olivLaw · US equity research
Phoenix Education Partners, Inc. PXED
Services-Educational Services · SIC 8200 · Vertical: Services-Educational Services (SIC 8200)
Phoenix Education Partners, Inc. (PXED) is the parent of The University of Phoenix, one of the largest online education providers for working adults, with a skills-aligned model and employer partnerships. The company listed on the stock exchange in October 2025, and in fiscal 2025 its net revenue reached 1,007.2 million USD amid tightening federal regulation.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Phoenix Education Partners, Inc. (PXED) stock was 21.66 USD (−7.40% on the day), with market capitalisation 794.4 m USD, P/E 9.5 on diluted EPS of 2.29 USD over the last 12 months, dividend yield 2.91%, beta 0.74, 52-week range 21.66–35.25 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q4 2026): revenue of 260.7 m USD (+1.3% YoY), net income of 23.5 m USD (+34.1% YoY), diluted EPS 0.60 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 26.3
- oversold (≤ 30)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 22.35 – 26.04
- below the lower band · %B -0.19 · band width 15.2%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 25.87 / 28.80
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.69 / -0.60
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −11.6% | −1.1% | −10.5 pp | — |
| 3 months | −28.3% | −0.5% | −27.8 pp | — |
| 6 months | −27.7% | +4.4% | −32.1 pp | — |
| Year to date | −28.5% | +12.3% | −40.8 pp | — |
| 1 year | −37.8% | +13.5% | −51.4 pp | −30.3% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +76.4% | unavailable | −16.5% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q4 2026 · 31 Aug 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 | Q3 '26 | Q4 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 254.7 m | 223.4 m | 271.7 m | 257.4 m | 262.0 m | 222.5 m | 271.8 m | 260.7 m |
| Operating income | 59.7 m | 19.7 m | 71.1 m | 21.7 m | 25.6 m | 14.0 m | 51.8 m | 31.2 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 5.2 m | 5.6 m ≈ | 5.5 m ≈ | 5.7 m | 5.5 m | 5.7 m ≈ | 5.6 m ≈ | 6.7 m |
| Interest expense | 114.0 k | 111.0 k | 107.0 k | 148.0 k | 215.0 k | 550.0 k | 651.0 k | 627.0 k |
| Pre-tax income | 63.4 m | 21.8 m | 73.3 m | 23.7 m | 27.1 m | 15.2 m | 53.4 m | 33.3 m |
| Income tax | 16.3 m | 5.6 m | 18.6 m | 6.1 m | 11.7 m | 4.8 m | 14.5 m | 10.1 m |
| Net income | 46.4 m | 16.1 m | 53.8 m | 17.5 m | 15.5 m | 10.8 m | 39.2 m | 23.5 m |
| Diluted EPS | 1.23 | 0.43 | 1.42 | 0.45 ≈ | 0.40 | 0.28 | 1.01 | 0.60 ≈ |
| Operating cash flow | -34.0 m | 56.2 m ≈ | 29.6 m ≈ | 35.6 m | 31.1 m | 48.9 m ≈ | 36.7 m ≈ | 79.6 m |
| Capex | 5.8 m | 5.1 m ≈ | 5.5 m ≈ | 6.1 m | 4.7 m | 5.4 m ≈ | 4.9 m ≈ | 5.5 m |
| Dividends paid | 141.0 k | -141.0 k ≈ | 0 ≈ | 0 | 721.0 k | 8.3 m ≈ | 8.3 m ≈ | 8.2 m |
| Share repurchases | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | 3.1 m |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 0 percentile of its own 4-quarter history (min 11.6, median 12.6, max 14.1; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.0 bn | 1.0 bn |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +1.0% |
| Net income | 133.9 m | 88.9 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | −33.6% |
| Diluted EPS | 3.51 | 2.29 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | −34.8% |
| net % | 13.3% | 8.7% |
| Free cash flow | 64.9 m | 175.8 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2026 · 31 Aug 2026
- Cash
- 159.4 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 346.3 m USD
- Total assets
- 619.5 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 2.10x
- ROE
- 30.3%
- ROA
- 16.0%
- FCF margin
- 17.3%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.0 bn | 1.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Operating income | 172.1 m | 122.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 22.0 m | 23.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| EBITDA | 194.1 m ≈ | 146.2 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 480.0 k | 2.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | 182.1 m | 129.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Income tax | 46.7 m | 41.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Net income | 133.9 m | 88.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 3.51 | 2.29 | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 38.1 m | 38.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | — | 0.63 | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 136.5 m | 159.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Receivables | 59.0 m | 54.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Current assets | 266.0 m | 382.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 38.8 m | 37.