olivLaw · US equity research
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. SDHC
Operative Builders · SIC 1531 · Vertical: Operative Builders (SIC 1531)
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. designs, builds and sells single-family homes mainly for entry-level and empty-nest buyers in high-growth markets across the Southeastern and Southern United States. Its land-light model matters now because elevated mortgage rates have pressured demand, and the company has responded with financing incentives and continued volume growth. The company closed 2,908 homes in 2025, and home closing revenue rose year over year in the second quarter of 2026.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 05 Nov 2026, Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC) stock was 10.32 USD (+6.39% on the day), with P/E 19.1 on diluted EPS of 0.54 USD over the last 12 months, beta 0.94, 52-week range 9.70–22.16 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q3 2026): revenue of 262.5 m USD (+0.2% YoY), net income of 577.0 k USD (−72.9% YoY), diluted EPS 0.07 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 50.0
- neutral
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 9.69 – 10.67
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.64 · band width 9.6%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 10.43 / 13.43
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.10 / -0.13
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +1.3% | −1.1% | +2.4 pp | — |
| 3 months | −26.5% | −0.5% | −26.1 pp | — |
| 6 months | −19.9% | +4.4% | −24.3 pp | — |
| Year to date | −38.5% | +12.3% | −50.8 pp | — |
| 1 year | −42.4% | +13.5% | −55.9 pp | −11.0% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +76.4% | unavailable | +9.8% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +63.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q3 2026 · 30 Sept 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 | Q3 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 287.5 m | 224.7 m | 223.9 m | 262.0 m | 260.4 m | 206.4 m | 273.0 m | 262.5 m |
| Cost of revenue | 214.2 m | 171.2 m | 172.0 m | 207.1 m | 208.7 m | 166.0 m | 225.1 m | 219.8 m |
| Gross profit | 73.3 m | 53.5 m | 51.9 m | 55.0 m | 51.7 m | 40.5 m | 47.9 m | 42.7 m |
| SG&A | 42.9 m | 33.0 m | 34.7 m | 36.1 m | 36.0 m | 35.9 m | 41.9 m | 40.4 m |
| Interest expense | 586.0 k | 666.0 k | 772.0 k | 898.0 k | 858.0 k | 848.0 k | 640.0 k | 66.0 k |
| Pre-tax income | 30.0 m | 19.6 m | 17.2 m | 17.2 m | 16.9 m | 4.3 m | 1.9 m | 3.3 m |
| Income tax | 1.3 m | 857.0 k | 744.0 k | 1.0 m | -130.0 k | 253.0 k | 100.0 k | 279.0 k |
| Net income | 4.1 m | 2.7 m | 2.4 m | 2.1 m | 3.5 m | 565.0 k | 246.0 k | 577.0 k |
| Diluted EPS | — | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.38 ≈ | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.07 |
| Operating cash flow | 5.5 m | -34.9 m | -28.9 m ≈ | 22.8 m ≈ | 9.8 m | 338.0 k | 4.5 m ≈ | -33.3 m ≈ |
| Capex | 676.0 k | 1.0 m | 2.1 m ≈ | 1.4 m ≈ | 1.0 m | 540.0 k | 599.0 k ≈ | 1.5 m ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 75 percentile of its own 4-quarter history (min 13.0, median 16.5, max 21.9; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 764.6 m | 975.5 m | 971.1 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +27.6% | −0.4% |
| Net income | 123.2 m | 16.1 m | 10.7 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | −87.0% | −33.5% |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | 1.81 | 1.19 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | −34.3% |
| net % | 16.1% | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Free cash flow | 74.9 m | 15.2 m | -36.9 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 12.7 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 444.1 m USD
- Total assets
- 557.6 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- unavailable
- ROE
- 2.5%
- ROA
- 2.1%
- FCF margin
- -3.8%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 764.6 m | 975.5 m | 971.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 548.3 m | 719.9 m | 758.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 216.3 m | 255.5 m | 212.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| SG&A | 92.4 m | 136.4 m | 139.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Interest expense | 1.7 m | 2.5 m | 3.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | 123.2 m | 116.9 m | 70.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 0 | 5.1 m | 2.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | 123.2 m | 16.1 m | 10.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | — | 1.81 | 1.19 | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | — | 9.1 m | 9.