olivLaw · US equity research
TIC Solutions, Inc. TIC
Services-Business Services, NEC · SIC 7389 · Vertical: Services-Business Services, NEC (SIC 7389)
TIC Solutions provides essential inspection, testing, compliance, engineering and geospatial services for industrial assets and public infrastructure, largely recurring and driven by regulation. The company expanded sharply after acquiring NV5, and second-quarter 2026 revenue reached 584.3 million USD with a record backlog.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC) stock was 10.70 USD (+1.33% on the day), with market capitalisation 2.3 bn USD, dividend yield 96.07%, beta 1.23, 52-week range 6.54–11.86 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 584.3 m USD (+86.1% YoY), net income of -13.3 m USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 71.8
- overbought (≥ 70)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 8.15 – 10.82
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.95 · band width 28.1%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 9.25 / 8.75
- uptrend (price > SMA50 > SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- 0.42 / 0.27
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +29.5% | −1.1% | +30.6 pp | — |
| 3 months | +30.8% | −0.5% | +31.3 pp | — |
| 6 months | +3.8% | +4.4% | −0.6 pp | — |
| Year to date | +5.8% | +12.3% | −6.5 pp | — |
| 1 year | −8.4% | +13.5% | −21.9 pp | −4.0% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +76.4% | unavailable | +2.0% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q2 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 309.3 m | 234.2 m | 313.9 m | 473.9 m | 508.3 m | 488.0 m | 584.3 m |
| Cost of revenue | 228.7 m | 190.5 m | 239.8 m | 321.2 m | 329.4 m | 326.7 m | 380.2 m |
| Gross profit | 80.6 m | 43.7 m | 74.1 m | 152.7 m | 178.9 m | 161.3 m | 204.2 m |
| SG&A | 60.9 m | 39.9 m | 55.8 m | 140.5 m | 192.6 m | 150.3 m | 193.3 m |
| Operating income | 19.7 m | -9.4 m | 18.4 m | -6.5 m | -19.5 m | -29.1 m | 10.8 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | — | 28.6 m | 29.5 m | 51.1 m | 69.1 m | 58.9 m | 60.4 m |
| Pre-tax income | 2.5 m | -24.3 m | 3.7 m | -30.4 m | -47.1 m | -58.0 m | -16.6 m |
| Income tax | 7.9 m | 1.5 m | 3.9 m | -16.6 m | 128.0 k | -16.5 m | -3.2 m |
| Net income | -5.5 m | -25.8 m | -233.0 k | -13.9 m | -47.2 m | -41.5 m | -13.3 m |
| Diluted EPS | — | — | — | -0.08 | — | — | — |
| Operating cash flow | — | 32.8 m | -6.5 m ≈ | 19.0 m ≈ | 49.7 m | 9.9 m | -9.8 m ≈ |
| Capex | — | 4.5 m | 8.0 m ≈ | 8.7 m ≈ | 12.6 m | 5.7 m | 19.7 m ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
EPS unavailable in the issuer's structured filings (e.g. a partnership reports per unit, not per share).
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2023 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.1 bn | 1.5 bn |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | unavailable |
| Net income | unavailable | -87.1 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | unavailable | -5.7% |
| Free cash flow | unavailable | 61.3 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 439.5 m USD
- Financial debt
- 1.6 bn USD
- Net debt
- 1.2 bn USD
- Equity
- 2.2 bn USD
- Total assets
- 4.4 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- 0.74x
- Current ratio
- 3.20x
- ROE
- unavailable
- ROA
- -2.0%
- FCF margin
- 4.0%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.1 bn | 1.5 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 810.5 m | 1.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 239.5 m | 449.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| SG&A | — | 440.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | — | -17.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 94.8 m | 178.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | — | 161.2 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026derived |
| Pre-tax income | — | -98.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | — | -11.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | — | -87.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | — | 10.28 | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | — | 439.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | — | 366.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | — | 1.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | — | 255.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | — | 1.6 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | — | 1.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | — | 4.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | — | 60.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | — | 25.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | — | 1.6 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | — | 319.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | — | 2.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | — | 2.2 bn † | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | — | 95.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | — | 33.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | — | 61.3 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | — | -874.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | — | 1.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | — | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
Score: 28 / 100
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
score < 40
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 2.3 bn USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
- Balance sheet32
- Valuation24
- Quality22
- Returns40
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 5.52 – 181.67 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDA5.52 – 11.32 (Mid 8.52)18 companies used · median multiple 15.9x · quartiles 12.6x – 19.1xBR, CBZ, CPAY, CSGP, EBAY, FICO, FIS, GPN, HQY, MELI, MSCI, PAYS, PHR, PSFE, PYPL, RBA, UBER, WEX
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)135.09 – 181.67 (Mid 154.96)
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Unattractive profile · Score 28/100
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | -1.4% | 17 (vs peers) | 17% |
| Net margin · Quality | -5.6% | 31 (vs peers) | 10% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | 6.4x | 5 (vs peers) | 17% |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 2.9x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | 18.4x | 33 (vs peers) | 17% |
| FCF yield · Valuation | 1.0% | 12 (on a fixed band) | 14% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 0.0% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | 0.0% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet32/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality22/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns40/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Valuation24/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 1.5 bn USD in 2025; net margin -5.6%; ROE -7.1%; net debt/EBITDA 6.4x.