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 3.7 m | 3.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | 87.3 m | 84.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Total assets | 493.6 m | 619.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 25.7 m | 32.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 162.0 m | 182.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 253.5 m | 273.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Equity | 240.1 m | 346.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2025 | 2026 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 87.4 m | 196.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Capex | 22.5 m | 20.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | 64.9 m ≈ | 175.8 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -20.0 m | -165.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -250.6 m | -39.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 25.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
| Share repurchases | 0 | 7.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 03 Nov 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- score weight coverage: 52.1% of at least 60%
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 794.4 m USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
52% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 8.28 – 39.40 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/E16.64 – 39.40 (Mid 29.52)15 companies used · median multiple 12.9x · quartiles 7.3x – 17.2xAPEI, CVSA, IH, LAUR, LFS, LGCY, LINC, LOPE, LRN, PRDO, STG, STRA, TAL, VSA, YOUL
- Dividend discount (DDM)8.28 – 11.13 (Mid 9.50)
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: score weight coverage: 52.1% of at least 60%
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | 8.7% | 63 (vs peers) | 12% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | 197.9% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 12% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | 60.0x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 12% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 2.1x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 8% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 9.5x | 79 (vs peers) | 20% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | 22.1% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 16% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 4.1% | 59 (on a fixed band) | 12% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | 14.6% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 8% |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet100/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality82/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns75/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Valuation88/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Phoenix Education Partners, Inc. (PXED). Latest full fiscal year: 2026; data up to 2026-08-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 1.0 bn USD in 2026; YoY growth 1.0%; net margin 8.7%; ROE 30.1%.
The estimated value range is 12.46–25.27 USD per share (median of 2 methods, agreement: low); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 19.51 USD, the price of 21.66 USD leaves a potential of -9.9% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of -11.0% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
Insufficient data for a verdict (score weight coverage: 52.1% of at least 60%).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- FCF conversion: 197.9%
- Interest coverage: 60.0x
- Current ratio: 2.1x
- P/E (TTM): 9.5x
- FCF yield: 22.1%
- Payout ratio (FCF): 14.6%
What contradicts it
- The valuation methods diverge
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, EV/EBITDA.
Versus the vertical median
Services-Educational Services (SIC 8200) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDUNew Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 80.7 bn | 169.7 | 12.4% | 8.4% | +15.5% | +2% / −36% |
| LAURLaureate Education, Inc. | 4.8 bn | 12.9 | 34.1% | 20.3% | +8.6% | +14% / +168% |
| CVSACovista Inc. | 4.1 bn | 17.0 | 17.9% | 12.8% | +9.3% | +34% / +118% |
| COE51Talk Online Education Group | 4.1 bn | — | — | -17.6% | +88.6% | −73% / +43% |
| LOPEGrand Canyon Education, Inc. | 3.8 bn | 16.1 | 35.9% | 21.9% | +7.1% | −4% / +10% |
| LRNStride, Inc. | 3.3 bn | 10.9 | 20.9% | 13.2% | +4.7% | +25% / +31% |
| NAMIJinxin Technology Holding Company | 2.6 bn | — | -89.7% | -22.8% | +6.1% | −89% / unavailable |
| DAOYoudao, Inc. | 2.5 bn | 159.2 | — | 1.6% | +9.6% | +105% / +397% |
| PRDOPerdoceo Education Corp | 1.9 bn | 10.9 | 17.6% | 20.6% | +24.2% | +7% / +72% |
| STRAStrategic Education, Inc. | 1.7 bn | 12.4 | 8.2% | 10.5% | +4.0% | −5% / −16% |
