olivLaw · US equity research
Noah Holdings Limited NOAH
Investment Advice · SIC 6282 · Vertical: Investment Advice (SIC 6282)
Noah Holdings is a wealth management provider for high-net-worth clients, mainly Mandarin speakers, combining investment product distribution with asset management through Gopher and Olive. The company has expanded beyond mainland China, which makes it relevant for investors tracking Asian private wealth. Its 2025 revenue split shows wealth management at 65.5% and asset management at 32.9%.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) stock was 7.05 USD (+4.14% on the day), with market capitalisation 2.4 bn USD, P/E 30.7 on diluted EPS of 0.23 USD over the last 12 months, dividend yield 3.31%, beta 0.80, 52-week range 6.73–12.32 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 42.8
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 6.55 – 7.66
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.45 · band width 15.7%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 7.72 / 9.69
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.26 / -0.29
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −8.4% | −1.1% | −7.3 pp | — |
| 3 months | −14.8% | −0.5% | −14.3 pp | — |
| 6 months | −35.6% | +4.4% | −39.9 pp | — |
| Year to date | −29.8% | +12.3% | −42.1 pp | — |
| 1 year | −36.1% | +13.5% | −49.7 pp | −2.5% |
| 3 years | −41.2% | +76.4% | −117.6 pp | +24.7% |
| 5 years | −83.6% | +63.7% | −147.3 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 67 percentile of its own 9-quarter history (min 3.7, median 11.2, max 65.1; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 478.5 m | 487.2 m | 506.6 m | 673.7 m | 449.5 m | 464.0 m | 356.3 m | 373.3 m |
| Revenue YoY | +131.2% | +1.8% | +4.0% | +33.0% | −33.3% | +3.2% | −23.2% | +4.8% |
| Net income | 118.0 m | 119.1 m | -114.2 m | 206.2 m | 141.6 m | 142.2 m | 65.1 m | 79.9 m |
| Net income YoY | +0.6% | +0.9% | −195.9% | unavailable | −31.3% | +0.4% | −54.2% | +22.7% |
| Diluted EPS | 3.88 | 3.86 | -3.68 | 6.10 | 4.14 | 0.41 | 0.18 | 0.23 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | −2.5% | −0.5% | −195.3% | unavailable | −32.1% | −90.1% | −56.1% | +27.8% |
| net % | 24.7% | 24.4% | -22.5% | 30.6% | 31.5% | 30.6% | 18.3% | 21.4% |
| Free cash flow | 131.1 m | 175.7 m | 114.1 m | -117.6 m | 82.7 m | 163.4 m | 41.8 m | 120.5 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 623.6 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 1.4 bn USD
- Total assets
- 1.7 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 4.46x
- ROE
- 5.7%
- ROA
- 4.9%
- FCF margin
- 32.3%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 506.6 m | 673.7 m | 449.5 m | 464.0 m | 356.3 m | 373.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Operating income | 192.9 m | 188.1 m | 157.8 m | 154.6 m | 86.8 m | 111.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 15.1 m | 23.0 m | 22.6 m | 22.3 m | 21.5 m | 22.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| EBITDA | 208.0 m ≈ | 211.1 m ≈ | 180.4 m ≈ | 176.9 m ≈ | 108.3 m ≈ | 133.5 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026derived |
| Pre-tax income | -89.7 m | 203.7 m | 166.7 m | 170.3 m | 118.9 m | 122.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Income tax | 39.6 m | 46.1 m | 38.7 m | 37.0 m | 36.8 m | 42.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Net income | -114.2 m | 206.2 m | 141.6 m | 142.2 m | 65.1 m | 79.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | -3.68 | 6.10 | 4.14 | 0.41 | 0.18 | 0.23 | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 31.0 m | 337.8 m | 342.0 m | 347.4 m | 352.4 m | 352.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | — | — | — | 0.08 | 0.41 | 0.23 | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026derived |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 767.1 m | 534.3 m | 638.5 m | 731.3 m | 523.7 m | 623.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Receivables | 66.6 m | 126.8 m | 72.2 m | 71.0 m | 64.9 m | 60.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Current assets | 1.0 bn | 865.7 m | 915.9 m | 1.0 bn | 887.0 m | 909.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 38.1 m | 405.0 m | 360.5 m | 349.6 m | 326.4 m | 337.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Total assets | 1.4 bn | 1.7 bn | 1.7 bn | 1.8 bn | 1.6 bn | 1.7 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 288.3 m | 358.3 m | 276.2 m | 266.4 m | 195.8 m | 204.