olivLaw · US equity research
Venture Global, Inc. VG
Natural Gas Distribution · SIC 4924 · Vertical: Natural Gas Distribution (SIC 4924)
Venture Global is a U.S. LNG exporter that integrates liquefaction, pipeline transport, shipping and regasification. The company has moved several projects into commercial operation, and its quarterly revenue rose sharply in the second quarter of 2026, making its business relevant to global energy markets. Revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 reached 4.6 billion USD, and net income was 1417 million USD.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Venture Global, Inc. (VG) stock was 12.00 USD (−7.69% on the day), with P/E 9.1 on diluted EPS of 1.31 USD over the last 12 months, dividend yield 0.30%, beta 0.82, 52-week range 5.92–17.53 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 4.6 bn USD (+47.6% YoY), net income of 1.4 bn USD (+198.3% YoY), diluted EPS 0.51 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 38.3
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 11.84 – 14.79
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.05 · band width 22.2%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 13.75 / 12.76
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.07 / 0.00
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −10.8% | −2.0% | −8.8 pp | — |
| 3 months | −3.5% | −2.2% | −1.3 pp | — |
| 6 months | 0.0% | +4.3% | −4.3 pp | — |
| Year to date | +76.0% | +10.6% | +65.4 pp | — |
| 1 year | +50.6% | +10.5% | +40.1 pp | +2.8% |
| 3 years | unavailable | +73.7% | unavailable | +41.4% |
| 5 years | unavailable | +61.7% | unavailable | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 926.0 m | 1.5 bn | 2.9 bn | 3.1 bn | 3.3 bn | 4.4 bn | 4.6 bn | 4.6 bn |
| Cost of revenue | 272.0 m | 414.0 m | 1.1 bn | 1.4 bn | 1.4 bn | 2.1 bn | 2.8 bn | 1.7 bn |
| Research & development | 156.0 m | 124.0 m | 182.0 m | 57.0 m | 53.0 m | 52.0 m | 46.0 m | 23.0 m |
| Operating income | 189.0 m | 594.0 m | 1.1 bn | 1.0 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.7 bn | 1.2 bn | 2.2 bn |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 89.0 m | 93.0 m | 216.0 m | 267.0 m | 218.0 m | 240.0 m | 251.0 m | 260.0 m |
| Interest expense | 128.0 m | 117.0 m | 276.0 m | 310.0 m | 421.0 m | 447.0 m | 444.0 m | 489.0 m |
| Pre-tax income | -372.0 m | 1.2 bn | 668.0 m | 591.0 m | 637.0 m | 1.5 bn | 736.0 m | 1.8 bn |
| Income tax | -78.0 m | 248.0 m | 151.0 m | 116.0 m | 87.0 m | 276.0 m | 111.0 m | 336.0 m |
| Net income | -294.0 m | 990.0 m | 517.0 m | 475.0 m | 550.0 m | 1.2 bn | 625.0 m | 1.4 bn |
| Diluted EPS | -0.15 | 0.38 ≈ | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.45 ≈ | 0.19 | 0.51 |
| Operating cash flow | 280.0 m ≈ | 673.0 m | 1.1 bn | 1.5 bn ≈ | 1.9 bn ≈ | 2.1 bn | 763.0 m | 2.1 bn ≈ |
| Capex | 3.8 bn ≈ | 3.7 bn | 3.5 bn | 3.0 bn ≈ | 3.3 bn ≈ | 3.6 bn | 3.2 bn | 3.7 bn ≈ |
| Dividends paid | 54.0 m ≈ | 56.0 m | 190.0 m | 57.0 m ≈ | 176.0 m ≈ | 42.0 m | 180.0 m | -91.0 m ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 33 percentile of its own 6-quarter history (min 7.5, median 16.9, max 30.0; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 7.9 bn | 5.0 bn | 13.8 bn |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | −37.0% | +176.9% |
| Net income | 3.6 bn | 1.7 bn | 2.7 bn |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | −51.7% | +56.5% |
| Diluted EPS | 1.25 | 0.57 | 0.86 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | −54.4% | +50.9% |
| net % | 45.8% | 35.1% | 19.8% |
| Free cash flow | -3.5 bn | -11.6 bn | -6.8 bn |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 2.4 bn USD
- Financial debt
- 34.2 bn USD
- Net debt
- 31.9 bn USD
- Equity
- 10.3 bn USD
- Total assets
- 53.4 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- 3.32x
- Current ratio
- 0.93x
- ROE
- 32.8%
- ROA
- 5.6%
- FCF margin
- -49.4%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 7.9 bn | 5.0 bn | 13.8 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 1.7 bn | 1.4 bn | 5.9 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 6.2 bn ≈ | 3.6 bn ≈ | 7.8 bn ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026derived |