The estimated value range is 70.31–96.50 USD per share (median of 2 methods, agreement: low); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 81.74 USD, the price of 10.70 USD leaves a potential of 663.9% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of 86.9% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
olivLaw score 28/100, methodological classification: unattractive profile (score, margin of safety and method agreement together; not a judgement of the right price). Groups assessed only in part: growth. Not investment advice.
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Current ratio: 2.9x
- Payout ratio (FCF): 0.0%
- The price is below the estimated value range
What contradicts it
- ROIC: -1.4%
- Net debt / EBITDA: 6.4x
- FCF yield: 1.0%
- Shareholder yield (distributions): 0.0%
- The valuation methods diverge
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM).
Versus the vertical median
Services-Business Services, NEC (SIC 7389) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd | 195.6 bn | 131.6 | 10.3% | 10.1% | +8.1% | −33% / +41% |
| UBERUber Technologies, Inc. | 142.7 bn | 41.3 | 12.4% | 6.1% | +18.3% | −20% / +24% |
| MELIMercadoLibre, Inc. | 88.2 bn | 47.3 | 27.5% | 5.3% | +39.1% | −16% / +7% |
| EBAYeBay Inc. | 54.9 bn | 27.2 | 46.6% | 16.9% | +7.9% | +51% / +205% |
| PYPLPayPal Holdings, Inc. | 50.0 bn | 11.5 | 23.8% | 13.8% | +4.3% | −4% / +4% |
| MSCIMsci Inc. | 48.2 bn | 35.7 | — | 40.3% | +9.7% | +20% / +29% |
| FISVFiserv, Inc. | 33.0 bn | — | -17.0% | -18.9% | +3.6% | +1% / −52% |
| CPAYCorpay, Inc | 27.5 bn | 25.4 | 30.5% | 22.7% | +13.9% | +42% / +74% |
| GPNGlobal Payments Inc. | 25.4 bn | — | -4.1% | -9.1% | −0.4% | +27% / −17% |
| BRBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 21.4 bn | 20.9 | 40.2% | 13.9% | +8.5% | −17% / −2% |
| RBARB Global, Inc | 17.6 bn | 39.9 | 8.8% | 10.0% | +7.2% | −3% / +49% |
| FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 15.3 bn | 4.4 | 23.0% | 26.8% | +5.4% | −55% / −49% |
| FICOFair Isaac Corp | 15.1 bn | 20.3 | — | 34.1% | +15.9% | −61% / −36% |
| CSGPCoStar Group, Inc. | 13.1 bn | 74.3 | 2.2% | 4.9% | +18.7% | −53% / −61% |
| HQYHealthequity, Inc. | 9.0 bn | 39.4 | 11.4% | 17.4% | +9.5% | +3% / +62% |
| WEXWEX Inc. | 5.9 bn | 15.5 | 35.6% | 14.0% | +1.2% | +21% / +2% |
| ALITAlight, Inc. | 5.7 bn | — | -67.9% | -46.0% | −3.0% | −72% / −92% |
| XMTRXometry, Inc. | 5.2 bn | — | -3.9% | -2.0% | +25.9% | +94% / +364% |
| CBZCBIZ, Inc. | 3.0 bn | 25.8 | 6.8% | 4.6% | +52.1% | −0% / +6% |
| FLYWFlywire Corporation | 2.7 bn | 36.3 | 9.1% | 10.3% | +26.6% | +56% / −6% |
| TICTIC Solutions, Inc. | 2.3 bn | — | -7.1% | -5.6% | unavailable | −8% / unavailable |
| AHGAkso Health Group | 2.2 bn | 133.0 | -9.8% | -135.0% | −6.4% | −11% / +56% |
| PAYSPaysign, Inc. | 863.9 m | 58.4 | 30.8% | 15.7% | +40.5% | +194% / +551% |
| PHRPhreesia, Inc. | 818.1 m | 77.1 | 3.1% | 2.1% | +14.5% | −36% / −14% |
| CASSCass Information Systems, Inc. | 704.1 m | 18.9 | 16.3% | 18.9% | +5.3% | +31% / +33% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for TIC from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
TIC Solutions provides essential inspection, testing, compliance, engineering and geospatial services for industrial assets and public infrastructure, largely recurring and driven by regulation. The company expanded sharply after acquiring NV5, and second-quarter 2026 revenue reached 584.3 million USD with a record backlog.
SWOT
Strengths
- Broad integrated service portfolio covering the full asset life cycle, from testing and engineering to geospatial analytics. Skilled workforce and long-standing relationships with public and private clients 1.
