olivLaw · US equity research
Trilogy Metals Inc. TMQ
Gold and Silver Ores · SIC 1040 · Vertical: Gold and Silver Ores (SIC 1040)
Trilogy Metals is an exploration and development company holding half of Ambler Metals, which owns the Upper Kobuk projects in northwest Alaska, home to the Arctic polymetallic VMS deposit and the Bornite copper deposit. The company has no mining revenue yet, and its current phase is dominated by permitting and funding from the U.S. government, which invested 17.8 million USD in the company and 35.6 million USD in total into the projects.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) stock was 2.19 USD (+0.00% on the day), with market capitalisation 397.2 m USD, beta 1.73, 52-week range 2.02–6.89 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q3 2026): net income of 244.0 k USD, diluted EPS 0.00 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 32.2
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 1.89 – 2.80
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.33 · band width 38.9%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 2.91 / 3.77
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.22 / -0.24
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −28.0% | −1.1% | −26.9 pp | — |
| 3 months | −36.3% | −0.5% | −35.9 pp | — |
| 6 months | −52.9% | +4.4% | −57.3 pp | — |
| Year to date | −49.2% | +12.3% | −61.5 pp | — |
| 1 year | −45.3% | +13.5% | −58.8 pp | −9.2% |
| 3 years | +386.7% | +76.4% | +310.3 pp | +144.6% |
| 5 years | +14.7% | +63.7% | −49.0 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q3 2026 · 31 Aug 2026
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 | Q3 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation & amortisation | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net income | -1.6 m | -3.6 m | -2.2 m | -1.7 m | -34.7 m | -7.1 m | -6.3 m | 244.0 k |
| Diluted EPS | -0.01 ≈ | -0.02 | -0.01 | -0.01 | -0.21 ≈ | -0.04 | -0.04 | 0.00 |
| Operating cash flow | 26.0 k | -748.0 k | -677.0 k ≈ | -1.3 m ≈ | -558.0 k | -2.7 m | -1.0 m ≈ | -1.1 m ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Net income | -21.8 m | -27.9 m | 161.8 m | -21.7 m | -24.3 m | -15.0 m | -8.6 m | -42.2 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | −113.4% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | -0.18 | -0.21 | 1.12 | -0.15 | -0.17 | -0.10 | -0.05 | -0.26 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | −113.4% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Free cash flow | -22.1 m | -24.1 m | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 30 Nov 2025
- Cash
- 51.6 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 124.1 m USD
- Total assets
- 157.3 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 1.57x
- ROE
- -32.9%
- ROA
- -29.0%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research & development | 1.1 m | — | — | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Feb 2021verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 91.0 k | 21.0 k | 17.0 k | 8.0 k | 4.0 k | — | SEC (XBRL)· 14 Feb 2025verified |
| Income tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Net income | 161.8 m | -21.7 m | -24.3 m | -15.0 m | -8.6 m | -42.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 1.12 | -0.15 | -0.17 | -0.10 | -0.05 | -0.26 | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 144.6 m | 144.4 m | 145.7 m | 152.6 m | 159.8 m | 164.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 11.1 m | 6.3 m | 2.6 m | 2.6 m | 25.8 m | 51.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Receivables | 129.0 k | 19.0 k | 17.0 k | 33.0 k | 16.0 k | 118.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Current assets | 11.4 m | 6.6 m | 2.9 m | 2.9 m | 26.0 m | 51.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 206.0 k | 29.0 k | 12.0 k | 4.0 k | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Feb 2024verified |
| Total assets | 185.3 m | 167.3 m | 146.0 m | 138.0 m | 133.7 m | 157.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 888.0 k | 852.0 k | 345.0 k | 432.0 k | 756.0 k | 2.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 1.0 m | 1.0 m | 534.0 k | 465.0 k | 793.0 k | 33.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 1.5 m | 1.3 m | 567.0 k | 465.0 k | 903.0 k | 33.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Equity | 183.8 m † | 166.0 m † | 145.4 m † | 137.6 m † | 132.8 m † | 124.1 m † | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -8.3 m | -5.1 m | -3.9 m | -3.1 m | -1.8 m | -3.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Investing cash flow | — | -119.0 k | 142.0 k | — | 25.0 m | -1.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 217.0 k | 416.0 k | 54.0 k | 3.1 m | 74.0 k | 30.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 17 Feb 2026verified |
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 1 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 4.2% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 397.2 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
4% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the input exists, but its latest figure is far older than the latest reported period: not used
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 1 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 4.2% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.3x | 44 (on a fixed band) | 100% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial44/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
TRILOGY METALS INC. (TMQ). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-08-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: ROE -39.0%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 1 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 4.2% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