| Research & development | 490.0 m | 635.0 m | 344.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | 4.9 bn | 1.8 bn | 5.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 277.0 m | 322.0 m | 941.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | 5.1 bn ≈ | 2.1 bn ≈ | 6.1 bn ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 641.0 m | 584.0 m | 1.5 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | 4.4 bn | 2.2 bn | 3.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 816.0 m | 437.0 m | 630.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | 3.6 bn | 1.7 bn | 2.7 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 1.25 | 0.57 | 0.86 | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 2.1 bn | 2.6 bn | 2.6 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | — | — | 0.03 | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Revenue − Cost of revenue; Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 5.9 bn | 3.6 bn | 2.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | — | 364.0 m | 918.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | — | 171.0 m | 253.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | — | 4.6 bn | 4.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | — | 43.5 bn | 53.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | — | 1.5 bn | 737.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | — | 190.0 m | 812.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | — | 29.1 bn | 33.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | — | 3.5 bn | 4.3 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | — | 35.6 bn | 41.5 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | — | 6.4 bn | 10.3 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 4.6 bn | 2.1 bn | 6.6 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 8.1 bn | 13.7 bn | 13.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | -3.5 bn ≈ | -11.6 bn ≈ | -6.8 bn ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -8.7 bn | -14.2 bn | -13.2 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | 7.6 bn | 10.8 bn | 5.5 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 164.0 m | 139.0 m | 465.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- score weight coverage: 54.2% of at least 60%
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: unavailable
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
54% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 19.68 – 27.32 USD.
Methods computed but outside the aggregate range: Dividend discount (DDM) (a small share of earnings is paid as dividends (capital returns through buybacks): the dividend model does not describe the value and stays outside the aggregate).
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · input data missing
- Peers: P/E19.68 – 27.32 (Mid 22.76)10 companies used · median multiple 17.3x · quartiles 15.0x – 20.8xATO, CQP, EE, LNG, MDU, NFG, NJR, NWN, OGS, SR
- Dividend discount (DDM)outside the aggregate0.39 – 0.53 (Mid 0.45)a small share of earnings is paid as dividends (capital returns through buybacks): the dividend model does not describe the value and stays outside the aggregate
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: score weight coverage: 54.2% of at least 60%
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | 12.0% | 70 (vs peers) | 19% |
| Net margin · Quality | 22.3% | 67 (vs peers) | 12% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | -184.8% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 12% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | 5.3x | 22 (vs peers) | 19% |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | 3.5x | 31 (on a fixed band) | 12% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.2x | 32 (on a fixed band) | 8% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 9.1x | 100 (vs peers) | 19% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet27/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Quality50/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial100/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
VENTURE GLOBAL, INC. (VG). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 13.8 bn USD in 2025; YoY growth 176.9%; net margin 22.3%; ROE 54.7%; net debt/EBITDA 5.3x.
