olivLaw · US equity research
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. ZIM
Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight · SIC 4412 · Vertical: Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight (SIC 4412)
ZIM is a global container liner shipping company founded in Israel in 1945, operating a network of 56 weekly lines. In February 2026 it signed a merger agreement with Hapag-Lloyd AG, so its outlook now depends largely on completing that transaction.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) stock was 28.41 USD (−3.04% on the day), with market capitalisation 3.4 bn USD, P/E 7.1 on diluted EPS of 3.98 USD over the last 12 months, beta 1.09, 52-week range 14.66–30.90 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 42.9
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 28.13 – 30.72
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.11 · band width 8.8%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 29.23 / 26.55
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.14 / -0.00
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −1.8% | −1.1% | −0.7 pp | — |
| 3 months | +6.9% | −0.5% | +7.3 pp | — |
| 6 months | +2.0% | +4.4% | −2.3 pp | — |
| Year to date | +33.8% | +12.3% | +21.5 pp | — |
| 1 year | +98.0% | +13.5% | +84.4 pp | +26.8% |
| 3 years | +260.1% | +76.4% | +183.7 pp | +34.6% |
| 5 years | −43.3% | +63.7% | −106.9 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 100 percentile of its own 4-quarter history (min 0.4, median 1.4, max 5.3; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3.2 bn | 3.3 bn | 4.0 bn | 10.7 bn | 12.6 bn | 5.2 bn | 8.4 bn | 6.9 bn |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | +1.6% | +21.0% | +168.8% | +17.1% | −58.9% | +63.3% | −18.1% |
| Net income | -125.7 m | -18.1 m | 518.0 m | 4.6 bn | 4.6 bn | -2.7 bn | 2.1 bn | 479.2 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | +795.8% | −0.5% | −158.4% | unavailable | −77.7% |
| Diluted EPS | -1.26 | -0.18 | 4.96 | 39.02 | 38.35 | -22.42 | 17.82 | 3.98 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | +686.7% | −1.7% | −158.5% | unavailable | −77.7% |
| net % | -3.9% | -0.6% | 13.0% | 43.3% | 36.8% | -52.2% | 25.5% | 6.9% |
| Free cash flow | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 1.1 bn USD
- Financial debt
- 79.2 m USD
- Net debt
- -972.5 m USD
- Equity
- 4.0 bn USD
- Total assets
- 11.0 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- 0.02x
- Current ratio
- 1.23x
- ROE
- 11.9%
- ROA
- 4.3%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 4.0 bn | 10.7 bn | 12.6 bn | 5.2 bn | 8.4 bn | 6.9 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Cost of revenue | 2.8 bn | 3.9 bn | 4.8 bn | 3.9 bn | 4.5 bn | 4.5 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Gross profit | 865.0 m | 6.1 bn | 6.4 bn | -2.2 bn | 2.8 bn | 1.3 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | 722.0 m | 5.8 bn | 6.1 bn | -2.5 bn | 2.5 bn | 1.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 314.1 m | 779.2 m | 1.4 bn | 1.5 bn | 1.1 bn | 1.3 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| EBITDA | 1.0 bn ≈ | 6.6 bn ≈ | 7.5 bn ≈ | -1.0 bn ≈ | 3.7 bn ≈ | 2.3 bn ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026derived |
| Interest expense | 189.3 m | 175.6 m | 239.4 m | 446.7 m | 471.5 m | 490.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | 540.8 m | 5.7 bn | 6.0 bn | -2.8 bn | 2.2 bn | 658.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 16.6 m | 1.0 bn | 1.4 bn | -127.6 m | 51.2 m | 177.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | 518.0 m | 4.6 bn | 4.6 bn | -2.7 bn | 2.1 bn | 479.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 4.96 | 39.02 | 38.35 | -22.42 | 17.82 | 3.98 | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 104.5 m | 118.9 m | 120.4 m | 120.2 m | 120.5 m | 120.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 570.4 m | 1.5 bn | 1.0 bn | 921.5 m | 1.3 bn | 1.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | 520.0 m | 1.3 bn | 825.7 m | 596.5 m | 933.6 m | 676.