What contradicts it
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, Net margin, FCF conversion, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Gold and Silver Ores (SIC 1040) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEMNewmont Corporation | 111.7 bn | 12.5 | 26.8% | 34.7% | +21.3% | +18% / +167% |
| AEMAgnico Eagle Mines Limited | 91.7 bn | 20.7 | 19.6% | 37.5% | +43.7% | +5% / +242% |
| BBarrick Mining Corp | 67.2 bn | 13.7 | 19.6% | 29.4% | +31.2% | −3% / +128% |
| FNVFRANCO NEVADA Corp | 46.7 bn | 42.0 | 16.3% | 61.0% | +63.7% | +15% / +116% |
| AUAngloGold Ashanti plc | 44.4 bn | 17.0 | 43.1% | 32.1% | +70.8% | +3% / +357% |
| GFIGold Fields Limited | 32.9 bn | 26.6 | 25.7% | 23.9% | +15.6% | −14% / +140% |
| KGCKinross Gold Corp | 25.7 bn | 11.0 | 31.0% | 33.9% | +36.9% | −24% / +264% |
| PAASPan American Silver Corp. | 17.5 bn | 16.2 | 16.8% | 27.1% | +28.4% | −9% / +165% |
| CDECoeur Mining, Inc. | 15.0 bn | 12.0 | 12.8% | 26.8% | +96.4% | −16% / +378% |
| AGIAlamos Gold Inc. | 12.6 bn | 14.3 | 22.1% | 49.0% | +34.3% | −20% / +103% |
| HMYHarmony Gold Mining Company Limited | 10.4 bn | — | — | — | +25.8% | −17% / +163% |
| EQXEquinox Gold Corp. | 8.9 bn | 32.2 | 4.8% | 12.2% | +99.1% | −19% / +106% |
| AGFirst Majestic Silver Corp. | 7.6 bn | 45.3 | 8.0% | 13.1% | +124.3% | +1% / +158% |
| EGOEldorado Gold Corp | 6.7 bn | 13.6 | 12.4% | 27.9% | +37.5% | +7% / +155% |
| CGAUCenterra Gold Inc. | 4.3 bn | — | -4.7% | -7.4% | +28.8% | +61% / +249% |
| ARISAris Mining Corp | 3.2 bn | 38.3 | 7.0% | 8.4% | +81.7% | +12% / +396% |
| NGNovagold Resources Inc. | 2.7 bn | — | -32.8% | — | unavailable | −40% / +45% |
| AAUCAllied Gold Corporation | 2.5 bn | — | -13.8% | -3.9% | +82.3% | −3% / unavailable |
| EXKEndeavour Silver Corp. | 2.1 bn | — | -22.4% | -25.5% | +114.8% | −21% / +259% |
| HYMCHycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 1.6 bn | — | -72.3% | — | −100.0% | +49% / +716% |
| IAUXi-80 GOLD CORP. | 1.2 bn | — | -81.9% | -202.7% | +89.1% | +18% / −15% |
| NEWPNew Pacific Metals Corp. | 952.3 m | — | -2.8% | — | −19.1% | +101% / +181% |
| MUXMcEWEN INC. | 916.1 m | 12.8 | 13.5% | 32.5% | +13.2% | −20% / +94% |
| MTAMetalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. | 732.0 m | — | -1.7% | -36.1% | +99.6% | +6% / +145% |
| GROYGold Royalty Corp. | 648.9 m | — | -0.7% | -26.5% | +54.5% | −34% / +86% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for TMQ from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Trilogy Metals is an exploration and development company holding half of Ambler Metals, which owns the Upper Kobuk projects in northwest Alaska, home to the Arctic polymetallic VMS deposit and the Bornite copper deposit. The company has no mining revenue yet, and its current phase is dominated by permitting and funding from the U.S. government, which invested 17.8 million USD in the company and 35.6 million USD in total into the projects. 123
SWOT
Strengths
- A portfolio with high-grade deposits, especially the Arctic project, and a positive preliminary economic assessment for Bornite. 1
- Support from the U.S. government and an industrial partner, South32, which share development costs. 23
- Access to capital through equity programs on U.S. and Canadian exchanges, offering financing flexibility. 2
Weaknesses
- The company generates no mining revenue and records long-term losses that depend on external financing. 1
- Control over the project is shared with the partner, limiting direct influence over strategic decisions. 1
- Results are strongly affected by losses of the joint venture, and quarterly profit often depends on non-cash gains. 3
Opportunities
Risks
- Uncertain financinghigh
The company might be unable to finance development or exploration programs on acceptable terms, which could lead to postponed projects or sale of interests. 1
- Dependence on access roadhigh
Lack of access infrastructure could delay or prevent development if permits or construction of the road do not proceed. 12
- Dependence on South32medium
If the partner had other priorities or failed to meet its obligations, the timing and cost of development could be affected. 1
- Shareholder dilutionmedium
Exercise of the DOW warrants and sales under the at-the-market programs could reduce the value of existing shares. 2
- Metal price volatilitymedium
A fall in copper or zinc prices could reduce the ability to raise capital and the viability of the projects. 1
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If permitting advances on schedule and the access road is built, the Arctic project could become a reference copper supplier in the United States. 23
- Government support and the capital already invested by the DOW could reduce dependence on volatile markets for financing. 23
- The positive preliminary economics of the Bornite project could add another source of value. 1
What would break the thesis
- The company has no mining revenue, and development depends on permits that could be delayed considerably. 1
- Share issuances and warrants could dilute shareholders, and losses from the Ambler Metals stake could continue. 23
- If copper prices fell, financing the projects could become more costly or harder to obtain. 1
What to watch
- Publication of permitting decisions and the environmental impact statement for the Arctic project2027
- Progress on construction and financing of the Ambler Access Project roadnext 10-K
- Use of the at-the-market program and the level of share issuancesQ1 2027
- Ambler Metals spending and the company's contribution for fiscal 2027next 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