The estimated value range is 19.68–27.32 USD per share (median of 1 methods, agreement: single method); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 22.76 USD, the price of 12.00 USD leaves a potential of 89.7% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of 47.3% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
Insufficient data for a verdict (score weight coverage: 54.2% of at least 60%).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- ROIC: 12.0%
- P/E (TTM): 9.1x
- The price is below the estimated value range
What contradicts it
- FCF conversion: -184.8%
- Net debt / EBITDA: 5.3x
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): Revenue CAGR 3Y, EPS CAGR 3Y, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Natural Gas Distribution (SIC 4924) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 14 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNGCheniere Energy, Inc. | 63.5 bn | 21.7 | 45.7% | 13.1% | +27.2% | +49% / +71% |
| CQPCheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 30.5 bn | 9.3 | — | 28.1% | +23.6% | +16% / +2% |
| ATOAtmos Energy Corp | 29.4 bn | 20.7 | 9.8% | 28.5% | +12.9% | −1% / +53% |
| NFGNational Fuel Gas Company | 7.3 bn | 10.6 | 19.6% | 26.9% | +17.1% | −7% / +51% |
| NJRNew Jersey Resources Corporation | 5.6 bn | 15.2 | 14.5% | 24.0% | +9.9% | +15% / +30% |
| SRSpire Inc. | 5.3 bn | 14.9 | 10.3% | 13.9% | −4.5% | +2% / +48% |
| OGSONE Gas, Inc. | 5.2 bn | 17.5 | 8.7% | — | +42.5% | −2% / +43% |
| MDUMdu Resources Group Inc | 4.2 bn | 20.8 | 7.0% | 10.7% | +6.7% | −7% / +87% |
| NWNNorthwest Natural Holding Company | 2.2 bn | 17.1 | 8.3% | 9.7% | +11.8% | +4% / +40% |
| NFENew Fortress Energy Inc. | 1.2 bn | — | -533.9% | -148.7% | −36.2% | +234% / −89% |
| SLNGStabilis Solutions, Inc. | 71.2 m | — | -12.7% | -14.1% | −6.9% | −18% / −16% |
| CETYClean Energy Technologies, Inc. | 10.4 m | — | -76.3% | -245.9% | −63.8% | −53% / −96% |
| VGVenture Global, Inc. | — | 9.1 | 54.7% | 22.3% | +176.9% | +51% / unavailable |
| EEExcelerate Energy, Inc | — | 26.8 | — | — | +44.3% | +22% / +105% |
| UGPUltrapar Holdings Inc. | — | — | 16.5% | 1.8% | +5.9% | +36% / +10% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for VG from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 11 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 8-K (07 Oct 2026 · results).
In brief
Venture Global is a U.S. LNG exporter that integrates liquefaction, pipeline transport, shipping and regasification. The company has moved several projects into commercial operation, and its quarterly revenue rose sharply in the second quarter of 2026, making its business relevant to global energy markets. Revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 reached 4.6 billion USD 2, and net income was 1417 million USD 2.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company has long-term fixed-price contracts with creditworthy counterparties, which give predictable revenue. Its modular model and in-house construction have allowed rapid commissioning of projects 1.
- Vertical integration through pipelines, shipping and regasification gives direct access to markets with limited transport options 1.
- Revenue growth in the second quarter of 2026 shows production and sales have reached an important level 2.
Weaknesses
- The operating history is limited, and results can vary widely between periods, especially because of commissioning sales 1.
- Operating and maintenance costs rose in 2026 with the commissioning and ramp-up of Plaquemines production 2.
- The company depends on regulatory approvals and project financing, and delays could postpone expected revenue 12.
Opportunities
- Expansions of existing projects can use current infrastructure, which could reduce capital cost per unit 1.
- New five-year contracts and growing capacity could diversify the customer base and sales portfolio 2.
- European and other import markets with limited transport capacity could become important customers 1.
Risks
- Uncertain profitability before CODhigh
Profitability depends on commissioning sales, which end at COD. If these sales decline, revenue could be lower than expected 1.
- LNG price volatilityhigh
Revenue from commissioning sales and excess capacity depends on spot prices, which have varied significantly 1.
- Regulatory approvalshigh
Projects require FERC and DOE approvals, and some authorizations are under appeal. Delays or restrictions could change project timelines 12.
- Construction cost overrunsmedium
Project costs could rise because of external factors, inflation and labor availability, which could weigh on returns 1.
- Debt burden and financing costsmedium
The company has raised significant project financing, and interest costs could weigh on net income if market conditions worsen 2.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If Plaquemines and CP2 production keeps growing and long-term contracts perform as planned, revenue could become more stable and predictable.
- Vertical integration and the modular model could provide competitive costs, which could support margins over the long term.
- Demand for LNG to diversify energy supply could support new contracts and existing expansions.
What would break the thesis
- If spot prices fall or commissioning volumes shrink, revenue and profitability could fall below expectations.
- Legal challenges to export authorizations and approval delays could postpone revenue from new projects.
- Debt levels and interest costs could limit financial flexibility if market conditions deteriorate.
What to watch
- Production and sales trends at Plaquemines and timing of COD for the next phasesQ3 2026
- Delivery of the remaining LNG tankers and utilization of the fleet2026
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 11 Aug 2026; since then the company filed 8-K (07 Oct 2026 · results).
The business
Venture Global is a long-term, low-cost provider of U.S. LNG sourced from North American natural gas basins. Its integrated assets cover the LNG supply chain: production, gas transportation, shipping and regasification 1. Its 'design-one, build-many' model aims to build modular, standardized facilities quickly and at lower cost. The Calcasieu Project reached COD on April 15, 2025, and Plaquemines entered production and growing sales in 2025 and 2026 12.