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 325.2 m | 431.2 m | 333.1 m | 318.0 m | 242.0 m | 251.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Equity | 1.1 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.4 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.4 bn | 1.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | — | — | 31.9 m | 328.0 m | 335.2 m | 335.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 122.0 m | 238.8 m | 91.8 m | 185.7 m | 53.1 m | 139.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Capex | 7.9 m | 356.4 m | 9.1 m | 22.2 m | 11.3 m | 19.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | 114.1 m ≈ | -117.6 m ≈ | 82.7 m ≈ | 163.4 m ≈ | 41.8 m ≈ | 120.5 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | 54.0 m | -403.6 m | 10.8 m | -34.8 m | -115.2 m | 42.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -56.9 m | -80.5 m | 33.9 m | -28.1 m | -155.4 m | -90.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | — | — | — | 25.0 m | 138.1 m | 78.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
| Share repurchases | 43.2 m | 58.4 m | — | — | 7.3 m | 7.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 29 Apr 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
Score: 46 / 100
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
(margin_of_safety <= -0.25 & agreement in ['high', 'medium'])
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 2.4 bn USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
- Balance sheet100
- Growth0
- Quality83
- Returns63
- Valuation42
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 2.73 – 6.47 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/E2.73 – 6.47 (Mid 4.92)29 companies used · median multiple 21.4x · quartiles 11.9x – 28.1xAAMI, ABX, AMG, AMP, APAM, APO, ARES, BEN, BVC, BX, CG, CNS, EVR, FHI, GROW, HLI, HNNA, KKR, LAZ, MORN, PAX, PJT, RILY, RPC, TROW, VALU, VCTR, VRTS, WHG
- Dividend discount (DDM)3.06 – 4.12 (Mid 3.52)
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Unattractive profile · Score 46/100
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | 21.4% | 67 (vs peers) | 10% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | 150.7% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -6.0% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 13% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | -61.8% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 13% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 4.5x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 30.7x | 25 (vs peers) | 17% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | 5.1% | 64 (on a fixed band) | 13% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 3.6% | 52 (on a fixed band) | 10% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | 64.9% | 79 (on a fixed band) | 7% |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial100/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth0/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Quality83/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns63/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Valuation42/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Noah Holdings Ltd (NOAH). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 373.3 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 4.8%; net margin 21.4%; ROE 5.8%.
The estimated value range is 2.90–5.29 USD per share (median of 2 methods, agreement: high); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 4.22 USD, the price of 7.05 USD leaves a potential of -40.2% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of -67.2% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
olivLaw score 46/100, methodological classification: unattractive profile (score, margin of safety and method agreement together; not a judgement of the right price). Groups assessed only in part: balance. Not investment advice.
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- FCF conversion: 150.7%
- Current ratio: 4.5x
- Payout ratio (FCF): 64.9%
What contradicts it
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -6.0%
- EPS CAGR 3Y: -61.8%
- P/E (TTM): 30.7x
- The price is above the estimated value range
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, EV/EBITDA.