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | 52.2 m | 119.0 m | 190.7 m | 179.3 m | 212.2 m | 167.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 1.2 bn | 5.1 bn | 4.3 bn | 2.6 bn | 3.3 bn | 2.6 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 1.5 bn | 4.4 bn | 5.8 bn | 4.6 bn | 6.8 bn | 7.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 2.8 bn | 9.8 bn | 11.6 bn | 8.3 bn | 11.4 bn | 11.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 398.9 m | 1.1 bn | 896.2 m | 566.4 m | 736.2 m | 636.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Short-term debt | 122.5 m | 106.5 m | 53.0 m | 32.0 m | 32.0 m | 32.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Long-term debt | 519.5 m | 120.8 m | 91.9 m | 73.6 m | 59.9 m | 47.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 1.2 bn | 2.8 bn | 2.7 bn | 2.5 bn | 2.6 bn | 2.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 2.5 bn | 5.2 bn | 5.7 bn | 5.9 bn | 7.3 bn | 7.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 274.5 m | 4.6 bn | 5.9 bn | 2.5 bn | 4.0 bn | 4.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 120.4 m | 120.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 880.8 m | 6.0 bn | 6.1 bn | 1.0 bn | 3.8 bn | 2.3 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Investing cash flow | -35.2 m | -3.3 bn | -1.6 bn | 1.8 bn | -223.2 m | -133.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -460.4 m | -1.7 bn | -5.0 bn | -2.9 bn | -3.1 bn | -2.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 Mar 2026verified |
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
Score: 54 / 100
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 3.4 bn USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
- Balance sheet60
- Quality68
- Valuation82
- Growth0
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 15.15 – 230.24 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · input data missing
- Peers: EV/EBITDA93.64 – 230.24 (Mid 154.39)13 companies used · median multiple 7.7x · quartiles 4.5x – 11.6xCCEC, CMRE, DHT, DSX, ECO, EHLD, GNK, GSL, HSHP, NVGS, SMHI, TEN, TRMD
- Peers: P/E15.15 – 66.99 (Mid 41.86)29 companies used · median multiple 10.5x · quartiles 3.8x – 16.8xASC, CCEC, CISS, CMBT, CMRE, CTRM, DHT, DSX, ECO, EHLD, ESEA, FRO, GASS, GNK, GSL, HSHP, IMPP, NMM, NVGS, PANL, PSHG, PXS, SBLK, SHIP, STNG, TEN, TK, TOPS, TRMD
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Neutral profile · Score 54/100
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | 25.3% | 92 (vs peers) | 14% |
| Net margin · Quality | 6.9% | 29 (vs peers) | 8% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -18.1% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | -53.0% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | -0.4x | 100 (vs peers) | 14% |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | 2.1x | 9 (on a fixed band) | 8% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.2x | 36 (on a fixed band) | 6% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 7.1x | 63 (vs peers) | 14% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | 1.1x | 100 (vs peers) | 14% |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet60/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
- Growth0/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Quality68/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation82/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES LTD. (ZIM). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 6.9 bn USD in 2025; YoY growth -18.1%; net margin 6.9%; ROE 11.9%; net debt/EBITDA -0.4x.
The estimated value range is 54.39–148.62 USD per share (median of 2 methods, agreement: low); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 98.12 USD, the price of 28.41 USD leaves a potential of 245.4% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of 71.0% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
olivLaw score 54/100, methodological classification: neutral profile (score, margin of safety and method agreement together; not a judgement of the right price). Groups assessed only in part: returns. Not investment advice.