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 19.8 m | 22.4 m | 12.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 1.5 m | 3.8 m | 9.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Goodwill | 25.7 m | 25.7 m | 25.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 352.7 m | 475.9 m | 557.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 143.8 m | 74.2 m | 113.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 208.9 m | 401.7 m | 444.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 76.3 m | 19.1 m | -31.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 1.3 m | 3.9 m | 5.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | 74.9 m ≈ | 15.2 m ≈ | -36.9 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -76.8 m | -4.7 m | -6.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -9.2 m | -11.8 m | 28.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 12 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 3 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 22.9% of at least 60%
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
05 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: unavailable
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
23% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 6.98 – 8.23 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/E6.98 – 8.23 (Mid 7.88)12 companies used · median multiple 14.6x · quartiles 12.9x – 15.3xCCS, DFH, DHI, ECG, GRBK, KBH, LGIH, MHO, MTH, NVR, PHM, TOL
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 3 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 22.9% of at least 60%
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | 0.5% | 7 (vs peers) | 27% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | -456.8% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 27% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 19.1x | 8 (vs peers) | 45% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality3/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial8/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-09-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 971.1 m USD in 2025; YoY growth -0.4%; net margin 0.5%; ROE 6.0%.
The estimated value range is 6.98–8.23 USD per share (median of 1 methods, agreement: single method); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 7.88 USD, the price of 10.32 USD leaves a potential of -23.7% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of -31.0% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 3 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 22.9% of at least 60%).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
What contradicts it
- Net margin: 0.5%
- FCF conversion: -456.8%
- P/E (TTM): 19.1x
- The price is above the estimated value range
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, Current ratio, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Operative Builders (SIC 1531) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 16 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DHID.R. Horton, Inc. | 43.9 bn | 14.9 | 12.8% | 9.2% | −6.9% | −1% / +23% |
| PHMPultegroup, Inc. | 25.0 bn | 14.5 | 13.9% | 11.2% | −3.5% | +7% / +54% |
| NVRNVR, Inc. | 16.9 bn | 17.6 | 28.3% | 11.2% | −1.9% | −15% / +4% |
| TOLToll Brothers, Inc. | 14.3 bn | 12.5 | 14.4% | 11.1% | +1.1% | +11% / +81% |
| MTHMeritage Homes Corporation | 4.6 bn | 16.0 | 5.8% | — | unavailable | −3% / +1% |
| ECGEverus Construction Group, Inc. | 3.7 bn | 14.6 | 39.5% | 6.0% | +31.5% | −21% / unavailable |
| MHOM/i Homes, Inc. | 3.4 bn | 12.8 | 8.7% | 6.6% | −1.9% | −2% / +27% |
| KBHKb Home | 3.2 bn | 14.6 | 5.9% | 4.4% | −10.0% | −19% / −0% |
| GRBKGreen Brick Partners, Inc. | 2.8 bn | 10.6 | 14.3% | 14.2% | −1.0% | −3% / +39% |
| CCSCentury Communities, Inc. | 1.6 bn | 15.2 | 4.2% | 2.9% | −6.4% | −13% / −21% |
| LGIHLgi Homes, Inc. | 1.1 bn | 15.5 | 3.4% | 4.2% | −22.6% | −9% / −60% |
| BZHBeazer Homes USA Inc | 893.2 m | — | -0.7% | -0.4% | +1.8% | +49% / +38% |
| HOVHovnanian Enterprises Inc | 75.5 m | 77.0 | 2.2% | 0.6% | −0.9% | −20% / +16% |
| SDHCSmith Douglas Homes Corp. | — | 19.1 | 6.0% | 0.5% | −0.4% | −42% / unavailable |
| DFHDream Finders Homes, Inc. | — | 13.0 | 7.6% | 2.6% | −2.9% | −37% / −49% |
| LGPSLogprostyle Inc. | — | — | 19.7% | 3.4% | +7.6% | −48% / unavailable |
| LRELead Real Estate Co., Ltd | — | — | 12.2% | 3.5% | −3.5% | −15% / −84% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for SDHC from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 06 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 8-K (04 Nov 2026 · results), 10-Q (04 Nov 2026).