Versus the vertical median
Investment Advice (SIC 6282) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BXBlackstone Inc. | 94.3 bn | 28.1 | 40.5% | 21.8% | +9.2% | −14% / +12% |
| KKRKkr & Co. Inc. | 91.0 bn | 28.9 | 10.6% | 14.8% | −11.0% | −17% / +34% |
| APOApollo Global Management, Inc. | 72.5 bn | 43.8 | 9.3% | 5.2% | +22.7% | −7% / +33% |
| AMPAmeriprise Financial, Inc. | 45.8 bn | 11.9 | 72.0% | 20.7% | +5.5% | +16% / +49% |
| TROWPrice T Rowe Group Inc | 24.0 bn | 11.3 | 19.7% | 28.4% | +3.1% | +10% / +12% |
| BENFranklin Resources Inc | 17.2 bn | 22.8 | 6.8% | 8.7% | +3.5% | +50% / +37% |
| CGCarlyle Group Inc. | 15.2 bn | 44.6 | 5.2% | 10.1% | −11.9% | −22% / +25% |
| ARESAres Management Corporation | 14.1 bn | 22.2 | 15.3% | 12.0% | +28.9% | −13% / +22% |
| IVZInvesco Ltd. | 12.9 bn | — | -0.6% | -1.2% | +5.1% | +20% / +106% |
| AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 9.4 bn | 17.8 | 18.9% | 26.9% | +1.6% | +36% / +169% |
| MORNMorningstar, Inc. | 9.1 bn | 21.4 | 35.1% | 17.0% | +7.5% | +14% / −14% |
| VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. | 7.4 bn | 20.6 | 19.0% | 29.6% | +46.2% | +91% / +274% |
| MAASMAASE Inc. | 4.9 bn | — | -7.2% | -102.1% | −75.2% | +182% / −95% |
| LAZLazard, Inc. | 4.5 bn | 24.4 | 20.6% | 5.5% | +1.5% | −19% / +36% |
| PJTPJT Partners Inc. | 3.9 bn | 19.7 | 83.2% | 10.6% | +14.8% | −6% / +76% |
| CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. | 3.9 bn | 23.3 | 29.2% | 28.2% | +7.5% | +20% / +29% |
| APAMArtisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 3.3 bn | 9.3 | 73.1% | 24.5% | +7.6% | −2% / +7% |
| AAMIAcadian Asset Management Inc. | 3.3 bn | 32.4 | — | 15.2% | +11.5% | +104% / +425% |
| NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd | 2.4 bn | 30.7 | 5.8% | 21.4% | +4.8% | −36% / −41% |
| ABXAbacus Global Management, Inc. | 885.0 m | 32.5 | 6.6% | 10.5% | +110.2% | +37% / +31% |
| VRTSVirtus Investment Partners, Inc. | 853.6 m | 7.4 | 12.6% | 14.0% | −6.0% | −19% / −34% |
| VALUValue Line, Inc. | 416.6 m | 21.0 | 18.7% | 60.3% | −4.7% | +20% / +6% |
| WHGWestwood Holdings Group, Inc. | 182.5 m | 21.9 | 6.4% | 7.8% | +3.2% | +14% / +75% |
| RILYBRC Group Holdings, Inc. | 154.0 m | 0.3 | — | 35.9% | +29.6% | −12% / −79% |
| BVCBitVentures Limited | 138.6 m | 39.8 | 28.9% | 687.6% | unavailable | +1,203% / −76% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for NOAH from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 3.91 Total return -42% · Per year -42% | 6.94 Total return 2% · Per year 2% | 10.50 Total return 53% · Per year 53% |
| 3 years | 3.10 Total return -50% · Per year -20% | 6.26 Total return -2% · Per year -1% | 10.50 Total return 61% · Per year 17% |
| 5 years | 2.46 Total return -55% · Per year -15% | 5.65 Total return -5% · Per year -1% | 10.50 Total return 68% · Per year 11% |
- Exit P/E± 1.57
- Net margin± 1.10
- Annual revenue growth± 0.99
- Annual dilution± 0.09
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 29 Apr 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (08 Oct 2026), 6-K (15 Sept 2026), 6-K (04 Sept 2026), 6-K (28 Aug 2026), 6-K (26 Aug 2026), 6-K (25 Aug 2026).
In brief
Noah Holdings is a wealth management provider for high-net-worth clients, mainly Mandarin speakers, combining investment product distribution with asset management through Gopher and Olive. The company has expanded beyond mainland China, which makes it relevant for investors tracking Asian private wealth. Its 2025 revenue split shows wealth management at 65.5% and asset management at 32.9% 1.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company has over two decades of operating experience and an ecosystem of top product partners, giving it access to a broad product range 1.
- Geographic diversification across Hong Kong, Singapore and the United States reduces dependence on the Chinese market 1.
- Its revenue structure combines wealth management and asset management, giving more than one source of income 1.
Weaknesses
- The company depends heavily on the volume of products distributed and on fees from product partners, which can fluctuate with markets 1.
- Control over part of the mainland China operations rests on contracts rather than direct ownership, which limits operational control 1.
- Asset management revenue depends on investment performance, and weak performance could reduce revenue and the ability to raise new funds 1.
Opportunities
- Overseas expansion through Olive and USD-denominated products could open international investment access for its clients 1.
- Growing investor education could deepen client relationships and encourage long-duration investment 1.
- A recovery in secondary markets could raise performance-based fees and private secondary product volume 1.