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- ROIC: 25.3%
- Net debt / EBITDA: -0.4x
- EV/EBITDA: 1.1x
- The price is below the estimated value range
What contradicts it
- Net margin: 6.9%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -18.1%
- EPS CAGR 3Y: -53.0%
- Interest coverage: 2.1x
- The valuation methods diverge
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): FCF conversion, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight (SIC 4412) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FROFrontline plc | 10.8 bn | 28.5 | 15.6% | 19.2% | −8.8% | +106% / +144% |
| CMBTCmb.tech NV | 5.4 bn | 3.8 | 49.1% | 92.6% | −23.9% | +56% / −5% |
| STNGScorpio Tankers Inc. | 4.4 bn | 12.1 | 11.4% | 36.7% | −24.6% | +48% / +57% |
| TRMDTORM plc | 3.8 bn | 13.2 | 13.3% | 21.3% | −14.1% | +76% / +33% |
| DHTDht Holdings, Inc. | 3.5 bn | 16.8 | 19.4% | 42.4% | −12.8% | +69% / +121% |
| ZIMZim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 3.4 bn | 7.1 | 11.9% | 6.9% | −18.1% | +98% / +260% |
| SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp. | 3.1 bn | 37.3 | 3.4% | 8.1% | −17.6% | +37% / +28% |
| ECOOkeanis Eco Tankers Corp. | 3.0 bn | 22.5 | 25.0% | 31.4% | −0.4% | +130% / +252% |
| NMMNavios Maritime Partners L.P. | 2.5 bn | 8.6 | — | 21.2% | +0.8% | +57% / +232% |
| SFLSFL Corporation Ltd. | 1.7 bn | — | -2.5% | -3.6% | −18.9% | +42% / +3% |
| CMRECostamare Inc. | 1.6 bn | 4.6 | 15.9% | 41.5% | −1.2% | −14% / +30% |
| GSLGlobal Ship Lease, Inc. | 1.4 bn | 3.5 | 25.5% | 54.3% | +7.8% | +14% / +118% |
| TENTsakos Energy Navigation Limited | 1.4 bn | 10.5 | 9.1% | 20.1% | −0.7% | +91% / +132% |
| NVGSNavigator Holdings Ltd | 1.3 bn | 13.9 | 8.2% | 17.1% | +3.6% | +14% / +40% |
| CCECCapital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. | 1.2 bn | 7.3 | 12.0% | — | +62.0% | +2% / +57% |
| TKTeekay Corporation Ltd. | 1.2 bn | 11.9 | 4.8% | 10.3% | −22.2% | +38% / +95% |
| GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited | 1.1 bn | 13.9 | 8.9% | 15.5% | −19.1% | +31% / +59% |
| SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 987.8 m | 14.3 | 7.8% | 13.4% | −5.6% | +37% / +98% |
| ASCArdmore Shipping Corp | 752.3 m | 21.0 | 6.6% | 13.2% | −23.6% | +51% / +36% |
| HSHPHimalaya Shipping Ltd. | 719.3 m | 40.6 | 11.2% | 13.4% | +6.7% | +72% / +157% |
| PANLPangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. | 491.7 m | 10.1 | 11.0% | 6.7% | +17.8% | +7% / +7% |
| ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | 459.1 m | 3.3 | 33.1% | 60.1% | +7.0% | +8% / +172% |
| GASSStealthgas Inc. | 308.3 m | 5.1 | 9.2% | 35.0% | +3.5% | +21% / +24% |
| DSXDiana Shipping Inc. | 276.7 m | 21.7 | 3.5% | 8.3% | −6.4% | +21% / −30% |
| SMHISEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. | 241.4 m | — | -14.0% | -17.6% | −16.0% | +25% / −23% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for ZIM from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 15.18 Total return -47% · Per year -47% | 26.98 Total return -5% · Per year -5% | 40.82 Total return 44% · Per year 44% |
| 3 years | 12.05 Total return -58% · Per year -25% | 24.35 Total return -14% · Per year -5% | 40.82 Total return 44% · Per year 13% |
| 5 years | 9.57 Total return -66% · Per year -20% | 21.97 Total return -23% · Per year -5% | 40.82 Total return 44% · Per year 8% |
- Exit P/E± 6.09
- Net margin± 4.26
- Annual revenue growth± 3.85
- Annual dilution± 0.36
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 09 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (15 Oct 2026), 6-K (06 Oct 2026), 6-K (30 Sept 2026), 6-K (19 Aug 2026), 6-K (28 Jul 2026), 6-K (06 Jul 2026).
In brief
ZIM is a global container liner shipping company founded in Israel in 1945, operating a network of 56 weekly lines 1. In February 2026 it signed a merger agreement with Hapag-Lloyd AG, so its outlook now depends largely on completing that transaction 1.
SWOT
Strengths
- The company has more than eight decades of history and a reputation for competitive transit times and schedule reliability 1.
- A diversified customer base, with most of its top customers having relationships longer than ten years, reduces dependence on individual clients 1.
- Investments in digital tools and artificial intelligence could support operational efficiency and capacity planning 1.
Weaknesses
- The fleet is mostly chartered in, which makes the company sensitive to swings in the charter market 1.
- The company does not hold substantial terminal investments, which limits its ability to respond to port congestion 1.
- The company is not part of a formal strategic alliance, which may reduce its participation in operational cooperation 1.