- Recurring, compliance-driven revenue and repeat contracts provide a stable base. The record backlog in engineering and geospatial supports near-term visibility 3.
- Ability to combine industrial inspection with geospatial data and software, giving clients integrated insight for safety and compliance 1.
Weaknesses
- Significant debt following the NV5 acquisition, with large term loans that limit financial flexibility 13.
- Net losses in recent reported periods, and integration of NV5 still affects the comparability of financial results 3.
- Dependence on certain industries, notably oil and gas and the public sector, where budget delays can affect demand 1.
Opportunities
- Rising demand from data centers, energy and utilities, highlighted in the August 2026 release, could open new contracts 3.
- Cross-selling across inspection, engineering and geospatial could raise the average contract value with existing clients 3.
- Pipeline integrity rules and infrastructure investment programs could support long-term demand 1.
Threats
- Intense competition from low-cost providers could press prices down and compress margins 1.
- Delays in government budgets and infrastructure projects could postpone collections and activity 1.
- Integration risks from acquisitions and internal control weaknesses reported as material could weigh on financial credibility 1.
Risks
- Industry concentration and cycleshigh
Demand from oil and gas, chemicals and industrial clients can fall during downturns or geopolitical stress, affecting maintenance projects 1.
- High indebtednesshigh
Significant debt from the term loans taken on for the NV5 acquisition could limit financing options and investment capacity 13.
- NV5 integrationmedium
If the expected synergies and benefits of the acquisition do not materialize within the expected timeframe, results could remain below expectations 3.
- Internal controlsmedium
Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting could delay reporting and weaken investor confidence if not remediated 1.
- Operational and safety risksmedium
The inherently dangerous nature of work sites can lead to accidents, penalties and extra costs, and fixed-price contracts can produce cost overruns 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- The record backlog and revenue growth in engineering and geospatial could support steadier growth if integration of NV5 keeps progressing 3.
- Recurring, regulation-driven demand could provide predictable revenue even during periods of economic uncertainty 1.
- The reaffirmed 2026 outlook suggests management expects margin improvement as synergies materialize 3.
What would break the thesis
What to watch
- Delivery against reaffirmed 2026 revenue and Adjusted EBITDA guidanceQ4 2026
- Backlog trend in the engineering and geospatial segmentsQ3 2026
- Progress on NV5 integration and cost synergies2027
- Remediation of reported material weaknesses in internal controlnext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
TIC Solutions, Inc. (formerly Acuren Corporation, renamed on October 10, 2025) is a provider of tech-enabled testing, inspection, certification and compliance (TICC), engineering and consulting, and geospatial services. Its services are often non-discretionary and driven by regulatory requirements, customer risk policies and the need to extend the life of critical assets. The company operates primarily in North America and serves private and public-sector clients. Its headquarters moved to Houston, Texas, per the August 2026 release. The NV5 acquisition, completed August 4, 2025, added infrastructure engineering, building systems, environmental consulting and geospatial analytics. Fiscal 2025 revenue was 1.5 billion USD, up 39.4% 1.