In brief
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. designs, builds and sells single-family homes mainly for entry-level and empty-nest buyers in high-growth markets across the Southeastern and Southern United States. Its land-light model matters now because elevated mortgage rates have pressured demand, and the company has responded with financing incentives and continued volume growth. The company closed 2,908 homes in 2025, and home closing revenue rose year over year in the second quarter of 2026.
SWOT
Strengths
- The land-light model reduces capital tied up in land and exposure to development risk, giving flexibility when demand is weak.
- Construction cycle times are among the shortest in the public sector, and the SMART Builder system provides near real-time cost control.
- The balance sheet is conservatively leveraged with available liquidity, which allows quick responses to changes in market conditions.
Weaknesses
- Home closing gross margin fell sharply in the second quarter of 2026, and the company recorded inventory impairments and lot option abandonment charges.
- The company depends on a limited number of markets, with Atlanta accounting for a large share of activity, increasing exposure to a local slowdown.
- Net income attributable to Smith Douglas Homes Corp. declined sharply, and a large part of the result belongs to non-controlling interests.
Opportunities
- Demographic growth and limited resale supply could support long-term demand for new affordable homes.
- Expansion into new markets and growth in active communities could add volume if execution remains disciplined.
- Lower mortgage rates could ease affordability pressure and improve the conversion of orders into sales.
Threats
- High mortgage rates and economic uncertainty can restrain demand and force the company into costly incentives.
- Strains at regional banks can affect land financing and the ability of partner developers to deliver lots on time.
- Tariffs on building materials and rising labor costs could reduce margins if they cannot be passed on to prices.
Risks
- Cyclical housing exposurehigh
The business is affected by general and local economic conditions, and a deterioration could reduce orders and selling prices.
- Access to mortgage credithigh
Buyers depend on mortgage financing, and tighter lending standards or higher rates could prevent sales.
- Geographic concentrationmedium
Concentration of activity in a few markets, especially Atlanta, makes the company vulnerable to weaker local economies.
- Reliance on third parties for landmedium
The land-light model depends on third-party developers and land bankers, and their financing problems could delay lot delivery.
- Construction costsmedium
Rising material, labor and possible tariff costs could reduce margins if they cannot be passed on to buyers.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If mortgage rates ease, demand for affordable homes in the company's growth markets could recover quickly, and orders in the second quarter of 2026 already show an upward trend.
- The operating model built on short build times and land-light acquisition could sustain profitability through volatility if capital discipline holds.
- A conservative balance sheet and expansion into new markets could give the company room to take advantage of acquisition or organic growth opportunities.
What would break the thesis
- Home closing gross margin contracted sharply in the second quarter of 2026, and impairments and abandoned lot options suggest pressure on asset values.
- If mortgage rates stay high, the incentives needed to support volume could erode margins and profitability over the medium term.
- Concentration in a few markets and reliance on third-party land financing could amplify the impact of any weakening in demand or regional lending.
What to watch
- Trend in home closing gross margin and any further inventory impairmentsQ3 2026
- Pace of net new orders and demand response to mortgage rate movementsQ3 2026
- Cancellation rate and the level of financing incentives offered to buyersnext 10-K
- Cost of financing for partner land developers and land banks2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 06 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 8-K (04 Nov 2026 · results), 10-Q (04 Nov 2026).
The business
The company builds single-family homes sold mainly to entry-level and empty-nest buyers, priced below FHA loan limits. Lots are acquired largely through option contracts on finished lots, which reduces upfront capital and land exposure, and almost all homes are pre-sold with buyer-selected options from a limited set of floor plans. Construction is run on the SMART Builder ERP system and the Rteam process, which support short build times and a relatively high home closing gross margin.
