwind
Ingredient supply and prices depend on factors such as war, weather and seasonality, which can cause supply interruptions 1. Because production is outsourced, these risks pass to the distributor and can affect volumes 1.
- Investor interest in critical mineralsmixed
Interest in critical minerals and battery materials has led the company to widen its strategic goals beyond candy 2. If the graphite project is financed and developed successfully, it could change the company's profile, although the sector is volatile 2.
Competitive position
- Mars, Inc.
Private company, cited as the largest direct competitor in freeze dried candy and confectionery 1.
- The Hershey CompanyHSY
Large confectionery maker that entered the freeze dried category and competes for shelf space 1.
- Nestlé S.A.
Global food company listed in Switzerland, named as a competitor in packaged food 1.
- Crazy Candy
Smaller freeze dried candy producer with limited capacity and branding, cited by the company 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report30 Oct 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report15 Oct 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report13 Oct 2026Other events
- Current report27 Aug 2026Material agreement · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report19 Aug 2026
- Current report10 Aug 2026Shareholder vote · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement27 Jul 2026
- Quarterly report20 May 2026
- Current report11 May 2026Departure or appointment of officers
- Current report05 May 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Sow Good Inc. · 31 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Sow Good Inc. · 19 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Sow Good Inc. · 14 Nov 2025
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.