The company's core activity is exploring and developing the Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects in the Ambler Mining District of Alaska, held through Ambler Metals LLC, which Trilogy and South32 control equally. The Arctic project contains a high-grade polymetallic volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit, and the Bornite project a carbonate-hosted copper deposit. The goal is to advance the projects toward production decisions through technical, engineering and feasibility studies. 1
Trilogy has not generated revenue from mining operations and finances its activity through external capital, including at-the-market equity programs. It has a small staff, most of whom work in its Vancouver office handling accounting, investor relations and oversight of its 50% stake in Ambler Metals. 1
Trilogy records losses, and its stake in Ambler Metals is accounted for under the equity method, so the share of losses of the joint venture flows directly into its results. For the quarter ended August 31, 2026, the company reported net income of 0.2 million USD, driven mainly by a mark-to-market gain on the derivative linked to the DOW investment. 13
Segments
Arctic project
A high-grade polymetallic VMS deposit with copper, zinc, lead, gold and silver, located on Ambler lands. The company has published a coordinated federal and state permitting schedule targeting a Record of Decision in September 2028. 23
Bornite project
A carbonate-hosted copper deposit explored on lands under the agreement with NANA Regional Corporation. The January 2025 preliminary economic assessment describes an underground operation with a 17-year mine life and a total output of 1.9 billion pounds of copper. 1
Market context
The company operates in base metals markets, focused on copper and zinc, whose prices are volatile and depend on demand, supply, speculative activity and economic conditions. The company notes it cannot predict how these factors will affect prices. 1
U.S. government interest in domestic copper supply chains is a specific market factor, since the DOW investment and support for the Ambler Access Project could ease financing. These effects depend on future permits and decisions. 23
Trends
- U.S. government supportmixed
The DOW investment and commitment to help finance the Ambler road could speed development if delivered as announced. A government becoming a significant shareholder also brings governance and dilution risks. 23
- Federal permitting timelinetailwind
A coordinated federal and state schedule for the Arctic project could clarify the permitting process, and the notice of intent for an environmental impact statement has launched the NEPA review. 3
- Dependence on access roadheadwind
Development depends on building the Ambler industrial road, which requires permits and has faced lawsuits and policy shifts. A delay could push back the whole project. 1
- Equity-funded modelheadwind
The company relies on share issuances to fund its activity, which can dilute existing shareholders; an at-the-market program of up to 200 million USD and the DOW warrants are examples. 2
Competitive position
The company competes for capital, skilled personnel and equipment with other exploration companies, and the sources consulted do not detail direct rivals. It notes that rising demand for exploration services and equipment can raise costs. 1
Competition also arises for acquiring exploration properties, where rival companies may win attractive land, potentially limiting the company's expansion opportunities. 2
- South32
Joint venture partner in Ambler Metals, so more an ally than a direct competitor; it controls half of the joint venture and took part in the DOW investment.
- Other mineral exploration companies
Compete for financing, skilled personnel and exploration services, according to the risk factors in the sources.
- Copper producers in comparable jurisdictions
Potential competitors for copper supply; the sources do not name these producers.
- Companies acquiring exploration properties
Competition for attractive properties can reduce opportunities to expand the portfolio.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Târgul de Crăciun din Timișoara: brad de 20 de metri, patinoar-circuit și pian suspendat / Se deschide în 28 noiembrie cu „Christmas Rock Trilogy”G4Media · 28 Oct 2026 · RO
- VisionQuest Character Bios Reveal Some Potential Spoilers For WandaVision Trilogy FinaleSurge — GDELT DOC · 02 Oct 2026 · RO
- Wicker Man director's sons complete their late father's film trilogyBBC World News · 23 Aug 2026 · EN
- Grab the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy on 4K Blu-Ray for $50The Verge · 07 Aug 2026 · EN
- Final Fantasy VII’s remake trilogy will conclude with RevelationThe Verge · 05 Jun 2026 · EN
- US Extends Deadline for Trilogy Metals Equity Stake PurchaseBloomberg Markets · 01 Jun 2026 · EN
SEC filings
- Current report21 Oct 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report02 Oct 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report02 Oct 2026
- Current report21 Sept 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report14 Sept 2026Material agreement · Item 3.02 · Regulation FD disclosure · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report10 Sept 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report31 Aug 2026Material agreement · Item 3.02 · Regulation FD disclosure · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report04 Aug 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report16 Jul 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report08 Jul 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-11-30 · SEC / Trilogy Metals Inc. · 17 Feb 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-08-31 · SEC / Trilogy Metals Inc. · 02 Oct 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Trilogy Metals Inc. · 02 Oct 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.