| YQ17 Education & Technology Group Inc. | 1.5 bn | — | -46.5% | -145.6% | −41.5% | −41% / +14% |
| UTIUniversal Technical Institute, Inc | 1.2 bn | 36.3 | 10.5% | 3.9% | +14.0% | −3% / +91% |
| PXEDPhoenix Education Partners, Inc. | 794.4 m | 9.5 | 30.1% | 8.7% | +1.0% | −38% / unavailable |
| APEIAmerican Public Education, Inc. | 776.2 m | 17.5 | 15.6% | 6.8% | +3.9% | +22% / +439% |
| LINCLincoln Educational Services Corporation | 637.9 m | 28.0 | 11.9% | 4.0% | +17.8% | −2% / +117% |
| JZJianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited | 522.3 m | — | -44.4% | -22.4% | −70.6% | −98% / −100% |
| GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc. | 373.9 m | — | -20.8% | -5.3% | +40.9% | −0% / −9% |
| IHiHuman Inc. | 245.2 m | 22.8 | 10.0% | 11.8% | −8.7% | −60% / −59% |
| FEDUFour Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. | 210.5 m | 46.6 | 6.8% | 12.1% | +7.6% | −30% / +13% |
| LXEHLixiang Education Holding Co. Ltd. | 155.2 m | — | -83.1% | -395.4% | −1.9% | −63% / −99% |
| LGCYLegacy Education Inc. | 118.1 m | 14.0 | 19.5% | 11.4% | +24.8% | −12% / unavailable |
| EEIQEpicQuest Education Group International Limited | 93.6 m | — | -34.8% | -27.2% | +9.6% | −23% / −81% |
| VSAVisionSys AI Inc | 81.8 m | 0.3 | — | 164,963.8% | −99.9% | −97% / −100% |
| CHGGChegg, Inc | 71.1 m | — | -30.7% | -17.2% | −39.0% | −34% / −94% |
| AMBOAmbow Education Holding Ltd. | 62.3 m | — | -2.9% | -2.6% | +0.8% | −61% / −10% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for PXED from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 13.07 Total return -37% · Per year -37% | 23.14 Total return 10% · Per year 10% | 34.91 Total return 65% · Per year 65% |
| 3 years | 11.80 Total return -39% · Per year -15% | 23.59 Total return 18% · Per year 6% | 39.20 Total return 93% · Per year 24% |
| 5 years | 10.65 Total return -40% · Per year -10% | 24.05 Total return 27% · Per year 5% | 44.02 Total return 124% · Per year 18% |
- Exit P/E± 5.90
- Net margin± 4.13
- Annual revenue growth± 3.51
- Annual dilution± 0.35
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 14 Jul 2026; since then the company filed 8-K (03 Nov 2026 · results), 10-K (03 Nov 2026).
In brief
Phoenix Education Partners, Inc. (PXED) is the parent of The University of Phoenix, one of the largest online education providers for working adults, with a skills-aligned model and employer partnerships. The company listed on the stock exchange in October 2025, and in fiscal 2025 its net revenue reached 1,007.2 million USD amid tightening federal regulation.
SWOT
Strengths
- Long experience in online education for adults, a large alumni base and an academic model fitted to students' working schedules.
- Rising student retention and a strong base of employer partners that support enrollment.
- Investment in data and AI to personalise student support and job matching.
Weaknesses
- Very high dependence on federal Title IV funding, which makes revenue sensitive to regulatory change.
- Competitive advantage from early online leadership has narrowed as competitors have entered.
- Advertising and share-based compensation costs rose after the listing, which reduced quarterly net income.
Opportunities
- Growing non-degree certificates and employer solutions could diversify revenue.
- Expanding B2B employer partnerships could bring students with better retention.
- Skills-to-job matching tools could open new revenue sources.
Threats
- Legislative changes that restrict federal funding or condition program eligibility.
- Competition from traditional universities and other online providers could reduce market share.
- The cybersecurity incident identified in November 2025 and data protection requirements could create costs and reputational risk.
Risks
- Dependence on Title IV fundinghigh
A very large share of revenue comes from federal student funds; if eligibility narrows, the business could become hard to sustain.
- Borrower defense and loan discharge liabilitieshigh
Borrower defense and closed school discharge rules could create repayment liabilities for discharged federal loans, including on a large number of applications received since 2020.
- Rising competitionmedium
Traditional providers and lower-cost alternatives could reduce market share and pressure pricing.
- Cybersecurity incidentmedium
The incident identified in November 2025 could lead to remediation costs, litigation or reporting obligations.
- Share sales after lock-up expirylow
Options held by pre-IPO holders can be exercised and sold, which could affect share count and liquidity.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- The company has a large student base and rising retention, which supports revenue if enrollment stays stable.
- Revenue guidance for fiscal 2026 points to stability, and operating cash generation has increased.