Operations are organized into ten geographic divisions forming two reportable segments, Southeast (Atlanta, Central Georgia, Charlotte, Greenville, Raleigh and, from 2026, Chattanooga) and Central (Alabama, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Nashville and Alabama Gulf Coast). Expansion has been mostly organic, with the Devon Street Homes acquisition in 2023 bringing the company into Houston. The balance sheet is conservatively leveraged and management owns most of the common stock.
The land-light model remains central to the strategy: the company aims to keep at most about two months of finished lots on the balance sheet and to reach at least 200 annual starts within two years of entering a new market. The company frames its aim as risk-adjusted returns rather than volume alone, while its reliance on third-party developers and land bankers ties the model to financing conditions in credit markets.
Segments
Southeast segment
The Southeast segment includes the Atlanta, Central Georgia, Charlotte, Chattanooga, Greenville and Raleigh divisions, with Atlanta the company's largest market. In the second quarter of 2026 it generated home closing revenue of 168,995 thousand USD, up 20% year over year, on 509 homes closed.
Central segment
The Central segment comprises the Alabama, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Nashville and Alabama Gulf Coast divisions. In the second quarter of 2026 its home closing revenue rose 26% year over year to 104,031 thousand USD with a flat average selling price, and the 2025 entries into Dallas-Fort Worth and the Alabama Gulf Coast broaden the regional footprint.
Market context
The company operates in Southeastern and Southern markets where demand is supported by population growth, positive net migration and limited resale housing supply. High mortgage rates and macroeconomic uncertainty have restricted affordability for buyers, and in the first half of 2026 revenue rose 7% from the prior-year period while the average selling price of homes closed edged down.
The competitive landscape includes large national builders that can use scale to offer pricing and incentives, while the markets where the company operates remain fragmented across metro areas. Financing costs, lot availability and building material prices are factors that can quickly change the relative position of companies in the sector.
Trends
- Elevated mortgage ratesheadwind
High mortgage rates have narrowed affordability for entry-level buyers and pushed the company to offer support such as rate buydowns and closing cost credits. If rates ease, demand could recover faster, but a prolonged high-rate environment could keep pressure on margins.
- Demographic growth in the Southtailwind
Net migration and job growth in the large metro areas of the Southeast and South support long-term demand for new homes. The company sees this as a favorable backdrop, although a weaker local economy could quickly weigh on demand.
- Building material costs and tariffsheadwind
Higher building material costs, including lumber, and possible tariffs on building supplies can compress gross margin if they cannot be passed on to buyers. This is already visible in the lower second quarter 2026 home closing gross margin.
- Land financing through regional banksmixed
Strains at regional banks could make it harder for land developers and land bankers to finance lots that the company buys through option contracts. The land-light model could become harder to sustain, although direct balance sheet exposure remains limited.
Competitive position
Competition comes from regional and national builders operating in the same Southeastern and Southern markets, some with greater scale and cheaper access to financing. The company differentiates itself through short construction cycle times, its lot acquisition model and a focus on affordable pricing with a high degree of buyer personalization.
Rivals in these markets can offer more floor plans or more aggressive incentives, and the company's advantage depends on keeping its operating efficiency and competitive land costs. If those advantages narrow, its position in metro markets could be affected.
- D.R. HortonDHI
Large national builder that competes directly in the affordable housing segment of Southeastern markets.
- LennarLEN
National builder with large scale and extensive Southern operations that can sustain financing incentives.
- Taylor MorrisonTMHC
Builder active in several Southern and Eastern markets that competes for the same first-time buyers.
- Meritage HomesMTH
Builder with operations in Texas and the Southeast, an important rival in the same metro areas.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Quarterly report04 Nov 2026
- Current report04 Nov 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report06 Aug 2026
- Current report06 Aug 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report10 Jun 2026Shareholder vote
- Quarterly report30 Apr 2026
- Current report29 Apr 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Proxy statement22 Apr 2026
- Annual report12 Mar 2026
- Current report11 Mar 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · 12 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · 06 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · 06 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.