Development also includes complementary infrastructure: the Blackfin pipeline, a fleet of LNG tankers being expanded, regasification capacity in the United Kingdom and Greece, and a carbon capture and sequestration plan in Louisiana 1. Bolt-on expansions at existing sites could reduce capital cost per tonne, but depend on incremental gas supply and regulatory approvals 1.
Segments
Liquefaction and export projects
This activity covers the Calcasieu, Plaquemines and CP2 projects and their expansions. Total expected capacity of the projects, including developments, is 194 mtpa, and Calcasieu has an expected annualized capacity of 11.2 mtpa 1. Plaquemines increased volumes sold in 2026 and CP2 is under construction 2.
Market context
The LNG market rests on global natural gas demand, reference prices such as Henry Hub, TTF and JKM, and available liquefaction capacity. The weighted average price of LNG sold was 9.80 USD/MMBtu in 2025 1 and 9.64 USD/MMBtu in the first six months of 2026 2. Company revenue depends heavily on the U.S. gas-linked price component, so Henry Hub movements affect results directly.
Demand for U.S. LNG is supported by the need for energy diversification and for replacing more carbon-intensive sources such as coal and oil, as the company describes 1. Spot market dynamics and shipping costs can change the revenue from commissioning sales 1.
Trends
- Plaquemines production ramptailwind
LNG volumes sold from Plaquemines have grown as commissioning advances, lifting quarterly revenue 2. If production stabilizes, revenue could become more predictable.
- Spot price volatilityheadwind
Revenue from commissioning sales depends on spot prices and the timing of contract signing, so profitability can vary significantly from one period to the next 1.
- Regulatory approvals for expansionsmixed
Project expansions need approvals from FERC and DOE, and some authorizations are under legal appeal 12. If approvals are delayed, expansion timelines could be affected.
- Financing and refinancingmixed
In 2026 the company repaid and refinanced several debt instruments, including new notes and credit facilities, which strengthened its capital structure 2. Interest costs nonetheless remain significant.
Competitive position
The provided texts do not describe competitors in detail. The company presents itself as a low-cost provider that reaches the market faster than traditional projects, which suggests competition with other North American LNG exporters 1.
The declared advantage lies in its modular model, supply chain integration and long-term contracts. Competitors with larger projects or their own fleets could influence prices and market share 1.
- Other North American LNG exporters
The sources refer to North American LNG exporters as a competitive reference without naming them.
- Traditional LNG projects
The company compares its costs and timelines with traditional LNG projects, which use fewer and larger liquefaction trains.
- Global LNG suppliers with transport assets
Competition may come from operators controlling shipping and regasification in import markets.
- North American natural gas producers
Gas suppliers can influence feed gas costs and supply contract terms.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Venture Global inks deals with GE Vernova, Baker Hughes for power expansionCNA (Channel NewsAsia) · 15 Oct 2026 · EN
- Venture Global Loses LNG Arbitration to Portugal's GalpOil Price · 09 Oct 2026 · EN
- ConocoPhillips Signs 20-Year LNG Deal With Venture GlobalOil Price · 02 Oct 2026 · EN
- Baker Hughes (BKR) and Venture Global (VG) Team Up for the Next LNG WaveYahoo Finance — News · 16 Sept 2026 · EN
- Venture Global (VG) Secures 20 Years of New LNG DemandYahoo Finance — News · 16 Sept 2026 · EN
- IPO Stock Of The Week: Energy Leader Venture Global Breaks Into Buy Zone As Oil Prices SurgeYahoo Finance — News · 11 Sept 2026 · EN
- Could Venture Global (VG)’s Raised Guidance Signal a Multi-Year LNG Growth Story?Yahoo Finance — News · 26 Aug 2026 · EN
SEC filings
- Current report15 Oct 2026Material agreement · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report08 Oct 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report07 Oct 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report02 Sept 2026Material agreement · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report11 Aug 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report11 Aug 2026
- Current report08 Jul 2026Results of operations · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report26 Jun 2026Material agreement · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report11 Jun 2026Material agreement · Creation of a direct financial obligation · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report02 Jun 2026Item 2.04 · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Venture Global, Inc. · 02 Mar 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Venture Global, Inc. · 11 Aug 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.