Opportunities
Risks
- Completion of the Hapag-Lloyd mergerhigh
The merger may not be completed on time or at all, and if the transaction fails the company could incur significant costs and management distraction 1.
- Israeli State Special Sharehigh
The State of Israel holds a Special State Share that imposes operating restrictions and gives veto power over certain share transfers, and it may not provide the approval needed for the merger 1.
- Volatility of freight rates and fuel costsmedium
Freight rates and bunker prices are volatile and influenced by geopolitical factors, which could affect operating results 1.
- Cybersecurity and geopolitical riskslow
The company could be exposed to cyberattacks, particularly in times of war or military conflict, given its Israeli base 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the merger with Hapag-Lloyd is completed on the agreed terms, shareholders could receive the consideration set out in the agreement, and market risks could become less relevant for ZIM shares 1.
- If demand for container shipping stays firm on niche lanes, the company could sustain stable revenues through its specialized services 1.
- If investments in digitalization and technology produce real efficiencies, operating margins could remain competitive 1.
What would break the thesis
- If the merger does not close, the company could lose the support of the offer and could bear transaction costs that are not recovered 1.
- If excess capacity in the market intensifies, freight rates could fall and weigh on revenues and margins 1.
- If reliance on chartered vessels remains high, costs could stay rigid even when demand declines 1.
What to watch
- Status of approvals for the Hapag-Lloyd merger, including shareholder approval and the Israeli State approval2026
- Trend in freight rates and newly delivered capacity in global fleets2026
- Whether the United States and China port fees are resumed or remain suspendedlast quarter 2026
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 09 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (15 Oct 2026), 6-K (06 Oct 2026), 6-K (30 Sept 2026), 6-K (19 Aug 2026), 6-K (28 Jul 2026), 6-K (06 Jul 2026).
The business
Segments
Containerized cargo across five trade zones
The core business is container transport across five trade zones, of which Transpacific accounted for 43,0% of carried TEUs in fiscal 2025, followed by Intra-Asia and Latin America 1. The company focuses on niche trade lanes where it believes the market is underserved 1.
Market context
The container shipping market is volatile, and freight rates depend largely on demand and capacity supply 1. According to Alphaliner, global container ship capacity could grow 3.7% in 2026 while demand is projected to grow only 2.5%, which could keep pressure on rates 1. The company also noted that Red Sea attacks forced many carriers onto longer and more expensive routes 1.
Operating costs are dominated by cargo handling, at 47.1% of operating expenses and cost of services in fiscal 2025, and by bunker costs, at 25.7% 1. The charter market directly influences the company's costs, and if charter rates stay high, margins could be affected 1.
Trends
- Middle East and Red Sea conflictsmixed
Houthi attacks on ships in the Red Sea have forced rerouting onto longer and more expensive routes, which could raise operating costs 1. The effect on revenues depends on whether freight rates reflect these costs 1.
- Growth in global fleet capacityheadwind
Capacity delivered in 2026 could exceed demand growth, which could push freight rates down 1. This could limit the company's ability to operate its vessels profitably 1.
- Regulation and port feesheadwind
The United States and China adopted port fees on non-local carriers and foreign-built vessels, currently suspended until the last quarter of 2026 1. If they are resumed, operating expenses could rise significantly 1.
Competitive position
The container shipping industry is highly competitive, and according to the company its large competitors may be better positioned and have greater financial resources 1. Unlike some competitors, ZIM does not own substantial terminal investments, which limits its ability to respond to congestion 1.
The company strengthened its operational cooperation with MSC on transpacific trades after the 2M Alliance ended in January 2025, and it cooperates with Hapag-Lloyd on the cross-Atlantic service 1. Partnerships with other lines could offset the disadvantage of not being part of an alliance 1.
- Mediterranean Shipping Company
Operational partner of ZIM on transpacific trades and some East Mediterranean routes, and also a direct competitor on many trade lanes 1.
- Hapag-Lloyd AG
Party to the February 2026 merger agreement and cooperation partner on the cross-Atlantic service 1.
- Ocean Network Express
Partner for slot selling on the ZGT service, named in the source as part of current cooperation arrangements 1.
- Regional carriers and alliances
Regional and alliance carriers in Asia compete directly on intra-Asia trades and could offer more attractive services on some lanes 1.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)15 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)06 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)30 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)19 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)28 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)06 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)15 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)01 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)20 May 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)06 May 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. · 09 Mar 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.