Threats
- Regulatory changes in mainland China could affect product mix and restrict operations 1.
- Uncertainty over how authorities interpret the legal framework for contracts with affiliated entities could lead to penalties or restructuring 1.
- Competition for high-net-worth clients and product partners could compress fees and margins 1.
Risks
- Contractual structure in Chinahigh
Asset management operations in mainland China are run through contracts with affiliated entities, and authorities could find these contracts invalid, which could mean losing control 1.
- Regulation and licenceshigh
Rules in wealth and asset management are developing, and failing to hold the required approvals or licences could affect operations 1.
- Secondary market cyclemedium
Part of revenue depends on performance-based fees, which are sensitive to secondary market cycles and could fall if markets weaken 1.
- Counterparty exposuremedium
The company does not guarantee returns on distributed products, but a problem with a product or partner could still affect reputation and revenue 1.
- Tax and transfer pricingmedium
Chinese tax authorities could adjust arrangements between related entities, which could reduce consolidated net income 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If wealth among Chinese and overseas Mandarin-speaking individuals keeps growing, demand for wealth management services could support volumes and revenue 1.
- International expansion and USD products could reduce dependence on the Chinese market and attract new clients 1.
- Its partner ecosystem and diversified revenue could provide stability during periods of market volatility 1.
What would break the thesis
- If regulation in mainland China changes further, product mix and operating structure could be significantly affected 1.
- If secondary markets weaken, performance-based fees could decline and private product volume could fall back 1.
- Contractual control over part of the operations could be challenged, with serious consequences for consolidated results 1.
What to watch
- Revenue trends in wealth management and asset management by segment2026
- Transaction value of investment products and the share of private secondary products2026
- Changes to the contractual structure and regulatory framework in Chinanext annual report
- Olive performance and growth of assets under management outside China2026
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 29 Apr 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (08 Oct 2026), 6-K (15 Sept 2026), 6-K (04 Sept 2026), 6-K (28 Aug 2026), 6-K (26 Aug 2026), 6-K (25 Aug 2026).
The business
Noah Holdings, founded in August 2005 with its principal executive office in Singapore, offers one-stop wealth management and asset allocation services mainly to Mandarin-speaking high-net-worth clients 1. Its business runs along two main lines: wealth management, which distributes mutual funds, private secondary products and other products, and asset management, conducted through Gopher and Olive 1. From the fourth quarter of 2024 the company reports six business segments plus headquarters, reflecting its restructuring 1.
Wealth management revenue comes from one-time commissions, recurring service fees, shares of performance-based income and comprehensive services, and the company states it does not bear client investment losses or guarantee returns 1. Value-added services include investor education under the Enoch Education brand and international trust services through Ark Trust in Hong Kong, Jersey and Singapore 1. It also earns commissions by referring clients to insurance companies 1.
Clients are classified by assets under advisory into tiers from ivory to black card, and the number of black card clients was 2,299 as of December 31, 2025 1. Transaction value of investment products is a key operating metric, reaching RMB 67.0 billion in 2025 1.
Segments
Wealth management
The wealth management business contributed 65.5% of total net revenues in 2025, spread across domestic public securities, domestic insurance, overseas wealth management and overseas insurance and comprehensive services 1. Revenue from overseas products accounted for 48.7% of total revenues in 2025, showing diversification beyond the Chinese market 1.
Asset management
Asset management, conducted through Gopher domestically and Olive overseas, contributed 32.9% of net revenues in 2025, and its revenue depends directly on assets under management and investment performance 1. Olive was launched in 2024 to manage USD-denominated private equity funds 1.
Market context
The core market consists of individuals with investable assets above RMB 6.0 million and related institutional clients, mainly in mainland China with some overseas Mandarin-speaking clients 1. Industry growth depends on rising individual wealth, greater investor sophistication and the development of China's capital markets, including new exit routes for private investments 1.
Revenue is sensitive to secondary market cycles because part of it comes from performance-based fees, and rules restricting non-standardized credit products have already affected product mix 1. The contractual control structure over part of the Chinese operations adds regulatory complexity 1.
Trends
- Rising wealth in Chinatailwind
Economic growth and a growing number of individuals with investable assets support demand for wealth management services, if these trends continue 1.
- More sophisticated clientstailwind
Investors are becoming more sophisticated and using value-added services, which could support product innovation and client loyalty 1.