- If employer partnerships and talent solutions develop, the company could diversify its revenue sources.
What would break the thesis
- Dependence on federal funding leaves revenue exposed to legislative changes that restrict eligibility.
- Quarterly net income fell in the third quarter of fiscal 2026, mainly due to listing-related costs and higher advertising expense.
- Competition from traditional universities could erode the company's advantage among working adults.
What to watch
- Financial results and guidance for fiscal 2026Q4 2026
- Trends in average total degreed enrollment and student retentionQ4 2026
- Application of federal student financing and program eligibility rules2027
- Development of non-degree and employer solution revenuenext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 14 Jul 2026; since then the company filed 8-K (03 Nov 2026 · results), 10-K (03 Nov 2026).
The business
Phoenix Education Partners, Inc. operates through its subsidiary The University of Phoenix, Inc., founded in 1976 and accredited since 1978 by the Higher Learning Commission. The university focuses mainly on working adults and offers bachelor's, master's, doctoral and non-degree certificate programs in a non-term model with consecutive courses. According to the annual report, about 97% of net revenue in fiscal 2025 came from degree-granting programs 1.
Average Total Degreed Enrollment was 81,900 students in fiscal 2025, of whom 66,300 were undergraduate and 15,600 graduate 1. Bachelor's programs make up the largest share, followed by master's and associate's. Most students are employed, and the company has invested in digital career tools and academic progress tracking.
Segments
Degree programs (bachelor's, master's, doctoral)
These programs generate almost all revenue and are the main growth engine, tied to federal student financing and eligibility rules.
Non-degree programs and employer solutions
Certificates, professional development courses and talent platforms for employers are a growing priority but still a small share of revenue.
B2B employer partnerships
Enrollment through employer programs is an important share of students and could diversify the revenue base and reduce student acquisition costs.
Market context
The US post-secondary education market includes more than 5,000 colleges and universities, and competition is fragmented 1. Working adults are an attractive but distinct segment that traditional programs for 18- to 22-year-olds do not serve well. Demand depends on institutions' ability to offer flexible, fast models, and changes in how students search online, including through AI-enabled platforms, could affect enrollment.
Growth in the segment also depends on labour market trends and demand for reskilling. The company is one of the largest US universities focused on distance education, but no single institution holds a significant share of the total post-secondary market 1.
Trends
- Changes to federal student financingheadwind
Recent amendments to the Higher Education Act could reduce federal student aid and tie program eligibility to former students' earnings 1. If these rules are applied strictly, revenue could be affected.
- Demand for adult reskillingtailwind
Rapid workforce change and pressure for new skills support demand for flexible career programs, an advantage for a provider focused on working adults 3.
- AI in student search and enrollmentmixed
The way prospective students discover programs has changed, including through AI-enabled platforms, which can change enrollment pace and marketing efficiency 2.
- Growing competition from traditional universitiesheadwind
Traditional institutions are expanding online programs aimed at adults, which could reduce the company's competitive advantage 1.
Competitive position
Competition comes from local colleges and universities offering online courses, other proprietary online providers and non-traditional alternatives such as bootcamps. The company says it is well positioned thanks to affordability, online experience and brand recognition 1.
Some competitors have greater financial resources and can offer similar programs at lower tuition. Traditional universities' use of online program managers has declined recently, but the number of institutions offering fully online adult programs has grown 1.
- Traditional universities with online programs
Public and private institutions offering online programs for adults, with strong academic reputations, as noted in the annual report.
- Other proprietary online education providers
Accredited proprietary institutions offering fully online programs for working adults.
- Skills-focused bootcamp programs
Intensive skills programs with lower fees that attract price-sensitive students.
- Online program management providers
Companies that help traditional universities launch online programs aimed at working adults.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report03 Nov 2026Results of operations · Departure or appointment of officers · Financial statements and exhibits
- Annual report03 Nov 2026
- Current report09 Oct 2026Departure or appointment of officers · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report17 Sept 2026Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report14 Jul 2026
- Current report14 Jul 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report13 Jul 2026Departure or appointment of officers
- Quarterly report07 Apr 2026
- Current report07 Apr 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report13 Feb 2026Shareholder vote
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-08-31 · SEC / Phoenix Education Partners, Inc. · 20 Nov 2025
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-05-31 · SEC / Phoenix Education Partners, Inc. · 14 Jul 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Phoenix Education Partners, Inc. · 14 Jul 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.