The business model relies on master service agreements with terms from a few days to five years, priced on time-and-materials, cost-plus, fixed-price or unit-rate bases. Most work is done under multi-year or recurring relationships. The company stresses that these services generate relatively stable and predictable cash flows, although revenue can fluctuate with turnaround and project activity 1.
Across the two reviewed filings, the company reaffirmed its 2026 outlook: revenue of 2150 to 2250 million USD and Adjusted EBITDA of 330 to 355 million USD 3. Debt management remains a priority, and total liquidity stood at 473.5 million USD on June 30, 2026 3.
Segments
Inspection and Mitigation
Covers nondestructive testing (NDT), rope access technician (RAT) solutions and mitigation work, often for refineries, pipelines, power plants and chemical facilities. Demand is largely regulatory and driven by asset aging. According to the August 2026 release, the segment shows signs of improving commercial trends 13.
Consulting Engineering
Covers infrastructure engineering, building systems, environmental consulting, conformity assessment, materials engineering and laboratory testing. The segment reached record revenue in the second quarter of 2026, and public-sector clients are a significant part of demand 13.
Geospatial
Provides geospatial data collection and analytics (LiDAR, aerial imagery, unmanned aerial systems) and subscription software for asset and environmental risk management. Combined with industrial inspection, it supports integrated services, with utilities and public agencies as core customers 13.
Market context
Industrial inspection and engineering markets are generally fragmented, with many small local providers, but customers are consolidating spending with larger firms that can deliver integrated solutions at scale. Demand for engineering and geospatial services is supported by public spending on transport, water and energy 1. Growth differs across operating segments because demand varies by industry 3.
Expansion of TICC and consulting services depends on infrastructure investment, extending asset life and industrial demand, including data centers and energy, as noted in the August 2026 release 3.
Trends
- Aging infrastructuretailwind
Extending the life of existing assets increases the need for inspection and maintenance, which could support long-term demand if new infrastructure investment stays limited 1.
- Digitalization of asset managementtailwind
The move from paper-based programs to digital platforms and inspection data analytics opens opportunities for providers with integrated expertise, but requires continued technology investment 1.
- Inflation and tariffsheadwind
Rising labor and material costs, along with tariff uncertainty, could compress margins if prices cannot be adjusted enough 2.
- Public budgets and energy marketsmixed
Government funding supports public demand, but budget delays and volatility in oil and gas could postpone projects and affect collections 1.
Competitive position
The company describes its market as highly competitive, with rivals ranging from small private firms to multi-billion dollar public companies. Some competitors have low-overhead models and may price below it. Contracts are awarded on quality, experience, reputation and price, and barriers to entry are limited 1.
Claimed advantages include an integrated service range, a skilled workforce and the ability to combine inspection with engineering and geospatial work, which could matter in winning large contracts 13.
- Regional private NDT and inspection providers
Small and mid-sized local firms competing mainly on price and niche services, as described in the annual report 1.
- Engineering and consulting firms with multidisciplinary operations
Compete for public-sector and utility contracts where scale and multidisciplinary expertise matter 1.
- Geospatial and data solution providers
Firms with proprietary analytics software and long-term monitoring services for public agencies and utilities 1.
- Low-overhead service providers
Competitors with lean cost structures that may offer more aggressive pricing in certain markets, per the risks the company describes 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Quarterly report06 Aug 2026
- Current report06 Aug 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report01 Jul 2026Shareholder vote
- Current report05 Jun 2026Material agreement · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement21 May 2026
- Quarterly report06 May 2026
- Current report06 May 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report12 Mar 2026Financial statements and exhibits
- Annual report12 Mar 2026
- Current report12 Mar 2026Results of operations · Departure or appointment of officers · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / TIC Solutions, Inc. · 12 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / TIC Solutions, Inc. · 06 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / TIC Solutions, Inc. · 06 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.