- Capital market developmentmixed
Reforms such as the registration-based IPO regime provide exit routes for private investments, but the pace of the secondary cycle remains uncertain 1.
- Changing regulationheadwind
New rules on credit products and the contractual structure with affiliated entities could limit product mix and affect operations if authorities interpret the framework differently 1.
Competitive position
The company differentiates itself from many competitors in mainland China through multi-currency product offerings and its presence in Hong Kong, Singapore and the United States 1. The source does not name specific competitors, so the comparison remains limited to what the annual report states 1.
Its stated advantage rests on an ecosystem of leading product partners, including fund managers and top PE/VC general partners, plus operating efficiency and risk management 1. Competitive pressure could show up in the service fee rates negotiated with partners 1.
- Other wealth managers in mainland China
Firms that mainly offer domestic and RMB-denominated products, which the source describes as a narrower offering than the company's.
- Other mutual fund and structured product distributors
Competition for distribution of mutual fund products, which form a large part of transaction volume.
- Private equity and secondary asset managers
Partners in products and possible competitors for high-net-worth client capital.
- International trust and wealth planning providers
Competition in international trust services and succession planning.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Noah Wyle a fost desemnat „Cel mai sexy bărbat în viaţă” de revista People. Prima reacție a actorului. „Am crezut că e o farsă”Libertatea.ro · 28 Oct 2026 · RO
- Noah Wyle named People magazine's 'sexiest man alive'CNA (Channel NewsAsia) · 28 Oct 2026 · EN
- Noah Wyle a fost desemnat "Cel mai sexy bărbat în viață" în 2026 de revista People. "Am crezut că e o farsă"Antena 3 CNN · 27 Oct 2026 · RO
- Noah Wyle, desemnat „Cel mai sexy bărbat în viaţă” în 2026. Starul din „The Pitt” a crezut că e o farsăHotNews.ro · 27 Oct 2026 · RO
- Actorul Noah Wyle, desemnat cel mai sexy bărbat în viață în 2026. „Am crezut că este o farsă”Adevărul · 27 Oct 2026 · RO
- Noah Wyle, desemnat cel mai sexy bărbat în viață în 2026. Reacția starului din „ER”: „Am crezut că e o farsă”Mediafax · 27 Oct 2026 · RO
- Yuval Noah Harari, avertisment despre AI: „Oamenii sunt vacile viitorului”SpotMedia.ro · 25 Oct 2026 · RO
- Yuval Noah Harari: „Noi suntem vacile viitorului”HotNews.ro · 24 Oct 2026 · RO
- Noah Adams, longtime host of NPR's All Things Considered, has diedNPR News · 18 Oct 2026 · EN
- UK stablecoin infrastructure startup Noah closes $38M seed roundTech.eu · 07 Oct 2026 · EN
- Why people keep looking for Noah's Ark in a natural rock formation in Turkey: A scholar of early Christianity explainsPhys.org · 06 Oct 2026 · EN
- NHS trust apologises as 10 staff suspended over Noah Woods data breachThe Guardian World · 27 Sept 2026 · EN
- Noah Woods, three, died after leaving playground through gap in fence, inquest toldThe Guardian World · 25 Sept 2026 · EN
- Footballers and fans pay tribute to Noah Woods after toddler’s death in SuffolkThe Guardian World · 19 Sept 2026 · EN
- Father of Noah, three, thanks those who searched for his son as village reels from lossThe Guardian World · 17 Sept 2026 · EN
- Body found in search for Noah Woods, three-year-old boy who went missing from Suffolk playgroundThe Guardian World · 16 Sept 2026 · EN
- Suffolk police release footage of Noah Woods as search for missing boy continuesThe Guardian World · 16 Sept 2026 · EN
- Just for Laughs Singapore returns with Trevor Noah, Atsuko Okatsuka, Aaron Chen and moreCNA (Channel NewsAsia) · 08 Sept 2026 · EN
- Noah (NOAH) Grew Operating Income 34% as Revenue Fell. Can Cost Cuts Keep Working?Yahoo Finance — News · 28 Aug 2026 · EN
- Made by Google 2026 live blog: Let’s watch Trevor Noah talk about the Pixel 11The Verge · 12 Aug 2026 · EN
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)08 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)15 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)04 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)28 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)26 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)25 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)17 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)14 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)06 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)10 Jul 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Noah Holdings Limited · 29 Apr 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.